How biochar works, and when it doesn't: a review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar
Open accessAbstract
We synthesized 20 years of research to explain the interrelated processes that determine soil and plant responses to biochar. The properties of biochar and its effects within agricultural ecosystems largely depend on feedstock and pyrolysis conditions. We describe three stages of reactions of biochar in soil: dissolution (1–3 weeks); reactive surface development (1–6 months); and aging (beyond 6 months). As biochar ages, it is incorporated into soil aggregates, protecting the biochar carbon and promoting the stabilization of rhizodeposits and microbial products. Biochar carbon persists in soil for hundreds to thousands of years. By increasing pH, porosity, and water availability, biochars can create favorable conditions for root development and microbial functions. Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that increase nutrient supply and uptake by plants, reduce phytotoxins, stimulate plant development, and increase resilience to disease and environmental stressors. Meta‐analyses found that, on average, biochars increase P availability by a factor of 4.6; decrease plant tissue concentration of heavy metals by 17%–39%; build soil organic carbon through negative priming by 3.8% (range −21% to +20%); and reduce non‐CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions from soil by 12%–50%. Meta‐analyses show average crop yield increases of 10%–42% with biochar addition, with greatest increases in low‐nutrient P‐sorbing acidic soils (common in the tropics), and in sandy soils in drylands due to increase in nutrient retention and water holding capacity. Studies report a wide range of plant responses to biochars due to the diversity of biochars and contexts in which biochars have been applied. Crop yields increase strongly if site‐specific soil constraints and nutrient and water limitations are mitigated by appropriate biochar formulations. Biochars can be tailored to address site constraints through feedstock selection, by modifying pyrolysis conditions, through pre‐ or post‐production treatments, or co‐application with organic or mineral fertilizers. We demonstrate how, when used wisely, biochar mitigates climate change and supports food security and the circular economy.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes 20 years of research on biochar mechanisms in soil and plants, describing three stages: dissolution (1–3 weeks), reactive surface development (1–6 months), and aging (>6 months). It concludes that biochar can improve yields, nutrient availability, heavy-metal immobilization, soil organic carbon, and greenhouse-gas mitigation when tailored to site constraints, but responses vary widely with feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, application rate, and context.
Key findings
- Meta-analyses report average crop yield increases of 10%–42% with biochar addition, with greatest increases in low-nutrient P-sorbing acidic soils and in sandy dryland soils, especially when biochar is applied with organic and/or mineral fertilizers.
- On average, biochar increases P availability by a factor of 4.6; decreases plant tissue concentrations of Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn by 38%, 39%, 25%, and 17%, respectively; builds soil organic carbon through negative priming by 3.8% (range −21% to +20%); and reduces non-CO₂ greenhouse gas emissions from soil by 12%–50%.
- Biochar carbon persists in soil for hundreds to thousands of years, and aging forms organo-mineral microagglomerates that can increase cation and anion exchange capacity, protect biochar carbon, and stabilize rhizodeposits and microbial products.
- Effects depend strongly on feedstock, highest treatment temperature, application rate, and site context; low rates (<1 Mg ha⁻¹) as nutrient carriers or biochar compound fertilizers can be cost-effective, while high rates (10–50 Mg ha⁻¹) are used as soil conditioners, and negative effects can occur at high rates or when low-nutrient biochars are applied without fertilizer.
Methods
- Narrative review and synthesis of 20 years of biochar research, focusing on annual crops and rhizosphere processes, with sections on food security, climate change mitigation, and the circular economy.
- Draws on published meta-analyses and primary studies, including a summary table of yield-response meta-analyses and a table of biochar mean residence times; no new data were created.
- The paper describes three reaction stages—dissolution (1–3 weeks), reactive surface development (1–6 months), and aging (>6 months)—and integrates physical, chemical, microbial, and plant-response mechanisms.
Limitations
- The authors state that knowledge gaps remain regarding long-term field biochar–soil–plant interactions, including longevity of yield response and N₂O emission reduction, the direction/magnitude/duration of organic matter priming, long-term effects of repeated applications, and optimal scheduling of biochar re-application for heavy-metal immobilization.
- The authors note that few studies have examined biochar or biochar compound fertilizer applied at low, commercially viable rates as single or repeated applications, and that formulations combining biochar with mineral and/or organic fertilizers have received limited research attention with very few field trials.
- Evident from the text: conclusions rely heavily on meta-analyses and studies with heterogeneous biochars, soils, application rates, and experimental designs; the authors caution that studies without plants, in soil-less media, or in pots cannot readily be extrapolated to field situations.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 377 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisenone given
Studies report a wide range of plant responses to biochars due to the diversity of biochars and contexts in which biochars have been applied.
“Studies report a wide range of plant responses to biochars due to the diversity of biochars and contexts in which biochars have been applied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Biochar properties vary widely, determined largely by feedstock, HTT, and residence time at HTT, as well as treatments applied before and after pyrolysis.
“Biochar properties vary widely, determined largely by feedstock, HTT, and residence time at HTT, as well as treatments applied before and after pyrolysis (Schimmelpfennig & Glaser, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schimmelpfennig & Glaser, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Meta-analyses found that, on average, biochars increase P availability by a factor of 4.6.
“Meta-analyses found that, on average, biochars increase P availability by a factor of 4.6;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Biochar reactions in soil occur in three stages: dissolution (1-3 weeks), reactive surface development (1-6 months), and aging (beyond 6 months).
“We describe three stages of reactions of biochar in soil: dissolution (1-3 weeks); reactive surface development (1-6 months); and aging (beyond 6 months).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Biochar carbon persists in soil for hundreds to thousands of years.
“Biochar carbon persists in soil for hundreds to thousands of years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Premisenone given
Meta-analyses found that, on average, biochars reduce non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from soil by 12%-50%.
“reduce non-CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions from soil by 12%-50%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A review of 5400 studies found that wood-based feedstocks generally produced biochars with the highest surface area.
“A review of 5400 studies (Ippolito et al., 2020) found that wood-based feedstocks generally produced biochars with the highest surface area,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ippolito et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that increase nutrient supply and uptake by plants.
“Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that increase nutrient supply and uptake by plants, reduce phytotoxins, stimulate plant development, and increase resilience to disease and environmental stressors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Meta-analyses show average crop yield increases of 10%-42% with biochar addition.
“Meta-analyses show average crop yield increases of 10%-42% with biochar addition,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that stimulate plant development.
“Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that increase nutrient supply and uptake by plants, reduce phytotoxins, stimulate plant development, and increase resilience to disease and environmental stressors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Crop yields increase strongly if site-specific soil constraints and nutrient and water limitations are mitigated by appropriate biochar formulations.
“Crop yields increase strongly if site-specific soil constraints and nutrient and water limitations are mitigated by appropriate biochar formulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The properties of biochar and its effects within agricultural ecosystems largely depend on feedstock and pyrolysis conditions.
“The properties of biochar and its effects within agricultural ecosystems largely depend on feedstock and pyrolysis conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
By increasing pH, porosity, and water availability, biochars can create favorable conditions for root development and microbial functions.
“By increasing pH, porosity, and water availability, biochars can create favorable conditions for root development and microbial functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Meta-analyses found that, on average, biochars decrease plant tissue concentration of heavy metals by 17%-39%.
“decrease plant tissue concentration of heavy metals by 17%-39%;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Meta-analyses found that, on average, biochars build soil organic carbon through negative priming by 3.8% (range -21% to +20%).
“build soil organic carbon through negative priming by 3.8% (range -21% to +20%);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that reduce phytotoxins.
“Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that increase nutrient supply and uptake by plants, reduce phytotoxins, stimulate plant development, and increase resilience to disease and environmental stressors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that increase resilience to disease and environmental stressors.
“Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that increase nutrient supply and uptake by plants, reduce phytotoxins, stimulate plant development, and increase resilience to disease and environmental stressors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The greatest crop yield increases with biochar addition occur in low-nutrient P-sorbing acidic soils (common in the tropics).
“with greatest increases in low-nutrient P-sorbing acidic soils (common in the tropics),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally increases water retention.
“increases dissolved and total organic C, CEC, available nutrients, water retention, and aggregate stability;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites El-Naggar et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally increases CEC.
“increases dissolved and total organic C, CEC, available nutrients, water retention, and aggregate stability;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites El-Naggar et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Applications of biochar-fertilizer mixes at low rates (<1 Mg ha-1 biochar) have also increased yields, particularly when applied as a band near the seed.
“however, applications of biocharfertilizer mixes at low rates (<1 Mg ha -1 biochar) have also increased yields, particularly when applied as a band near the seed (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Biochar can increase microbial activity.
“Biochar can increase microbial activity, accelerate nutrient cycling, and reduce leaching and volatilization of nitrogen (Lehmann & Joseph, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally increases dissolved and total organic C.
“increases dissolved and total organic C, CEC, available nutrients, water retention, and aggregate stability;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites El-Naggar et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can reduce leaching and volatilization of nitrogen.
“Biochar can increase microbial activity, accelerate nutrient cycling, and reduce leaching and volatilization of nitrogen (Lehmann & Joseph, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally lowers soil acidity.
“Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally lowers soil acidity and increases buffering capacity;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites El-Naggar et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can accelerate nutrient cycling.
“Biochar can increase microbial activity, accelerate nutrient cycling, and reduce leaching and volatilization of nitrogen (Lehmann & Joseph, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally increases aggregate stability.
“increases dissolved and total organic C, CEC, available nutrients, water retention, and aggregate stability;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites El-Naggar et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premiseown data
Studies reporting positive responses have commonly used biochar application rates of 5-20 Mg ha-1.
“Studies reporting positive responses have commonly used biochar application rates of 5-20 Mg ha -1 (Table 1);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally increases buffering capacity.
“Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally lowers soil acidity and increases buffering capacity;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites El-Naggar et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally reduces bulk density.
“and reduces bulk density (El-Naggar et al., 2019;Lehmann & Joseph, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites El-Naggar et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A review of 5400 studies found that manure feedstocks produced biochars with the highest N and P content.
“and manure feedstocks produced biochars with the highest N and P content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ippolito et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A review of 5400 studies found that straw-based feedstocks gave the highest cation exchange capacity (CEC).
“straw-based feedstocks gave the highest cation exchange capacity (CEC),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ippolito et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reviews and meta-analyses show that biochar generally increases available nutrients.
“increases dissolved and total organic C, CEC, available nutrients, water retention, and aggregate stability;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites El-Naggar et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lehmann & Joseph, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
As CEC of fresh biochar is relatively low compared with CEC of many soil components, applying biochar typically does not increase the soil CEC immediately.
“As CEC of fresh biochar is relatively low compared with CEC of many soil components, applying biochar typically does not increase the soil CEC immediately (Kharel et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kharel et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Initial rapid dissolution can occur via dissolution of salts, ion exchange, submicrometer particle detachment, and preferential dissolution at crystal imperfections.
“Initial rapid dissolution can occur via dissolution of salts, ion exchange, submicrometer particle detachment, and preferential dissolution at crystal imperfections (Wang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Except in flooded soils, oxygen will diffuse into the pores and react with redox-active organic molecules and minerals, particularly Fe and Mn.
“Except in flooded soils, oxygen will diffuse into the pores and react with redox-active organic molecules (e.g., quinones; Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021) and minerals, particularly Fe and Mn.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Fresh biochar typically has a low CEC, as the high temperatures during pyrolysis reduce the concentration of functional groups.
“Fresh biochar typically has a low CEC, as the high temperatures during pyrolysis reduce the concentration of functional groups (e.g., -OH, -COOH, -CH, and -C=O).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Using methods considered suitable for biochar, CEC ranges from approximately 50 to 200 mmol kg-1.
“Using methods considered suitable for biochar, CEC ranges from approximately 50 to 200 mmol kg -1 (Graber et al., 2017;Mitchell et al., 2013),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Graber et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mitchell et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
When biochar is applied in the form of BCF, the physical and chemical reactions that occur during production of the granules slow the rate and extent of dissolution of N compounds compared with dissolution of mineral fertilizers.
“When biochar is applied in the form of BCF that combines biochar, minerals, and N and P compounds (e.g., urea, ammonium sulfate, diammonium phosphate), the physical and chemical reactions that occur during the production of the granules slow the rate and extent of dissolution of N compounds compared with dissolution of mineral fertilizers (Chen et al., 2017;Shi et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shi et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
An exception is flooded rice soils, where biochar application can increase Eh due to the release of O2 from roots.
“An exception is flooded rice soils, where biochar application can increase Eh due to the release of O 2 from roots.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Biochar can increase soil C levels by decreasing mineralization of existing soil organic matter (SOM).
“In addition, biochar can increase soil C levels by decreasing mineralization of existing soil organic matter (SOM; Wang et al., 2016) and newly added plant C (Weng et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can reduce emissions of the greenhouse gases nitrous oxide and methane.
“Furthermore, biochar can reduce emissions of the greenhouse gases (GHGs), nitrous oxide and methane (Van Zwieten, Kammann, et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Zwieten, Kammann, et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The extent of changes in soil solution composition depends on the specific biochar and soil.
“The extent of changes in soil solution composition depends on the specific biochar and soil (Mukherjee & Zimmerman, 2013;Schreiter et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mukherjee & Zimmerman, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schreiter et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
High-temperature biochars (HTT >450°C) have relatively lower levels of water-soluble compounds that are dominated by low-molecular weight acids and low-molecular weight neutrals.
“whereas high-temperature biochars (HTT >450°C) have relatively lower levels of watersoluble compounds that are dominated by low-molecular weight acids and low-molecular weight neutrals (Graber et al., 2015;Reynolds et al., 2018;Taherymoosavi et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Graber et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reynolds et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Taherymoosavi et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can increase soil C levels by decreasing mineralization of newly added plant C.
“In addition, biochar can increase soil C levels by decreasing mineralization of existing soil organic matter (SOM; Wang et al., 2016) and newly added plant C (Weng et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weng et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CEC of biochar is more difficult to measure than CEC of soils, due to its pH-dependent variable charge properties and the presence of soluble salts.
“CEC of biochar is more difficult to measure than CEC of soils, due to its pH-dependent variable charge properties and the presence of soluble salts (Graber et al., 2017;Munera-Echeverri et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Graber et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Munera-Echeverri et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Low-temperature biochars can be hydrophobic initially due to accumulation of aliphatic compounds in pores and on the surface.
“Low-temperature biochars can be hydrophobic initially due to accumulation of aliphatic compounds in pores and on the surface;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
After application to soil, water entering biochar pores dissolves soluble organic and mineral compounds on biochar outer and inner surfaces.
“After application to soil, water entering biochar pores dissolves soluble organic and mineral compounds on biochar outer and inner surfaces (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Anion exchange capacity (AEC) is typically also less than 200 mmol kg-1.
“and anion exchange capacity (AEC) is typically also less than 200 mmol kg -1 (Lawrinenko et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lawrinenko et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochars commonly increase soil water holding capacity, particularly in coarse-textured soils.
“Biochars commonly increase soil water holding capacity, particularly in coarse-textured soils, decrease bulk density, and increase porosity, with greater effects observed at rates exceeding 40 Mg ha -1 (see Section 3; Quin et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quin et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Reported impacts of biochar on germination and seedling growth range from inhibition to stimulation.
“Reported impacts of biochar on germination and seedling growth range from inhibition to stimulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
The specific sensitivity of seeds of different plant species to salinity, toxins, hormone-like compounds and water availability also results in very variable results.
“The specific sensitivity of seeds of different plant species to salinity, toxins, hormone-like compounds and water availability also results in very variable results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
This acceleration leads to oxidation not only of biochar itself but also of SOM and plant residues.
“This acceleration leads to oxidation not only of biochar itself but also of SOM and plant residues (Du et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Du et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The effects on infiltration were attributed to a biochar-related increase in soil solution Ca and decrease in Na, leading to decreased sodium adsorption ratio.
“The effects were attributed to a biochar-related increase in soil solution Ca and decrease in Na, leading to decreased sodium adsorption ratio (Abrol et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abrol et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
High mineral ash biochars and engineered biochars used in BCF generally contain high quantities of small mineral particles <100 μm in or on the C matrix that are easily fragmented from the biochar and are mobile in soil.
“High mineral ash biochars and engineered biochars used in BCF generally contain high quantities of small mineral particles <100 µm (especially silica, alumina, Fe/O and CaCO 3 , CaHPO 4 , and Mg compounds) in or on the C matrix that are easily fragmented from the biochar and are mobile in soil.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Biochars commonly decrease bulk density.
“Biochars commonly increase soil water holding capacity, particularly in coarse-textured soils, decrease bulk density, and increase porosity, with greater effects observed at rates exceeding 40 Mg ha -1 (see Section 3; Quin et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quin et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Cultivation and ingestion by soil fauna result in fragmentation and fracturing, creating very small particles (approximately <100 μm).
“Cultivation and ingestion by soil fauna result in fragmentation and fracturing, creating very small particles (approximately <100 µm).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In acid soils, excess H+ reacts with basic minerals such as calcite and dolomite present within the C lattice of the biochar.
“In acid soils, excess H + reacts with basic minerals such as calcite and dolomite present within the C lattice of the biochar (Amonette & Joseph, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Amonette & Joseph, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reduced sealing leads to lower runoff and erosion rates.
“Reduced sealing leads to lower runoff and erosion rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Greater effects on water holding capacity, bulk density, and porosity are observed at rates exceeding 40 Mg ha-1.
“with greater effects observed at rates exceeding 40 Mg ha -1 (see Section 3; Quin et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quin et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Aqueous extracts of some biochars have been found to stimulate germination and seedling growth.
“Aqueous extracts of some biochars have been found to stimulate germination and seedling growth (Taek-Keun et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Taek-Keun et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
These biochar-related factors are the reason that biochar feedstock, production HTT, and application amount have a range of impacts on germination speed and rate.
“These biochar-related factors are the reason that biochar feedstock, production HTT, and application amount have a range of impacts on germination speed and rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Other studies that applied a range of woody and manure biochars at rates of 10-40 Mg ha-1 found positive or nil effect on germination.
“Other studies that applied a range of woody and manure biochars at rates of 10-40 Mg ha -1 found positive or nil effect on germination (Das et al., 2020;Gascó et al., 2016;Khan et al., 2014;Mete et al., 2015;Van Zwieten, Kimber, Morris, Downie, et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Das et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gascó et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Khan et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can impact water infiltration into soils, for example, moderating the reduction in infiltration rate that occurs during high-intensity rainstorms in soils prone to surface sealing, as seen at 2% w/w.
