Cited by 19Cancer survivorship and careFamily Support in IllnessPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

The psychological symptom burden in partners of pancreatic cancer patients: a population-based cohort study

Dengsø, Kristine Elberg, Thomsen, Thordis, Andersen, Elisabeth Wreford, Hansen, Carsten Palnæs, Christensen, Bo Marcel, Hillingsø, Jens, Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg·2021·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Pancreatic cancer (PC) has high morbidity and mortality and is stressful for patients and their partners. We investigated the psychological symptom burden in partners of PC patients. Methods We followed 5774 partners of PC patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2016 up for first redeemed prescriptions of antidepressants or hospital admission, anxiolytics, and hypnotics as proxies for clinical depression, anxiety, and insomnia and compared them with 59,099 partners of cancer-free spouses. Data were analysed using Cox regression and multistate Markov models. Results The cumulative incidence proportion of first depression was higher in partners of PC patients compared to comparisons. The highest adjusted HR of first depression was seen the first year after diagnosis (HR 3.2 (95% CI: 2.9; 3.7)). Educational level, chronic morbidity, and bereavement status were associated with an increased risk of first depression. There was a significantly higher first acute use (1 prescription only) of both anxiolytics and hypnotics and chronic use (3+ prescriptions) of hypnotics in partners of PC patients than in comparisons. Conclusion Being a partner to a PC patient carries a substantial psychological symptom burden and increases the risk for first depression and anxiolytic use and long-term use of hypnotics. Attention should be given to the psychological symptom burden of partners of PC patients, as this may pose a barrier for the optimal informal care and support of the PC patient, as well…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-021-06251-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dengsø, K. E., Thomsen, T., Andersen, E. W., Hansen, C. P., Christensen, B. M., Hillingsø, J., & Dalton, S. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Danish Cancer Society (DK)
  • Zealand University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Dengsø, Kristine Elberg
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2021-05-08
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
6689-6699
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W3159246329
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF15OC0017022, NNF16OC0022680)
  • Rigshospitalet (PSP E-22647-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, family caregivers, partners of cancer patients, depression, anxiety, insomnia, hypnotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants, bereavement, informal care, caregiver burden
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review