The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana based on methylation-sensitive AFLP markers
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. AFLP analysis using restriction enzyme isoschizomers that differ in their sensitivity to methylation of their recognition sites has been used to analyse the methylation state of anonymous CCGG sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana. The technique was modified to improve the quality of fingerprints and to visualise larger numbers of scorable fragments. Sequencing of amplified fragments indicated that detection was generally associated with non-methylation of the cytosine to which the isoschizomer is sensitive. Comparison of EcoRI/HpaII and EcoRI/MspI patterns in different ecotypes revealed that 35–43% of CCGG sites were differentially digested by the isoschizomers. Interestingly, the pattern of digestion among different plants belonging to the same ecotype is highly conserved, with the rate of intra-ecotype methylation-sensitive polymorphisms being less than 1%. However, pairwise comparisons of methylation patterns between samples belonging to different ecotypes revealed differences in up to 34% of the methylation-sensitive polymorphisms. The lack of correlation between inter-ecotype similarity matrices based on methylation-insensitive or methylation-sensitive polymorphisms suggests that whatever the mechanisms regulating methylation may be, they are not related to nucleotide sequence variation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peredo, E. L., Ángeles Revilla, M., & Arroyo-García, R. (2006) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2005.09.010 · Cited by 91
Fiuk, A., Bednarek, P. T., & Rybczyński, J. J. (2010) · Plant Molecular Biology Reporter · doi:10.1007/s11105-009-0167-3 · Cited by 68
DNA Methylation Levels in Different Tissues in Tea Plant via an Optimized HPLC Method
Gao, Y., Hao, J.-L., Wang, Z., Song, K.-J., Ye, J.-H., Zheng, X.-Q., Liang, Y.-R., & Lu, J.-L. (2019) · Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s13580-019-00180-2 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Cervera, M.-T., Ruiz-García, L., & Martínez-Zapater, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Genetics and Genomics
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 543-552
- ISSN
- 1617-4615 (ISSN-L)
- 1617-4623
- OpenAlex
- W2042333818
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.