Cited by 1,090Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAgricultural Science and Fertilization

How biochar works, and when it doesn't: a review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar

Open access
Joseph, Stephen, Cowie, Annette L., Van Zwieten, Lukas, Bolan, Nanthi, Budai, Alice, Buss, Wolfram, Cayuela, Maria Luz, Graber, Ellen R. +9 more·2021·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

We synthesized 20 years of research to explain the interrelated processes that determine soil and plant responses to biochar. The properties of biochar and its effects within agricultural ecosystems largely depend on feedstock and pyrolysis conditions. We describe three stages of reactions of biochar in soil: dissolution (1–3 weeks); reactive surface development (1–6 months); and aging (beyond 6 months). As biochar ages, it is incorporated into soil aggregates, protecting the biochar carbon and promoting the stabilization of rhizodeposits and microbial products. Biochar carbon persists in soil for hundreds to thousands of years. By increasing pH, porosity, and water availability, biochars can create favorable conditions for root development and microbial functions. Biochars can catalyze biotic and abiotic reactions, particularly in the rhizosphere, that increase nutrient supply and uptake by plants, reduce phytotoxins, stimulate plant development, and increase resilience to disease and environmental stressors. Meta‐analyses found that, on average, biochars increase P availability by a factor of 4.6; decrease plant tissue concentration of heavy metals by 17%–39%; build soil organic carbon through negative priming by 3.8% (range −21% to +20%); and reduce non‐CO 2 greenhouse gas emissions from soil by 12%–50%. Meta‐analyses show average crop yield increases of 10%–42% with biochar addition, with greatest increases in low‐nutrient P‐sorbing acidic soils (common in the tropics), and in sandy soils in drylands due to increase in nutrient retention and water holding capacity. Studies report a wide range of plant responses to biochars due to the diversity of biochars and contexts in which biochars have been applied. Crop yields increase strongly if site‐specific soil constraints and nutrient and water limitations are mitigated by appropriate biochar formulations. Biochars can be tailored to address site constraints through feedstock selection, by modifying pyrolysis conditions, through pre‐ or post‐production treatments, or co‐application with organic or mineral fertilizers. We demonstrate how, when used wisely, biochar mitigates climate change and supports food security and the circular economy.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review synthesizes 20 years of research on biochar mechanisms in soil and plants, describing three stages: dissolution (1–3 weeks), reactive surface development (1–6 months), and aging (>6 months). It concludes that biochar can improve yields, nutrient availability, heavy-metal immobilization, soil organic carbon, and greenhouse-gas mitigation when tailored to site constraints, but responses vary widely with feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, application rate, and context.

Key findings

  • Meta-analyses report average crop yield increases of 10%–42% with biochar addition, with greatest increases in low-nutrient P-sorbing acidic soils and in sandy dryland soils, especially when biochar is applied with organic and/or mineral fertilizers.
  • On average, biochar increases P availability by a factor of 4.6; decreases plant tissue concentrations of Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn by 38%, 39%, 25%, and 17%, respectively; builds soil organic carbon through negative priming by 3.8% (range −21% to +20%); and reduces non-CO₂ greenhouse gas emissions from soil by 12%–50%.
  • Biochar carbon persists in soil for hundreds to thousands of years, and aging forms organo-mineral microagglomerates that can increase cation and anion exchange capacity, protect biochar carbon, and stabilize rhizodeposits and microbial products.
  • Effects depend strongly on feedstock, highest treatment temperature, application rate, and site context; low rates (<1 Mg ha⁻¹) as nutrient carriers or biochar compound fertilizers can be cost-effective, while high rates (10–50 Mg ha⁻¹) are used as soil conditioners, and negative effects can occur at high rates or when low-nutrient biochars are applied without fertilizer.

Methods

  • Narrative review and synthesis of 20 years of biochar research, focusing on annual crops and rhizosphere processes, with sections on food security, climate change mitigation, and the circular economy.
  • Draws on published meta-analyses and primary studies, including a summary table of yield-response meta-analyses and a table of biochar mean residence times; no new data were created.
  • The paper describes three reaction stages—dissolution (1–3 weeks), reactive surface development (1–6 months), and aging (>6 months)—and integrates physical, chemical, microbial, and plant-response mechanisms.

Limitations

  • The authors state that knowledge gaps remain regarding long-term field biochar–soil–plant interactions, including longevity of yield response and N₂O emission reduction, the direction/magnitude/duration of organic matter priming, long-term effects of repeated applications, and optimal scheduling of biochar re-application for heavy-metal immobilization.
  • The authors note that few studies have examined biochar or biochar compound fertilizer applied at low, commercially viable rates as single or repeated applications, and that formulations combining biochar with mineral and/or organic fertilizers have received limited research attention with very few field trials.
  • Evident from the text: conclusions rely heavily on meta-analyses and studies with heterogeneous biochars, soils, application rates, and experimental designs; the authors caution that studies without plants, in soil-less media, or in pots cannot readily be extrapolated to field situations.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcbb.12885

Cites

310 of 310 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 377 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisenone given

    Studies report a wide range of plant responses to biochars due to the diversity of biochars and contexts in which biochars have been applied.

    “Studies report a wide range of plant responses to biochars due to the diversity of biochars and contexts in which biochars have been applied.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Biochar properties vary widely, determined largely by feedstock, HTT, and residence time at HTT, as well as treatments applied before and after pyrolysis.

    “Biochar properties vary widely, determined largely by feedstock, HTT, and residence time at HTT, as well as treatments applied before and after pyrolysis (Schimmelpfennig & Glaser, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schimmelpfennig & Glaser, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisenone given

    Meta-analyses found that, on average, biochars increase P availability by a factor of 4.6.

    “Meta-analyses found that, on average, biochars increase P availability by a factor of 4.6;”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationnone given

    Biochar reactions in soil occur in three stages: dissolution (1-3 weeks), reactive surface development (1-6 months), and aging (beyond 6 months).

    “We describe three stages of reactions of biochar in soil: dissolution (1-3 weeks); reactive surface development (1-6 months); and aging (beyond 6 months).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisereasoning

    Biochar carbon persists in soil for hundreds to thousands of years.

    “Biochar carbon persists in soil for hundreds to thousands of years.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 147
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Wood biochars pyrolyzed above 450-500°C have a mean residence time of hundreds to a thousand years, compared with decades for manure biochars.

    “Wood biochars pyrolyzed at temperatures above 450-500°C have a mean residence time of hundreds to a thousand years, compared with decades for manure biochars (Kuzyakov et al., 2014;Kuzyakov & Gavrichkova, 2009;Singh et al., 2012Singh et al., , 2015;;Wang et al., 2016; Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kuzyakov et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Singh et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    As biochar ages, it is incorporated into soil aggregates, protecting the biochar carbon and promoting the stabilization of rhizodeposits and microbial products.

    “As biochar ages, it is incorporated into soil aggregates, protecting the biochar carbon and promoting the stabilization of rhizodeposits and microbial products.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The greatest crop yield increases with biochar addition occur in sandy soils in drylands due to increase in nutrient retention and water holding capacity.

    “and in sandy soils in drylands due to increase in nutrient retention and water holding capacity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When used wisely, biochar mitigates climate change and supports food security and the circular economy.

    “We demonstrate how, when used wisely, biochar mitigates climate change and supports food security and the circular economy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Biochars can be tailored to address site constraints through feedstock selection, by modifying pyrolysis conditions, through pre- or postproduction treatments, or co-application with organic or mineral fertilizers.