“Biochar can also impact water infiltration into soils, for example, moderating the reduction in infiltration rate that occurs during high-intensity rainstorms in soils prone to surface sealing, as seen at 2% w/w by Abrol et al. (2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abrol et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochars commonly increase porosity.
“Biochars commonly increase soil water holding capacity, particularly in coarse-textured soils, decrease bulk density, and increase porosity, with greater effects observed at rates exceeding 40 Mg ha -1 (see Section 3; Quin et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quin et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
By raising the pH, alkaline biochars alleviate Al and heavy metal toxicity that can reduce root growth in acidic soils.
“For example, by raising the pH, alkaline biochars alleviate Al and heavy metal toxicity that can reduce root growth in acidic soils (Lauricella et al., 2021;Shetty et al., 2020;Van Zwieten, Rose, et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lauricella et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shetty et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Zwieten, Rose, et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The physical and chemical properties of biochar surfaces change significantly in Stage 2 through a range of biotic and abiotic processes that take place in the pores exposed after the rapid dissolution phase ends.
“The physical and chemical properties of biochar surfaces change significantly in Stage 2 through a range of biotic and abiotic processes that take place in the pores exposed after the rapid dissolution phase ends (Joseph et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Joseph et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Seed germination and early seedling development can be influenced as a result of the effects of biochar on soil physical properties.
“Seed germination and early seedling development can be influenced as a result of the effects of biochar on soil physical properties (Section 2.1.1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
These effects typically increase with higher biochar rates.
“These effects typically increase with higher biochar rates (Obia et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Obia et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
At low biochar rates, low levels of free radicals could be beneficial, as reactive oxygen species can interact with plant hormones that trigger germination.
“However, at low biochar rates, low levels of free radicals could be beneficial, as reactive oxygen species can interact with plant hormones that trigger germination (Gomes & Garcia, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gomes & Garcia, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Biochars with high levels of soluble mineral compounds can also cause inhibition at high application rates.
“Biochars with high levels of soluble mineral compounds can also cause inhibition at high application rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
At high biochar application rates in the absence of soil (volumetrically equivalent to >40 Mg ha-1, in a petri dish), free radicals from biochar inhibit germination and seedling growth.
“At high biochar application rates in the absence of soil (volumetrically equivalent to >40 Mg ha -1 , in a petri dish), free radicals from biochar inhibit germination and seedling growth (Liao et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liao et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
The effects of biochar in later periods differ from the first stage which is dominated by dissolution of compounds from biochar.
“The effects of biochar in later periods differ from the first stage which is dominated by dissolution of compounds from biochar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In stage 2, plant roots intercept and interact with biochar.
“In stage 2, plant roots intercept and interact with biochar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Chemical impacts of biochar on soils and soil water solution can also affect seed germination and early seedling development.
“Chemical impacts of biochar on soils and soil water solution can also affect seed germination and early seedling development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
At high application rates, biochars with high levels of soluble salts could inhibit germination and seedling growth through osmotic stress.
“At high application rates, biochars with high levels of soluble salts could inhibit germination and seedling growth through osmotic stress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Stimulation of the gibberellin pathway contributes to the observed promotion of germination and seedling growth by wood biochar in some tomato genotypes.
“French and Iyer-Pascuzzi (2018) found evidence that stimulation of the gibberellin pathway contributes to the observed promotion of germination and seedling growth by wood biochar in some tomato genotypes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites French and Iyer-Pascuzzi, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochars contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that can inhibit germination at high rates.
“Biochars contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs; Gascó et al., 2016;Weidemann et al., 2018), organic pollutants formed during incomplete combustion, that can inhibit germination at high rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gascó et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weidemann et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Certain soluble organic compounds released from biochars can stimulate germination and plant growth.
“Certain soluble organic compounds released from biochars can stimulate germination and plant growth (Sun, Drosos, et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun, Drosos, et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochars containing karrikins can accelerate germination and early growth of plants.
“Kochanek et al. (2016) showed that biochars containing karrikins, a class of water-soluble organic molecules associated with plant response to fire, can accelerate germination and early growth of plants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kochanek et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
At very high rates of application (>50 Mg ha-1), biochars derived from contaminated sludges or feedstock grown in contaminated soils can release heavy metals that inhibit germination.
“At very high rates of application (>50 Mg ha -1 ), biochars derived from contaminated sludges or feedstock grown in contaminated soils can release heavy metals that inhibit germination (Das et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Das et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
C:N ratio does not influence microbial metabolization of biochars.
“Note also that C:N ratio does not influence microbial metabolization of biochars (Torres-Rojas et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Torres-Rojas et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Recent research indicates that many of the reactions described above related to biochar occur on or in the microagglomerates.
“Recent research indicates that many of the reactions described above related to biochar occur on or in the microagglomerates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Some of the nutrients released from fertilizer, especially N and P, can react with the biochar pore surfaces and organo-mineral layers.
“Some of the nutrients released from fertilizer, especially N and P, can react with the biochar pore surfaces and organo-mineral layers (Haider et al., 2020;Hestrin et al., 2019;Joseph et al., 2018;Kammann et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Haider et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hestrin et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Joseph et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Microagglomerates that form on internal and external biochar surfaces, consisting of nanoparticulate minerals bound with organic molecules, have a significant concentration of -C-O, -C=O, -COOH, or -NH functional groups.
“Microagglomerates that form on internal and external biochar surfaces, consisting of nanoparticulate minerals bound with organic molecules, have a significant concentration of -C-O, -C=O, -COOH, or -NH functional groups (Joseph et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Joseph et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Surfaces in nanopores bind molecules more tightly than larger pores.
“Surfaces in nanopores bind molecules more tightly than larger pores (Pignatello et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pignatello et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar directly mediates electron transfer by functioning as an electron shuttle.
“Biochar directly mediates electron transfer by functioning as an electron shuttle”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Adsorption of root exudates by biochar can result in additional adsorption sites for organic molecules.
“and can result in additional adsorption sites for organic molecules (Prendergast-Miller et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Prendergast-Miller et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar indirectly transfers electrons from the valence band to the conduction band in Fe minerals by generating electron-hole pairs producing reactive oxygen species by Fenton and Fenton-like reactions.
“and indirectly transfers electrons from the valence band to the conduction band in the Fe minerals by generating electron-hole pairs producing reactive oxygen species (O ⋅ - 2 , H 2 O 2 , HO ⋅ ) by Fenton and Fenton-like reactions (Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
When biochar is in contact with root hairs, in the presence of microbes, it has the capacity to store and release nutrient ions and electrons.
“Thus, when biochar is in contact with root hairs, in the presence of microbes, it has the capacity to store and release nutrient ions and electrons (Chew et al., 2020;Sun, Levin, et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chew et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sun, Levin, et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In flooded paddy soils, biochar and BCF particles can be encapsulated in an organo-mineral layer on the root surface.
“In flooded paddy soils, biochar and BCF particles can be encapsulated in an organo-mineral layer (Chew et al., 2020) on the root surface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chew et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The change in root membrane potential can facilitate uptake of nutrients when required by the plant.
“The change in root membrane potential can facilitate uptake of nutrients when required by the plant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
BCF attached to the root or located in the rhizosphere of rice grown in flooded soils significantly alters the pH and Eh around the root.
“BCF attached to the root or located in the rhizosphere of rice grown in flooded soils was observed to significantly alter the pH and Eh around the root”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chew et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
P availability can be low in Ca-rich and K-poor feedstocks such as sewage sludge because pyrolysis can convert plant-available organic P into inorganic P that is less available in the short term.
“However, P availability can be low in Ca-rich and K-poor feedstocks such as sewage sludge (Buss et al., 2018(Buss et al., , 2020;;Torres-Rojas et al., 2020;Wang et al., 2019) because pyrolysis can convert plant-available organic P into inorganic P that is less available in the short term (Buss et al., 2020;Rose et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Buss et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Torres-Rojas et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Adsorption of root exudates by biochar may cause dissolution of mineral compounds in biochar pores.
“Adsorption of root exudates by biochar may cause dissolution of mineral compounds in biochar pores (Wang et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Much of the N within the biochar C matrix (e.g., heterocyclic-N) is unavailable to plants.
“Much of the N within the biochar C matrix (e.g., heterocyclic-N) is unavailable to plants (Clough et al., 2013;Torres-Rojas et al., 2020),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Clough et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Torres-Rojas et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The effect of biochar on P availability is determined by microscale effects on soil pH and soil solution composition, especially Ca content.
“The effect of biochar on P availability is determined by microscale effects on soil pH and soil solution composition, especially Ca content (Buss, Assavavittayanon, et al., 2018;Buss et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buss, Assavavittayanon, et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Buss et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Dissolution of mineral compounds in biochar pores can increase nutrient availability.
“which can increase nutrient availability”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Biochar addition to soils resulted in average decreases in plant tissue concentrations of Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn by 38%, 39%, 25%, and 17%, respectively.
“A meta-analysis found biochar addition to soils resulted in average decreases in plant tissue concentrations of Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn by 38%, 39%, 25%, and 17%, respectively (Chen et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Surface O-functional groups on biochar can immobilize heavy metals through ion exchange, precipitation, cation and anion metal attraction, reduction, electron shuttling, and physisorption.
“The surface O-functional groups on biochar can immobilize heavy metals through ion exchange, precipitation, cation and anion metal attraction, reduction, electron shuttling, and physisorption (Figure 2; Ahmad et al., 2014;Ding et al., 2014;Liu, Xu, et al., 2018;Tan et al., 2015;Zheng et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ahmad et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ding et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Liu, Xu, et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
High-temperature willow biochar adsorbs heavy metals from sewage sludge through physisorption and other mechanisms.
“High-temperature willow biochar was found to adsorb heavy metals from sewage sludge through both physisorption and the mechanisms described above (Bogusz et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bogusz et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The optimal rate for disease suppression does not always coincide with the optimum rate for growth response.
“However, the optimal rate for disease suppression does not always coincide with the optimum rate for growth response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Priming effect has been observed for abiotic environmental pressures such as salt, heat, cold, toxins, and drought.
“This effect has been observed also for abiotic environmental pressures such as salt, heat, cold, toxins, and drought (Ton & Maunch-Mani, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ton & Maunch-Mani, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many studies have shown that biochar can reduce uptake of heavy metal(loid)s by plants.
“Many studies have shown that biochar can reduce uptake of heavy metal(loid)s by plants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Plants in a primed state display faster and stronger activation of cellular defense responses upon encountering biotic stresses.
“Plants in a primed state display faster and stronger activation of cellular defense responses, such as earlier oxidative burst and stronger upregulation of defense genes, upon encountering biotic stresses (Conrath et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Conrath et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Stable precipitates formed in biochars with high P can immobilize Pb through formation of β-Pb9(PO4)6.
“Stable precipitates formed in biochars with high P can immobilize Pb through the formation of β-Pb 9 (PO 4 ) 6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cao & Harris, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Engineering biochars by adding magnetite nanoparticles can increase AEC and thus adsorb As.
“Engineering biochars through adding magnetite nanoparticles can increase AEC and thus adsorb As (Wan et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wan et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Release of Si from biochar, especially straw and rice husk biochars, increases disease resistance and plant growth by suppression of initial infection and pathogen access to plant tissues.
“release of Si from biochar (especially straw and rice husk biochars), reported to increase disease resistance and plant growth (Wang, Wang, et al., 2019) by suppression of initial infection and pathogen access to plant tissues”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang, Wang, et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Even feedstocks that contain high contents of heavy metals can reduce the bioavailability of some heavy metals in some soils.
“Even feedstocks that contain high contents of heavy metals can reduce the bioavailability of some heavy metals in some soils.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Higher alkalinity and calcite in biochar facilitate formation of insoluble hydrocerussite Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2.
“whereas higher alkalinity and calcite in biochar facilitate the formation of insoluble hydrocerussite Pb 3 (CO 3 ) 2 (OH) 2 (Cao & Harris, 2010;Li et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cao & Harris, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Adsorption by biochar of extracellular pathogenic enzymes and toxins lowers their concentrations in the root zone.
“adsorption by biochar of extracellular pathogenic enzymes and toxins (released by soil pathogens to dissolve and poison roots) lowering their concentrations in the root zone (Jaiswal, Frenkel, et al., 2018)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaiswal, Frenkel, et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can elicit systemic resistance in plants against diseases in numerous pathosystems.
“Besides the impacts of biochar on plant growth and development, it has been observed in numerous pathosystems that biochar can elicit systemic resistance in plants against diseases (Frenkel et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frenkel et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Chemolithotroph bacteria can grow on surfaces of microagglomerates of clay and Fe nanoparticles and make S and Fe more available to plants.
“Chemolithotroph bacteria can grow on the surfaces of microagglomerates of clay and Fe nanoparticles and make S and Fe more available to plants (Ye et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ye et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar induces systemic acquired resistance through upregulation of genes and pathways associated with plant defense and growth.
“induced systemic acquired resistance through upregulation of genes and pathways associated with plant defense and growth (Jaiswal et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaiswal et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Studies showing significant reduction in bioavailability of heavy metals have often applied high rates of biochar, in excess of 10 Mg ha -1.
“Studies showing significant reduction in bioavailability of heavy metals have often applied high rates of biochar, in excess of 10 Mg ha -1 (Chen et al., 2018;Wang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar adsorbs and deactivates plant signaling molecules that induce germination of parasitic weed seeds.
“adsorption and deactivation of plant signaling molecules that induce germination of parasitic weed seeds (Eizenberg et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eizenberg et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The impact of biochar on plant disease is a function of biochar dose and type.
“The impact of biochar on plant disease is a function of biochar dose and type (physical/chemical characteristics, as discussed above; Frenkel et al., 2017;Poveda et al., 2021;Rogovska et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Frenkel et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Poveda et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rogovska et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar in the growing medium can prime plants for rapid upregulation of defense-related genes.
“Biochar in the growing medium can “prime” plants (Ton & Maunch-Mani, 2003) for rapid upregulation of defense-related genes (Elad et al., 2010;Jaiswal et al., 2014Jaiswal et al., , 2015Jaiswal et al., , 2017Jaiswal et al., , 2020;;Jaiswal, Elad, et al., 2018;Kolton et al., 2017;Kumar et al., 2021;Mehari et al., 2015;Meller Harel et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ton & Maunch-Mani, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Elad et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jaiswal et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Particles on the surface of biochars consisting of carbon-coated minerals are particularly effective in reducing bioavailability of heavy metals.
“Particles on the surface of biochars consisting of carboncoated minerals are particularly effective in reducing bioavailability of heavy metals (Kumar & Prasad, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kumar & Prasad, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can increase mobility of anionic metalloids such as As through a decrease in positively charged sites, which decreases binding sites for As as soil pH increases.
“Biochar can increase the mobility of anionic metalloids such as As (e.g., AsO 3 - 4 , AsO 3 - 3 ; Igalavithana et al., 2017) through a decrease in positively charged sites, which decreases the binding sites for As as soil pH increases (Vithanage et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Igalavithana et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vithanage et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Aggregation can protect biochar and newly added organic matter, stabilizing new C for long periods in soil.
“Aggregation can protect biochar and newly added organic matter, stabilizing new C for long periods in soil.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Rates that are beneficial for plant growth in non-diseased systems can result in disease promotion in pathogen-infected systems.
“Rates that are beneficial for plant growth in non-diseased systems can result in disease promotion in pathogen-infected systems (Jaiswal et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaiswal et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis reported an increase in crop yield over multiple years after a single biochar application where fertilizer was applied.
“In their meta-analysis, Ye et al. (2020) reported an increase in crop yield over multiple years after a single biochar application, where fertilizer was applied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ye et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Porous organomineral heterogeneous microagglomerates with mineral phases including Fe, Al, Si oxides, phosphates, carbonates, and chlorides, and dimensions from 1 to 50 nm, form and bond to the biochar surface.
“Two studies identified the formation of porous organomineral heterogeneous microagglomerates with mineral phases consisting of Fe, Al, Si oxides, phosphates (Ca/Fe/ Al), carbonates (Ca/Mg), and chlorides (K, Na), and dimensions from 1 to 50 nm, bound together by organic compounds and bonded to the biochar surface (Archanjo et al., 2017;Rafiq et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Archanjo et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rafiq et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Colloidal aged biochar particles may be more mobile in soil than fresh biochar.
“Colloidal aged biochar particles consisting of microagglomerates and fragments of the C matrix may be more mobile in soil than fresh biochar (Wang, Zhang, et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang, Zhang, et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Improved pepper plant productivity in biochar-treated plots under extreme environmental pressures was attributed to biochar-elicited acclimation responses.
“Improved pepper plant productivity in biochar-treated plots in a multi-year trial conducted under extreme environmental pressures (high evaporation demand and vapor pressure deficit, high daytime temperatures (heat stress) at planting and low nighttime temperatures at fruiting, brackish water irrigation) was attributed to biochar-elicited acclimation responses in the plants (Kumar, Elad, et al., 2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kumar, Elad, et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A substantial fraction of biochar in Terra Preta soils remained in particulate form, protected by Fe and Al oxides.
“Observations of Terra Preta soils identified that a substantial fraction of the biochar remained in particulate form, protected by Fe and Al oxides (Glaser et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glaser et al., 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Disturbance through cultivation, wetting-drying and freeze-thaw cycles, and ingestion by soil fauna can lead to fragmentation of biochar particles and oxidation of biochar surfaces.
“Disturbance through cultivation, exposure to wetting-drying and freeze-thaw cycles, and ingestion by soil fauna can lead to further fragmentation of biochar particles and oxidation of biochar surfaces exposed through detachment of microagglomerates (Wang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Aged high-temperature wood biochar particles retain plant-available N as nitrates and ammonium adsorbed onto organo-mineral microagglomerates.
“Aged high-temperature wood biochar particles retain plant-available N as nitrates and ammonium, adsorbed onto the organo-mineral microagglomerates (Haider et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haider et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reduction in uptake of Cd and Pb from a highly contaminated soil was sustained over 3 years after a single application of wheat straw biochar.
“For example, the reduction in uptake of Cd and Pb from a highly contaminated soil was sustained over 3 years after a single application of wheat straw biochar (Bian et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bian et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Biochar particles can be protected within soil microaggregates.
