Cited by 54Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Telomere shortening in gastric carcinoma with aging despite telomerase activation

Open access
Furugori, Eiki, Hirayama, Renzo, Nakamura, Ken-Ichi, Kammori, Makoto, Esaki, Yukiyoshi, Takubo, Kaiyo·2000·Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Abstract

In the present study, we analyzed both telomere length and telomerase activity in surgical and autopsy samples of non-neoplastic mucosa and carcinomas of the stomach. Telomere length, determined by Southern blot analysis, demonstrated progressive shortening with age in non-neoplastic gastric mucosal specimens from 38 human subjects aged between 0 and 99 years, with an average annual loss rate of 46 base pairs (bp). The mean (+/- SD) telomere length in 21 gastric carcinomas was 7.0 +/- 1.6 x 10(3) base pairs (1.6 kbp). In 20 (95%) of the 21 subjects, the values were smaller than those in the nonneoplastic gastric mucosa (mean shortening 1.8 kbp), although a strong correlation was observed for the paired data (r = 0.69, P = 0.0004). Similarly, telomere lengths in carcinomas were shorter than those for intestinal metaplasia (a mean difference of 1.1 kbp). Telomerase activity, estimated using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay, was positive in 18 (86%) of the 21 gastric carcinomas, without significant differences among the three histological types (well, moderately, and poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas) or with sex or age. The results suggest that telomere length and possibly shortening rates vary with the individual, and that examination of both non-neoplastic mucosa and tumors is necessary to improve our understanding of the significance of telomerase in neoplasia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004320000137

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Furugori, E., Hirayama, R., Nakamura, K.-I., Kammori, M., Esaki, Y., & Takubo, K.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP)
  • Saitama Medical University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-07-16
Volume
126
Issue
8
Pages
481-485
ISSN
  • 0084-5353 (ISSN-L)
  • 0171-5216
  • 1432-1335
OpenAlex
W2040591541
Cited by
54
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Keywords
telomere shortening, gastric cancer, telomerase activity, aging, telomere length, gastric mucosa, intestinal metaplasia, adenocarcinoma, telomeric repeat amplification protocol
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Child, Preschool, Enzyme Activation, Female, Gastric Mucosa, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Stomach Neoplasms, Blotting, Southern, Telomere, Cellular Senescence, Telomerase, Terminal Repeat Sequences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review