The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entwicklung und empirische �berpr�fung des Deutschen Schmerzfragebogens der DGSS
Abstract
The German pain questionnaire (DSF) has been developed and validated by the Task force on "Standardization and Economy in Pain Management" of the German Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (DGSS). The concept of the DSF is based on a bio (medical) - psycho - social pain model. The modular approach to pain assessment consists of:demographic data,pain variables (e. g. pain sites, temporal characteristics, duration, intensity),pain associated symptoms,affective and sensory qualities of pain (adjective list by Geissner, SESCopyright ),pain relieving and intensifying factors,previous pain treatment procedures,pain-related disability (Pain Disability Index by Tait et al.),depression test CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Test),comorbid conditions,social factors (educational level, occupation, retirement status, compensation and/or litigation status, disability for work),health related quality of life (SF-36Copyright ). Practicability and content validity were tested in some 3000 patients. Comparison with external criteria (e. g. medical and psychiatric-psychological diagnoses, physician-determined chronicity of pain) proved good content validity and excellent reliability of patients statements in the questionnaire. The great majority of patients stated that the DSF covered their pain history completely and in an orderly fashion. Difficulty to answer the questions was considered low. The German pain questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for recording the multidimensional experience of pain. Data from such questionnaires are indispensable for follow-up studies and internal and external quality assessments. The DSF can be ordered from the German Society for the Study of Pain (www.dgss.org) and is a core instrument of the computer program "quality assurance in pain management" (QUAST) of this society.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A higher score reflects stronger pain; high reliability and validity of the DSF have been reported [32].”
From EFFects of Exposure and Cognitive behavioral Therapy for chronic BACK pain (“EFFECT-BACK”): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“The German pain questionnaire (DSF) has been developed and validated by the Taskforce on “Standardization and Economy in Pain Management” of the German Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (DGSS).”
From Adjustment to Chronic Pain in Back Pain Patients Classified According to the Motivational Stages of Chronic Pain Management (2006) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“The concept of the DSF is based on a bio (medical) – psycho – social pain model.”
From Adjustment to Chronic Pain in Back Pain Patients Classified According to the Motivational Stages of Chronic Pain Management (2006) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods
Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9 · Cited by 3,275
Grading the severity of chronic pain
Von Korff, M., Ormel, J., Keefe, F. J., & Dworkin, S. F. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4 · Cited by 3,022
Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.
Jensen, M. P., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Fisher, L. D. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00101-3 · Cited by 1,247 · cited 1×
“Die übliche Schmerzstärke wird als Mittelwert der momentanen, durchschnittlichen und normalen Intensität berechnet [13].”
BackgroundThe Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties
Tait, R. C., Chibnall, J. T., & Krause, S. (1990) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(90)90068-o · Cited by 952
Melzack, R., & Torgerson, W. S. (1971) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-197101000-00017 · Cited by 930
Graded chronic pain status—An epidemiologic evaluation
Von Korff, M., Dworkin, S. F., & Le Resche, L. (1990) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(90)91125-3 · Cited by 488
Objective Clinical Evaluation of Physical Impairment in Chronic Low Back Pain
Waddell, G., Somerville, D., Henderson, I., & Newton, M. (1992) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199206000-00001 · Cited by 414
Chronic pain and depression: toward a cognitive-behavioral mediation model
Rudy, T. E., Kerns, R. D., & Turk, D. C. (1988) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(88)90220-5 · Cited by 370
The Pain Drawing as an Aid to the Psychologic Evaluation of Patients With Low-Back Pain
RANSFORD, A. O., Cairns, D., & Mooney, V. (1976) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-197606000-00007 · Cited by 310
Behinderungseinschätzung bei chronischen Schmerzpatienten
Dillmann, U., Nilges, P., Saile, H., & Gerbershagen, H. U. (1994) · Der Schmerz · doi:10.1007/bf02530415 · Cited by 302
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised trial
Witt, C. M., Brinkhaus, B., Jena, S., Linde, K., Streng, A., Wagenpfeil, S., Hummelsberger, J., Walther, H., Melchart, D., & Willich, S. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66871-7 · Cited by 660
Acupuncture for Patients With Migraine
Linde, K., Streng, A., Jürgens, S., Hoppe, A., Brinkhaus, B., Witt, C. M., Wagenpfeil, S., Pfaffenrath, V., Hammes, M. G., Weidenhammer, W., et al. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.17.2118 · Cited by 636
Linde, K., Witt, C. M., Streng, A., Weidenhammer, W., Wagenpfeil, S., Brinkhaus, B., Willich, S. N., & Melchart, D. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.006 · Cited by 558
Acupuncture in patients with tension-type headache: randomised controlled trial
Melchart, D., Streng, A., Hoppe, A., Brinkhaus, B., Witt, C. M., Wagenpfeil, S., Pfaffenrath, V., Hammes, M. G., Hummelsberger, J., Irnich, D., et al. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38512.405440.8f · Cited by 415
Schmidt-Wilcke, T., Leinisch, E., Gänbauer, S., Draganski, B., Bogdahn, U., Altmeppen, J., & May, A. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.004 · Cited by 413
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagel, B., Gerbershagen, H. U., Lindena, G., & Pfingsten, M.
- Affiliations
- RedCLARA (UY)
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
- Venue
- Der Schmerz
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 263-270
- ISSN
- 0932-433X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2129
- OpenAlex
- W11504318
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Der Schmerz (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- pain assessment, questionnaire development, content validity, reliability statistics, pain-related disability, pain-related depression, pain-related anxiety, pain-related hopelessness, pain-related guilt, pain-related shame, pain-related helplessness, chronic pain, screening tool
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Germany, Humans, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