“Biochar particles can also be protected within the soil microaggregates (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Simultaneous occurrence of Fe(II) and Fe(III) as magnetite and hematite could make N and P more available through redox cycling of Fe.
“Simultaneous occurrence of Fe(II) and Fe(III) present as magnetite and hematite could make N and P more available through redox cycling of Fe (Haider et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haider et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Tests with heat stress and biochar in Arabidopsis indicated early microstresses primed plants to cope better with subsequent acute heat stress.
“Tests with heat stress and biochar in Arabidopsis indicated early microstresses primed the plants to cope better with subsequent acute heat stress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Bioavailability of heavy metals can increase or decrease as biochar ages in soil.
“The bioavailability of heavy metals has been observed to increase or decrease as biochar ages in soil (Wang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Terra Preta soils provide evidence of very long-term reactions of biochar in soil.
“The biochar-enriched anthropogenic Terra Preta soils associated with pre-Columbian settlements in the Brazilian Amazon (Steiner et al., 2009) provide evidence of very long-term reactions of biochar in soil.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Steiner et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Terra Preta soils are valid analogues for long-term aging of modern biochar.
- Interpretationreasoning
Application of biochar to contaminated soils could reduce heavy metal bioavailability via direct interactions and indirect interactions that immobilize heavy metals through modification of soil properties.
“Application of biochar to contaminated soils could reduce heavy metal bioavailability via (1) direct interactions between biochar and heavy metals, and (2) indirect interactions that immobilize heavy metals through modification of soil properties (see Section 2.2.3)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Rasse et al. (2017) found a similar rate of decomposition of Miscanthus biochar between laboratory and field conditions over a 90 day incubation period.
“although Rasse et al. (2017) found a similar rate of decomposition of Miscanthus biochar between laboratory and field conditions over a 90 day incubation period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rasse et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Increase in soil CEC following biochar application can reduce bioavailability of cationic heavy metals.
“Increase in soil CEC following biochar application can also reduce the bioavailability of cationic heavy metals (Mohamed et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mohamed et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar increased P availability on average by a factor of 4.6.
“A meta-analysis by Glaser and Lehr (2019) found availability of P increased on average by a factor of 4.6 in response to biochar application.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glaser and Lehr, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Selecting appropriate biochar type suited to soil properties, plant type, and specific heavy metal can result in effective remediation while safeguarding food quality.
“Therefore, selecting the appropriate biochar type to address heavy metal contamination, suited to the soil properties, type of plant, and specific heavy metal, can result in effective remediation while safeguarding food quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This response most likely reflects physicochemical and microbial changes that improve soil health as biochar ages, rather than a simple soil pH response.
“This response most likely reflects the physicochemical and microbial changes that improve soil health as biochar ages (Section 2.3), rather than a simple soil pH response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Due to high persistence, biochar can contribute significantly to long-term C sequestration.
“Due to this high persistence, biochar can contribute significantly to long-term C sequestration (Lehmann, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lehmann, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Remediation efficacy of biochar for heavy metal contamination depends on type of biochar, biogeochemical properties of soil, plant species, and specific heavy metal.
“the remediation efficacy depends on the type of biochar, biogeochemical properties of soil, plant species, and the specific heavy metal (Albert et al., 2020;Palansooriya et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Albert et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Palansooriya et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In two studies using BCF, N partial factor productivity increased by 37%-74%.
“Similarly, in two studies using BCF, N partial factor productivity increased by 37%-74% (Joseph, Graber, et al., 2013;Qian et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Joseph, Graber, et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Qian et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Mean residence times calculated from incubations are around 10 times lower than under field conditions.
“Kuzyakov et al. (2009) suggested that mean residence times calculated from incubations (Table 2), which maintain optimal conditions for decomposition, are around 10 times lower than under field conditions (Kuzyakov et al., 2009)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kuzyakov et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Grass and straw biochars increase water-holding capacity to a greater extent than woody biochars.
“Grass and straw biochars increase water-holding capacity to a greater extent than woody biochars (Burrell et al., 2016;Kroeger et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Burrell et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kroeger et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar application can alter soil Eh, impacting speciation, mobility, and bioavailability of anionic heavy metalloids such as As.
“Biochar application can also alter soil Eh, impacting the speciation, mobility, and bioavailability of anionic heavy metalloids such as As (Yuan et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yuan et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
The very slow decomposition of biochar compared to unpyrolyzed biomass is attributed to its aromatic structure resulting from chemical transformations during carbonization.
“The very slow decomposition of biochar in comparison to unpyrolyzed biomass is attributed to its aromatic structure, which results from chemical transformations of biomass during carbonization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The majority of C in biochar has a mean residence time in the range of hundreds and thousands of years.
“Unlike other forms of biomass that are rapidly decomposed in soil, the majority of C in biochar has a mean residence time in the range of hundreds and thousands of years (Schmidt et al., 2011;Wang et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Schmidt et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Negative effects on yields can result from reduction in soil N and P availability, especially at high rates of high temperature biochars.
“Negative effects can result from reduction in soil N and P availability (Nielsen et al., 2014;Prommer et al., 2014) especially at high rates of high temperature biochars (Kammann et al., 2015) through binding mechanisms described in Section 2.2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Nielsen et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Prommer et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kammann et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The kinetics of formation of the fused aromatic C structure depend on rate of heating, ratio of lignin to cellulose and hemicellulose, time at HTT, and mineral content.
“The kinetics of formation of the fused aromatic C structure depend on the rate of heating, the ratio of lignin to cellulose and hemicellulose, time at the HTT, and mineral content (Budai et al., 2014;Leng & Huang, 2018;Rawal et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Budai et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Leng & Huang, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rawal et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Yield responses were greater in the third year after a single application when fertilizer was applied with biochar.
“Importantly, Ye et al. (2020) identified that yield responses were greater in the third year after a single application, when fertilizer was applied with the biochar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ye et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Heavy metals may be present in biochar produced from feedstocks such as sewage sludge and treated timber.
“Heavy metals may be present in biochar produced from feedstocks such as sewage sludge and treated timber.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Movement of biochar through the soil profile can increase persistence in some soil types.
“The movement of biochar through the soil profile can increase persistence in some soil types (Singh et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singh et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
The largely amorphous structure of biochars pyrolyzed at temperatures in excess of 400-450°C has been found to be persistent.
“The largely amorphous structure of biochars pyrolyzed at temperatures in excess of 400-450°C has been found to be persistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Minerals present in biochar, especially Si and P, can increase persistence of biochar-C.
“Minerals present in biochar, especially Si and P, can increase persistence of biochar-C (Xu et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xu et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can lower denitrification by decreasing total denitrification activity.
“and (ii) decreasing total denitrification activity (Cayuela et al., 2013;Weldon et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cayuela et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weldon et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can lower denitrification by facilitating the last step of denitrification, the transformation of N2O to N2.
“Biochar can lower denitrification (the reduction of NO - 3 to N 2 ) by: (i) facilitating the last step of denitrification (the transformation of N 2 O to N 2 )”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cayuela et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weldon et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Premisecitation
N2O can be transformed to NH3, pyridine, or pyrrole compounds on biochar surfaces, thus decreasing N2O emissions.
“It has also been shown that N 2 O can be transformed to NH 3 , pyridine, or pyrrole compounds on biochar surfaces, thus decreasing N 2 O emissions (Quin et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quin et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Premisecitation
The decrease in denitrification may result from a decrease in availability of nitrate and bioavailable C substrate.
“The decrease in denitrification may result from decrease in availability of NO 3 -and bioavailable C substrate (Fiorentino et al., 2019;Hagemann, Kammann, et al., 2017;Heaney et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fiorentino et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hagemann, Kammann, et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Heaney et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Premisecitation
In a subtropical pasture, a 13C-depleted hardwood biochar initiated positive priming up to 0.15 Mg C ha -1 over 62 days, switching to negative priming after 188 days in presence of plants.
“In a subtropical pasture on a Rhodic Ferralsol, a 13 C-depleted hardwood biochar (450°C) initiated positive priming up to 0.15 Mg C ha -1 over 62 days, switching to negative priming after 188 days in the presence of plants (Weng et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weng et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Abiotic processes, in particular with biochars containing high Fe and Mn content, can directly catalyze the reduction of N2O to N2.
“Abiotic processes, in particular with biochars containing high Fe and Mn content (see Section 2.2.1), can directly catalyze the reduction of N 2 O to N 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Interpretationcitation
There is solid evidence that biochar can mitigate soil N2O and CH4 emissions from soil, at least in the short and medium term.
“there is solid evidence that biochar can mitigate soil N 2 O and CH 4 emissions from soil, at least in the short and medium term”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Borchard et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cayuela et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cayuela et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Rests on an assumption: Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.
- Premisecitation
The elemental ratio H/C org has been identified as a simple and reliable parameter for characterizing biochar persistence.
“The elemental ratio of hydrogen to organic C expressed as H/C org has been identified as a simple and reliable parameter for characterizing biochar persistence and recommendations for conservative thresholds have been provided (Budai et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Budai et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Further heat converts the C matrix to a highly persistent three-dimensional nanographitic structure at around 600°C.
“Further heat converts the C matrix to a highly persistent three-dimensional nanographitic structure at around 600°C (McDonald-Wharry et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McDonald-Wharry et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a 6-year field experiment, SOC stocks increased by 14 Mg C ha -1 , twice the quantity of C added in biochar, as a result of negative priming.
“In a 6-year field experiment where woody biochar was applied to corn and bioenergy crops, SOC stocks increased by 14 Mg C ha -1 , twice the quantity of C added in the biochar, as a result of negative priming (Blanco-Canqui et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blanco-Canqui et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is some evidence that biochar persistence decreases as ambient temperature increases.
“There is some evidence that biochar persistence decreases as ambient temperature increases (Fang et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fang et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biochar can facilitate the reduction of N2O to N2 by changing the relative abundance and composition of N2O-reducing microbial communities.
“changing the relative abundance and composition of N 2 O-reducing microbial communities (Harter, Weigold, et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harter, Weigold, et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Interpretationcitation
Temperature thresholds identified in transformation processes can indicate persistence.
“Temperature thresholds identified in the transformation processes can indicate persistence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Early meta-analyses on N2O emissions showed very high mitigation, around 50% reductions, of N2O with biochar.
“Early meta-analyses on N 2 O emissions showed very high mitigation (around 50% reductions) of N 2 O with biochar”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cayuela et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cayuela et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Premisecitation
P and K are fully retained in biochar at typical pyrolysis temperatures of 300°-700°.
“Of the main plant nutrients, P and K are fully retained in biochar at typical pyrolysis temperatures (300°-700°) (Bridle & Pritchard, 2004;Buss et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bridle & Pritchard, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Buss et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
There is strong evidence that biochar amendment reduces, on average, direct N2O emissions from soil, particularly when compared to other organic amendments.
“there is strong evidence that biochar amendment reduces (on average) direct N 2 O emissions from soil particularly when compared to other organic amendments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Premisecitation
Qian et al. (2014) found a decrease in N2O and CH4 emissions from paddy soil when a range of biochar-based BCFs was compared with NPK fertilizers.
“Qian et al. (2014) found a decrease in N 2 O and CH 4 emissions from paddy soil when a range of biochar-based BCFs was compared with NPK fertilizers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Qian et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.
- Premisecitation
The effect of biochar on N2O emissions might diminish with time as biochar ages in soil.
“The effect of biochar might diminish with time, as biochar ages in soil (Borchard et al., 2019;Fungo et al., 2017;Liu, Zhang, et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Borchard et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fungo et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Liu, Zhang, et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Premisecitation
Xia et al. (2018) found an average increase of 22% in N2O emissions when straw was applied.
“Xia et al. (2018) found an average increase of 22% in N 2 O emissions when straw was applied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xia et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis focusing on vegetable fields in China found that biochar application decreased yield-scaled N2O emissions by an average of 35%.
“A meta-analysis focusing on vegetable fields in China also found that biochar application decreased yieldscaled N 2 O emissions by an average of 35% (Gu et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gu et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most organic contaminants are destroyed with high efficiency during pyrolysis, by thermal degradation and volatilization followed by destruction during vapor combustion.
“most organic contaminants are destroyed with high efficiency during pyrolysis, by thermal degradation and volatilization followed by destruction during vapor combustion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Zielińska & Oleszczuk, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bridle et al., 1990
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kundu et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Some sewage sludge biochars contain as much as 6%-20% total P.
“some sewage sludge biochars contain as much as 6%-20% total P (Faria et al., 2018;Roberts et al., 2017;Shepherd et al., 2016;Zhang et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Faria et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Roberts et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shepherd et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A dose of 10-20 Mg ha-1 has been found to significantly reduce N2O emissions.
“A dose of 10-20 Mg ha -1 has been found to significantly reduce N 2 O emissions (Borchard et al., 2019;Cayuela et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Borchard et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cayuela et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Interpretationnone given
Biochar can support the development of a circular economy at regional and farm scale by improving nutrient recovery and nutrient use efficiency.
“Biochar can support the development of a circular economy at regional and farm scale by improving nutrient recovery and nutrient use efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The economic case for biochar production is strongest for biochar made from residue materials, especially when the residues contain high concentrations of nutrients, such as animal manures and sewage sludge.
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis on manure application to soil found an average increase of 33% in N2O emissions compared to synthetic fertilizer.
“a meta-analysis on manure application to soil found an average increase of 33% in N 2 O emissions compared to synthetic fertilizer (Zhou, Zhu, et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou, Zhu, et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Premisecitation
Biochars produced by slow pyrolysis, with high degree of carbonization, high pH, and high surface area, are most effective in suppressing N2O emissions.
“Biochars produced by slow pyrolysis, with high degree of carbonization, high pH, and high surface area, are most effective in suppressing N 2 O emissions (Borchard et al., 2019;Cayuela et al., 2015;Weldon et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Borchard et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cayuela et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weldon et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
- Interpretationreasoning
Biochar systems contribute to building a circular economy.
“Biochar systems (Figure 5) thereby contribute to building a circular economy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The economic case for biochar production is strongest for biochar made from residue materials, especially when the residues contain high concentrations of nutrients, such as animal manures and sewage sludge.
- Rests on an assumption: Pyrolysis gases can be captured for use as a renewable energy product.
- Interpretationreasoning
Soil and plant responses to addition of biochar can be negative, positive, or neutral, depending on many variables, including feedstock and pyrolysis temperature, application rate and method, and application context.
“Soil and plant responses to addition of biochar can be negative, positive, or neutral, depending on many variables, including feedstock and pyrolysis temperature, application rate and method, and application context (crop, soil type, and environmental and biological stresses).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Significant yield increases occur where site-specific soil constraints, nutrient and water limitations are addressed by appropriate biochar formulations applied at an optimal application rate.
“Significant yield increases occur where site-specific soil constraints, nutrient and water limitations are addressed by appropriate biochar formulations applied at an optimal application rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Controlled release biochar-fertilizer combinations can be effective at low application rates when applied in a band near the seed/plant.
“and these can be effective at low application rates when applied in a band near the seed/plant (Qian et al., 2014;Schmidt et al., 2015;Yao et al., 2015;Zheng et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Qian et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schmidt et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yao et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The microscale processes on the biochar surface and in the rhizosphere mediate the macro responses of plants to biochar.
“The microscale processes on the biochar surface and in the rhizosphere mediate the macro responses of plants to biochar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 147
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWood biochars pyrolyzed above 450-500°C have a mean residence time of hundreds to a thousand years, compared with decades for manure biochars.
“Wood biochars pyrolyzed at temperatures above 450-500°C have a mean residence time of hundreds to a thousand years, compared with decades for manure biochars (Kuzyakov et al., 2014;Kuzyakov & Gavrichkova, 2009;Singh et al., 2012Singh et al., , 2015;;Wang et al., 2016; Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kuzyakov et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Singh et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAs biochar ages, it is incorporated into soil aggregates, protecting the biochar carbon and promoting the stabilization of rhizodeposits and microbial products.
“As biochar ages, it is incorporated into soil aggregates, protecting the biochar carbon and promoting the stabilization of rhizodeposits and microbial products.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe greatest crop yield increases with biochar addition occur in sandy soils in drylands due to increase in nutrient retention and water holding capacity.
“and in sandy soils in drylands due to increase in nutrient retention and water holding capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen used wisely, biochar mitigates climate change and supports food security and the circular economy.
“We demonstrate how, when used wisely, biochar mitigates climate change and supports food security and the circular economy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBiochars can be tailored to address site constraints through feedstock selection, by modifying pyrolysis conditions, through pre- or postproduction treatments, or co-application with organic or mineral fertilizers.
“Biochars can be tailored to address site constraints through feedstock selection, by modifying pyrolysis conditions, through pre-or postproduction treatments, or co-application with organic or mineral fertilizers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany studies report that biochar increases plant productivity, with an average yield increase of 10%-42%, although negative effects have also been recorded.
“Many studies report that biochar increases plant productivity, with an average yield increase of 10%-42% (Table 1), although negative effects have also been recorded (Jeffery et al., 2017;Macdonald et al., 2014;Ye et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Jeffery et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Macdonald et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ye et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEconomic analyses suggest that formulations combining biochar with fertilizer (BCF), applied at low rates, are likely to be the most cost-effective approach for broadacre cropping in higher income countries.
“Economic analyses suggest that formulations combining biochar with fertilizer (biochar compound fertilizer [BCF]), applied at low rates, are likely to be the most cost-effective approach for broadacre cropping in higher income countries (Robb et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Robb et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBiochars can affect seed germination, plant growth, flowering, resistance to disease, and acclimation to abiotic stresses.
“In terms of plant performance, biochars can affect seed germination, plant growth, flowering, resistance to disease, and acclimation to abiotic stresses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHTTs above 500°C produced biochars that were more persistent in soil, with higher ash contents and pHs.
“HTTs above 500°C produced biochars that were more persistent in soil, with higher ash contents and pHs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar is a reductant, and therefore lowers soil redox potential.
“Biochar is a reductant, and therefore lowers soil redox potential (Joseph et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Joseph et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe CEC and AEC of biochar increase over time as additional functional groups form on biochar surfaces, increasing its ability to sorb and retain cations and anions.
