Cited by 88Corneal surgery and disordersForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsCollagen: Extraction and Characterization

Human cornea and sclera studied by atomic force microscopy

Meller, D., Meller, K., Peters, K.·1997·Cell and Tissue Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the ultrastructure of the extracellular matrix of human cornea and sclera by using the atomic force microscope (AFM). Specimens of human cornea (n=16) and sclera (n=10) were obtained from a cornea bank or from enucleated eyes (n=1; clinical and histopathological diagnosis: choroidal melanoma) and fixed in Karnovsky solution. The AFM resolved individual collagen fibrils in corneal and scleral tissue. Scleral collagen fibrils had a diameter ranging from 118.3 to 1268.0 nm and showed clear banding with a mean axial D-periodicity of 77.02 nm. The mean gap depth between the two overlaps was larger in the sclera than in the cornea. The diameter of corneal collagen fibrils ranged from 48.0 to 113.0 nm. In contrast to the sclera, the corneal collagen fibrils did not exhibit clear banding as their surface pattern. Closely attached fibrils with a beaded to globular structure were predominant in the cornea. The mean axial D-periodicity of the corneal collagen fibrils was 68.50 nm. In both tissues, the AFM resolved structures resembling cross-bridges between adjacent fibrils. The corneal collagen fibrils showed fibrillar properties that were different from those of the sclera, and that therefore might be essential for the spatial organization responsible for the optical quality of the cornea.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004410050798

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In human corneas, the depth of the grooves in the gaps is about 0.23 nm.

    “In human corneas, the depth of the grooves in the gaps is about 0.23 nm (Meller et al., 1997).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Meller et al., 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meller, D., Meller, K., & Peters, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
Cell and Tissue Research
Published
1997-03-11
Volume
288
Issue
1
Pages
111-118
ISSN
  • 0302-766X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0878
OpenAlex
W2043703730
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell and Tissue Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
Keywords
cornea, sclera, extracellular matrix, collagen fibrils, fibril diameter, cross-bridges, corneal ultrastructure, choroidal melanoma
MeSH terms
Cornea, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Sclera, Microscopy, Atomic Force

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review