Cited by 105Financial Distress and Bankruptcy PredictionExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques

Toward interpretable credit scoring: integrating explainable artificial intelligence with deep learning for credit card default prediction

Talaat, Fatma M., Aljadani, Abdussalam, Badawy, Mahmoud, Elhosseini, Mostafa·2024·Neural Computing and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00521-023-09232-2

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Talaat, F. M., Aljadani, A., Badawy, M., & Elhosseini, M.
Affiliations
  • Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
  • Taibah University (SA)
  • Mansoura University (EG)
Corresponding author
Talaat, Fatma M.
Venue
Neural Computing and Applications
Published
2023-12-21
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
4847-4865
ISSN
  • 0941-0643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3058
OpenAlex
W4390049924
Cited by
105
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 18
FWCI
61.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neural Computing and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Keywords
credit card default prediction, credit scoring, explainable AI, interpretability, credit risk assessment, deep learning, black-box models, late payment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review