“However, the CEC and AEC of biochar increase over time as additional functional groups form on biochar surfaces (see Section 2.3), increasing its ability to sorb and retain cations and anions (Hagemann, Joseph, et al., 2017;Hagemann et al., 2017;Rechberger et al., 2017;de la Rosa et al., 2018;Wang et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hagemann, Joseph, et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hagemann et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rechberger et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe increase in solutes increases the electrical conductivity and pH and reduces Eh.
“which increases the electrical conductivity and pH and reduces Eh (Joseph et al., 2015)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Joseph et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost biochars are alkaline, with acid-neutralizing capacity up to 33% of agricultural lime due to their carbonate, oxide, and hydroxide content.
“Most biochars are alkaline, with acid-neutralizing capacity up to 33% of agricultural lime (Van Zwieten, Kimber, Morris, Chan, et al., 2010) due to their carbonate, oxide, and hydroxide content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Zwieten, Kimber, Morris, Chan, et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenUse of biochar in annual crops has been the most commonly studied application to date and is anticipated to be the most widespread future application of biochar.
“Use of biochar in annual crops has been the most commonly studied application to date and is anticipated to be the most widespread future application of biochar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese solutes increase dissolved organic carbon (DOC), cations, and anions in the soil solution.
“These solutes increase dissolved organic carbon (DOC), cations, and anions in the soil solution (Silber et al., 2010),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Silber et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHydrophobicity can inhibit water uptake by biochar particles, but this effect dissipates over time.
“Hydrophobicity can inhibit water uptake by biochar particles (Gray et al., 2014), but this effect dissipates over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gray et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLow-temperature biochars (HTT < 450°C) and biochars produced in facilities with incomplete separation of pyrolysis vapors generally have higher contents of water-soluble organic compounds.
“Low-temperature biochars (HTT < 450°C) and biochars produced in facilities with incomplete separation of pyrolysis vapors (Buss & Mašek, 2014;Buss et al., 2015) generally have higher contents of water-soluble organic compounds, particularly low molecular weight neutrals (alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, phenolics, karrikins), polyphenols/polyphenolic acids, and complex macromolecules,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buss & Mašek, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Buss et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAfter the initial rapid dissolution stage, continued dissolution is faster in acidic and low-nutrient soils.
“After the initial rapid dissolution stage, continued dissolution is faster in acidic (Silber et al., 2010) and low-nutrient soils (Wang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Silber et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBiochar C persists in soil for one to two orders of magnitude longer than unpyrolyzed organic residues, providing long-term C sequestration when applied to soil.
“Biochar C persists in soil for one to two orders of magnitude longer than unpyrolyzed organic residues, providing long-term C sequestration when applied to soil.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWood biochar (HTT 620°C) at 80 Mg ha-1 in a pot trial inhibited germination of tomatoes, while biochar made from paper sludge and wheat husk (500°C) or sewage sludge (600°C), and applied at the same rate, had no effect on lentil, tomato, cress, cucumber, and lettuce seeds.
“For example, wood biochar (HTT 620°C) at 80 Mg ha -1 in a pot trial inhibited germination of tomatoes, while biochar made from paper sludge and wheat husk (500°C) or sewage sludge (600°C), and applied at the same rate, had no effect on lentil, tomato, cress, cucumber, and lettuce seeds (Gascó et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gascó et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe acceleration of oxidation is especially intensive in soils with fluctuating water level or with high content of iron (oxyhydr)oxides.
“and is especially intensive in soils with fluctuating water level (Merino et al., 2020) or with high content of iron (oxyhydr)oxides (Merino et al., 2020;Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Merino et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochars (especially those made at >400°C) can have a high content of free radicals, which can lead to the formation of reactive oxygen species and strongly accelerate oxidation reactions.
“Biochars (especially those made at >400°C) can have a high content of free radicals, which can lead to the formation of reactive oxygen species (Pignatello et al., 2017;Ruan et al., 2019;Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021) and strongly accelerate oxidation reactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pignatello et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ruan et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHormesis is commonly observed, that is, high rates of biochar can have a detrimental effect, while low rates can be stimulatory.
“Hormesis is commonly observed, that is, high rates of biochar can have a detrimental effect, while low rates can be stimulatory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGermination rates were not affected by the addition of BCF at <700 kg ha-1 in pot or field trials, while seedling growth was the same or greater than with NPK fertilizer alone.
“Germination rates were not affected by the addition of BCF at <700 kg ha -1 in pot or field trials, while seedling growth was the same or greater than with NPK fertilizer alone (Joseph, Graber, et al., 2013;Liao et al., 2020;Qian et al., 2014;Zheng et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Joseph, Graber, et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Liao et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Qian et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome studies that reported negative effects of biochar on germination at very high rates (120 Mg ha-1) applied biochar directly to seeds in a petri dish, in the absence of soil or other media, which is unlikely to reflect the effects of biochar in the field environment.
“Some studies (e.g., Uslu et al., 2020) that reported negative effects of biochar on germination at very high rates (120 Mg ha -1 ) applied biochar directly to seeds in a petri dish, in the absence of soil or other media, which is unlikely to reflect the effects of biochar in the field environment, where charged clay minerals, microbes, and organic compounds interact with biochar, and are likely to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Uslu et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese small particles are more mobile and can have higher reactivity, surface charge, radical content, and surface area than larger particles, which can increase reactivity and nutrient availability.
“These small particles are more mobile and can have higher reactivity, surface charge, radical content (Das et al., 2020;Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021) and surface area than larger particles (Yang et al., 2020), which can increase reactivity and nutrient availability (Wang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Das et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar particles have low density and are easily crushed.
“Biochar particles have low density and are easily crushed (Abdullah & Wu, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abdullah & Wu, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFree radicals associated with biochar have been found to degrade certain organic and inorganic pollutants which in turn could enhance germination and seedling growth.
“Furthermore, free radicals associated with biochar have been found to degrade certain organic and inorganic pollutants (Ruan et al., 2019) which in turn could enhance germination and seedling growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ruan et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar affects the abundance of specific microorganisms especially in the rhizosphere, and the interactions between biochar, soil, plants, and the microbiome affect plant growth and health.
“Biochar affects the abundance of specific microorganisms especially in the rhizosphere, and the interactions between biochar, soil, plants, and the microbiome affect plant growth and health (Anderson et al., 2011;Jaiswal et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Anderson et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jaiswal et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome organic molecules released can be phytotoxic, so applying biochar a few weeks in advance of sowing supports seedling growth through the development of a beneficial rhizosphere microbiome.
“Yet, some organic molecules released can be phytotoxic, so applying biochar a few weeks in advance of sowing supports seedling growth through the development of a beneficial rhizosphere microbiome (Jaiswal et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaiswal et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningBy reducing soil bulk density and increasing soil aeration, biochar can provide oxygen for seed germination and improve seedling growth through lower resistance to root penetration and seedling emergence.
“For instance, by reducing soil bulk density and increasing soil aeration, biochar can provide oxygen for seed germination and improve seedling growth through lower resistance to root penetration and seedling emergence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLow temperature biochars have a higher content of water-soluble organic molecules that can promote germination and early growth at low application rates; these biochars are also likely to cause inhibition if applied at high rates.
“These effects vary between biochars: low temperature biochars have a higher content of water-soluble organic molecules that can promote germination and early growth at low application rates; these biochars are also likely to cause inhibition if applied at high rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPhenols and polyphenols released from biochar can break seed dormancy, leading to germination, and also promote seedling growth.
“Similarly, phenols and polyphenols released from biochar (Reynolds et al., 2018) can break seed dormancy, leading to germination, and also promote seedling growth (Mu et al., 2003;Stoms, 1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Reynolds et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mu et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stoms, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar can lower the production of reactive oxygen species by plants: Natasha et al. (2021) showed that the production of reactive oxygen species was lower, on average, by 33% in plants grown in soils contaminated with trace elements where biochar was applied (2%-10% w/w).
“In addition, biochar can lower the production of reactive oxygen species by plants: Natasha et al. (2021) showed that the production of reactive oxygen species was lower, on average, by 33% in plants grown in soils contaminated with trace elements where biochar was applied (2%-10% w/w).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Natasha et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMost biochars and biochar formulations do not inhibit germination and early growth of plants in soil unless applied at very high rates (e.g., >40-50 Mg ha-1), and can promote germination and seedling growth at moderate rates.
“In summary, most biochars and biochar formulations do not inhibit germination and early growth of plants in soil unless applied at very high rates (e.g., >40-50 Mg ha -1 ), and can promote germination and seedling growth at moderate rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNegative effects on germination can result where high rates are applied due to release of soluble salts or phytotoxic levels of organic compounds, where biochar is contaminated, and where soil is absent.
“Negative effects on germination can result where high rates are applied due to release of soluble salts or phytotoxic levels of organic compounds, where biochar is contaminated, and where soil is absent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe quantity of karrikins and germination response varied widely between biochars studied by Kochanek et al. (2016).
“The quantity of karrikins and germination response varied widely between biochars studied by Kochanek et al. (2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kochanek et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe mechanisms for the positive effects largely involve water-soluble organic compounds that stimulate germination and seedling growth, or reactions that deactivate inhibitory factors such as heavy metals and phytotoxic organic compounds.
“The mechanisms for the positive effects largely involve water-soluble organic compounds that stimulate germination and seedling growth, or reactions that deactivate inhibitory factors such as heavy metals and phytotoxic organic compounds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPAHs in biochar are generally of little or no concern for plant growth due to their strong binding by biochar, and their concentration is usually below regulatory limits if biochar is made under slow pyrolysis conditions.
“However, PAHs in biochar are generally of little or no concern for plant growth due to their strong binding by biochar, and furthermore, their concentration is usually below regulatory limits if biochar is made under slow pyrolysis conditions (Buss et al., 2015;Hale et al., 2012;Hilber et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Buss et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hale et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hilber et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRoot hairs enter biochar pores, roots wrap around biochar, and very small biochar particles can attach to root surfaces.
“Root hairs enter biochar pores, roots wrap around biochar (Joseph et al., 2010;Prendergast-Miller et al., 2014), and very small biochar particles can attach to root surfaces (Figure 1; Chew et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Joseph et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Prendergast-Miller et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chew et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSmall biochar particles can migrate to the root surface and can alter the abundance of specific root-associated bacteria.
“Small biochar particles can migrate to the root surface and can alter the abundance of specific root-associated bacteria (Chew et al., 2020;Kolton et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chew et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kolton et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn low P soils, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) invade the pores of biochar, especially biochars with high P content on the pore surface, which can increase plant P uptake.
“In low P soils, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) invade the pores of biochar, especially biochars with high P content on the pore surface, which can increase plant P uptake (Gujre et al., 2020;Solaiman et al., 2019;Vanek & Lehmann, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gujre et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Solaiman et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vanek & Lehmann, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analyses have shown that biochar increases microbial biomass and activities, particularly in high-N soils and with biochars produced at low temperature from nutrient-rich feedstocks.
“Meta-analyses have shown that biochar increases microbial biomass and activities (Pokharel et al., 2020), particularly in high-N soils (Zhang et al., 2018) and with biochars produced at low temperature from nutrient-rich feedstocks (Li et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Pokharel et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhang et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationThe increase in enzyme activities and shift in microbial community diversity and activity are directly dependent on strong increase in hydrophobic compounds in soil that favors activity of fungi.
“and (iv) strong increase in hydrophobic compounds in soil that favors activity of fungi (Deng et al., 2021;Xia et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Deng et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xia et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe increase in enzyme activities and shift in microbial community diversity and activity are directly dependent on increased aeration, and consequently, better conditions for fungi and aerobic bacteria, as well as oxidative enzymes.
“(ii) increased aeration, and consequently, better conditions for fungi and aerobic bacteria, as well as oxidative enzymes;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe increase in enzyme activities as well as the shift in microbial community diversity and activity are directly dependent on pH increase after biochar addition, as soil acidity is the main factor regulating microbial composition.
“This increase in enzyme activities as well as the shift in microbial community diversity and activity (Jaiswal, Elad, et al., 2018) are directly dependent on (i) pH increase after biochar addition, as soil acidity is the main factor regulating microbial composition (Rousk et al., 2010);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jaiswal, Elad, et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rousk et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLi et al. (2020) noted a negative effect of high biochar rates (>50 Mg ha-1) on microbial diversity, and suggested potential causes: introduction of toxic components that inhibit some species; increase in the C:N ratios of SOM that limits microbial C utilization; and disruption of microbial microenvironments.
“Li et al. (2020) noted a negative effect of high biochar rates (>50 Mg ha -1 ) on microbial diversity, and suggested the following potential causes: (i) introduction of toxic components that inhibit some species; (ii) increase in the C:N ratios of SOM that limits microbial C utilization, possibly only in the short term and only to the extent that the organic C is metabolized; and (iii) disruption”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBlackwell et al. (2015) found that a phosphorus-enhanced BCF increased root colonization to 75% compared with 20% in mineral fertilizer and unfertilized control and increased P uptake efficiency.
“Blackwell et al. (2015) found that a phosphorus-enhanced BCF increased root colonization to 75% compared with 20% in mineral fertilizer and unfertilized control and increased P uptake efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Blackwell et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe surface area and porosity increase, and a fine layer of organic matter with a high concentration of C-O and C-N functional groups forms around the external and some of the internal pore surfaces of the biochar and BCF.
“The surface area and porosity increase (Schreiter et al., 2020), and a fine layer of organic matter with a high concentration of C-O and C-N functional groups forms around the external and some of the internal pore surfaces of the biochar and BCF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schreiter et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe adsorption of root exudates, microbial metabolites, and microbial necromass increases SOM levels and thus increases soil organic carbon (SOC).
“The adsorption of root exudates, microbial metabolites, and microbial necromass increases SOM levels and thus increases soil organic carbon (SOC; see Section 4.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThese layers are redox-active and mesoporous.
“These layers are redox-active and mesoporous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGases such as NH3, N2O, and CH4 produced through biotic and abiotic reactions of fertilizers in soils and/or through chemical reactions on the surfaces of the biochar can diffuse into the nanopores (<50 nm), where they can react with oxidants and reductants, especially if the pores contain water, which reduces N loss and GHG emissions.
“Gases such as NH 3 , N 2 O, and CH 4 produced through biotic and abiotic reactions of fertilizers in soils and/or through chemical reactions on the surfaces of the biochar can diffuse into the nanopores (<50 nm), where they can react with oxidants and reductants, especially if the pores contain water, which reduces N loss and GHG emissions (Section 4.3; Chiu & Huang, 2020;Quin et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chiu & Huang, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Quin et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe increase in enzyme activities and shift in microbial community diversity and activity are directly dependent on changes in metabolic needs due to the prevalence of large organic compounds, and consequently, shift in the community toward K-strategists, decrease in gram-negative bacteria, shift toward saprophytic fungi, and increase in peroxidases.
“(iii) changes in metabolic needs due to the prevalence of large organic compounds, and consequently, shift in the community toward K-strategists (Cui et al., 2020), decrease in gram-negative bacteria, shift toward saprophytic fungi, and increase in peroxidases;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cui et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochars, particularly those made at low temperature from crop residues, cause shifts in microbial community composition, increasing the ratios of fungi to bacteria, and gram-positive to gram-negative bacteria.
“Biochars, particularly those made at low temperature from crop residues, cause shifts in microbial community composition, increasing the ratios of fungi to bacteria, and gram-positive to gram-negative bacteria (Zhang et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFungi and bacteria inhabit the larger nutrient-rich pores of biochar (>2 μm) where they mine the nutrients in the biochar and those that have been absorbed from fertilizers.
“Fungi and bacteria inhabit the larger nutrient-rich pores of biochar (>2 µm) where they mine the nutrients in the biochar and those that have been absorbed from fertilizers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar pores may become filled with organic matter and minerals, protecting organic matter from microbial decomposition and reduces availability of nutrients.
“Biochar pores may become filled with organic matter and minerals, protecting organic matter from microbial decomposition (Pignatello et al., 2017) and reduces availability of nutrients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pignatello et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe meta-analysis by Pokharel et al. (2020) identified that biochar increased microbial biomass C and the activities of the enzymes urease, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase by 22%, 23%, 25%, and 20%, respectively, with greatest effects in acidic fine-textured soils.
“The meta-analysis by Pokharel et al. (2020) identified that biochar increased microbial biomass C and the activities of the enzymes urease, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase by 22%, 23%, 25%, and 20%, respectively, with greatest effects in acidic fine-textured soils.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pokharel et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar can retain nutrients, especially N, released as fertilizers dissolve, and nutrients already present in soil, reducing loss through leaching.
“Biochar can retain nutrients, especially N, released as fertilizers dissolve, and nutrients already present in soil, reducing loss through leaching (Haider et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haider et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost K in biochar is present in soluble forms, released in the short term after application to soil, and is readily available to plants.
“whereas most K in biochar is present in soluble forms, released in the short term after application to soil (Silber et al., 2010), and is readily available to plants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Silber et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationBCF attached to the root or located in the rhizosphere of rice grown in flooded soils significantly alters the abundance of specific microorganisms that increase nutrient availability.
“and the abundance of specific microorganisms that increase nutrient availability (Chew et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chew et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile the stimulation of microbial activity by easily-mineralizable components of biochar can reduce N availability through microbial immobilization, it also accelerates the mineralization of organic matter and nutrient cycling, and AMF root colonization, which can increase N and P uptake by plants, and can also improve root growth under water stress.
“While the stimulation of microbial activity by easily-mineralizable components of biochar can reduce N availability through microbial immobilization (Clough et al., 2013), it also accelerates the mineralization of organic matter and nutrient cycling, and AMF root colonization, which can increase N and P uptake by plants, as discussed above (Solaiman et al., 2019) and can also improve root growth”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Clough et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Solaiman et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analyses have found that biochar application commonly increases P availability, particularly when applied to acidic or neutral soils, and for biochar produced from low C:N feedstocks (e.g., manure, crop residues), and produced at low temperatures.
“Meta-analyses have found that biochar application commonly increases P availability, particularly when applied to acidic or neutral soils, and for biochar produced from low C:N feedstocks (e.g., manure, crop residues), and produced at low temperatures (Gao et al., 2019;Glaser & Lehr, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gao et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Glaser & Lehr, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe opposite has also been observed, with pyrolysis increasing plant-available P although decreasing water-extractable P.
