Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with GI cancer: 8-week follow-up and processes associated with change
Abstract
Purpose We recently reported that a partner-assisted emotional disclosure intervention for gastrointestinal cancer led to improvements in relationship quality and intimacy for couples in which the patient initially reported higher levels of holding back from discussing cancer-related concerns. The purposes of the present study were to examine outcomes at 8-week follow-up and process variables that may influence treatment effects. Methods One hundred thirty couples were randomly assigned to either partner-assisted emotional disclosure or an education/support control condition. Participants completed measures of relationship quality, intimacy, and psychological distress before randomization, post-treatment, and 8 weeks later. Patients in the disclosure intervention completed measures of negative affect immediately following each treatment session, and their level of expressiveness during the sessions was rated by trained observers. Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. Results Among couples in which the patient initially reported higher levels of holding back, the disclosure intervention led to improvements in relationship quality and intimacy that were maintained at 8-weeks follow-up. High levels of patient expressiveness during the disclosure sessions were associated with improvements in relationship quality and intimacy, and high levels of patient negative affect immediately following the sessions were associated with reductions in psychological distress at the post-…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Twelve studies lacked sufficient data or had incompatible designs and were included only in the narrative synthesis.
“Twelve studies (13 reports because of one pair of publications from the same RCT 42 , 43 ) lacked sufficient data or had incompatible designs (e.g., re‐randomization, multiple overlapping intervention arms) and were included only in the narrative synthesis”
Cites
Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research
Kazdin, A. E. (2007) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432 · Cited by 2,504 · see citing works
Writing About Emotional Experiences as a Therapeutic Process
Pennebaker, J. W. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x · Cited by 2,486 · see citing works
Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables
Smyth, J. M. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.1.174 · Cited by 1,294 · see citing works
Antoni, M. H., Lehman, J. M., Kilbourn, K. M., Boyers, A. E., Culver, J. L., Alferi, S. M., Yount, S. E., McGregor, B. A., Arena, P. L., Harris, S. D., et al. (2001) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.1.20 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Health effects of emotional disclosure in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Kelley, J. E., Lumley, M. A., & Leisen, J. C. C. (1997) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.16.4.331 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Baucom, D. H., Hurwitz, H., Moser, B., Patterson, E., & Kim, H. J. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24578 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: A systematic review
Traa, M. J., De Vries, J., Bodenmann, G., & Den Oudsten, B. L. (2015) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12094 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer
Treanor, C. J., Santin, O., Prue, G., Coleman, H., Cardwell, C. R., O'Halloran, P., & Donnelly, M. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009912.pub2 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
The biopsychosocial model in cancer pain
Novy, D. M., & Aigner, C. J. (2014) · Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1097/spc.0000000000000046 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Baucom, D. H., Olsen, M., Zafar, S. Y., & Uronis, H. (2017) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4121 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationSchiess, L. C., Song, L. L., Schädelin, S., Fürst, T., Urech, C., Friese, C. R., & Katapodi, M. C. (2026) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.70076
“Twelve studies (13 reports because of one pair of publications from the same RCT 42,43 ) lacked sufficient data or had incompatible designs (e.g., re - randomization, multiple overlapping intervention arms) and were included only in the narrative synthesis (see Supporting Methods, Tables S1 and S2…”
- Authors
- Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Baucom, D. H., Hurwitz, H., Moser, B., Patterson, E., & Kim, H. J.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Porter, Laura S.
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2011-09-24
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1755-1762
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W2000965378
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA100743)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- gastrointestinal cancer, couples, relationship quality, intimacy, psychological distress, negative affect, intervention process
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Emotions, Female, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Self Disclosure, Sexual Partners, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review