Cited by 119Nerve injury and regenerationHereditary Neurological DisordersTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Axonal degeneration as a therapeutic target in the CNS

Open access
Lingor, Paul, Koch, Jan C., Tönges, Lars, Bähr, Mathias·2012·Cell and Tissue Research

Abstract

Degeneration of the axon is an important step in the pathomechanism of traumatic, inflammatory and degenerative neurological diseases. Increasing evidence suggests that axonal degeneration occurs early in the course of these diseases and therefore represents a promising target for future therapeutic strategies. We review the evidence for axonal destruction from pathological findings and animal models with particular emphasis on neurodegenerative and neurotraumatic disorders. We discuss the basic morphological and temporal modalities of axonal degeneration (acute, chronic and focal axonal degeneration and Wallerian degeneration). Based on the mechanistic concepts, we then delineate in detail the major molecular mechanisms that underlie the degenerative cascade, such as calcium influx, axonal transport, protein aggregation and autophagy. We finally concentrate on putative therapeutic targets based on the mechanistic prerequisites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00441-012-1362-3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 229 · Cited by 119

Metadata

Authors
Lingor, P., Koch, J. C., Tönges, L., & Bähr, M.
Affiliations
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Lingor, Paul
Venue
Cell and Tissue Research
Published
2012-03-06
Volume
349
Issue
1
Pages
289-311
ISSN
  • 0302-766X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0878
OpenAlex
W1984096229
Cited by
119
References
229
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cell and Tissue Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
axonal degeneration, Wallerian degeneration, neurodegenerative diseases, neurotrauma, traumatic brain injury, calcium influx, axonal transport, protein aggregation, autophagy, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Central Nervous System, Central Nervous System Diseases, Humans, Models, Biological, Nerve Degeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review