“The opposite has also been observed, with pyrolysis increasing plant-available P although decreasing water-extractable P (Wang et al., 2014;Zwetsloot et al., 2015Zwetsloot et al., , 2016)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zwetsloot et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationBCF attached to the root or located in the rhizosphere of rice grown in flooded soils significantly alters the root membrane potential.
“the root membrane potential (the potential difference between the inside of the root and the soil)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chew et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analysis found that biochar reduces N leaching on average by 26%, though it can increase ammonia volatilization at biochar application rates >40 Mg ha-1 and with biochar pH > 9.
“For example, meta-analysis found that biochar reduces N leaching on average by 26%, though it can increase ammonia volatilization at biochar application rates >40 Mg ha -1 and with biochar pH > 9 (Haider et al., 2020;Liu, Zhang, et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Haider et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Liu, Zhang, et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar can also adsorb pathogenic enzymes and toxic metabolites exuded by soil-borne pathogens, thus reducing the concentration of virulence factors in the root zone and lowering disease severity.
“Biochar can also adsorb pathogenic enzymes and toxic metabolites exuded by soil-borne pathogens, thus reducing the concentration of virulence factors in the root zone and lowering disease severity (Jaiswal et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaiswal et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdsorption of microbial signaling molecules (especially acyl-homoserine lactone) on biochar surfaces can disrupt soil microbial communication, which could reduce the effects of pathogens.
“Adsorption of microbial signaling molecules (especially acyl-homoserine lactone) on biochar surfaces can disrupt soil microbial communication, which could reduce the effects of pathogens (Gao et al., 2016;Masiello et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gao et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Masiello et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncorporation into organo-mineral microagglomerates can reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) through interaction with reduced Fe, organic compounds, and free radicals, reducing availability to plants.
“Incorporation into organo-mineral microagglomerates can reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) through interaction with reduced Fe, organic compounds, and free radicals (Odinga et al., 2020), including through electron shuttling (Xu et al., 2019), reducing their availability to plants (Kumar, Joseph, et al., 2018;Kumar et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Odinga et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xu et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kumar, Joseph, et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenGenerally, no impact of biochar on plant disease is found at low rates (<2 Mg ha -1 ), positive impacts at moderate rates (2-20 Mg ha -1 ), and negative impacts at relatively high rates (>50 Mg ha -1 ).
“Generally, no impact is found at low rates (<2 Mg ha -1 ), positive impacts are seen at moderate rates (2-20 Mg ha -1 ), and negative impacts at relatively high rates (>50 Mg ha -1 ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlkalinity from biochar increases pH of acid soils, increasing negatively charged exchange sites on clay particles, attracting cationic metals.
“Alkalinity from biochar (the liming effect) increases pH of acid soils, increasing the negatively charged exchange sites on clay particles, attracting cationic metals (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationManure biochars commonly contain higher Ca than plant-derived biochars, and thus can immobilize cationic heavy metals through ion exchange.
“Manure biochars commonly contain higher Ca than plant-derived biochars, and thus can immobilize cationic heavy metals (e.g., Cd 2+ and Cu 2+ ) through ion exchange (Lei et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lei et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSewage sludge biochar decreased bioaccumulation of As, Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, and Pb, but increased that of Cd and Zn in an acidic paddy soil.
“For example, sewage sludge biochar decreased the bioaccumulation of As, Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, and Pb, but increased that of Cd and Zn in an acidic paddy soil (Khan et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Khan et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicrobes can form biofilms on biochar surfaces and establish corrosion cells that increase the solubility of metal species.
“Microbes can form biofilms on biochar surfaces, and establish corrosion cells that increase the solubility of metal species (e.g., insoluble Al 2 O 3 to soluble Al; Joseph, Van Zwieten, et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Joseph, Van Zwieten, et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSlow release of P from BCF and biochar can increase P-use efficiency in tropical soils over the medium-to long-term, possibly through high P biochars and reduced P sorption due to DOM released from biochar.
“Slow release of P from BCF and biochar can increase P-use efficiency in tropical soils over the medium-to long-term (Lustosa Filho et al., 2020), possibly through (i) input with high P biochars such as those made from manure or sewage sludge; and (ii) reduced P sorption due to DOM released from biochar (Schneider & Haderlein, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lustosa Filho et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schneider & Haderlein, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenResidual effects of single application of biochar on pH have been recorded, and some residual yield benefits have been observed.
“Residual effects of single application of biochar on pH have been recorded, and some residual yield benefits have been observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochars buffer pH and poise Eh, which can create and maintain conditions in the rhizosphere that support plant growth and resilience to environmental pressures.
“In addition to in planta responses discussed above, biochars buffer pH and poise (equilibrate) Eh (Husson, 2013;Joseph et al., 2015) which can create and maintain conditions in the rhizosphere that support plant growth and resilience to a range of environmental pressures, such as drought, heat, pathogens and pollutants (Husson et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Husson, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Joseph et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Husson et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncreased fruit yield and quality, and resistance to powdery mildew and broad mite, were observed over three seasons in fertilized, irrigated peppers after application of greenwaste and woody biochars.
“Kumar, Elad, et al. (2018) observed increased fruit yield and quality, and resistance to the pathogen causing powdery mildew and the arthropod pest broad mite, over three seasons in fertilized, irrigated peppers after application of greenwaste and woody biochars.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kumar, Elad, et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCrop growth on Terra Preta soils is approximately double that on adjacent unamended soils, providing evidence that biochar can increase soil fertility over centuries.
“Crop growth on Terra Preta soils is approximately double that on adjacent unamended soils, providing evidence that biochar can increase soil fertility over centuries (Lehmann et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lehmann et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Terra Preta soils are valid analogues for long-term aging of modern biochar.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAging through interactions of biochar with soil minerals and microbes generally leads to functionalized surfaces consisting of organo-mineral microagglomerates, which can increase nutrient-holding capacity.
“In summary, aging through interactions of biochar with soil minerals and microbes generally leads to functionalized surfaces consisting of organo-mineral microagglomerates, which can increase nutrient-holding capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis could contribute to long-term increase in P availability in response to biochar application, with enhancement lasting up to 5 years.
“This could contribute to long-term increase in P availability in response to biochar application, such as identified in the meta-analysis of Glaser and Lehr (2019), who reported enhancement lasting up to 5 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glaser and Lehr, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnder sufficient and drought water conditions, Chenopodium quinoa and maize grew significantly better in biochar treatments, attributed to improved plant traits rather than increased root zone water content.
“Under sufficient and drought water conditions, Chenopodium quinoa and maize both grew significantly better in biochar treatments, which was attributed to improved plant traits (lower proline content and less negative osmotic potential) rather than to increased root zone water content (Ahmed et al., 2018;Kammann et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ahmed et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kammann et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationModerate rates (2-6 Mg ha -1 ) of rice husk biochar applied with fertilizer gave a residual benefit for pasture yield lasting at least 3 years, associated with enhanced microbial activity and diversity.
“Rafiq et al. (2020) found that moderate rates (2-6 Mg ha -1 ) of rice husk (high ash) biochar applied with fertilizer gave a residual benefit for pasture yield, lasting at least 3 years, associated with enhanced microbial activity and diversity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rafiq et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBiochar can support plant growth, health, and resilience to disease and environmental stressors.
“Thus, biochar can support plant growth, health, and resilience to disease and environmental stressors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSoil pH is consistently identified as a key variable, with responses greatest in acidic soils because of the liming effect of biochar and a concomitant decline in available Al.
“Soil pH is consistently identified as a key variable (Dai et al., 2020;Jeffery et al., 2011): Responses were greatest in acidic soils, because of the liming effect of biochar and a concomitant decline in available Al (Van Zwieten, Rose, et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dai et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jeffery et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Zwieten, Rose, et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRhizodeposits are protected in soil microaggregates and Fe (oxyhydr)oxides, and this mechanism may provide long-term stabilization of newly added plant C.
“Rhizodeposits are protected in soil microaggregates and Fe (oxyhydr)oxides (Jeewani et al., 2020), and a decadal study indicates potential for this mechanism to provide longterm stabilization of newly added plant C (Weng et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jeewani et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weng et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAged biochar particles can have higher negative surface charge than fresh biochar due to higher concentration of C-O functional groups, increasing CEC and capacity to adsorb organic molecules.
“These particles can have higher negative charge on the surface compared with fresh biochar due to the higher concentration of C-O functional groups (Wang, Zhang, et al., 2019), further increasing CEC and capacity to adsorb organic molecules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang, Zhang, et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMicroagglomerates and portions of the C matrix can detach, and colloidal-sized particles can migrate through the soil profile.
“Microagglomerates and portions of the C matrix can detach, and colloidal-sized particles can migrate through the soil profile.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFormation of microagglomerates increases surface area, CEC and AEC, but pore volume generally decreases compared to fresh biochar after multiple crop cycles.
“The formation of microagglomerates increases the surface area, CEC and AEC, but the pore volume generally decreases compared to the fresh biochar after multiple crop cycles, for example, Dong et al. (2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dong et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analyses have found yield responses of annual crops and trees of 10%-42% and identified site and biochar features giving greatest responses.
“Meta-analyses have found yield responses of annual crops and trees of 10%-42% and identified site and biochar features giving greatest responses (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar can rapidly transfer charge, which could enhance plants' capacity to cope with oxidative stress.
“Biochar can rapidly transfer charge (Sun, Levin, et al., 2017;Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021), which could also enhance plants' capacity to cope with oxidative stress (Husson et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Sun, Levin, et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Husson et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSandy soils and soils with CEC below 100 mmolc kg -1 or organic C content below 20 g kg -1 are most responsive to biochar.
“Sandy soils and soils with CEC below 100 mmol c kg -1 or organic C content below 20 g kg -1 are most responsive (Dai et al., 2020;Ye et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dai et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ye et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHeavy metal pollution in arable land significantly impacts plant growth and food safety, especially in developing countries.
“Heavy metal pollution in arable land significantly impacts plant growth and food safety (Luo et al., 2018) especially in developing countries (Hou et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Luo et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hou et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar increased P availability by a factor of 5.1 and 2.4 in acidic and neutral soils, respectively, but had no effect in alkaline soils or at application rates below 10 Mg ha -1 or with biochars produced at HTT < 600 °C.
“They noted that biochar increased P availability by a factor of 5.1 and 2.4 in acidic and neutral soils, respectively, but it had no effect in alkaline soils or at application rates below 10 Mg ha -1 or with biochars produced at HTT < 600 °C (Glaser & Lehr, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glaser & Lehr, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPyrolysis concentrates most heavy metals, but some metals such as Cd, Zn, and As can be partly volatilized during pyrolysis resulting in lower concentrations than feedstock.
“Although the pyrolysis process concentrates most heavy metals, some metals such as Cd and Zn (Dong et al., 2015) and As (Zhang et al., 2020) can be partly volatilized during pyrolysis resulting in lower concentrations than the feedstock.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dong et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe optimal biochar dose differs between studies and depends on biochar characteristics, soil properties, and the constraint being addressed.
“The optimal biochar dose differed between studies (Table 1) and is dependent on the biochar characteristics, soil properties, and the constraint being addressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochars generally increase soil water-holding capacity, which would enhance resilience of agricultural systems to drought.
“Biochars are generally found to increase soil water-holding capacity, which would enhance resilience of agricultural systems to drought, especially under climate change (Edeh et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Edeh et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analyses show increases in plant available water content of 33%-45% in coarse-textured soils and 9%-14% in clay soils, with greatest response at 30-70 Mg ha -1 .
“Meta-analyses have shown increases in plant available water content of 33%-45% in coarse-textured soils and 9%-14% in clay soils (Edeh et al., 2020;Omondi et al., 2016;Razzaghi et al., 2020), with greatest response at 30-70 Mg ha -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Edeh et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Omondi et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Razzaghi et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCo-application of biochar with N fertilizer tended to provide the greatest yield increase, and biochar can increase fertilizer N-use efficiency.
“The co-application of biochar with N fertilizer tended to provide the greatest yield increase, supporting previous evidence (Van Zwieten, Kimber, Morris, Chan, et al., 2010) that biochar can increase fertilizer N-use efficiency”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Zwieten, Kimber, Morris, Chan, et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAmong carbon dioxide removal strategies, biochar is suggested as a preferred method due to comparatively low cost and large environmental benefits.
“Among carbon dioxide removal strategies, biochar is suggested as a preferred method due to comparatively low cost and large environmental benefits (Smith, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe average 27% increase in photosynthetic rate in C3 plants, but no effect on C4 plants, associated with increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content was attributed to combined effects of biochar on water availability and N nutrition.
“The average 27% increase in photosynthetic rate in C 3 plants (but no effect on C 4 plants) observed in the metaanalysis of He et al. (2020) associated with increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content was attributed to the combined effects of biochar on water availability and N nutrition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis of rice production showed a net yield increase of 16%, with greatest response at 11-20 Mg ha -1 and with biochars produced at 400-450°C.
“A meta-analysis of the impacts of biochar on rice production (Awad et al., 2018) showed a net yield increase of 16%, with greatest response at 11-20 Mg ha -1 and with biochars produced at 400-450°C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Awad et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSequential additions of biochar to soil will continue to build SOC stocks, whereas additions of unpyrolyzed organic matter will be rapidly mineralized and increase SOC stocks only until equilibrium.
“Sequential additions of biochar to soil will continue to build SOC stocks, whereas additions of unpyrolyzed organic matter (plant litter, compost, manure) will be rapidly mineralized, and will increase SOC stocks only until an equilibrium is reached where inputs equal decomposition rate (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationX-ray μ-tomography observed increases in total soil porosity, connectivity of pore space and number of fine pores across soils of different texture.
“Using X-ray μ-tomography, Quin et al. (2014) observed increases in total soil porosity, connectivity of pore space and number of fine pores across soils of different texture, explaining the results of Edeh et al. (2020) and Razzaghi et al. (2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Quin et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Edeh et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Razzaghi et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar has been recognized as a negative emissions technology, in addition to reducing GHG emissions from soil.
“Biochar has been recognized as a negative emissions technology (de Coninck et al., 2018;Cowie et al., 2020), in addition to reducing GHG emissions from soil, as reviewed below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites de Coninck et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cowie et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar may have no effect on yields when low-nutrient biochars are applied without fertilizer, or when biochar is applied to nutrient-rich soils.
“Biochar may have no effect on yields when low-nutrient biochars are applied without fertilizer, or when biochar is applied to nutrient-rich soils (Ye et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ye et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar can affect new additions of plant-derived C, and rhizodeposits can prime and act as a source of SOC.
“Biochar can affect new additions to soil of plant-derived C, and these rhizodeposits can also prime and act as a source of SOC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBiochar properties are the key determinant of its persistence, but edaphic and climatic factors are also influential.
“Biochar properties are the key determinant of its persistence in comparison to mineralization of unpyrolyzed biomass, but edaphic and climatic factors are also influential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar builds SOC through soil aggregation processes that stabilize new C by 6%-16%, and by reducing priming caused by plant C input.
“Biochar builds SOC through soil aggregation processes that stabilize new C (i.e., rhizodeposits), by 6%-16% (Ventura et al., 2019;Weng et al., 2015Weng et al., , 2017)), as well as by reducing priming caused by plant C input (Whitman et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ventura et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weng et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Whitman et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar can facilitate the reduction of N2O to N2 by increasing pH in acid soils, thus enhancing the nosZ gene.
“increasing pH in acid soils (Obia et al., 2015) thus enhancing the nosZ gene (Harter, Guzman-Bustamante, et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Obia et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Harter, Guzman-Bustamante, et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar amendments reduced activities of soil enzymes associated with C cycling by 6%, improved C-use efficiency, increased soil microbial biomass, and lowered metabolic quotient by 12%-21% compared with unamended soils.
“Biochar amendments reduced the activities of soil enzymes associated with C cycling by 6% (Zhang et al., 2019), improved C-use efficiency (Liu, Zhu, et al., 2019, 2020), increased soil microbial biomass (Li et al., 2020), and lowered the metabolic quotient by 12%-21% (i.e., respiration rate CO 2 -C per unit of microbial biomass C) compared with the unamended soils (Zhou, Zhang, et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Liu, Zhu, et al., 2019, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThis is followed by an exothermic phase where most volatile gases are released, up to approximately 350°C.
“This is followed by an exothermic phase where most of the volatile gases are released, up to a temperature of approximately 350°C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe magnitude of negative priming increased with increasing pyrolysis temperature, time following biochar application, and soil clay content >50%, but decreased with increasing C:N ratio of soil.
“Ding et al. (2014) found that the magnitude of negative priming increased with increasing pyrolysis temperature, time following biochar application, and soil clay content >50%, but decreased with an increasing C:N ratio of soil.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ding et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar can facilitate the reduction of N2O to N2 by facilitating extracellular electron exchange or directly donating electrons to denitrifying bacteria.
“facilitating extracellular electron exchange (Chen et al., 2014) or directly donating electrons to denitrifying bacteria (Pascual, Sánchez-Monedero, Cayuela, et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pascual, Sánchez-Monedero, Cayuela, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar decreased SOM mineralization by 20% with crop residue biochars, 19% with fast pyrolysis biochars, 19% with low temperature biochars, and 12% with low biochar application rates, but increased SOM mineralization by 21% in sandy soils.
“Wang et al. (2016) further identified that biochar decreased SOM mineralization by 20% with crop residue biochars, 19% with fast pyrolysis biochars, 19% with low temperature biochars (200-375°C), and 12% with low biochar application rates (0.1%-1% w/w) but increased SOM mineralization by 21% in sandy soils.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe initial process of drying and depolymerization is endothermic and takes place between ambient temperatures and approximately 250°C.
“The initial process of drying and depolymerization is endothermic and takes place between ambient temperatures and approximately 250°C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHistorical addition of pyrogenic organic matter has been shown to slow SOM mineralization and enhance native SOC stocks.
“Historical addition of pyrogenic organic matter has been shown to slow SOM mineralization and enhance native soil organic C (SOC) stocks (Borchard et al., 2014;Downie et al., 2011;Hernandez-Soriano et al., 2016;Kerré et al., 2016;Liang et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Borchard et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Downie et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hernandez-Soriano et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analyses show biochar application commonly induces positive priming initially, followed by negative priming, of 3.8% on average.
