Cited by 63Economic and Financial Impacts of CancerHealthcare Systems and ReformsCancer survivorship and care

Out-of-pocket-payments and the financial burden of 502 cancer patients of working age in Germany: results from a longitudinal study

Büttner, Matthias, König, Hans-Helmut, Löbner, Margrit, Briest, Susanne, Konnopka, Alexander, Dietz, Andreas, Riedel-Heller, Steffi, Singer, Susanne·2019·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Cancer patients in Germany often face payments related to their disease or treatment which are not covered by their health insurance. The aim of this study was to analyze the amount of out-of-pocket payments (OOPPs) among cancer patients in Germany, to explore potential socioeconomic determinants of OOPPs, and to identify how cancer patients are burdened by these payments. Methods Cancer ptients were consecutively enrolled in 16 clinics in Leipzig, Germany. Data on OOPPs for the past 3 months and on socioeconomic status were obtained at the end of their hospital stay (t0) and 3 (t1) and 15 months (t2) after t0. Financial burden was calculated by dividing the monthly OOPPs by the midpoint of the income category, and the perceived burden was assessed by using the financial difficulties scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30. A two-part regression model was used to estimate the determinants of OOPPs. Results At baseline (t0), 502 cancer patients participated in the study and provided data on OOPPs and socioeconomic status. The mean 3-month OOPPs were the following: €205.8 at baseline, €179.2 at t1, and €148.1 at t2. Compared to the lowest income group ( Conclusion German cancer patients face relatively high OOPPs during their cancer journey. These payments may burden cancer patients, especially certain subgroups like low-income groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-018-4498-1

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Büttner, M., König, H.-H., Löbner, M., Briest, S., Konnopka, A., Dietz, A., Riedel-Heller, S., & Singer, S.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
Corresponding author
Büttner, Matthias
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2018-10-12
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
2221-2228
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2897409289
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
German Pension Insurance (#8011-106-31/31.81)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
out-of-pocket costs, financial burden, cancer patients, socioeconomic status, income, health insurance coverage, EORTC QLQ-C30, low-income patients, Germany
MeSH terms
Adult, Health Expenditures, Female, Germany, Humans, Insurance, Health, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review