Cited by 13Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

Needs of neuro-oncological patients and their caregivers during the hospitalization and after discharge: results from a longitudinal study

Scaratti, C, Leonardi, M, Saladino, A, Anghileri, E, Broggi, M, Lamperti, E, Fariselli, L, Ayadi, R +2 more·2017·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose The aims of this study are to identify neuro-oncological patients' and their caregivers' needs during hospitalization (T0) and at 4 months after discharge (T1); to analyze the longitudinal changes in patients' and caregivers' needs and burden; to identify correlations between patients' needs and caregivers' burden and needs. Methods A pilot observational longitudinal study was conducted on 94 neuro-oncological patients and their caregivers using NEQ to evaluate patients' needs, CNA, and FSQ for caregivers' needs and burden at T0 and T1. Descriptive statistics were performed to illustrate the distribution of questionnaires' scores. The longitudinal change of NEQ, FSQ, and CNA scores were investigated using Wilcoxon test. Spearman's correlation was used to measure the relation between NEQ and FSQ and CNA scores. Results The most frequent patients and caregivers' needs were material and informative. Needs tend to decrease over time; in particular FSQ factor "need for knowledge about the disease", CNA factor "Information/communication needs" and CNA total score significantly decreased (p Conclusions It is crucial to plan an assessment of patients' and caregivers' needs from the very beginning, in order to identify those individuals potentially at risk of developing high level of distress and to provide information and support following the illness trajectory of the brain tumor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-017-3619-6

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scaratti, C., Leonardi, M., Saladino, A., Anghileri, E., Broggi, M., Lamperti, E., Fariselli, L., Ayadi, R., Tringali, G., & Schiavolin, S.
Affiliations
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
Corresponding author
Schiavolin, S
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2017-02-15
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
2137-2145
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2588064548
Cited by
13
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
neuro-oncology, brain tumors, patient needs, caregiver needs, caregiver burden, hospitalization, post-discharge care, longitudinal change, emotional burden, information needs, social engagement, death concerns
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review