Cited by 117Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

Interactions between biochar and mycorrhizal fungi in a water-stressed agricultural soil

Mickan, Bede S., Abbott, Lynette K., Stefanova, Katia, Solaiman, Zakaria M.·2016·Mycorrhiza

Abstract

Biochar may alleviate plant water stress in association with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi but research has not been conclusive. Therefore, a glasshouse experiment was conducted to understand how interactions between AM fungi and plants respond to biochar application under water-stressed conditions. A twin chamber pot system was used to determine whether a woody biochar increased root colonisation by a natural AM fungal population in a pasture soil ('field' chamber) and whether this was associated with increased growth of extraradical AM fungal hyphae detected by plants growing in an adjacent ('bait') chamber containing irradiated soil. The two chambers were separated by a mesh that excluded roots. Subterranean clover was grown with and without water stress and harvested after 35, 49 and 63 days from each chamber. When biochar was applied to the field chamber under water-stressed conditions, shoot mass increased in parallel with mycorrhizal colonisation, extraradical hyphal length and shoot phosphorus concentration. AM fungal colonisation of roots in the bait chamber indicated an increase in extraradical mycorrhizal hyphae in the field chamber. Biochar had little effect on AM fungi or plant growth under well-watered conditions. The biochar-induced increase in mycorrhizal colonisation was associated with increased growth of extraradical AM fungal hyphae in the pasture soil under water-stressed conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00572-016-0693-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mickan, B. S., Abbott, L. K., Stefanova, K., & Solaiman, Z. M.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Mickan, Bede S.
Venue
Mycorrhiza
Published
2016-04-11
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
565-574
ISSN
  • 0940-6360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1890
OpenAlex
W2328077617
Cited by
117
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mycorrhiza (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
biochar, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, water stress, drought tolerance, extraradical hyphae, root colonization, subterranean clover, pasture soils, phosphorus uptake, soil amendment
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Charcoal, Phosphorus, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Water, Trifolium, Mycorrhizae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review