Cited by 8Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Effect of hemodialysis on impedance cardiography (electrical velocimetry) parameters in children

Wilken, Meike, Oh, Jun, Pinnschmidt, Hans O., Singer, Dominique, Blohm, Martin E.·2020·Pediatric Nephrology

Abstract

Background Pediatric hemodialysis (HD) patients have a high incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The study aim was to investigate whether impedance cardiography (electrical velocimetry, EV) is suitable as a hemodynamic trend monitoring tool in pediatric patients during HD. Methods Measurements by EV were obtained before, during, and after HD in a prospective single-center pediatric observational study. In total, 54 dialysis cycles in four different pediatric patients with end-stage kidney disease on chronic HD were included. EV parameters analyzed were heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), stroke volume index (SI), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), thoracic fluid content (TFC), index of contractility (ICON), stroke volume variation (SVV), variation of ICON (VIC), R-R interval (TRR), pre-ejection period (PEP), left ventricular ejection time (LVET), and systolic time ration (STR). Systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) was calculated. Results EV did measure significant changes in cardiovascular parameters associated with HD. The following parameters increased after HD: HR (9%), SVV (19%), VIC (33%), PEP (8%), and STR (18%). A decrease after HD was measured in SV (18%), SI (18%), CO (10%), CI (10%), TFC (10%), ICON (7%), TRR (7%), LVET (8%), and LVET (8%). SVRI was not affected by HD. The changes were correlated to ultrafiltration. HD cycles without fluid withdrawal also altered cardiovascular parameters. Conclusions Pediatric HD with and without fluid withdrawal changes hemodynamic EV monitoring parameters. Possibly EV may be useful to optimize HD management in pediatric patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00467-019-04409-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilken, M., Oh, J., Pinnschmidt, H. O., Singer, D., & Blohm, M. E.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Blohm, Martin E.
Venue
Pediatric Nephrology
Published
2019-12-14
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
669-676
ISSN
  • 0931-041X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-198X
OpenAlex
W2996106031
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
pediatric hemodialysis, impedance cardiography, electrical velocimetry, hemodynamic monitoring, end-stage renal disease, stroke volume variation, cardiac output, ultrafiltration, fluid withdrawal, pre-ejection period, left ventricular ejection time, systemic vascular resistance index, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cardiography, Impedance, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Prospective Studies, Rheology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review