Cited by 41Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesNursing care and researchPalliative and Oncologic Care

Informal caregiver quality of life in a palliative oncology population

Duimering, Adele, Turner, Jill, Chu, Karen, Huang, Fleur, Severin, Diane, Ghosh, Sunita, Yee, Don, Wiebe, Ericka +7 more·2020·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Many patients with advanced cancer receive primary supports from informal caregivers (IC). As patient health deteriorates, IC assume increasing responsibility, often accompanied by distress. We investigated the quality of life (QOL) of IC of patients referred to a palliative radiotherapy (PRT) program. Methods IC accompanying patients to a dedicated PRT clinic completed a survey based on the validated Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC). Demographics, burden, and engagement in support services were evaluated. Summary statistics were calculated, and parameters were assessed for association with CQOLC scores by a generalized linear model. Results Two hundred one surveys were analyzed representing 197 unique patients. The mean age was 68.3 years, with predominantly lung (25.0%) and prostate (19.3%) malignancies. 24.4% had been in hospital/long-term care within the previous 7 days. IC were 60.8% female, and 60.6% were the patient's spouse. 69.5% lived with the patient and 38.3% were additionally employed. IC spent a daily mean of 6.6 h (SD 7) assisting with instrumental (72.5%) and basic (37.5%) activities of daily living. Mean CQOLC score was 82.1/140 (SD 20). 63.8% of IC had previously accessed support service(s), most commonly home care (37.2%) and pharmacy (29.1%). 55.9% indicated interest in services not yet accessed. Multivariate analysis revealed additional employment, cohabitation, poor patient performance status, and interest in accessing more support…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-019-04970-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duimering, A., Turner, J., Chu, K., Huang, F., Severin, D., Ghosh, S., Yee, D., Wiebe, E., Usmani, N., Gabos, Z., Patel, S., Danielson, B., Amanie, J., Roa, W., & Fairchild, A.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Fairchild, Alysa
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2019-07-10
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
1695-1702
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2956460837
Cited by
41
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
informal caregivers, caregiver quality of life, palliative radiotherapy, advanced cancer, caregiver burden, caregiver support services, caregiver employment, cohabitation, performance status, lung cancer, prostate cancer
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Multivariate Analysis, Linear Models, Caregivers, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review