Cited by 11Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Postoperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Austria: A national survey on current clinical practice in hemodynamic monitoring and postoperative management

Open access
Menger, Johannes, Edlinger-Stanger, Maximilian, Dworschak, Martin, Steinlechner, Barbara·2018·Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No data are currently available regarding the current clinical practice in postoperative care of cardiac surgical patients in Austria. OBJECTIVE: The study investigated the current intensive care management concerning hemodynamic monitoring and strategies to treat common perioperative disorders of patients after cardiac surgery in Austria. METHODS: A survey consisting of 31 questions was sent to intensivists at all 9 hospitals offering cardiac surgery in Austria. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. The mean number of procedures on cardiopulmonary bypass per centre was 722 ± 223. In the majority of cases postoperative critical care is performed by anesthesiologists. Blood gas analysis, pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram, temperature, central venous pressure, arterial pressure and hourly urine output are de facto standard monitoring in all centers. Transesophageal echocardiography is available in all centers and is frequently used. Crystalloids are the first choice for volume replacement, whereas levosimendan and adrenaline are employed for the treatment of low cardiac output syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the current state of postoperative management of cardiac surgical patients in Austria. Standard monitoring as proposed by international guidelines is well established in Austrian intensive care units. Echocardiography is widely seen as a very important tool in the postoperative care of cardiac surgical patients. Knowledge about the status quo of postoperative intensive care management of cardiac surgical patients enables further development of patient care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00508-018-1403-3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no consensus and substantial heterogeneity in bedside hemodynamic monitoring practices for neonates after cardiac surgery.

    “highlighting the lack of a gold standard in pediatric hemodynamic monitoring, which leads to variability between institutions regarding the postoperative hemodynamic surveillance protocol [9].”

    From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction says guidelines give relatively non-specific recommendations and that postoperative cardiac-surgery practices vary between institutions. The Results and Discussion also document variation across Austrian centers in some monitoring practices. But the paper concerns adult cardiac-surgery patients, not neonates or pediatric monitoring, and it does not establish a lack of a pediatric gold standard. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The guideline does not recommend a specific method, highlighting the lack of a gold standard in pediatric hemodynamic monitoring.

    “However, the guideline does not recommend a specific method, highlighting the lack of a gold standard in pediatric hemodynamic monitoring, which leads to variability between institutions regarding the postoperative hemodynamic surveillance protocol [9].”

    From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says guidelines give relatively non-specific hemodynamic recommendations and that postoperative strategies vary between institutions. But it identifies the relevant guidelines as addressing adult cardiac-surgery patients; the paper does not establish a lack of a gold standard in pediatric monitoring. The Discussion also lists monitoring methods the German guidelines consider standard. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menger, J., Edlinger-Stanger, M., Dworschak, M., & Steinlechner, B.
Affiliations
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Menger, Johannes
Venue
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
Published
2018-10-29
Volume
130
Issue
23-24
Pages
716-721
ISSN
  • 0043-5325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-7671
OpenAlex
W2899275110
Cited by
11
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wiener klinische Wochenschrift (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical University of Vienna
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Keywords
postoperative care, cardiac surgery, postoperative intensive care, hemodynamic monitoring, transesophageal echocardiography, low cardiac output syndrome, levosimendan, epinephrine, crystalloids, volume replacement, blood gas analysis
MeSH terms
Hemodynamic Monitoring, Austria, Germany, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review