    “Biochars can be tailored to address site constraints through feedstock selection, by modifying pyrolysis conditions, through pre-or postproduction treatments, or co-application with organic or mineral fertilizers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many studies report that biochar increases plant productivity, with an average yield increase of 10%-42%, although negative effects have also been recorded.

    “Many studies report that biochar increases plant productivity, with an average yield increase of 10%-42% (Table 1), although negative effects have also been recorded (Jeffery et al., 2017;Macdonald et al., 2014;Ye et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jeffery et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Macdonald et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ye et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Economic analyses suggest that formulations combining biochar with fertilizer (BCF), applied at low rates, are likely to be the most cost-effective approach for broadacre cropping in higher income countries.

    “Economic analyses suggest that formulations combining biochar with fertilizer (biochar compound fertilizer [BCF]), applied at low rates, are likely to be the most cost-effective approach for broadacre cropping in higher income countries (Robb et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Robb et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Biochars can affect seed germination, plant growth, flowering, resistance to disease, and acclimation to abiotic stresses.

    “In terms of plant performance, biochars can affect seed germination, plant growth, flowering, resistance to disease, and acclimation to abiotic stresses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    HTTs above 500°C produced biochars that were more persistent in soil, with higher ash contents and pHs.

    “HTTs above 500°C produced biochars that were more persistent in soil, with higher ash contents and pHs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar is a reductant, and therefore lowers soil redox potential.

    “Biochar is a reductant, and therefore lowers soil redox potential (Joseph et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Joseph et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The CEC and AEC of biochar increase over time as additional functional groups form on biochar surfaces, increasing its ability to sorb and retain cations and anions.

    “However, the CEC and AEC of biochar increase over time as additional functional groups form on biochar surfaces (see Section 2.3), increasing its ability to sorb and retain cations and anions (Hagemann, Joseph, et al., 2017;Hagemann et al., 2017;Rechberger et al., 2017;de la Rosa et al., 2018;Wang et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hagemann, Joseph, et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hagemann et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rechberger et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The increase in solutes increases the electrical conductivity and pH and reduces Eh.

    “which increases the electrical conductivity and pH and reduces Eh (Joseph et al., 2015)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Joseph et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most biochars are alkaline, with acid-neutralizing capacity up to 33% of agricultural lime due to their carbonate, oxide, and hydroxide content.

    “Most biochars are alkaline, with acid-neutralizing capacity up to 33% of agricultural lime (Van Zwieten, Kimber, Morris, Chan, et al., 2010) due to their carbonate, oxide, and hydroxide content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van Zwieten, Kimber, Morris, Chan, et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Use of biochar in annual crops has been the most commonly studied application to date and is anticipated to be the most widespread future application of biochar.

    “Use of biochar in annual crops has been the most commonly studied application to date and is anticipated to be the most widespread future application of biochar.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These solutes increase dissolved organic carbon (DOC), cations, and anions in the soil solution.

    “These solutes increase dissolved organic carbon (DOC), cations, and anions in the soil solution (Silber et al., 2010),”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silber et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hydrophobicity can inhibit water uptake by biochar particles, but this effect dissipates over time.

    “Hydrophobicity can inhibit water uptake by biochar particles (Gray et al., 2014), but this effect dissipates over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gray et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Low-temperature biochars (HTT < 450°C) and biochars produced in facilities with incomplete separation of pyrolysis vapors generally have higher contents of water-soluble organic compounds.

    “Low-temperature biochars (HTT < 450°C) and biochars produced in facilities with incomplete separation of pyrolysis vapors (Buss & Mašek, 2014;Buss et al., 2015) generally have higher contents of water-soluble organic compounds, particularly low molecular weight neutrals (alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, phenolics, karrikins), polyphenols/polyphenolic acids, and complex macromolecules,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Buss & Mašek, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Buss et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    After the initial rapid dissolution stage, continued dissolution is faster in acidic and low-nutrient soils.

    “After the initial rapid dissolution stage, continued dissolution is faster in acidic (Silber et al., 2010) and low-nutrient soils (Wang et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Silber et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Biochar C persists in soil for one to two orders of magnitude longer than unpyrolyzed organic residues, providing long-term C sequestration when applied to soil.

    “Biochar C persists in soil for one to two orders of magnitude longer than unpyrolyzed organic residues, providing long-term C sequestration when applied to soil.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wood biochar (HTT 620°C) at 80 Mg ha-1 in a pot trial inhibited germination of tomatoes, while biochar made from paper sludge and wheat husk (500°C) or sewage sludge (600°C), and applied at the same rate, had no effect on lentil, tomato, cress, cucumber, and lettuce seeds.

    “For example, wood biochar (HTT 620°C) at 80 Mg ha -1 in a pot trial inhibited germination of tomatoes, while biochar made from paper sludge and wheat husk (500°C) or sewage sludge (600°C), and applied at the same rate, had no effect on lentil, tomato, cress, cucumber, and lettuce seeds (Gascó et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gascó et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The acceleration of oxidation is especially intensive in soils with fluctuating water level or with high content of iron (oxyhydr)oxides.

    “and is especially intensive in soils with fluctuating water level (Merino et al., 2020) or with high content of iron (oxyhydr)oxides (Merino et al., 2020;Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Merino et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochars (especially those made at >400°C) can have a high content of free radicals, which can lead to the formation of reactive oxygen species and strongly accelerate oxidation reactions.

    “Biochars (especially those made at >400°C) can have a high content of free radicals, which can lead to the formation of reactive oxygen species (Pignatello et al., 2017;Ruan et al., 2019;Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021) and strongly accelerate oxidation reactions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pignatello et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ruan et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Hormesis is commonly observed, that is, high rates of biochar can have a detrimental effect, while low rates can be stimulatory.

    “Hormesis is commonly observed, that is, high rates of biochar can have a detrimental effect, while low rates can be stimulatory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Germination rates were not affected by the addition of BCF at <700 kg ha-1 in pot or field trials, while seedling growth was the same or greater than with NPK fertilizer alone.

    “Germination rates were not affected by the addition of BCF at <700 kg ha -1 in pot or field trials, while seedling growth was the same or greater than with NPK fertilizer alone (Joseph, Graber, et al., 2013;Liao et al., 2020;Qian et al., 2014;Zheng et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Joseph, Graber, et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Liao et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Qian et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some studies that reported negative effects of biochar on germination at very high rates (120 Mg ha-1) applied biochar directly to seeds in a petri dish, in the absence of soil or other media, which is unlikely to reflect the effects of biochar in the field environment.

    “Some studies (e.g., Uslu et al., 2020) that reported negative effects of biochar on germination at very high rates (120 Mg ha -1 ) applied biochar directly to seeds in a petri dish, in the absence of soil or other media, which is unlikely to reflect the effects of biochar in the field environment, where charged clay minerals, microbes, and organic compounds interact with biochar, and are likely to”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Uslu et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These small particles are more mobile and can have higher reactivity, surface charge, radical content, and surface area than larger particles, which can increase reactivity and nutrient availability.

    “These small particles are more mobile and can have higher reactivity, surface charge, radical content (Das et al., 2020;Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021) and surface area than larger particles (Yang et al., 2020), which can increase reactivity and nutrient availability (Wang et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Das et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yang et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar particles have low density and are easily crushed.

    “Biochar particles have low density and are easily crushed (Abdullah & Wu, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Abdullah & Wu, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Free radicals associated with biochar have been found to degrade certain organic and inorganic pollutants which in turn could enhance germination and seedling growth.

