Cited by 6Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Improved efficacy of tetracycline by acaciasides on Dirofilaria immitis

Datta, S., Maitra, S., Gayen, P., Sinha Babu, S. P.·2009·Parasitology Research

Abstract

The discovery of Wolbachia, a bacterial endosymbiont that occurs in the filarial parasite and its sensitivity to tetracycline, has fostered a new initiative in the development of suitable antifilarial drugs. The present study is an attempt to investigate whether adding acaciasides (saponins from Acacia auriculiformis) to the standard dose of tetracycline would further improve the efficacy of tetracycline treatment against Dirofilaria immitis microfilariae in vivo. Treatment of microfilaremic adult dogs (body weight range 8-12 kg) with tetracycline at 10 mg/kg/day for 40 days resulted in 72% and 83% reduction in mf count on days 15 and 30, respectively, and the maximum reduction in mf count (91%) was achieved on day 75 post-treatment. However, treatment with tetracycline (10 mg/kg/day for 40 days) followed by acaciasides (10 mg/kg/day for 7 days) resulted in almost 100% clearance of mf at a faster rate on day 45 post-treatment and ensured long-term (until 4 months post-treatment) protection against microfilaremia. Data from polymerase chain reaction analysis reveals that compared to untreated dogs, in treated dogs, there was marked reduction in Wolbachia specific wsp markers in fast depleting mf population. The present data indicate that prior tetracycline treatment enhances microfilaricidal activity of saponins. This effect may be additive or synergistic as the worms are weakened by Wolbachia depletion, and these weakened microfilariae are possibly killed by the saponins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-009-1441-x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tetracycline treatment followed by acaciasides eliminates microfilariae for at least 4 months.

    “the total elimination of microfilariae for at least 4 months were found when tetracycline treatment was followed by the administration of acaciasides (Acacia auriculiformis-derived saponins) (104).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Datta, S., Maitra, S., Gayen, P., & Sinha Babu, S. P.
Affiliations
Visva-Bharati University (IN)
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2009-05-09
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
697-702
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W2051111414
Cited by
6
References
14
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, tetracycline, saponins, Acacia auriculiformis, Wolbachia, microfilariae, antifilarial agents, synergistic drug efficacy, microfilaremia, dogs, wsp gene
MeSH terms
Animals, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Drug Synergism, Female, Filaricides, Male, Saponins, Tetracycline, Triterpenes, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review