Cited by 20Epigenetics and DNA MethylationPlant Molecular Biology ResearchTea Polyphenols and Effects

DNA Methylation Levels in Different Tissues in Tea Plant via an Optimized HPLC Method

Gao, Ying, Hao, Jia-Li, Wang, Zhen, Song, Kwan-Jeong, Ye, Jian-Hui, Zheng, Xin-Qiang, Liang, Yue-Rong, Lu, Jian-Liang·2019·Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13580-019-00180-2

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Camellia sinensis, methylation levels followed a saddle curve during bud growth, with the lowest point at the one-leaf and bud stage.

    “The methylation levels followed a saddle curve during bud growth, with the lowest point at the one-leaf and bud stage.”
  • In Camellia sinensis, DNA methylation levels varied across tissues, cultivars, and growth stages; higher methylation was observed in tender leaves (38.34%) and pistils (38.19%), while lower levels were found in capillary roots (19.45%), stamens (19.61%), and old leaves (20.70%).

    “Higher methylation levels were observed in tender leaves (38.34%) and pistils (38.19%), while lower levels were found in capillary roots (19.45%), stamens (19.61%), and old leaves (20.70%).”
  • In Camellia sinensis, DNA methylation levels in adventitious buds decreased as pruning intensity increased, suggesting a link between methylation and tea plant development.

    “Additionally, DNA methylation levels in adventitious buds decreased as pruning intensity increased, suggesting a link between methylation and tea plant development [148].”
  • In Camellia sinensis, tissue-specific variations in DNA methylation levels were observed across different tissues.

    “Observed tissue-specific variations in DNA methylation levels across different tea plant tissues”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, Y., Hao, J.-L., Wang, Z., Song, K.-J., Ye, J.-H., Zheng, X.-Q., Liang, Y.-R., & Lu, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • Tea Research Institute (CN)
  • Jeju National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lu, Jian-Liang
Venue
Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology
Published
2019-10-09
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
967-974
ISSN
  • 2211-3452 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-3460
OpenAlex
W2979884652
Cited by
20
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470687)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
Keywords
DNA methylation, Camellia sinensis, epigenetics, HPLC method optimization, tissue-specific methylation, growth stages, adventitious bud regeneration, cultivar differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review