Cited by 88Forensic and Genetic ResearchRace, Genetics, and SocietyGenetic diversity and population structure

Elevated male European and female African contributions to the genomes of African American individuals

Lind, Joanne M., Hutcheson-Dilks, Holli B., Williams, Scott M., Moore, Jason H., Essex, Myron, Ruiz-Pesini, Eduardo, Wallace, Douglas C., Tishkoff, Sarah A. +2 more·2006·Human Genetics

Abstract

The differential relative contribution of males and females from Africa and Europe to individual African American genomes is relevant to mapping genes utilizing admixture analysis. The assessment of ancestral population contributions to the four types of genomic DNA (autosomes, X and Y chromosomes, and mitochondrial) with their differing modes of inheritance is most easily addressed in males. A thorough evaluation of 93 African American males for 2,018 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphic (SNP) markers, 121 X chromosome SNPs, 10 Y chromosome haplogroups specified by SNPs, and six haplogroup defining mtDNA SNPs is presented. A distinct lack of correlation observed between the X chromosome and the autosomal admixture fractions supports separate treatment of these chromosomes in admixture-based gene mapping applications. The European genetic contributions were highest (and African lowest) for the Y chromosome (28.46%), followed by the autosomes (19.99%), then the X chromosome (12.11%), and the mtDNA (8.51%). The relative order of admixture fractions in the genomic compartments validates previous studies that suggested sex-biased gene flow with elevated European male and African female contributions. There is a threefold higher European male contribution compared with European females (Y chromosome vs. mtDNA) to the genomes of African American individuals meaning that admixture-based gene discovery will have the most power for the autosomes and will be more limited for X chrom…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00439-006-0261-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sex bias in African American ancestry, with greater male European and female African contributions, has been suggested through mtDNA, Y chromosome, and autosomal studies.

    “A sex bias in African American ancestry, with greater male European and female African contributions, has been suggested through mtDNA, Y chromosome, and autosomal studies.6”
  • More recent studies using high-density genotype data provide reliable individual ancestry estimates, illustrate large variability in African and European ancestry proportions at an individual level, and detect low proportions of Native American ancestry.

    “More recent studies that utilized high-density genotype data provide reliable individual ancestry estimates, illustrate the large variability in African and European ancestry proportions at an individual level, and are able to detect low proportions of Native American ancestry.3–11”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lind, J. M., Hutcheson-Dilks, H. B., Williams, S. M., Moore, J. H., Essex, M., Ruiz-Pesini, E., Wallace, D. C., Tishkoff, S. A., O’Brien, S. J., & Smith, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Michael W.
Venue
Human Genetics
Published
2006-09-28
Volume
120
Issue
5
Pages
713-722
ISSN
  • 0018-7348 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-6717
  • 1432-1203
OpenAlex
W2158094182
Cited by
88
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (n01co12400-79-0-22)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01CO12400)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
European ancestry, African ancestry, sex-biased gene flow, Y chromosome, X chromosome, mitochondrial DNA, autosomes, single nucleotide polymorphisms, Y-chromosome haplogroups, mtDNA haplogroups
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Black or African American, DNA, Mitochondrial, Female, Genetics, Population, Haplotypes, Humans, Male, Phylogeny, Genome, Human, Chromosomes, Human, X, Chromosomes, Human, Y, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review