Cited by 42Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and careMusic Therapy and Health

Audio recordings of mindfulness-based stress reduction training to improve cancer patients’ mood and quality of life—a pilot feasibility study

Altschuler, Andrea, Rosenbaum, Elana, Gordon, Peter, Canales, Sandra, Avins, Andrew L.·2012·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), typically taught in eight weekly classes, helps patients cope with illness, including cancer. Current research is almost exclusively based on post-treatment class attendance. Research suggests that short courses and alternative delivery techniques may also be beneficial. This pilot study assessed whether it would be feasible for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy to listen to MBSR audio recordings individually during treatment and at home and evaluate whether the intervention shows preliminary evidence of efficacy to improve patients' mood and quality of life (QoL).Methods Patients were recruited from two oncology clinics. Inclusion criteria included a score ≥ 8 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Participants were asked to listen to study CDs containing MBSR instructions at least 5 days/week for 3 months and to maintain study diaries of their meditation practices.Results Twenty-three patients enrolled in the study, and 20 (87%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 66% to 97%) completed the study protocol. Analysis showed that participants listened to study CDs an average of 39 times during the study; mean HADS scores declined from 18.3 to 12.2 (change = -6.1 points; 95% CI, -2.9 to -9.4). Participants reported subjectively that participation improved their mood and QoL.Conclusions This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of investigating an individual audio MBSR intervention for patients with cancer and provides preliminary evidence that MBSR may benefit chemotherapy patients' mood and QoL. Fully powered comparative clinical trials to asses this MBSR modality to help improve mood and QoL for patients receiving chemotherapy are feasible and needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-011-1216-7

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altschuler, A., Rosenbaum, E., Gordon, P., Canales, S., & Avins, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Redwood City Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Altschuler, Andrea
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2011-06-19
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
1291-1297
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2089154237
Cited by
42
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kaiser Permanente
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, audio recordings, cancer patients, chemotherapy, mood, quality of life, anxiety, depression, feasibility, home-based intervention, meditation
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Meditation, Mind-Body Therapies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review