    “Furthermore, free radicals associated with biochar have been found to degrade certain organic and inorganic pollutants (Ruan et al., 2019) which in turn could enhance germination and seedling growth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ruan et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar affects the abundance of specific microorganisms especially in the rhizosphere, and the interactions between biochar, soil, plants, and the microbiome affect plant growth and health.

    “Biochar affects the abundance of specific microorganisms especially in the rhizosphere, and the interactions between biochar, soil, plants, and the microbiome affect plant growth and health (Anderson et al., 2011;Jaiswal et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Anderson et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jaiswal et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some organic molecules released can be phytotoxic, so applying biochar a few weeks in advance of sowing supports seedling growth through the development of a beneficial rhizosphere microbiome.

    “Yet, some organic molecules released can be phytotoxic, so applying biochar a few weeks in advance of sowing supports seedling growth through the development of a beneficial rhizosphere microbiome (Jaiswal et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jaiswal et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    By reducing soil bulk density and increasing soil aeration, biochar can provide oxygen for seed germination and improve seedling growth through lower resistance to root penetration and seedling emergence.

    “For instance, by reducing soil bulk density and increasing soil aeration, biochar can provide oxygen for seed germination and improve seedling growth through lower resistance to root penetration and seedling emergence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Low temperature biochars have a higher content of water-soluble organic molecules that can promote germination and early growth at low application rates; these biochars are also likely to cause inhibition if applied at high rates.

    “These effects vary between biochars: low temperature biochars have a higher content of water-soluble organic molecules that can promote germination and early growth at low application rates; these biochars are also likely to cause inhibition if applied at high rates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Phenols and polyphenols released from biochar can break seed dormancy, leading to germination, and also promote seedling growth.

    “Similarly, phenols and polyphenols released from biochar (Reynolds et al., 2018) can break seed dormancy, leading to germination, and also promote seedling growth (Mu et al., 2003;Stoms, 1982).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Reynolds et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mu et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stoms, 1982

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar can lower the production of reactive oxygen species by plants: Natasha et al. (2021) showed that the production of reactive oxygen species was lower, on average, by 33% in plants grown in soils contaminated with trace elements where biochar was applied (2%-10% w/w).

    “In addition, biochar can lower the production of reactive oxygen species by plants: Natasha et al. (2021) showed that the production of reactive oxygen species was lower, on average, by 33% in plants grown in soils contaminated with trace elements where biochar was applied (2%-10% w/w).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Natasha et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Most biochars and biochar formulations do not inhibit germination and early growth of plants in soil unless applied at very high rates (e.g., >40-50 Mg ha-1), and can promote germination and seedling growth at moderate rates.

    “In summary, most biochars and biochar formulations do not inhibit germination and early growth of plants in soil unless applied at very high rates (e.g., >40-50 Mg ha -1 ), and can promote germination and seedling growth at moderate rates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Negative effects on germination can result where high rates are applied due to release of soluble salts or phytotoxic levels of organic compounds, where biochar is contaminated, and where soil is absent.

    “Negative effects on germination can result where high rates are applied due to release of soluble salts or phytotoxic levels of organic compounds, where biochar is contaminated, and where soil is absent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The quantity of karrikins and germination response varied widely between biochars studied by Kochanek et al. (2016).

    “The quantity of karrikins and germination response varied widely between biochars studied by Kochanek et al. (2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kochanek et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The mechanisms for the positive effects largely involve water-soluble organic compounds that stimulate germination and seedling growth, or reactions that deactivate inhibitory factors such as heavy metals and phytotoxic organic compounds.

    “The mechanisms for the positive effects largely involve water-soluble organic compounds that stimulate germination and seedling growth, or reactions that deactivate inhibitory factors such as heavy metals and phytotoxic organic compounds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PAHs in biochar are generally of little or no concern for plant growth due to their strong binding by biochar, and their concentration is usually below regulatory limits if biochar is made under slow pyrolysis conditions.

    “However, PAHs in biochar are generally of little or no concern for plant growth due to their strong binding by biochar, and furthermore, their concentration is usually below regulatory limits if biochar is made under slow pyrolysis conditions (Buss et al., 2015;Hale et al., 2012;Hilber et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Buss et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hale et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hilber et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Root hairs enter biochar pores, roots wrap around biochar, and very small biochar particles can attach to root surfaces.

    “Root hairs enter biochar pores, roots wrap around biochar (Joseph et al., 2010;Prendergast-Miller et al., 2014), and very small biochar particles can attach to root surfaces (Figure 1; Chew et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Joseph et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Prendergast-Miller et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chew et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Small biochar particles can migrate to the root surface and can alter the abundance of specific root-associated bacteria.

    “Small biochar particles can migrate to the root surface and can alter the abundance of specific root-associated bacteria (Chew et al., 2020;Kolton et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chew et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kolton et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In low P soils, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) invade the pores of biochar, especially biochars with high P content on the pore surface, which can increase plant P uptake.

    “In low P soils, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) invade the pores of biochar, especially biochars with high P content on the pore surface, which can increase plant P uptake (Gujre et al., 2020;Solaiman et al., 2019;Vanek & Lehmann, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gujre et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Solaiman et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vanek & Lehmann, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analyses have shown that biochar increases microbial biomass and activities, particularly in high-N soils and with biochars produced at low temperature from nutrient-rich feedstocks.

    “Meta-analyses have shown that biochar increases microbial biomass and activities (Pokharel et al., 2020), particularly in high-N soils (Zhang et al., 2018) and with biochars produced at low temperature from nutrient-rich feedstocks (Li et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Pokharel et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zhang et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Li et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    The increase in enzyme activities and shift in microbial community diversity and activity are directly dependent on strong increase in hydrophobic compounds in soil that favors activity of fungi.

    “and (iv) strong increase in hydrophobic compounds in soil that favors activity of fungi (Deng et al., 2021;Xia et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Deng et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Xia et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The increase in enzyme activities and shift in microbial community diversity and activity are directly dependent on increased aeration, and consequently, better conditions for fungi and aerobic bacteria, as well as oxidative enzymes.

    “(ii) increased aeration, and consequently, better conditions for fungi and aerobic bacteria, as well as oxidative enzymes;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The increase in enzyme activities as well as the shift in microbial community diversity and activity are directly dependent on pH increase after biochar addition, as soil acidity is the main factor regulating microbial composition.

    “This increase in enzyme activities as well as the shift in microbial community diversity and activity (Jaiswal, Elad, et al., 2018) are directly dependent on (i) pH increase after biochar addition, as soil acidity is the main factor regulating microbial composition (Rousk et al., 2010);”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jaiswal, Elad, et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rousk et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Li et al. (2020) noted a negative effect of high biochar rates (>50 Mg ha-1) on microbial diversity, and suggested potential causes: introduction of toxic components that inhibit some species; increase in the C:N ratios of SOM that limits microbial C utilization; and disruption of microbial microenvironments.

    “Li et al. (2020) noted a negative effect of high biochar rates (>50 Mg ha -1 ) on microbial diversity, and suggested the following potential causes: (i) introduction of toxic components that inhibit some species; (ii) increase in the C:N ratios of SOM that limits microbial C utilization, possibly only in the short term and only to the extent that the organic C is metabolized; and (iii) disruption”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Blackwell et al. (2015) found that a phosphorus-enhanced BCF increased root colonization to 75% compared with 20% in mineral fertilizer and unfertilized control and increased P uptake efficiency.

