Cited by 41Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityNursing care and researchMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Online Solutions to Support Needs and Preferences of Parents of Children with Asthma and Allergies

Stewart, Miriam, Letourneau, Nicole, Masuda, Jeffrey R., Anderson, Sharon, McGhan, Shawna·2011·Journal of Family Nursing

Abstract

Many families of children with asthma and allergies experience support deficits and isolation. However, support interventions have not been designed to meet their needs. Consequently, parents' intervention preferences were elicited, and an online peer support group intervention was designed based on these preferences and piloted in the study described. In-depth interviews with 44 parents elicited preferences for support interventions for both children and parents. Many said they felt alone and wanted support from others in similar situations. Based on the parents' preferences for accessible online peer support groups, a pilot online intervention was designed and implemented. Parents received information and reassurance from other parents in peer support sessions. Parents appreciated the accessibility and anonymity of the online support group. This innovative online peer support intervention, informed by parents' preferences, could be adapted and tested in intervention trials and guide programs and practice for families affected by asthma, allergies, and other chronic conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1074840711415416

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, M., Letourneau, N., Masuda, J. R., Anderson, S., & McGhan, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Journal of Family Nursing
Published
2011-08
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
357-379
ISSN
  • 1074-8407 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-549X
OpenAlex
W2147039811
Cited by
41
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
asthma, allergy, parental support, online peer support groups, parental preferences, family isolation, children with chronic illness, intervention design, anonymity, online intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Asthma, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Online Systems, Parents, Peer Group, Pilot Projects, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review