Cited by 177Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Unmet care needs in people living with advanced cancer: a systematic review

Open access
Moghaddam, Nima, Coxon, Helen, Nabarro, Sally, Hardy, Beth, Cox, Karen·2016·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose The support needs of cancer patients vary according to the phase of their cancer journey. Recent developments in healthcare are such that the advanced cancer phase is increasingly experienced as a chronic illness phase, with consequent changes in patient support needs. Understanding these needs, and identifying areas of unmet need, can enable us to develop services that are more adequate to the task of supporting this population.Methods We conducted a systematic search of four electronic databases to identify studies examining the unmet needs of people living with advanced cancer. Relevant data were extracted and synthesised; meta-analyses were conducted to obtain pooled estimates for prevalence of needs.Results We identified 23 studies (4 qualitative) for inclusion. Unmet needs were identified across a broad range of domains, with greatest prevalence in informational (30-55 %), psychological (18-42 %), physical (17-48 %), and functional (17-37 %) domains. There was considerable heterogeneity amongst studies in terms of methods of assessment, coding and reporting of needs, respondent characteristics, and appraised study quality.Conclusions Heterogeneity made it difficult to compare across studies and inflated confidence intervals for pooled estimates of prevalence-we need standardised and comprehensive approaches to assessment and reporting of unmet needs to further our understanding. Nonetheless, the review identified prominent needs across a range of (interacting) experiential domains. Moreover, by focussing on unmet needs for support, we were able to extrapolate potential implications for service development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-016-3221-3

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Care recipients with a mental illness or advanced or palliative disease have different needs, and in advanced disease grief and bereavement play a role.

    “Care recipients with a mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia) or advanced or palliative disease were excluded as the needs of these groups differ and in the case of advanced disease grief and bereavement play a role.[21][22][23]”

    From Non-pharmacological Interventions for Caregivers with Depression and Caregivers of Care Recipients with Co-morbid Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says support needs vary by stage of the cancer journey and that advanced cancer brings changes in patient support needs. This supports the advanced-disease part of the rationale, but the paper does not establish different needs for people with mental illness or say that grief and bereavement play a role in advanced disease. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moghaddam, N., Coxon, H., Nabarro, S., Hardy, B., & Cox, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Moghaddam, Nima
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2016-04-30
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
3609-3622
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2343005671
Cited by
177
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (CityCare Research Capability Funding 2014-15)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
unmet care needs, advanced cancer, palliative care, patient support needs, information needs, psychological needs, physical needs, functional needs, chronic disease, needs assessment, service development
MeSH terms
Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review