    “Blackwell et al. (2015) found that a phosphorus-enhanced BCF increased root colonization to 75% compared with 20% in mineral fertilizer and unfertilized control and increased P uptake efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Blackwell et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The surface area and porosity increase, and a fine layer of organic matter with a high concentration of C-O and C-N functional groups forms around the external and some of the internal pore surfaces of the biochar and BCF.

    “The surface area and porosity increase (Schreiter et al., 2020), and a fine layer of organic matter with a high concentration of C-O and C-N functional groups forms around the external and some of the internal pore surfaces of the biochar and BCF.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schreiter et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The adsorption of root exudates, microbial metabolites, and microbial necromass increases SOM levels and thus increases soil organic carbon (SOC).

    “The adsorption of root exudates, microbial metabolites, and microbial necromass increases SOM levels and thus increases soil organic carbon (SOC; see Section 4.2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    These layers are redox-active and mesoporous.

    “These layers are redox-active and mesoporous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gases such as NH3, N2O, and CH4 produced through biotic and abiotic reactions of fertilizers in soils and/or through chemical reactions on the surfaces of the biochar can diffuse into the nanopores (<50 nm), where they can react with oxidants and reductants, especially if the pores contain water, which reduces N loss and GHG emissions.

    “Gases such as NH 3 , N 2 O, and CH 4 produced through biotic and abiotic reactions of fertilizers in soils and/or through chemical reactions on the surfaces of the biochar can diffuse into the nanopores (<50 nm), where they can react with oxidants and reductants, especially if the pores contain water, which reduces N loss and GHG emissions (Section 4.3; Chiu & Huang, 2020;Quin et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chiu & Huang, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Quin et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The increase in enzyme activities and shift in microbial community diversity and activity are directly dependent on changes in metabolic needs due to the prevalence of large organic compounds, and consequently, shift in the community toward K-strategists, decrease in gram-negative bacteria, shift toward saprophytic fungi, and increase in peroxidases.

    “(iii) changes in metabolic needs due to the prevalence of large organic compounds, and consequently, shift in the community toward K-strategists (Cui et al., 2020), decrease in gram-negative bacteria, shift toward saprophytic fungi, and increase in peroxidases;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cui et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochars, particularly those made at low temperature from crop residues, cause shifts in microbial community composition, increasing the ratios of fungi to bacteria, and gram-positive to gram-negative bacteria.

    “Biochars, particularly those made at low temperature from crop residues, cause shifts in microbial community composition, increasing the ratios of fungi to bacteria, and gram-positive to gram-negative bacteria (Zhang et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Fungi and bacteria inhabit the larger nutrient-rich pores of biochar (>2 μm) where they mine the nutrients in the biochar and those that have been absorbed from fertilizers.

    “Fungi and bacteria inhabit the larger nutrient-rich pores of biochar (>2 µm) where they mine the nutrients in the biochar and those that have been absorbed from fertilizers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar pores may become filled with organic matter and minerals, protecting organic matter from microbial decomposition and reduces availability of nutrients.

    “Biochar pores may become filled with organic matter and minerals, protecting organic matter from microbial decomposition (Pignatello et al., 2017) and reduces availability of nutrients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pignatello et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The meta-analysis by Pokharel et al. (2020) identified that biochar increased microbial biomass C and the activities of the enzymes urease, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase by 22%, 23%, 25%, and 20%, respectively, with greatest effects in acidic fine-textured soils.

    “The meta-analysis by Pokharel et al. (2020) identified that biochar increased microbial biomass C and the activities of the enzymes urease, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase by 22%, 23%, 25%, and 20%, respectively, with greatest effects in acidic fine-textured soils.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pokharel et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar can retain nutrients, especially N, released as fertilizers dissolve, and nutrients already present in soil, reducing loss through leaching.

    “Biochar can retain nutrients, especially N, released as fertilizers dissolve, and nutrients already present in soil, reducing loss through leaching (Haider et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Haider et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most K in biochar is present in soluble forms, released in the short term after application to soil, and is readily available to plants.

    “whereas most K in biochar is present in soluble forms, released in the short term after application to soil (Silber et al., 2010), and is readily available to plants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Silber et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    BCF attached to the root or located in the rhizosphere of rice grown in flooded soils significantly alters the abundance of specific microorganisms that increase nutrient availability.

    “and the abundance of specific microorganisms that increase nutrient availability (Chew et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chew et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While the stimulation of microbial activity by easily-mineralizable components of biochar can reduce N availability through microbial immobilization, it also accelerates the mineralization of organic matter and nutrient cycling, and AMF root colonization, which can increase N and P uptake by plants, and can also improve root growth under water stress.

    “While the stimulation of microbial activity by easily-mineralizable components of biochar can reduce N availability through microbial immobilization (Clough et al., 2013), it also accelerates the mineralization of organic matter and nutrient cycling, and AMF root colonization, which can increase N and P uptake by plants, as discussed above (Solaiman et al., 2019) and can also improve root growth”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Clough et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Solaiman et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analyses have found that biochar application commonly increases P availability, particularly when applied to acidic or neutral soils, and for biochar produced from low C:N feedstocks (e.g., manure, crop residues), and produced at low temperatures.

    “Meta-analyses have found that biochar application commonly increases P availability, particularly when applied to acidic or neutral soils, and for biochar produced from low C:N feedstocks (e.g., manure, crop residues), and produced at low temperatures (Gao et al., 2019;Glaser & Lehr, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gao et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Glaser & Lehr, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The opposite has also been observed, with pyrolysis increasing plant-available P although decreasing water-extractable P.

    “The opposite has also been observed, with pyrolysis increasing plant-available P although decreasing water-extractable P (Wang et al., 2014;Zwetsloot et al., 2015Zwetsloot et al., , 2016)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zwetsloot et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    BCF attached to the root or located in the rhizosphere of rice grown in flooded soils significantly alters the root membrane potential.

    “the root membrane potential (the potential difference between the inside of the root and the soil)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chew et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analysis found that biochar reduces N leaching on average by 26%, though it can increase ammonia volatilization at biochar application rates >40 Mg ha-1 and with biochar pH > 9.

    “For example, meta-analysis found that biochar reduces N leaching on average by 26%, though it can increase ammonia volatilization at biochar application rates >40 Mg ha -1 and with biochar pH > 9 (Haider et al., 2020;Liu, Zhang, et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Haider et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Liu, Zhang, et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar can also adsorb pathogenic enzymes and toxic metabolites exuded by soil-borne pathogens, thus reducing the concentration of virulence factors in the root zone and lowering disease severity.

    “Biochar can also adsorb pathogenic enzymes and toxic metabolites exuded by soil-borne pathogens, thus reducing the concentration of virulence factors in the root zone and lowering disease severity (Jaiswal et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jaiswal et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adsorption of microbial signaling molecules (especially acyl-homoserine lactone) on biochar surfaces can disrupt soil microbial communication, which could reduce the effects of pathogens.

    “Adsorption of microbial signaling molecules (especially acyl-homoserine lactone) on biochar surfaces can disrupt soil microbial communication, which could reduce the effects of pathogens (Gao et al., 2016;Masiello et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gao et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Masiello et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Incorporation into organo-mineral microagglomerates can reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) through interaction with reduced Fe, organic compounds, and free radicals, reducing availability to plants.