“Meta-analyses show that biochar application commonly induces positive priming initially (for 20 days: Maestrini et al., 2015;2 years: Ding et al., 2018), followed by negative priming, of 3.8% on average (Wang et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Maestrini et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ding et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing hydrogen pyrolysis, <20% of biochar is persistent at pyrolysis temperatures <450°C, with >80% persistent at 600-700°C.
“Using hydrogen pyrolysis to assess relative chemical stability, McBeath et al. (2015) estimated, across a wide range of feedstocks, that <20% of the biochar is persistent at pyrolysis temperatures <450°C, with >80% persistent at 600-700°C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McBeath et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral meta-analyses found that, on average, biochar mitigates CH4 emissions from flooded soils, particularly from acidic soils, but decreases the CH4 sink of non-flooded soils.
“Several metaanalyses found that, on average, biochar mitigates CH 4 emissions from flooded soils, particularly from acidic soils, but decreases the CH 4 sink of non-flooded soils (Jeffery et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jeffery et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenUnlike incineration, pyrolysis retains a large portion of the feedstock C, typically around 50%, and most nutrients, in the biochar.
“unlike incineration, pyrolysis retains a large portion of the feedstock C (typically around 50%), and most nutrients, in the biochar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVerhoeven et al. (2017) found that biochar decreased yield-scaled N2O emissions across the majority of studied cropping systems, although a meta-analysis could not be carried out due to the low number of field studies and excessively high variance between studies.
“Verhoeven et al. (2017) who found that biochar decreased yieldscaled N 2 O emissions across the majority of the studied cropping systems, although a meta-analysis could not be carried out due to the low number of field studies and excessively high variance between studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Verhoeven et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiu, Mao, et al. (2019) showed an overall reduction of GHG intensity by 29% after biochar amendment, with higher reductions in non-flooded soils (-41%) compared to paddy fields (-17%).
“Liu, Mao, et al. (2019) were able to incorporate a larger number of studies and showed an overall reduction of GHG intensity by 29% after biochar amendment, with higher reductions in non-flooded soils (-41%) compared to paddy fields (-17%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu, Mao, et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn increase in SOC is often associated with higher N2O emissions, which could counteract the mitigation benefits derived from C sequestration.
“An increase in SOC is often associated with higher N 2 O emissions, which could counteract the mitigation benefits derived from C sequestration (Davies et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davies et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: In non-flooded soils, the relationship between SOC changes and N2O emissions usually regulates the net GHG emission, since agricultural soils are often weak CH4 sinks.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe mitigation provided initially can be substantial, and repeated applications may maintain the mitigation benefit.
“Nevertheless, the mitigation provided initially can be substantial, and repeated applications may maintain the mitigation benefit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationResults from separate meta-analyses on C sequestration and N2O emissions point to a strong synergy between C sequestration and mitigation of N2O emissions with biochar, which is much less evident for other SOC sequestration strategies.
“results from separate meta-analyses on C sequestration (Bai et al., 2019) and N 2 O emissions (Borchard et al., 2019;Liu, Liu, et al., 2019) point to a strong synergy between C sequestration and mitigation of N 2 O emissions with biochar, which is much less evident for other SOC sequestration strategies (Guenet et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bai et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Borchard et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guenet et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: In non-flooded soils, the relationship between SOC changes and N2O emissions usually regulates the net GHG emission, since agricultural soils are often weak CH4 sinks.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnalyses of specific cropping systems show a decrease in GHG intensity with biochar application in vegetable fields and in wheat-rice rotation systems.
“Analyses of specific cropping systems show a decrease in GHG intensity with biochar application in vegetable fields (Fan et al., 2017) and in wheat-rice rotation systems (Wu et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fan et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wu et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis found N, P, and K concentrations in biochars of 1.0%, 0.4%, and 1.9% for wood-derived biochars, 1.5%, 0.8%, and 4.1% for crop residue biochars, and 2.4%, 2.6%, and 2.5% for manure/sewage sludge biochars, respectively.
“A meta-analysis found N, P, and K concentrations in biochars of 1.0%, 0.4%, and 1.9% (wood-derived biochars), 1.5%, 0.8%, and 4.1% (crop residue biochars) and 2.4%, 2.6%, and 2.5% (manure/sewage sludge biochars), respectively (Ippolito et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ippolito et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationJi et al. (2018) cautioned that co-application of biochar with nitrogen fertilizers substantially decreased the effectiveness of biochar in reducing soil CH4 emissions from paddies; their meta-analysis also showed that the biochar-induced decrease in CH4 uptake by non-flooded soils was lessened when N fertilizer was also applied.
“Ji et al. (2018) cautioned that the co-application of biochar with nitrogen fertilizers substantially decreased the effectiveness of biochar in reducing soil CH 4 emissions from paddies, however, their meta-analysis also showed that the biochar-induced decrease in CH 4 uptake by non-flooded soils was lessened when N fertilizer was also applied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLater meta-analyses including a larger number of field studies and more realistic biochar application rates found lower average reductions, of 12% considering only field studies and 38% including laboratory and field studies.
“Later meta-analyses including a larger number of field studies and more realistic biochar application rates found lower average reductions, of 12% (Verhoeven et al., 2017) considering only field studies, and 38% (Borchard et al., 2019) including laboratory and field studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Verhoeven et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Borchard et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnly a fraction of the total nutrients in biochar is available for plant uptake in the short-medium term, in the order K>P>N.
“only a fraction of the total nutrients in biochar is available for plant uptake (in the short-medium term), in the order K>P>N.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ippolito et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation50%-80% of N can be lost during pyrolysis depending on the N content of the feedstock, with greater loss at high pyrolysis temperature.
“Nonetheless, 50%-80% of N can be lost (Hossain et al., 2011;Ye et al., 2020;Yuan et al., 2018) depending on the N content of the feedstock (Torres-Rojas et al., 2020), with greater loss at high pyrolysis temperature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hossain et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ye et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yuan et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochars with high electrical conductivity and ash concentrations decreased CH4 sink capacity, whereas biochars from woody materials pyrolyzed at high temperatures and with high pore area increased soil CH4 uptake rates.
“biochars with high electrical conductivity and ash concentrations decreased CH 4 sink capacity whereas biochars from woody materials pyrolyzed at high temperatures and with high pore area increased soil CH 4 uptake rates (Pascual et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pascual et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA direct correlation between application rate and N2O decrease was found, with lower N2O mitigation, average 27%, under more realistic rates equivalent to 10-20 Mg ha-1.
“A direct correlation between application rate and N 2 O decrease was found (Cayuela et al., 2014), with lower N 2 O mitigation (average 27%) under more realistic rates equivalent to 10-20 Mg ha -1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cayuela et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost experiments included in these meta-analyses were carried out under high moisture conditions favoring denitrification, where biochar is most effective in decreasing N2O emissions.
“Most experiments included in these metaanalyses were carried out under high moisture conditions favoring denitrification, where biochar is most effective in decreasing N 2 O emissions (Cayuela et al., 2013;Weldon et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cayuela et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weldon et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBiochars, including BCFs and biochar used as a compost additive, improve nutrient recovery from organic residues, facilitate use of residues in soil amendment, and reduce environmental impacts of waste management.
“Biochars, including BCFs and biochar used as a compost additive, thus improve nutrient recovery from organic residues, facilitate use of residues in soil amendment, and reduce environmental impacts of waste management.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBiochar can mitigate heavy metal pollution, that impacts food production and food safety in many developing countries, and enhance resource use efficiency.
“Biochar can also mitigate heavy metal pollution, that impacts food production and food safety in many developing countries, and enhance resource use efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis found average bioavailable percentages of N, P and K in biochar: 0.5%, 3%, and 9% for wood-derived biochar, 0.4%, 6%, and 22% for crop residue biochar, and 5%, 5%, and 17% for manure/sewage sludge biochar, respectively.
“A meta-analysis found that, on average, the following percentages of the N, P and K present in biochar were bioavailable: 0.5%, 3%, and 9% (wood-derived biochar), 0.4%, 6%, and 22% (crop residue biochar) and 5%, 5%, and 17% (manure/sewage sludge biochar), respectively (Ippolito et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ippolito et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMeta-analyses of crop responses to biochar show average yield increases of 10%-42%, with greatest responses in acidic and sandy soils where the biochar has been applied with organic and/or mineral fertilizers.
“Meta-analyses of crop responses to biochar show average yield increases of 10%-42%, with greatest responses in acidic and sandy soils where the biochar has been applied with organic and/or mineral fertilizers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenStudies that do not include plants, or are undertaken in soil-less media, or based on pot trials cannot readily be extrapolated to field situations.
“studies that do not include plants, or are undertaken in soil-less media, or based on pot trials cannot readily be extrapolated to field situations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHigher microbial activities lead to accelerated turnover of organic matter which enhances nutrient supply.
“Higher microbial activities lead to accelerated turnover of organic matter which enhances nutrient supply.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSuch formulations are the major focus of commercialization, but they have received limited attention in research studies, and very few field trials have been undertaken.
“Such formulations are the major focus of commercialization, but they have received limited attention in research studies, and very few field trials have been undertaken.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationControlled release biochar-fertilizer combinations can be produced from low-nutrient biomass mixed with mineral or organic nutrients before pyrolysis and/or organic nutrients after pyrolysis, or by composting to enrich with nutrients.
“Controlled release biochar-fertilizer combinations can be produced from low-nutrient biomass mixed with mineral or organic nutrients before pyrolysis and/or organic nutrients after pyrolysis, or by composting to enrich with nutrients (Buss et al., 2019(Buss et al., , 2020;;Dong et al., 2019;Hagemann, Joseph, et al., 2017;Schmidt et al., 2015)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Buss et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dong et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schmidt et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochar P availability can be increased by selecting low Ca feedstocks or doping feedstock with K, leading to preferential binding of P with K instead of Ca, Mg, Fe, or Al, forming highly soluble salts.
“Biochar P availability can be increased by selecting low Ca feedstocks or doping feedstock with K, leading to preferential binding of P with K instead of Ca, Mg, Fe, or Al, forming highly soluble salts (Buss et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buss et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis review presents strong evidence that biochar can contribute to climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration and reduction in soil GHG emissions, and that significant benefits to plant production are possible, particularly where site-specific soil constraints and nutrient and water limitations are addressed by appropriate biochar and fertilizer applications.
“This review presents strong evidence that biochar can contribute to climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration and reduction in soil GHG emissions, and that significant benefits to plant production are possible, particularly where site-specific soil constraints and nutrient and water limitations are addressed by appropriate biochar and fertilizer applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBiochars can be tailored for specific applications through feedstock selection; by modifying process conditions; through pre- or postproduction treatments to adjust pH, increase nutrient level and availability, carbon persistence and adsorptive properties; or co-application with organic or mineral fertilizers.
“Biochars can be tailored for specific applications through feedstock selection; by modifying process conditions; through pre-or postproduction treatments to adjust pH, increase nutrient level and availability, carbon persistence and adsorptive properties; or co-application with organic or mineral fertilizers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe use of biochar in composting of organic residues such as manures can reduce N losses through volatilization and leaching, reduce GHG emissions, increase C persistence, and reduce availability of heavy metals.
“The use of biochar in composting of organic residues such as manures can reduce N losses through volatilization and leaching, reduce GHG emissions, increase C persistence, and reduce availability of heavy metals (Agyarko-Mintah et al., 2017;Akdeniz, 2019;Oldfield et al., 2018;Sanchez-Monedero et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Agyarko-Mintah et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Akdeniz, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Oldfield et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBiochar has the greatest potential to increase crop yields in low-nutrient, high P-fixing acidic soils, common in the tropics and humid subtropics, and in sandy soils, particularly in dryland regions that are likely to be increasingly affected by drought under climate change.
“Biochar has the greatest potential to increase crop yields in low-nutrient, high P-fixing acidic soils, common in the tropics and humid subtropics, and in sandy soils, particularly in dryland regions that are likely to be increasingly affected by drought under climate change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBiochar catalyzes microbial and abiotic processes in the rhizosphere, decreasing the activation energy for biotic and abiotic reactions, which can increase nutrient mineralization and facilitate nutrient uptake by plants.
“Biochar catalyzes microbial and abiotic processes in the rhizosphere, decreasing the activation energy for biotic and abiotic reactions, which can increase nutrient mineralization and facilitate nutrient uptake by plants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBiochar can play a key role in addressing climate change and supporting global food security and the circular economy.
“Thus, biochar can play a key role in addressing climate change and supporting global food security and the circular economy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFormulations that combine biochar with mineral and/or organic fertilizers and minerals are likely to have high nutrient use efficiency and be the most cost-effective.
“Formulations that combine biochar with mineral and/ or organic fertilizers and minerals are likely to have high nutrient use efficiency and be the most cost-effective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenUse of biochar in waste management, such as co-composting of animal manures and pyrolysis of sewage sludge, can capture nutrients and reduce GHG emissions.
“Use of biochar in waste management, such as co-composting of animal manures and pyrolysis of sewage sludge, can capture nutrients and reduce GHG emissions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBiochar reduces the availability of heavy metals, increases plant resistance to disease, and improves resilience to environmental stressors.
“Biochar reduces the availability of heavy metals, increases plant resistance to disease, and improves resilience to environmental stressors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiochars can be optimized to sorb P or N from wastewater and hence be loaded with extra nutrients that are accessible to plants, reducing wastewater P and N concentrations, preventing eutrophication, and returning nutrients to agricultural land.
“Biochars can be optimized to sorb P or N from wastewater and hence be loaded with extra nutrients that are accessible to plants (Mood et al., 2020;Shang et al., 2018;Shepherd et al., 2016Shepherd et al., , 2017)), reducing wastewater P and N concentrations, preventing eutrophication, and returning nutrients to agricultural land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mood et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shang et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shepherd et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe catalytic ability of biochar changes as it ages in soil through oxidation and interactions with minerals, microbes, soil fauna, and organic matter.
“The catalytic ability of biochar changes as it ages in soil through oxidation and interactions with minerals, microbes, soil fauna, and organic matter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
There are few studies of biochar or BCF applied at low commercially viable rates as single or repeated applications.
“but there are few studies of biochar or BCF applied at low (commercially viable) rates, as single or repeated applications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Terra Preta soils are valid analogues for long-term aging of modern biochar.
“The biochar-enriched anthropogenic Terra Preta soils associated with pre-Columbian settlements in the Brazilian Amazon (Steiner et al., 2009) provide evidence of very long-term reactions of biochar in soil.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
“Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N 2 O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N 2 O formation pathways.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.
“Whereas nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH 4 , paddy soils can be a significant source of CH 4 .”
The paper relies on this without support.
In non-flooded soils, the relationship between SOC changes and N2O emissions usually regulates the net GHG emission, since agricultural soils are often weak CH4 sinks.
“In non-flooded soils, the relationship between SOC changes and N 2 O emissions usually regulates the net GHG emission, since agricultural soils are often weak CH 4 sinks.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The economic case for biochar production is strongest for biochar made from residue materials, especially when the residues contain high concentrations of nutrients, such as animal manures and sewage sludge.
“The economic case for biochar production is strongest for biochar made from residue materials, especially when the residues contain high concentrations of nutrients, such as animal manures and sewage sludge.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pyrolysis gases can be captured for use as a renewable energy product.
“In addition, pyrolysis gases can be captured for use as a renewable energy product (see Text S4).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The crop utilization efficiency of carbon is altered following biochar application, leading to decreased CO2 emissions because of plant utilization of labile carbon.
“The crop utilization efficiency of carbon is also altered following biochar application, leading to decreased CO 2 emissions (because of plant utilization of labile carbon) (Joseph et al. 2021).”
From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Joseph et al. 2021
Section 4.2 (Priming effects; page not provided) reports improved microbial carbon-use efficiency and a lower CO₂ respiration rate per unit of microbial biomass after biochar amendment. It does not attribute those effects to improved crop carbon-use efficiency or to plants using labile carbon; the efficiency reported is microbial, not crop-level. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNot all forms of biochar are environmentally friendly or beneficial.
“not all forms of biochar are environmentally friendly or beneficial.249”
From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [249]
Conversion of agricultural waste into biochar to improve soil health is regarded as a promising strategy for storing soil nutrients and reducing GHG emissions.
“the conversion of agricultural waste into biochar to improve soil health is regarded as a promising strategy for storing soil nutrients and reducing GHG emissions.249”
From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [249]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting optimal biochar rates for rice yield
MajorTable 1 lists 1-10 Mg ha−1 as the optimal dose in Awad et al. (2018), while the text says the greatest response in that meta-analysis occurred at 11-20 Mg ha−1.
“Awad et al. (2018) 50 Study focuses on rice production 1-10 Crop yield 16”
“A meta-analysis of the impacts of biochar on rice production (Awad et al., 2018) showed a net yield increase of 16%, with greatest response at 11-20 Mg ha -1”
Cites
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D. A. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10386 · Cited by 6,057 · see citing works
Self-citationBiochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review
Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Vithanage, M., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2014) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071 · Cited by 4,662 · see citing works
Self-citationSoil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil
Rousk, J., Bååth, E., Brookes, P. C., Lauber, C. L., Lozupone, C., Caporaso, J. G., Knight, R. D., & Fierer, N. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.58 · Cited by 4,242 · see citing works
Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems – A Review
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M. (2006) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5 · Cited by 3,053 · see citing works
Self-citationReview of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects
Kuzyakov, Y., Friedel, J. K., & Stahr, K. (2000) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00084-5 · Cited by 3,040 · see citing works
Self-citationBiochar for environmental management: science and technology
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-0296 · Cited by 2,947 · see citing works
Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4 · Cited by 2,890 · see citing works
Lehmann, J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/447143a · Cited by 2,477 · see citing works
Self-citationJeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015 · Cited by 2,422 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Soil pH is consistently identified as a key variable (Dai et al., 2020; Jeffery et al., 2011): Responses were greatest in acidic soils, because of the liming effect of biochar and a concomitant decline in available Al (Van Zwieten, Rose, et al., 2015).”
BackgroundBiochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation
(2015) · doi:10.4324/9780203762264 · Cited by 2,280 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Reviews and meta- analyses show that biochar generally lowers soil acidity and increases buffering capacity; increases dissolved and total organic C, CEC, available nutrients, water retention, and aggregate stability; and reduces bulk density (El- Naggar et al., 2019; Lehmann & Joseph, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationVan Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Morris, S., Chan, K. Y., Downie, A., Rust, J., Joseph, S., & Cowie, A. (2010) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x · Cited by 1,916 · see citing works
Self-citationLehmann, J., Pereira da Silva, J., Steiner, C., Nehls, T., Zech, W., & Glaser, B. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1022833116184 · Cited by 1,878 · see citing works
Self-citationBiochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis
Biederman, L. A., & Harpole, W. S. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12037 · Cited by 1,737 · see citing works
THE REFINEMENT TO THE 2006 IPCC GUIDELINES FOR NATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES
Gitarskiy, M. L. (2019) · Fundamental and Applied Climatology · doi:10.21513/0207-2564-2019-2-05-13 · Cited by 1,664 · see citing works
The footprint of urban heat island effect in China
Zhou, D., Zhao, S., Zhang, L., Sun, G., & Liu, Y. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11160 · Cited by 1,637 · see citing works
Priming: Getting Ready for Battle
Conrath, U., Beckers, G. J. M., Flors, V., García‐Agustín, P., Jakab, G., Mauch, F., Newman, M., Pieterse, C. M. J., Poinssot, B., Pozo, M. J., et al. (2006) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions · doi:10.1094/mpmi-19-1062 · Cited by 1,534 · see citing works
Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects
Wang, J., Xiong, Z., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12266 · Cited by 1,316 · see citing works
Self-citationPalansooriya, K. N., Shaheen, S. M., Chen, S. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Hashimoto, Y., Hou, D., Bolan, N. S., Rinklebe, J., & Ok, Y. S. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105046 · Cited by 1,272 · see citing works
Self-citationMetal contamination and bioremediation of agricultural soils for food safety and sustainability
Hou, D., O’Connor, D., Igalavithana, A. D., Alessi, D. S., Luo, J., Tsang, D. C. W., Sparks, D. L., Yamauchi, Y., Rinklebe, J., & Ok, Y. S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-020-0061-y · Cited by 1,200 · see citing works
Self-citationProperties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation
Cao, X., & Harris, W. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.052 · Cited by 1,173 · see citing works
An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil
Joseph, S. D., Camps-Arbestain, M., Lin, Y., Munroe, P., Chia, C. H., Hook, J., van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Cowie, A., Singh, B. P., et al. (2010) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr10009 · Cited by 1,111 · see citing works
Self-citationAbiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar)
Zimmerman, A. R. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903140c · Cited by 1,103 · see citing works
Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling
Kuzyakov, Y., Subbotina, I., Chen, H.-Q., Bogomolova, I., & Xu, X.-L. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.016 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Self-citationHossain, M. K., Strezov, V., Chan, K. Y., Ziolkowski, A., & Nelson, P. F. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.008 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
Biochar's role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis
Cayuela, M. L., van Zwieten, L., Singh, B. P., Jeffery, S., Roig, A., & Sánchez-Monedero, M. A. (2014) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.009 · Cited by 1,053 · see citing works
Self-citationA Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics
Clough, T., Condron, L., Kammann, C., & Müller, C. (2013) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy3020275 · Cited by 969 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Much of the N within the biochar C matrix (e.g., heterocyclic- N) is unavailable to plants (Clough et al., 2013; TorresRojas et al., 2020), whereas most K in biochar is present in soluble forms, released in the short term after application to soil (Silber et al., 2010), and is readily available to…”
BackgroundBiochar application to low fertility soils: A review of current status, and future prospects
El-Naggar, A., Lee, S. S., Rinklebe, J., Farooq, M., Song, H., Sarmah, A. K., Zimmerman, A. R., Ahmad, M., Shaheen, S. M., & Ok, Y. S. (2019) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.034 · Cited by 959 · see citing works
Self-citationIppolito, J. A., Cui, L., Kammann, C., Wrage-Mönnig, N., Estavillo, J. M., Fuertes-Mendizabal, T., Cayuela, M. L., Sigua, G., Novak, J., Spokas, K., et al. (2020) · Biochar · doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00067-x · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Self-citationSoil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies
Smith, P. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13178 · Cited by 921 · see citing works
Smith, P., Soussana, J., Angers, D. A., Schipper, L. A., Chenu, C., Rasse, D. P., Batjes, N. H., van Egmond, F., McNeill, S. J. E., Kuhnert, M., et al. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14815 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Fate of soil‐applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration
Major, J., Lehmann, J., Rondón, M., & Goodale, C. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02044.x · Cited by 822 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, X., Zhang, A., Ji, C., Joseph, S., Bian, R., Li, L., Pan, G., & Paz-Ferreiro, J. (2013) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1806-x · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Self-citationBiochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields
Jeffery, S., Abalos, D., Prodana, M., Bastos, A. C., van Groenigen, J. W., Hungate, B. A., & Verheijen, F. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa67bd · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Anderson, C. R., Condron, L. M., Clough, T. J., Fiers, M., Stewart, A., Hill, R. A., & Sherlock, R. R. (2011) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.07.005 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Towards an agronomic assessment of N2O emissions: a case study for arable crops
van Groenigen, J. W., Velthof, G. L., Oenema, O., van Groenigen, K. J., & van Kessel, C. (2010) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01217.x · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Biochar and denitrification in soils: when, how much and why does biochar reduce N2O emissions?
Cayuela, M. L., Sánchez-Monedero, M. A., Roig, A., Hanley, K., Enders, A., & Lehmann, J. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01732 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
Self-citationPromoting Interspecies Electron Transfer with Biochar
Chen, S., Rotaru, A.-E., Shrestha, P. M., Malvankar, N. S., Liu, F., Fan, W., Nevin, K. P., & Lovley, D. R. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05019 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Mosier, A. R., Halvorson, A. D., Reule, C. A., & Liu, X. J. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0232 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Husson, O. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1429-7 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Razzaghi, F., Obour, P. B., & Arthur, E. (2020) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114055 · Cited by 669 · see citing works
Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soil
Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Sohi, S. P., Thies, J. E., O’Neill, B., Trujillo, L., Gaunt, J., Solomon, D., Grossman, J., Neves, E. G., et al. (2010) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.09.007 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Self-citationKuzyakov, Y., Bogomolova, I., & Glaser, B. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.12.021 · Cited by 664 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, L., O’Connor, D., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Shen, Z., & Hou, D. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c04033 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Self-citationLuo, Y., Durenkamp, M., De Nobili, M., Lin, Q., & Brookes, P. C. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.020 · Cited by 640 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantifying the Total and Bioavailable Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Dioxins in Biochars
Hale, S. E., Lehmann, J., Rutherford, D., Zimmerman, A. R., Bachmann, R. T., Shitumbanuma, V., O’Toole, A., Sundqvist, K. L., Arp, H. P. H., & Cornelissen, G. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203984k · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Self-citationOmondi, M. O., Xia, X., Nahayo, A., Liu, X., Korai, P. K., & Pan, G. (2016) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.029 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Rapid electron transfer by the carbon matrix in natural pyrogenic carbon
Sun, T., Levin, B. D. A., Guzman, J. J. L., Enders, A., Muller, D. A., Angenent, L. T., & Lehmann, J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14873 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Self-citationBiochar Carbon Stability in a Clayey Soil As a Function of Feedstock and Pyrolysis Temperature
Singh, B. P., Cowie, A. L., & Smernik, R. J. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302545b · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Self-citationOrganic coating on biochar explains its nutrient retention and stimulation of soil fertility
Hagemann, N., Joseph, S. D., Schmidt, H., Kammann, C. I., Harter, J., Borch, T., Young, R. B., Varga, K., Taherymoosavi, S., Elliott, K. W., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01123-0 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Self-citationBian, R., Joseph, S. D., Cui, L., Pan, G., Li, L., Liu, X., Zhang, A., Rutlidge, H., Wong, S. C. T., Chia, C. H., et al. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.017 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Self-citationMukherjee, A., & Zimmerman, A. R. (2013) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.10.002 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Borchard, N., Schirrmann, M., Cayuela, M. L., Kammann, C., Wrage-Mönnig, N., Estavillo, J. M., Fuertes-Mendizábal, T., Sigua, G., Spokas, K., Ippolito, J. A., et al. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.060 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Self-citationXia, L., Lam, S. K., Wolf, B., Kiese, R., Chen, D., & Butterbach‐Bahl, K. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14466 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Plant growth improvement mediated by nitrate capture in co-composted biochar
Kammann, C. I., Schmidt, H.-P., Messerschmidt, N., Linsel, S., Steffens, D., Müller, C., Koyro, H.-W., Conte, P., & Joseph, S. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11080 · Cited by 535 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Some of the nutrients released from fertilizer, especially N and P, can react with the biochar pore surfaces and organo- mineral layers (Haider et al., 2020; Hestrin et al., 2019; Joseph et al., 2018; Kammann et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBlack carbon in density fractions of anthropogenic soils of the Brazilian Amazon region
Glaser, B., Balashov, E. V., Haumaier, L., Guggenberger, G., & Zech, W. (2000) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0146-6380(00)00044-9 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
One Step Forward toward Characterization: Some Important Material Properties to Distinguish Biochars
Schimmelpfennig, S., & Glaser, B. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0146 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Gao, S., DeLuca, T. H., & Cleveland, C. C. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.124 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Water uptake in biochars: The roles of porosity and hydrophobicity
Gray, M., Johnson, M. G., Dragila, M. I., & Kleber, M. (2014) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.12.010 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Responses of soil carbon sequestration to climate‐smart agriculture practices: A meta‐analysis
Bai, X., Huang, Y., Ren, W., Coyne, M. S., Jacinthe, P.-A., Tao, B., Hui, D., Yang, J., & Matocha, C. J. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14658 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Catechol and Humic Acid Sorption onto a Range of Laboratory-Produced Black Carbons (Biochars)
Kasozi, G. N., Zimmerman, A. R., Nkedi-Kizza, P., & Gao, B. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es1014423 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
An overview of the effect of pyrolysis process parameters on biochar stability
Leng, L., & Huang, H. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.030 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Biochar effects on phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: A meta-analysis
Glaser, B., & Lehr, V.-I. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45693-z · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Long-term effects of biochar on soil physical properties
Burrell, L. D., Zehetner, F., Rampazzo, N., Wimmer, B., & Soja, G. (2016) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.07.019 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Role of biochar as an additive in organic waste composting
Sanchez-Monedero, M. A., Cayuela, M. L., Roig, A., Jindo, K., Mondini, C., & Bolan, N. S. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.193 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Self-citationKhan, S. A., Chao, C., Waqas, M., Arp, H. P. H., & Zhu, Y. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es400554x · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Applications of biochar in redox-mediated reactions
Yuan, Y., Bolan, N., Prévoteau, A., Vithanage, M., Biswas, J. K., Ok, Y. S., & Wang, H. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.154 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Self-citationCui, J., Zhu, Z., Xu, X., et al. (2020) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107720 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Liao, S., Pan, B., Li, H., Zhang, D., & Xing, B. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es404250a · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Pyrolytic temperatures impact lead sorption mechanisms by bagasse biochars
Ding, W., Dong, X., Ime, I. M., Gao, B., & Ma, L. Q. (2014) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.042 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Influence of biochar on drought tolerance of Chenopodium quinoa willd and on soil-plant relations
Kammann, C. I., Linsel, S., Gößling, J. W., & Koyro, H.-W. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0771-5 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Prendergast‐Miller, M. T., Duvall, M., & Sohi, S. P. (2014) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.12079 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Can N 2 O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon storage?
Guenet, B., Gabrielle, B., Chenu, C., Arrouays, D., Balesdent, J., Bernoux, M., Bruni, E., Caliman, J., Cardinael, R., Chen, S., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15342 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: A meta-analysis
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., Kammann, C., & Abalos, D. (2016) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.021 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Ruan, X., Sun, Y., Du, W., Tang, Y., Liu, Q., Zhang, Z., Doherty, W., Frost, R. L., Qian, G., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.105 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Ye, L., Camps‐Arbestain, M., Shen, Q., Lehmann, J., Singh, B., & Sabir, M. (2020) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12546 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Self-citationInduction of Systemic Resistance in Plants by Biochar, a Soil-Applied Carbon Sequestering Agent
Elad, Y., David, D. R., Harel, Y. M., Borenshtein, M., Kalifa, H. B., Silber, A., & Graber, E. R. (2010) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-100-9-0913 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Self-citationA defensin-like protein drives cadmium efflux and allocation in rice
Luo, J., Huang, J. F., Zeng, D., Peng, J., Zhang, G.-B., Ma, H.-L., Guan, Y., Yi, H.-Y., Fu, Y.-L., Han, B., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03088-0 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Influence of biochars on flux of N2O and CO2 from Ferrosol
ZWIETEN, L. V., Kimber, S. W. L., Morris, S., Downie, A. E., Berger, E., Rust, J., & Scheer, C. (2010) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr10004 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Kolton, M., Harel, Y. M., Pasternak, Z., Gräber, E. R., Elad, Y., & Cytryn, E. J. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00148-11 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
pH-Dependent Mineral Release and Surface Properties of Cornstraw Biochar: Agronomic Implications
Silber, A., Levkovitch, I., & Graber, E. R. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es101283d · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Pokharel, P., Ma, Z., & Chang, S. X. (2020) · Biochar · doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00039-1 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Biochar built soil carbon over a decade by stabilizing rhizodeposits
(Han) Weng, Z., Van Zwieten, L., Singh, B. P., Tavakkoli, E., Joseph, S., Macdonald, L. M., Rose, T. J., Rose, M. T., Kimber, S. W. L., Morris, S., et al. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3276 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Self-citationFang, Y., Nazaries, L., Singh, B. K., & Singh, B. P. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14154 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Long-term influence of biochar on native organic carbon mineralisation in a low-carbon clayey soil
Singh, B. P., & Cowie, A. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep03687 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Self-citationXu, X., Zhao, Y., Sima, J., Zhao, L., Mašek, O., & Cao, X. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.023 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
How does biochar influence soil N cycle? A meta-analysis
Liu, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, B., Amonette, J. E., Lin, Z., Liu, G., Ambus, P., & Xie, Z. (2018) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-018-3619-4 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Effects of biochar application on root traits: a meta‐analysis
Xiang, Y., Deng, Q., Duan, H., & Guo, Y. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12449 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Interaction of arsenic with biochar in soil and water: A critical review
Vithanage, M., Herath, I., Joseph, S., Bundschuh, J., Bolan, N., Ok, Y. S., Kirkham, M. B., & Rinklebe, J. (2017) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.032 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Self-citationEdeh, I. G., Mašek, O., & Buss, W. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136857 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Self-citationJoseph, S., Graber, E., Chia, C., Munroe, P., Donne, S., Thomas, T., Nielsen, S., Marjo, C., Rutlidge, H., Pan, G., et al. (2013) · Carbon Management · doi:10.4155/cmt.13.23 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citationCombined effects of biochar properties and soil conditions on plant growth: A meta-analysis
Dai, Y., Zheng, H., Jiang, Z., & Xing, B. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136635 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Zhou, M., Zhu, B., Wang, S., Zhu, X., Vereecken, H., & Brüggemann, N. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13648 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Igalavithana, A. D., Lee, S., Lee, Y. H., Tsang, D. C. W., Rinklebe, J., Kwon, E. E., & Ok, Y. S. (2017) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.148 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of biochar on availability and plant uptake of heavy metals – A meta-analysis
De, C., Liu, X., Bian, R., Cheng, K., Zhang, X., Zheng, J., Joseph, S. D., Crowley, D. E., Pan, G., & Li, L. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.004 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Self-citationAbdullah, H., & Wu, H. (2009) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef900494t · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Luo, Y., Durenkamp, M., De Nobili, M., Lin, Q., Devonshire, B. J., & Brookes, P. C. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.033 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Self-citationPrommer, J., Wanek, W., Hofhansl, F., Trojan, D., Offre, P., Urich, T., Schleper, C., Sassmann, S., Kitzler, B., Soja, G., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086388 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Aluminum toxicity in plants and its possible mitigation in acid soils by biochar: A review
Shetty, R., Vidya, C. S.-N., Prakash, N. B., Lux, A., & Vaculík, M. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142744 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Western tropical Pacific multidecadal variability forced by the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation
Sun, C. J., Kucharski, F., Li, J., Jin, F., Kang, I., & Ding, R. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15998 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Heterogeneous global crop yield response to biochar: a meta-regression analysis
Crane-Droesch, A., Abiven, S., Jeffery, S., & Torn, M. S. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044049 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Kolton, M., Gräber, E. R., Tsehansky, L., Elad, Y., & Cytryn, E. J. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14253 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Activity and Reactivity of Pyrogenic Carbonaceous Matter toward Organic Compounds
Pignatello, J. J., Mitch, W. A., & Xu, W. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01088 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Chen, L., Chen, X. L., Zhou, C. H., Yang, H. M., Ji, S. F., Tong, D. S., Zhong, Z. K., Yu, W. H., & Chu, M. Q. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.050 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Biochar bound urea boosts plant growth and reduces nitrogen leaching
Shi, W., Ju, Y., Bian, R., Li, L., Joseph, S., Mitchell, D. R. G., Munroe, P. R., Taherymoosavi, S., & Pan, G. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134424 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Self-citationPlant-lead interactions: Transport, toxicity, tolerance, and detoxification mechanisms
Kumar, A., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.113 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Li, S., & Chen, G. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.048 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Li, X., Wang, T., Chang, S. X., Jiang, X., & Song, Y. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141593 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Jing, Y., Xiang, Y., Zhang, R., & Lü, H. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.231 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Yu, G., & Kuzyakov, Y. V. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103525 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, H., Xu, F., Xie, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, A., Li, L., & Xu, H. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.115 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Biochar mediates systemic response of strawberry to foliar fungal pathogens
Meller Harel, Y., Elad, Y., Rav-David, D., Borenstein, M., Shulchani, R., Lew, B., & Graber, E. R. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1129-3 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Self-citationA meta‐analysis on pyrogenic organic matter induced priming effect
