Cited by 140Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Understanding and supporting informal cancer caregivers

Open access
Molassiotis, Alex, Wang, Mian·2022·Current Treatment Options in Oncology

Abstract

Opinion statement Informal caregivers invest a significant amount of time and effort to provide cancer patients with physical, psychological, information, and social support. These challenging tasks can harm their own health and well-being, while a series of social-ecological factors may also influence the outcomes of cancer caregiving. Several instruments have been developed to help clinicians and researchers understand the multi-dimensional needs and concerns of caregivers. A growing body of evidence indicates that supportive interventions including psychoeducation, skills training, and therapeutic counseling can help improve the burden, information needs, coping strategies, physical functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life of caregivers. However, there is difficulty in translating research evidence into practice. For instance, some supportive interventions tested in clinical trial settings are regarded as inconsistent with the actual needs of caregivers. Other significant considerations are the lack of well-trained interdisciplinary teams for supportive care provision and insufficient funding. Future research should include indicators that can attract decision-makers and funders, such as improving the efficient utilization of health care services and satisfaction of caregivers. It is also important for researchers to work closely with key stakeholders, to facilitate evidence dissemination and implementation, to benefit caregivers and the patient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11864-022-00955-3

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When compared to previous literature on caregivers of other oncology patients, the prevalence of caregiver burden, anxiety, depression, and distress found in this review appears clinically significant and, in some ways, might be comparable to or higher than estimates reported in mixed cancer caregivers.

    “When compared to previous literature on caregivers of other oncology patients, the prevalence of caregiver burden, anxiety, depression, and distress found in this review appears clinically significant and, in some ways, might be comparable to or higher than estimates reported in mixed cancer caregivers.32, 33”

    From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [33]

    The paper’s “Impact of caregiving on informal cancer caregivers” section describes burden, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and psychological distress among cancer caregivers. It does not provide prevalence estimates for those outcomes, so it cannot substantiate the citing review’s comparison of rates with mixed-cancer caregiver estimates. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Caregivers of patients with advanced forms of cancer are known to have impaired quality of life and higher psychological morbidities.

    “Caregivers of patients with advanced forms of cancer are known to have impaired QoL and higher psychological morbidities.”

    From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [33]

    The ‘Impact of caregiving on informal cancer caregivers’ section says that caregiving can jeopardize quality of life and cause emotional distress; it also reports higher anxiety and depression after some caregivers are bereaved. These passages support the general point, but they do not establish both outcomes specifically for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior studies in cancer caregiving consistently show that informal caregivers experience higher rates of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and reduced quality of life compared with population norms, with burden influenced by caregiving intensity, financial toxicity, and perceived lack of support.

    “Prior studies in cancer caregiving consistently show that informal caregivers experience higher rates of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and reduced QoL compared with population norms, with burden influenced by caregiving intensity, financial toxicity, and perceived lack of support.33”

    From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [33]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The impaired quality of life and higher psychological morbidities among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer are because symptom burden, treatment intensity, and end-of-life care needs for the patients are high.

    “This is because symptom burden, treatment intensity, and end-of-life care needs for the patients are high.32,33”

    From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [33]

    The sections on interpersonal factors and the impact of caregiving (page not provided) link patients’ care demands to caregiver burden and quality of life, and describe distress during chemotherapy and end-of-life transitions. They do not establish that high patient symptom burden, treatment intensity, and end-of-life care needs together explain impaired quality of life and greater psychological morbidity specifically among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molassiotis, A., & Wang, M.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Molassiotis, Alex
Venue
Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Published
2022-03-14
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
494-513
ISSN
  • 1527-2729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-6277
OpenAlex
W4220745051
Cited by
138
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Treatment Options in Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
informal caregivers, cancer caregiving, caregiver burden, caregiver well-being, support measures, psychoeducation, skills training, therapeutic counseling, caregiver needs assessment, implementation of evidence-based interventions, interdisciplinary care teams, caregiver quality of life, caregiver coping
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Social Support, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review