    “Incorporation into organo-mineral microagglomerates can reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) through interaction with reduced Fe, organic compounds, and free radicals (Odinga et al., 2020), including through electron shuttling (Xu et al., 2019), reducing their availability to plants (Kumar, Joseph, et al., 2018;Kumar et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Odinga et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Xu et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kumar, Joseph, et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Generally, no impact of biochar on plant disease is found at low rates (<2 Mg ha -1 ), positive impacts at moderate rates (2-20 Mg ha -1 ), and negative impacts at relatively high rates (>50 Mg ha -1 ).

    “Generally, no impact is found at low rates (<2 Mg ha -1 ), positive impacts are seen at moderate rates (2-20 Mg ha -1 ), and negative impacts at relatively high rates (>50 Mg ha -1 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Alkalinity from biochar increases pH of acid soils, increasing negatively charged exchange sites on clay particles, attracting cationic metals.

    “Alkalinity from biochar (the liming effect) increases pH of acid soils, increasing the negatively charged exchange sites on clay particles, attracting cationic metals (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Manure biochars commonly contain higher Ca than plant-derived biochars, and thus can immobilize cationic heavy metals through ion exchange.

    “Manure biochars commonly contain higher Ca than plant-derived biochars, and thus can immobilize cationic heavy metals (e.g., Cd 2+ and Cu 2+ ) through ion exchange (Lei et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lei et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sewage sludge biochar decreased bioaccumulation of As, Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, and Pb, but increased that of Cd and Zn in an acidic paddy soil.

    “For example, sewage sludge biochar decreased the bioaccumulation of As, Cr, Co, Cu, Ni, and Pb, but increased that of Cd and Zn in an acidic paddy soil (Khan et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Khan et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Microbes can form biofilms on biochar surfaces and establish corrosion cells that increase the solubility of metal species.

    “Microbes can form biofilms on biochar surfaces, and establish corrosion cells that increase the solubility of metal species (e.g., insoluble Al 2 O 3 to soluble Al; Joseph, Van Zwieten, et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Joseph, Van Zwieten, et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Slow release of P from BCF and biochar can increase P-use efficiency in tropical soils over the medium-to long-term, possibly through high P biochars and reduced P sorption due to DOM released from biochar.

    “Slow release of P from BCF and biochar can increase P-use efficiency in tropical soils over the medium-to long-term (Lustosa Filho et al., 2020), possibly through (i) input with high P biochars such as those made from manure or sewage sludge; and (ii) reduced P sorption due to DOM released from biochar (Schneider & Haderlein, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lustosa Filho et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schneider & Haderlein, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Residual effects of single application of biochar on pH have been recorded, and some residual yield benefits have been observed.

    “Residual effects of single application of biochar on pH have been recorded, and some residual yield benefits have been observed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochars buffer pH and poise Eh, which can create and maintain conditions in the rhizosphere that support plant growth and resilience to environmental pressures.

    “In addition to in planta responses discussed above, biochars buffer pH and poise (equilibrate) Eh (Husson, 2013;Joseph et al., 2015) which can create and maintain conditions in the rhizosphere that support plant growth and resilience to a range of environmental pressures, such as drought, heat, pathogens and pollutants (Husson et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Husson, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Joseph et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Husson et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increased fruit yield and quality, and resistance to powdery mildew and broad mite, were observed over three seasons in fertilized, irrigated peppers after application of greenwaste and woody biochars.

    “Kumar, Elad, et al. (2018) observed increased fruit yield and quality, and resistance to the pathogen causing powdery mildew and the arthropod pest broad mite, over three seasons in fertilized, irrigated peppers after application of greenwaste and woody biochars.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kumar, Elad, et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Crop growth on Terra Preta soils is approximately double that on adjacent unamended soils, providing evidence that biochar can increase soil fertility over centuries.

    “Crop growth on Terra Preta soils is approximately double that on adjacent unamended soils, providing evidence that biochar can increase soil fertility over centuries (Lehmann et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lehmann et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Terra Preta soils are valid analogues for long-term aging of modern biochar.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Aging through interactions of biochar with soil minerals and microbes generally leads to functionalized surfaces consisting of organo-mineral microagglomerates, which can increase nutrient-holding capacity.

    “In summary, aging through interactions of biochar with soil minerals and microbes generally leads to functionalized surfaces consisting of organo-mineral microagglomerates, which can increase nutrient-holding capacity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This could contribute to long-term increase in P availability in response to biochar application, with enhancement lasting up to 5 years.

    “This could contribute to long-term increase in P availability in response to biochar application, such as identified in the meta-analysis of Glaser and Lehr (2019), who reported enhancement lasting up to 5 years.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Glaser and Lehr, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Under sufficient and drought water conditions, Chenopodium quinoa and maize grew significantly better in biochar treatments, attributed to improved plant traits rather than increased root zone water content.

    “Under sufficient and drought water conditions, Chenopodium quinoa and maize both grew significantly better in biochar treatments, which was attributed to improved plant traits (lower proline content and less negative osmotic potential) rather than to increased root zone water content (Ahmed et al., 2018;Kammann et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ahmed et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kammann et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Moderate rates (2-6 Mg ha -1 ) of rice husk biochar applied with fertilizer gave a residual benefit for pasture yield lasting at least 3 years, associated with enhanced microbial activity and diversity.

    “Rafiq et al. (2020) found that moderate rates (2-6 Mg ha -1 ) of rice husk (high ash) biochar applied with fertilizer gave a residual benefit for pasture yield, lasting at least 3 years, associated with enhanced microbial activity and diversity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rafiq et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Biochar can support plant growth, health, and resilience to disease and environmental stressors.

    “Thus, biochar can support plant growth, health, and resilience to disease and environmental stressors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Soil pH is consistently identified as a key variable, with responses greatest in acidic soils because of the liming effect of biochar and a concomitant decline in available Al.

    “Soil pH is consistently identified as a key variable (Dai et al., 2020;Jeffery et al., 2011): Responses were greatest in acidic soils, because of the liming effect of biochar and a concomitant decline in available Al (Van Zwieten, Rose, et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dai et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jeffery et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Van Zwieten, Rose, et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rhizodeposits are protected in soil microaggregates and Fe (oxyhydr)oxides, and this mechanism may provide long-term stabilization of newly added plant C.

    “Rhizodeposits are protected in soil microaggregates and Fe (oxyhydr)oxides (Jeewani et al., 2020), and a decadal study indicates potential for this mechanism to provide longterm stabilization of newly added plant C (Weng et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jeewani et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Weng et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aged biochar particles can have higher negative surface charge than fresh biochar due to higher concentration of C-O functional groups, increasing CEC and capacity to adsorb organic molecules.

    “These particles can have higher negative charge on the surface compared with fresh biochar due to the higher concentration of C-O functional groups (Wang, Zhang, et al., 2019), further increasing CEC and capacity to adsorb organic molecules.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang, Zhang, et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Microagglomerates and portions of the C matrix can detach, and colloidal-sized particles can migrate through the soil profile.

    “Microagglomerates and portions of the C matrix can detach, and colloidal-sized particles can migrate through the soil profile.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Formation of microagglomerates increases surface area, CEC and AEC, but pore volume generally decreases compared to fresh biochar after multiple crop cycles.

    “The formation of microagglomerates increases the surface area, CEC and AEC, but the pore volume generally decreases compared to the fresh biochar after multiple crop cycles, for example, Dong et al. (2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dong et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analyses have found yield responses of annual crops and trees of 10%-42% and identified site and biochar features giving greatest responses.

    “Meta-analyses have found yield responses of annual crops and trees of 10%-42% and identified site and biochar features giving greatest responses (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar can rapidly transfer charge, which could enhance plants' capacity to cope with oxidative stress.