Maestrini, B., Nannipieri, P., & Abiven, S. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12194 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Joseph, S., Kammann, C. I., Shepherd, J. G., Conte, P., Schmidt, H., Hagemann, N., Rich, A. M., Marjo, C. E., Allen, J. A., Munroe, P. R., et al. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.200 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Self-citationCation exchange capacity of biochar: An urgent method modification
Munera-Echeverri, J. L., Martinsen, V., Strand, L. T., Živanović, V., Cornelissen, G., & Mulder, J. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.017 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
A systematic review of biochar use in animal waste composting
Akdeniz, N. (2019) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.054 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Liu, Q., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Hu, T., Lin, Z., Liu, G., Wang, X., Ma, J., Wang, H., Jin, H., et al. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14613 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Energy and nutrient recovery from sewage sludge via pyrolysis
Bridle, T. R., & Pritchard, D. (2004) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2004.0562 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Simultaneous removal of arsenic, cadmium, and lead from soil by iron-modified magnetic biochar
Wan, X., Li, C., & Parikh, S. J. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114157 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Biochar and forest restoration: a review and meta-analysis of tree growth responses
Thomas, S. C., & Gale, N. V. (2015) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-015-9491-7 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Maturity indices in co-composting of chicken manure and sawdust with biochar
Khan, N., Clark, I., Sanchez-Monedero, M. A., Shea, S., Meier, S., & Bolan, N. S. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.123 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Self-citationEffect of temperature on biochar priming effects and its stability in soils
Fang, Y., Singh, B., & Singh, B. P. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.006 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Lü, F., Zhang, H., Shao, L., Chen, D., & He, P. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep09406 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Arranz, J. M. D. L. R., Rosado, M. J., Paneque, M., Miller, A. Z., & Knicker, H. (2017) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.124 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Odinga, E. S., Waigi, M. G., Gudda, F. O., Wang, J., Yang, B., Hu, X., Li, S., & Gao, Y. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105172 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Biochar and Microbial Signaling: Production Conditions Determine Effects on Microbial Communication
Masiello, C. A., Chen, Y., Gao, X., Liu, S., Cheng, H.-Y., Bennett, M. R., Rudgers, J. A., Wagner, D. S., Zygourakis, K., & Silberg, J. J. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es401458s · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Zhou, H., Zhang, D., Wang, P., Liu, X., Cheng, K., Li, L., Zheng, J., Zhang, X., Zheng, J., Crowley, D. E., et al. (2017) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.006 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Quantity and quality changes of biochar aged for 5 years in soil under field conditions
Dong, X., Li, G., Lin, Q., & Zhao, X. (2017) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2017.08.008 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Jaiswal, A. K., Elad, Y., Paudel, I., Graber, E. R., Cytryn, E., & Frenkel, O. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44382 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Self-citationKumar, A., Joseph, S. D., Tsechansky, L., Privat, K. L., Schreiter, I. J., Schüth, C., & Gräber, E. R. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.157 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Self-citationThe molar H:Corg ratio of biochar is a key factor in mitigating N2O emissions from soil
Cayuela, M. L., Jeffery, S., & van Zwieten, L. (2015) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.015 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationNielsen, S. J., Minchin, T., Kimber, S. W. L., ZWIETEN, L. V., Gilbert, J. A., Munroe, P. R., Joseph, S. D., & Thomas, T. (2014) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.006 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationReactive oxygen species and seed germination
Gomes, M. P., & Garcia, Q. S. (2013) · Biologia · doi:10.2478/s11756-013-0161-y · Cited by 205 · see citing works
The biochar effect: plant resistance to biotic stresses
Elad, Y., Cytryn, E. J., Harel, Y. M., Lew, B., & Gräber, E. R. (2012) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.14601/phytopathol_mediterr-9807 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Jaiswal, A. K., Elad, Y., Graber, E. R., & Frenkel, O. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.051 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationBiological degradation of pyrogenic organic matter in temperate forest soils
Santos, F., Torn, M. S., & Bird, J. A. (2012) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.005 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Zielińska, A., & Oleszczuk, P. (2015) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.02.019 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Mineral–Biochar Composites: Molecular Structure and Porosity
Rawal, A., Joseph, S. D., Hook, J. M., Chia, C. H., Munroe, P. R., Donne, S. W., Lin, Y., Phelan, D. M., Mitchell, D. R. G., Pace, B., et al. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00685 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citationNitrate capture and slow release in biochar amended compost and soil
Hagemann, N., Kammann, C. I., Schmidt, H., Kappler, A. A., & Behrens, S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171214 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Sustainable improvement of soil health utilizing biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A review
Gujre, N., Soni, A., Rangan, L., Tsang, D. C. W., & Mitra, S. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115549 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Schmidt, H., Pandit, B., Martinsen, V., Cornelissen, G., Conte, P., & Kammann, C. (2015) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture5030723 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Zheng, C., Yang, Z., Si, M., Zhu, F., Yang, W., Zhao, F., & Shi, Y. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124376 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Buss, W., & Mašek, O. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.045 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Electrochemical Properties of Biochars and How They Affect Soil Redox Properties and Processes
Joseph, S. D., Husson, O., Gräber, E. R., ZWIETEN, L. V., Taherymoosavi, S., Thomas, T., Nielsen, S. J., Ye, J., Pan, G., Chia, C. H., et al. (2015) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy5030322 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Self-citationAgyarko-Mintah, E., Cowie, A., Singh, B. P., Joseph, S., ZWIETEN, L. V., Cowie, A., Harden, S., & Smillie, R. (2016) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.027 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationInherent organic compounds in biochar–Their content, composition and potential toxic effects
Buss, W., Mašek, O., Graham, M., & Wüst, D. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.035 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationHaile, Z. M., Elad, Y., Rav‐David, D., Gräber, E. R., & Harel, Y. M. (2015) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2445-1 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Houssou, A. A., Li, X., Jeyakumar, P., Wei, L., Huang, L., Huang, Q., Kamran, M. A., Shaheen, S. M., Hou, D., Rinklebe, J., et al. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142582 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Changes in biochar physical and chemical properties: Accelerated biochar aging in an acidic soil
Rechberger, M. V., Kloss, S., Rennhofer, H., Tintner, J., Watzinger, A., Soja, G., Lichtenegger, H. C., & Zehetner, F. (2017) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.096 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
How may biochar influence severity of diseases caused by soilborne pathogens?
Gräber, E. R., Frenkel, O., Jaiswal, A. K., & Elad, Y. (2014) · Carbon Management · doi:10.1080/17583004.2014.913360 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Abrol, V., Ben‐Hur, M., VERHEIJEN, F. G. A., Keizer, J. J., Martins, M. A. S., Tenaw, H., Tchehansky, L., & Gräber, E. R. (2016) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-016-1448-8 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Impact of biochar application on yield-scaled greenhouse gas intensity: A meta-analysis
Liu, X., Mao, P., Li, L., & Ma, J. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.396 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Obia, A., Cornelissen, G., MULDER, J. P. M., & Dörsch, P. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138781 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Chemolithotrophic processes in the bacterial communities on the surface of mineral-enriched biochars
Ye, J., Joseph, S. D., Ji, M., Nielsen, S. J., Mitchell, D. R. G., Donne, S. W., Horvat, J., Wang, J., Munroe, P. R., & Thomas, T. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.187 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationMcBeath, A. V., Wurster, C. M., & Bird, M. I. (2015) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.12.022 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Wu, Z., Zhang, X., Dong, Y., Li, B., & Xiong, Z. (2019) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107625 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Zheng, J., Han, J., Liu, Z., Xia, W., Zhang, X., Li, L., Liu, X., Bian, R., Cheng, K., Zheng, J., et al. (2017) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.034 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Microplastics Mitigation in Sewage Sludge through Pyrolysis: The Role of Pyrolysis Temperature
Ni, B., Zhu, Z.-R., Li, W., Yan, X., Wei, W., Xu, Q., Xia, Z., Dai, X., & Sun, J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00740 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Budai, A., Wang, L., Grønli, M., Strand, L., Antal, M., Abiven, S., Dieguez-Alonso, A., Anca-Couce, A., & Rasse, D. (2014) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf501139f · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationBiochar, compost and biochar-compost blend as options to recover nutrients and sequester carbon
Oldfield, T. L., Sikirica, N., Mondini, C., López, G., Kuikman, P. J., & Holden, N. M. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.061 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Biochar-based fertilizer: Supercharging root membrane potential and biomass yield of rice
Chew, J., Zhu, L., Nielsen, S. J., Gräber, E. R., Mitchell, D. R. G., Horvat, J., Mohammed, M. H., Liu, M., ZWIETEN, L. V., Donne, S. W., et al. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136431 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationChemical Aging Changed Aggregation Kinetics and Transport of Biochar Colloids
Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Shang, J., Shen, C., & Joseph, S. D. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b00583 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citationA quantitative understanding of the role of co-composted biochar in plant growth using meta-analysis
Wang, Y., Villamil, M. B., Davidson, P., & Akdeniz, N. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.244 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Mohamed, B. A., Ellis, N., Kim, C., & Bi, X. T. (2017) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.075 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Shepherd, J. G., Sohi, S., & Heal, K. V. (2016) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.038 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationSoil biochar amendment shapes the composition of N2O-reducing microbial communities
Harter, J., Weigold, P., El-Hadidi, M. S., Huson, D. H., Kappler, A. A., & Behrens, S. (2016) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.220 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Potential effects of biochar on the availability of phosphorus — mechanistic insights
Schneider, F., & Haderlein, S. B. (2016) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.007 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Liao, J., Liu, X., Hu, A., Song, H., Chen, X., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67528-y · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Natasha, N., Shahid, M. A. R., Khalid, S., Bibi, I., Naeem, M. A., Niazi, N. K., Tack, F. M. G., Ippolito, J. A., & Rinklebe, J. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2021.1894064 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationSynergistic Effects of Biochar and NPK Fertilizer on Soybean Yield in an Alkaline Soil
METE, F. Z., Mia, S., Dijkstra, F. A., Abuyusuf, M., & Hossain, A. (2015) · Pedosphere · doi:10.1016/s1002-0160(15)30052-7 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Naisse, C., Girardin, C., Lefèvre, R., Pozzi, A., Maas, R., Stark, A., & Rumpel, C. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12158 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Performance and mechanisms of emerging animal-derived biochars for immobilization of heavy metals
Lei, S., Shi, Y., Qiu, Y., et al. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.374 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Suitability of marginal biomass-derived biochars for soil amendment
Buss, W., Graham, M. C., Shepherd, J. G., & Mašek, O. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.148 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationXu, Z., Xu, X., Tao, X., Yao, C., Tsang, D. C. W., & Cao, X. (2019) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.098 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Plant growth responses to biochar addition: an Australian soils perspective
Macdonald, L. M., Farrell, M., Zwieten, L. V., & Krull, E. S. (2014) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-014-0921-z · Cited by 133 · see citing works
ZWIETEN, L. V., Rose, T. J., HERRIDGE, D. F., Kimber, S. W. L., Rust, J., Cowie, A., & Morris, S. (2015) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2427-3 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationMaestrini, B., Herrmann, A. M., Nannipieri, P., Schmidt, M. W. I., & Abiven, S. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.11.013 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Biochar Surface Oxygenation by Ozonization for Super High Cation Exchange Capacity
Kharel, G., Sacko, O., Feng, X., Morris, J. R., Phillips, C. L., Trippe, K. M., Kumar, S., & Lee, J. W. (2019) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b03536 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Rusty sink of rhizodeposits and associated keystone microbiomes
Jeewani, P. H., Gunina, A., Tao, L., Zhu, Z., Kuzyakov, Y. V., ZWIETEN, L. V., Guggenberger, G., Shen, C., Yu, G., Singh, B. P., et al. (2020) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107840 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationJaiswal, A. K., Alkan, N., Elad, Y., Sela, N., Philosoph, A. M., Gräber, E. R., & Frenkel, O. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70882-6 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Ding, F., Van Zwieten, L., Zhang, W., Weng, Z., Shi, S., Wang, J., & Meng, J. (2018) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-017-1899-6 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationPersistence of biochar in soil
ZWIETEN, L. V., Kammann, C. I., Cayuela, M. L., Singh, B. P., Joseph, S., Kimber, S. W. L., Donne, S. W., Clough, T. J., & Spokas, K. A. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203762264-17 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationOil mallee biochar improves soil structural properties—A study with x-ray micro-CT
Quin, P., Cowie, A., Flavel, R. J., Keen, B., Macdonald, L. M., Morris, S., Singh, B. P., Young, I. M., & ZWIETEN, L. V. (2014) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.022 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationFungo, B., Lehmann, J. C., Kalbitz, K., Thionģo, M., Okeyo, I., Tenywa, M. M., & Neufeldt, H. (2016) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2016.08.012 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationFarias, W. M., de Figueiredo, C. C., Coser, T. R., do Vale, A. T., & Schneider, B. G. (2017) · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science · doi:10.1080/03650340.2017.1360488 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Blanco‐Canqui, H., Laird, D. A., Heaton, E. A., Rathke, S. J., & Acharya, B. S. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12665 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Surface and colloid properties of biochar and implications for transport in porous media
Yang, W., Shang, J., Li, B., & Markus Flury, A. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2019.1699381 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Zwetsloot, M. J., Lehmann, J. C., Bauerle, T. L., Vanek, S. J., Hestrin, R., & Nigussie, A. (2016) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-016-2905-2 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationQian, L., Chen, L., Joseph, S. D., Pan, G., Li, L., Zheng, J., Zhang, X., Zheng, J., Yu, X., & Wang, J. (2014) · Carbon Management · doi:10.1080/17583004.2014.912866 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationKundu, S. K., Patel, S., Halder, P. K., Patel, T., Marzbali, M. H., Pramanik, B. K., Paz‐Ferreiro, J., de Figueiredo, C. C., Bergmann, D., Surapaneni, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Science Water Research & Technology · doi:10.1039/d0ew00763c · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Archanjo, B. S., Mendoza, M. E., Albu, M., Mitchell, D. R. G., Hagemann, N., Mayrhofer, C., Mai, T. L. A., Weng, Z. H., Kappler, A. A., Behrens, S., et al. (2017) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.037 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, L., Xiang, Y., Jing, Y., & Zhang, R. (2019) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05604-1 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Interactions between biochar and mycorrhizal fungi in a water-stressed agricultural soil
Mickan, B. S., Abbott, L. K., Stefanova, K., & Solaiman, Z. M. (2016) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-016-0693-4 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The Use of Biochar for Plant Pathogen Control
Poveda, J., Martínez‐Gómez, Á., Fenoll, C., & Escobar, C. (2021) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-06-20-0248-rvw · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Zwetsloot, M. J., Lehmann, J. C., & Solomon, D. (2014) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6716 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationAn effective biochar-based slow-release fertilizer for reducing nitrogen loss in paddy fields
Dong, D., Wang, C., ZWIETEN, L. V., Wang, H., Jiang, P., Zhou, M., & Wu, W. (2019) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-019-02401-8 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Biochar – synergies and trade‐offs between soil enhancing properties and C sequestration potential
Crombie, K., Mašek, O., Cross, A., & Sohi, S. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12213 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Effect of bamboo vinegar on regulation of germination and radicle growth of seed plants
Mu, J., Uehara, T., & Furuno, T. (2003) · Journal of Wood Science · doi:10.1007/s10086-002-0472-z · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Whitman, T., Enders, A., & Lehmann, J. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.02.009 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationJaiswal, A. K., Frenkel, O., Elad, Y., Lew, B., & Gräber, E. R. (2014) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2331-2 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Liu, Z., Zhu, M., Wang, J., Liu, X., Guo, W., Zheng, J., Bian, R., Wang, G., Zhang, X., Cheng, K., et al. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12644 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Coninck H., 2018, Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre‐industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty
- Graber E. R., 2017, Biochar: A guide to analytical methods, 74
- Van Zwieten L., 2015, Biochar for environmental management, 489
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality
Wang, F., Harindintwali, J. D., Yuan, Z., Wang, M., Wang, F., Li, S., Yin, Z., Huang, L., Fu, Y., Li, L., et al. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100180 · Cited by 1,330 · see citing works
Self-citationOsman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Farghali, M., El-Azazy, M., Elgarahy, A. M., Fahim, R. A., Maksoud, M. I. A. A., Ajlan, A. A., Yousry, M., Saleem, Y., et al. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01424-x · Cited by 515 · see citing works
RETRACTED: Biochar modulating soil biological health: A review
Bolan, S., Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, M., Rao, C. S., Nataraj, K. C., Singh, G., Vinu, A., Bhowmik, A., Sharma, H., et al. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169585 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Self-citationRetractedRole of biochar toward carbon neutrality
Wang, L., Deng, J., Yang, X., Hou, R., & Hou, D. (2023) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-023-00035-7 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Waheed, A., Xu, H., Qiao, X., Aili, A., Yiremaikebayi, Y., Haitao, D., & Muhammad, M. (2025) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107531 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of biochar as a green sorbent for soil remediation
Osman, A. I., Farghali, M., & Rashwan, A. K. (2024) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100882 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Xiao, J., Li, X., Cao, Y., & Chen, G. (2023) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-023-00053-5 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Grover, S., Anderson, H. M., Fleck, J., Kelly, C. N., Schuler, J., Ruark, M. D., & Freedman, Z. B. (2024) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.1002/saj2.20647 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Joseph, S., Cowie, A. L., Van Zwieten, L., Bolan, N., Budai, A., Buss, W., Cayuela, M. L., Graber, E. R., Ippolito, J. A., Kuzyakov, Y., Luo, Y., Ok, Y. S., Palansooriya, K. N., Shepherd, J., Stephens, S., Weng, Z. (., & Lehmann, J.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Wollongbar New South Wales Australia
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO)
- Australian National University (AU)
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Waste Management CEBAS‐CSIC Murcia Spain
- Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences The Volcani Center Agricultural Research Organization Rishon LeTzion Israel
- Colorado State University (US)
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Korea University (KR)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cowie, Annette L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- GCB Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-08-26
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1731-1764
- ISSN
- 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-1707
- OpenAlex
- W3185137361
- Semantic Scholar
- ca047b9bbf4fbea25f917f665390c36770316d49
- Cited by
- 1,090
- References
- 310
- Citations by year
- 2026: 294 · 2025: 282 · 2024: 222 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 74.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- La Trobe University (cc-by)
- Funders
- La Trobe University (2000004349)
- Kazan Federal University
- RUDN University (5–100)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Keywords
- biochar, soil amendment, biochar aging, rhizosphere, soil organic carbon, phosphorus availability, heavy metal uptake, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, crop yield, pyrolysis feedstock, soil carbon stabilization, water retention, soil pH, plant disease resistance, circular economy, food security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review