Cited by 207Topological and Geometric Data AnalysisGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsPoint processes and geometric inequalities

Fréchet Means for Distributions of Persistence Diagrams

Open access
Turner, Katharine, Mileyko, Yuriy, Mukherjee, Sayan, Harer, John·2014·Discrete & Computational Geometry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00454-014-9604-7

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The L2 Wasserstein metric on B∞ results in a metric space that is simpler to work with computationally, and all the existence results from Mileyko et al. (2011) are also shown to hold in Turner et al. (2014).

    “The resulting metric space is simpler to work with computationally, and all the existence results from Mileyko et al. (2011) are also shown to hold in Turner et al. (2014).”

    From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Turner et al. (2014)

  • Turner, Mileyko, Mukherjee and Harer (2014) made the existence theorem algorithmic, but for a somewhat different choice of metric and metric space.

    “Turner, Mileyko, Mukherjee and Harer (2014) made this existence theorem algorithmic, but for a somewhat different choice of metric and metric space.”

    From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Turner, Mileyko, Mukherjee and Harer (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, K., Mileyko, Y., Mukherjee, S., & Harer, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Turner, Katharine
Venue
Discrete & Computational Geometry
Published
2014-07
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
44-70
ISSN
  • 0179-5376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0444
OpenAlex
W2047158247
Cited by
207
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Discrete & Computational Geometry (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1049290)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (HDTRA1)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-10-1-, FA9550‐10‐1‐0436)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Point processes and geometric inequalities
Keywords
Fréchet mean, persistence diagrams, persistence landscapes, topological data analysis, law of large numbers, Gaussian random fields, local minima

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review