    “Biochar can rapidly transfer charge (Sun, Levin, et al., 2017;Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021), which could also enhance plants' capacity to cope with oxidative stress (Husson et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sun, Levin, et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yu & Kuzyakov, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Husson et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sandy soils and soils with CEC below 100 mmolc kg -1 or organic C content below 20 g kg -1 are most responsive to biochar.

    “Sandy soils and soils with CEC below 100 mmol c kg -1 or organic C content below 20 g kg -1 are most responsive (Dai et al., 2020;Ye et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dai et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ye et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Heavy metal pollution in arable land significantly impacts plant growth and food safety, especially in developing countries.

    “Heavy metal pollution in arable land significantly impacts plant growth and food safety (Luo et al., 2018) especially in developing countries (Hou et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Luo et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hou et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar increased P availability by a factor of 5.1 and 2.4 in acidic and neutral soils, respectively, but had no effect in alkaline soils or at application rates below 10 Mg ha -1 or with biochars produced at HTT < 600 °C.

    “They noted that biochar increased P availability by a factor of 5.1 and 2.4 in acidic and neutral soils, respectively, but it had no effect in alkaline soils or at application rates below 10 Mg ha -1 or with biochars produced at HTT < 600 °C (Glaser & Lehr, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Glaser & Lehr, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pyrolysis concentrates most heavy metals, but some metals such as Cd, Zn, and As can be partly volatilized during pyrolysis resulting in lower concentrations than feedstock.

    “Although the pyrolysis process concentrates most heavy metals, some metals such as Cd and Zn (Dong et al., 2015) and As (Zhang et al., 2020) can be partly volatilized during pyrolysis resulting in lower concentrations than the feedstock.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dong et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zhang et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The optimal biochar dose differs between studies and depends on biochar characteristics, soil properties, and the constraint being addressed.

    “The optimal biochar dose differed between studies (Table 1) and is dependent on the biochar characteristics, soil properties, and the constraint being addressed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochars generally increase soil water-holding capacity, which would enhance resilience of agricultural systems to drought.

    “Biochars are generally found to increase soil water-holding capacity, which would enhance resilience of agricultural systems to drought, especially under climate change (Edeh et al., 2020)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Edeh et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analyses show increases in plant available water content of 33%-45% in coarse-textured soils and 9%-14% in clay soils, with greatest response at 30-70 Mg ha -1 .

    “Meta-analyses have shown increases in plant available water content of 33%-45% in coarse-textured soils and 9%-14% in clay soils (Edeh et al., 2020;Omondi et al., 2016;Razzaghi et al., 2020), with greatest response at 30-70 Mg ha -1 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Edeh et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Omondi et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Razzaghi et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Co-application of biochar with N fertilizer tended to provide the greatest yield increase, and biochar can increase fertilizer N-use efficiency.

    “The co-application of biochar with N fertilizer tended to provide the greatest yield increase, supporting previous evidence (Van Zwieten, Kimber, Morris, Chan, et al., 2010) that biochar can increase fertilizer N-use efficiency”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van Zwieten, Kimber, Morris, Chan, et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Among carbon dioxide removal strategies, biochar is suggested as a preferred method due to comparatively low cost and large environmental benefits.

    “Among carbon dioxide removal strategies, biochar is suggested as a preferred method due to comparatively low cost and large environmental benefits (Smith, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smith, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The average 27% increase in photosynthetic rate in C3 plants, but no effect on C4 plants, associated with increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content was attributed to combined effects of biochar on water availability and N nutrition.

    “The average 27% increase in photosynthetic rate in C 3 plants (but no effect on C 4 plants) observed in the metaanalysis of He et al. (2020) associated with increased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content was attributed to the combined effects of biochar on water availability and N nutrition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites He et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis of rice production showed a net yield increase of 16%, with greatest response at 11-20 Mg ha -1 and with biochars produced at 400-450°C.

    “A meta-analysis of the impacts of biochar on rice production (Awad et al., 2018) showed a net yield increase of 16%, with greatest response at 11-20 Mg ha -1 and with biochars produced at 400-450°C.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Awad et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sequential additions of biochar to soil will continue to build SOC stocks, whereas additions of unpyrolyzed organic matter will be rapidly mineralized and increase SOC stocks only until equilibrium.

    “Sequential additions of biochar to soil will continue to build SOC stocks, whereas additions of unpyrolyzed organic matter (plant litter, compost, manure) will be rapidly mineralized, and will increase SOC stocks only until an equilibrium is reached where inputs equal decomposition rate (Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    X-ray μ-tomography observed increases in total soil porosity, connectivity of pore space and number of fine pores across soils of different texture.

    “Using X-ray μ-tomography, Quin et al. (2014) observed increases in total soil porosity, connectivity of pore space and number of fine pores across soils of different texture, explaining the results of Edeh et al. (2020) and Razzaghi et al. (2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Quin et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Edeh et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Razzaghi et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar has been recognized as a negative emissions technology, in addition to reducing GHG emissions from soil.

    “Biochar has been recognized as a negative emissions technology (de Coninck et al., 2018;Cowie et al., 2020), in addition to reducing GHG emissions from soil, as reviewed below.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites de Coninck et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cowie et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar may have no effect on yields when low-nutrient biochars are applied without fertilizer, or when biochar is applied to nutrient-rich soils.

    “Biochar may have no effect on yields when low-nutrient biochars are applied without fertilizer, or when biochar is applied to nutrient-rich soils (Ye et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ye et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar can affect new additions of plant-derived C, and rhizodeposits can prime and act as a source of SOC.

    “Biochar can affect new additions to soil of plant-derived C, and these rhizodeposits can also prime and act as a source of SOC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Biochar properties are the key determinant of its persistence, but edaphic and climatic factors are also influential.

    “Biochar properties are the key determinant of its persistence in comparison to mineralization of unpyrolyzed biomass, but edaphic and climatic factors are also influential.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar builds SOC through soil aggregation processes that stabilize new C by 6%-16%, and by reducing priming caused by plant C input.

    “Biochar builds SOC through soil aggregation processes that stabilize new C (i.e., rhizodeposits), by 6%-16% (Ventura et al., 2019;Weng et al., 2015Weng et al., , 2017)), as well as by reducing priming caused by plant C input (Whitman et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ventura et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Weng et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Whitman et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar can facilitate the reduction of N2O to N2 by increasing pH in acid soils, thus enhancing the nosZ gene.

    “increasing pH in acid soils (Obia et al., 2015) thus enhancing the nosZ gene (Harter, Guzman-Bustamante, et al., 2016)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Obia et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Harter, Guzman-Bustamante, et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar amendments reduced activities of soil enzymes associated with C cycling by 6%, improved C-use efficiency, increased soil microbial biomass, and lowered metabolic quotient by 12%-21% compared with unamended soils.

    “Biochar amendments reduced the activities of soil enzymes associated with C cycling by 6% (Zhang et al., 2019), improved C-use efficiency (Liu, Zhu, et al., 2019, 2020), increased soil microbial biomass (Li et al., 2020), and lowered the metabolic quotient by 12%-21% (i.e., respiration rate CO 2 -C per unit of microbial biomass C) compared with the unamended soils (Zhou, Zhang, et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Liu, Zhu, et al., 2019, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Li et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    This is followed by an exothermic phase where most volatile gases are released, up to approximately 350°C.

