The psychological symptom burden in partners of pancreatic cancer patients: a population-based cohort study
Abstract
Purpose Pancreatic cancer (PC) has high morbidity and mortality and is stressful for patients and their partners. We investigated the psychological symptom burden in partners of PC patients. Methods We followed 5774 partners of PC patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2016 up for first redeemed prescriptions of antidepressants or hospital admission, anxiolytics, and hypnotics as proxies for clinical depression, anxiety, and insomnia and compared them with 59,099 partners of cancer-free spouses. Data were analysed using Cox regression and multistate Markov models. Results The cumulative incidence proportion of first depression was higher in partners of PC patients compared to comparisons. The highest adjusted HR of first depression was seen the first year after diagnosis (HR 3.2 (95% CI: 2.9; 3.7)). Educational level, chronic morbidity, and bereavement status were associated with an increased risk of first depression. There was a significantly higher first acute use (1 prescription only) of both anxiolytics and hypnotics and chronic use (3+ prescriptions) of hypnotics in partners of PC patients than in comparisons. Conclusion Being a partner to a PC patient carries a substantial psychological symptom burden and increases the risk for first depression and anxiolytic use and long-term use of hypnotics. Attention should be given to the psychological symptom burden of partners of PC patients, as this may pose a barrier for the optimal informal care and support of the PC patient, as well…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the context of cancer, informal caregivers may provide support during treatment, manage the patient's medications, coordinate healthcare visits, and update friends and family, in addition to supporting patients with activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living.
“In the context of cancer, informal caregivers may provide support during treatment, manage the patient’s medications, coordinate healthcare visits, and update friends and family, in addition to supporting patients with activities of daily living (e.g. feeding, bathing, and dressing patients) and instrumental activities of daily living (e.g. managing finance, cooking, and cleaning) [5, 6].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Informal caregivers were predominantly spouses to patients with pancreatic cancer (98.6%, 6058/6142).
“Informal caregivers were predominantly spouses to patients with pancreatic cancer (98.6%, 6058/6142) [5, 6, 28, 33, 34].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Eight included studies were cross-sectional studies and one study was a prospective cohort design.
“Eight studies were cross-sectional studies [5, 27–33]. One study was a prospective cohort design [6].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Five included studies were conducted in the USA, three in Australia, and one in Denmark.
“Five studies (three qualitative, two quantitative) were conducted in the USA [5, 28, 29, 31, 33], three (two qualitative, one quantitative) in Australia [27, 30, 32] and one quantitative study in Denmark [6].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Excluding a large study which included 5574 informal caregivers, a total of 77 and 363 informal caregivers were included in the qualitative and quantitative studies respectively.
“Excluding a large study which included 5574 informal caregivers [6], a total of 77 and 363 informal caregivers were included in the qualitative and quantitative studies respectively.”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
All four quantitative studies scored 0 points for the item assessing prospective calculation of study size.
“All four studies scored 0 points for the item assessing prospective calculation of study size [5, 6, 32, 33].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Educational level, chronic morbidity and bereavement status were associated with an increased risk of first depression.
“Educational level, chronic morbidity and bereavement status were associated with an increased risk of first depression [6]”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
There was a significantly higher first acute use (1 prescription only) of anxiolytics in partners of PC patients than in comparators.
“There was a significantly higher first acute use (1 prescription only) of anxiolytics in partners of PC patients than in comparators [6]”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The highest adjusted HR of first depression was seen the first year after diagnosis.
“The highest adjusted HR of first depression was seen the first year after diagnosis [6]”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Partners of pancreatic cancer patients had a threefold higher adjusted hazard ratio for depression (HR 3.2, 95% CI 2.9-3.7) in the first year after diagnosis compared to partners of non-cancer patients, based on the proxy of first prescription for antidepressants or hospital admission for clinical depression.
“Dengso et al. (2021) [6] used data-linkage methods and demonstrated a threefold higher adjusted hazard ratio for depression (HR 3.2 (95% CI: 2.9; 3.7)) in partners of pancreatic cancer patients in the first year after diagnosis when compared to partners of non-cancer patients, based on the proxy of first prescription for antidepressants or hospital admission for clinical depression.”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Predictors of psychological morbidity among informal caregivers were limited to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics including caregivers' chronic morbidity, education status, bereavement, and history of access to professional psychological help.
“Predictors of psychological morbidity among informal caregivers were limited to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics including caregivers’ chronic morbidity, education status, bereavement, and history of access to professional psychological help [6, 32].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Partners of pancreatic cancer patients had a higher chance of first acute use of anxiolytics compared to partners of non-cancer patients.
“The same study showed that partners of pancreatic cancer patients had a higher chance of first acute use of anxiolytics when compared to partners of non-cancer patients [6].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Predictors of increased risk of first depression among pancreatic cancer caregivers were low education level, chronic morbidity, and bereavement.
“Predictors of increased risk of first depression among pancreatic cancer caregivers were low education level, chronic morbidity, and bereavement [6].”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Four studies provided quantitative data on quality-of-life of informal caregivers of pancreatic cancer patients, and no studies provided qualitative data on quality-of-life.
“Four studies provided quantitative data on quality-of-life of informal caregivers [5, 6, 32, 33]. No studies provided qualitative data on quality-of-life of informal caregivers.”
From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
Fiske, A., Wetherell, J. L., & Gatz, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153621 · Cited by 2,353 · see citing works
European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia
Riemann, D., Baglioni, C., Bassetti, C., Bjorvatn, B., Dolenc Groselj, L., Ellis, J. G., Espie, C. A., Garcia‐Borreguero, D., Gjerstad, M., Gonçalves, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.12594 · Cited by 2,049 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chong, E., Crowe, L., Mentor, K., Pandanaboyana, S., & Sharp, L. (2023) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07468-7 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Mirhosseini, S., Imani Parsa, F., Moghadam-Roshtkhar, H., Basirinezhad, M. H., Ameri, M., & Ebrahimi, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1430371 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dengsø, K. E., Thomsen, T., Andersen, E. W., Hansen, C. P., Christensen, B. M., Hillingsø, J., & Dalton, S. O.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Danish Cancer Society (DK)
- Zealand University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Dengsø, Kristine Elberg
- ORCID
- Venue
- Supportive Care in Cancer
- Published
- 2021-05-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6689-6699
- ISSN
- 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7339
- OpenAlex
- W3159246329
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF15OC0017022, NNF16OC0022680)
- Rigshospitalet (PSP E-22647-02)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Keywords
- pancreatic cancer, family caregivers, partners of cancer patients, depression, anxiety, insomnia, hypnotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants, bereavement, informal care, caregiver burden
- MeSH terms
- Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review