    “This is followed by an exothermic phase where most of the volatile gases are released, up to a temperature of approximately 350°C.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The magnitude of negative priming increased with increasing pyrolysis temperature, time following biochar application, and soil clay content >50%, but decreased with increasing C:N ratio of soil.

    “Ding et al. (2014) found that the magnitude of negative priming increased with increasing pyrolysis temperature, time following biochar application, and soil clay content >50%, but decreased with an increasing C:N ratio of soil.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ding et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar can facilitate the reduction of N2O to N2 by facilitating extracellular electron exchange or directly donating electrons to denitrifying bacteria.

    “facilitating extracellular electron exchange (Chen et al., 2014) or directly donating electrons to denitrifying bacteria (Pascual, Sánchez-Monedero, Cayuela, et al., 2020)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pascual, Sánchez-Monedero, Cayuela, et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar decreased SOM mineralization by 20% with crop residue biochars, 19% with fast pyrolysis biochars, 19% with low temperature biochars, and 12% with low biochar application rates, but increased SOM mineralization by 21% in sandy soils.

    “Wang et al. (2016) further identified that biochar decreased SOM mineralization by 20% with crop residue biochars, 19% with fast pyrolysis biochars, 19% with low temperature biochars (200-375°C), and 12% with low biochar application rates (0.1%-1% w/w) but increased SOM mineralization by 21% in sandy soils.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The initial process of drying and depolymerization is endothermic and takes place between ambient temperatures and approximately 250°C.

    “The initial process of drying and depolymerization is endothermic and takes place between ambient temperatures and approximately 250°C.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Historical addition of pyrogenic organic matter has been shown to slow SOM mineralization and enhance native SOC stocks.

    “Historical addition of pyrogenic organic matter has been shown to slow SOM mineralization and enhance native soil organic C (SOC) stocks (Borchard et al., 2014;Downie et al., 2011;Hernandez-Soriano et al., 2016;Kerré et al., 2016;Liang et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Borchard et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Downie et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hernandez-Soriano et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analyses show biochar application commonly induces positive priming initially, followed by negative priming, of 3.8% on average.

    “Meta-analyses show that biochar application commonly induces positive priming initially (for 20 days: Maestrini et al., 2015;2 years: Ding et al., 2018), followed by negative priming, of 3.8% on average (Wang et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Maestrini et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ding et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Using hydrogen pyrolysis, <20% of biochar is persistent at pyrolysis temperatures <450°C, with >80% persistent at 600-700°C.

    “Using hydrogen pyrolysis to assess relative chemical stability, McBeath et al. (2015) estimated, across a wide range of feedstocks, that <20% of the biochar is persistent at pyrolysis temperatures <450°C, with >80% persistent at 600-700°C.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McBeath et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Several meta-analyses found that, on average, biochar mitigates CH4 emissions from flooded soils, particularly from acidic soils, but decreases the CH4 sink of non-flooded soils.

    “Several metaanalyses found that, on average, biochar mitigates CH 4 emissions from flooded soils, particularly from acidic soils, but decreases the CH 4 sink of non-flooded soils (Jeffery et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jeffery et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Unlike incineration, pyrolysis retains a large portion of the feedstock C, typically around 50%, and most nutrients, in the biochar.

    “unlike incineration, pyrolysis retains a large portion of the feedstock C (typically around 50%), and most nutrients, in the biochar.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Verhoeven et al. (2017) found that biochar decreased yield-scaled N2O emissions across the majority of studied cropping systems, although a meta-analysis could not be carried out due to the low number of field studies and excessively high variance between studies.

    “Verhoeven et al. (2017) who found that biochar decreased yieldscaled N 2 O emissions across the majority of the studied cropping systems, although a meta-analysis could not be carried out due to the low number of field studies and excessively high variance between studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Verhoeven et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Liu, Mao, et al. (2019) showed an overall reduction of GHG intensity by 29% after biochar amendment, with higher reductions in non-flooded soils (-41%) compared to paddy fields (-17%).

    “Liu, Mao, et al. (2019) were able to incorporate a larger number of studies and showed an overall reduction of GHG intensity by 29% after biochar amendment, with higher reductions in non-flooded soils (-41%) compared to paddy fields (-17%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liu, Mao, et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An increase in SOC is often associated with higher N2O emissions, which could counteract the mitigation benefits derived from C sequestration.

    “An increase in SOC is often associated with higher N 2 O emissions, which could counteract the mitigation benefits derived from C sequestration (Davies et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Davies et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: In non-flooded soils, the relationship between SOC changes and N2O emissions usually regulates the net GHG emission, since agricultural soils are often weak CH4 sinks.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The mitigation provided initially can be substantial, and repeated applications may maintain the mitigation benefit.

    “Nevertheless, the mitigation provided initially can be substantial, and repeated applications may maintain the mitigation benefit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Results from separate meta-analyses on C sequestration and N2O emissions point to a strong synergy between C sequestration and mitigation of N2O emissions with biochar, which is much less evident for other SOC sequestration strategies.

    “results from separate meta-analyses on C sequestration (Bai et al., 2019) and N 2 O emissions (Borchard et al., 2019;Liu, Liu, et al., 2019) point to a strong synergy between C sequestration and mitigation of N 2 O emissions with biochar, which is much less evident for other SOC sequestration strategies (Guenet et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bai et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Borchard et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Guenet et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: In non-flooded soils, the relationship between SOC changes and N2O emissions usually regulates the net GHG emission, since agricultural soils are often weak CH4 sinks.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Analyses of specific cropping systems show a decrease in GHG intensity with biochar application in vegetable fields and in wheat-rice rotation systems.

    “Analyses of specific cropping systems show a decrease in GHG intensity with biochar application in vegetable fields (Fan et al., 2017) and in wheat-rice rotation systems (Wu et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fan et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wu et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis found N, P, and K concentrations in biochars of 1.0%, 0.4%, and 1.9% for wood-derived biochars, 1.5%, 0.8%, and 4.1% for crop residue biochars, and 2.4%, 2.6%, and 2.5% for manure/sewage sludge biochars, respectively.

    “A meta-analysis found N, P, and K concentrations in biochars of 1.0%, 0.4%, and 1.9% (wood-derived biochars), 1.5%, 0.8%, and 4.1% (crop residue biochars) and 2.4%, 2.6%, and 2.5% (manure/sewage sludge biochars), respectively (Ippolito et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ippolito et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ji et al. (2018) cautioned that co-application of biochar with nitrogen fertilizers substantially decreased the effectiveness of biochar in reducing soil CH4 emissions from paddies; their meta-analysis also showed that the biochar-induced decrease in CH4 uptake by non-flooded soils was lessened when N fertilizer was also applied.

    “Ji et al. (2018) cautioned that the co-application of biochar with nitrogen fertilizers substantially decreased the effectiveness of biochar in reducing soil CH 4 emissions from paddies, however, their meta-analysis also showed that the biochar-induced decrease in CH 4 uptake by non-flooded soils was lessened when N fertilizer was also applied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ji et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Later meta-analyses including a larger number of field studies and more realistic biochar application rates found lower average reductions, of 12% considering only field studies and 38% including laboratory and field studies.

    “Later meta-analyses including a larger number of field studies and more realistic biochar application rates found lower average reductions, of 12% (Verhoeven et al., 2017) considering only field studies, and 38% (Borchard et al., 2019) including laboratory and field studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Verhoeven et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Borchard et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Only a fraction of the total nutrients in biochar is available for plant uptake in the short-medium term, in the order K>P>N.

    “only a fraction of the total nutrients in biochar is available for plant uptake (in the short-medium term), in the order K>P>N.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ippolito et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    50%-80% of N can be lost during pyrolysis depending on the N content of the feedstock, with greater loss at high pyrolysis temperature.

    “Nonetheless, 50%-80% of N can be lost (Hossain et al., 2011;Ye et al., 2020;Yuan et al., 2018) depending on the N content of the feedstock (Torres-Rojas et al., 2020), with greater loss at high pyrolysis temperature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hossain et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ye et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yuan et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochars with high electrical conductivity and ash concentrations decreased CH4 sink capacity, whereas biochars from woody materials pyrolyzed at high temperatures and with high pore area increased soil CH4 uptake rates.

    “biochars with high electrical conductivity and ash concentrations decreased CH 4 sink capacity whereas biochars from woody materials pyrolyzed at high temperatures and with high pore area increased soil CH 4 uptake rates (Pascual et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pascual et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A direct correlation between application rate and N2O decrease was found, with lower N2O mitigation, average 27%, under more realistic rates equivalent to 10-20 Mg ha-1.

    “A direct correlation between application rate and N 2 O decrease was found (Cayuela et al., 2014), with lower N 2 O mitigation (average 27%) under more realistic rates equivalent to 10-20 Mg ha -1 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cayuela et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most experiments included in these meta-analyses were carried out under high moisture conditions favoring denitrification, where biochar is most effective in decreasing N2O emissions.

    “Most experiments included in these metaanalyses were carried out under high moisture conditions favoring denitrification, where biochar is most effective in decreasing N 2 O emissions (Cayuela et al., 2013;Weldon et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cayuela et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Weldon et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Biochars, including BCFs and biochar used as a compost additive, improve nutrient recovery from organic residues, facilitate use of residues in soil amendment, and reduce environmental impacts of waste management.

    “Biochars, including BCFs and biochar used as a compost additive, thus improve nutrient recovery from organic residues, facilitate use of residues in soil amendment, and reduce environmental impacts of waste management.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Biochar can mitigate heavy metal pollution, that impacts food production and food safety in many developing countries, and enhance resource use efficiency.

    “Biochar can also mitigate heavy metal pollution, that impacts food production and food safety in many developing countries, and enhance resource use efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis found average bioavailable percentages of N, P and K in biochar: 0.5%, 3%, and 9% for wood-derived biochar, 0.4%, 6%, and 22% for crop residue biochar, and 5%, 5%, and 17% for manure/sewage sludge biochar, respectively.

    “A meta-analysis found that, on average, the following percentages of the N, P and K present in biochar were bioavailable: 0.5%, 3%, and 9% (wood-derived biochar), 0.4%, 6%, and 22% (crop residue biochar) and 5%, 5%, and 17% (manure/sewage sludge biochar), respectively (Ippolito et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ippolito et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Meta-analyses of crop responses to biochar show average yield increases of 10%-42%, with greatest responses in acidic and sandy soils where the biochar has been applied with organic and/or mineral fertilizers.

    “Meta-analyses of crop responses to biochar show average yield increases of 10%-42%, with greatest responses in acidic and sandy soils where the biochar has been applied with organic and/or mineral fertilizers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Studies that do not include plants, or are undertaken in soil-less media, or based on pot trials cannot readily be extrapolated to field situations.

    “studies that do not include plants, or are undertaken in soil-less media, or based on pot trials cannot readily be extrapolated to field situations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Higher microbial activities lead to accelerated turnover of organic matter which enhances nutrient supply.

    “Higher microbial activities lead to accelerated turnover of organic matter which enhances nutrient supply.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Such formulations are the major focus of commercialization, but they have received limited attention in research studies, and very few field trials have been undertaken.

    “Such formulations are the major focus of commercialization, but they have received limited attention in research studies, and very few field trials have been undertaken.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Controlled release biochar-fertilizer combinations can be produced from low-nutrient biomass mixed with mineral or organic nutrients before pyrolysis and/or organic nutrients after pyrolysis, or by composting to enrich with nutrients.

    “Controlled release biochar-fertilizer combinations can be produced from low-nutrient biomass mixed with mineral or organic nutrients before pyrolysis and/or organic nutrients after pyrolysis, or by composting to enrich with nutrients (Buss et al., 2019(Buss et al., , 2020;;Dong et al., 2019;Hagemann, Joseph, et al., 2017;Schmidt et al., 2015)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Buss et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dong et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Schmidt et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochar P availability can be increased by selecting low Ca feedstocks or doping feedstock with K, leading to preferential binding of P with K instead of Ca, Mg, Fe, or Al, forming highly soluble salts.

    “Biochar P availability can be increased by selecting low Ca feedstocks or doping feedstock with K, leading to preferential binding of P with K instead of Ca, Mg, Fe, or Al, forming highly soluble salts (Buss et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Buss et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This review presents strong evidence that biochar can contribute to climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration and reduction in soil GHG emissions, and that significant benefits to plant production are possible, particularly where site-specific soil constraints and nutrient and water limitations are addressed by appropriate biochar and fertilizer applications.

    “This review presents strong evidence that biochar can contribute to climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration and reduction in soil GHG emissions, and that significant benefits to plant production are possible, particularly where site-specific soil constraints and nutrient and water limitations are addressed by appropriate biochar and fertilizer applications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Biochars can be tailored for specific applications through feedstock selection; by modifying process conditions; through pre- or postproduction treatments to adjust pH, increase nutrient level and availability, carbon persistence and adsorptive properties; or co-application with organic or mineral fertilizers.

    “Biochars can be tailored for specific applications through feedstock selection; by modifying process conditions; through pre-or postproduction treatments to adjust pH, increase nutrient level and availability, carbon persistence and adsorptive properties; or co-application with organic or mineral fertilizers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The use of biochar in composting of organic residues such as manures can reduce N losses through volatilization and leaching, reduce GHG emissions, increase C persistence, and reduce availability of heavy metals.

    “The use of biochar in composting of organic residues such as manures can reduce N losses through volatilization and leaching, reduce GHG emissions, increase C persistence, and reduce availability of heavy metals (Agyarko-Mintah et al., 2017;Akdeniz, 2019;Oldfield et al., 2018;Sanchez-Monedero et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Agyarko-Mintah et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Akdeniz, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Oldfield et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Biochar has the greatest potential to increase crop yields in low-nutrient, high P-fixing acidic soils, common in the tropics and humid subtropics, and in sandy soils, particularly in dryland regions that are likely to be increasingly affected by drought under climate change.

    “Biochar has the greatest potential to increase crop yields in low-nutrient, high P-fixing acidic soils, common in the tropics and humid subtropics, and in sandy soils, particularly in dryland regions that are likely to be increasingly affected by drought under climate change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Biochar catalyzes microbial and abiotic processes in the rhizosphere, decreasing the activation energy for biotic and abiotic reactions, which can increase nutrient mineralization and facilitate nutrient uptake by plants.

    “Biochar catalyzes microbial and abiotic processes in the rhizosphere, decreasing the activation energy for biotic and abiotic reactions, which can increase nutrient mineralization and facilitate nutrient uptake by plants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Biochar can play a key role in addressing climate change and supporting global food security and the circular economy.

    “Thus, biochar can play a key role in addressing climate change and supporting global food security and the circular economy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Formulations that combine biochar with mineral and/or organic fertilizers and minerals are likely to have high nutrient use efficiency and be the most cost-effective.

    “Formulations that combine biochar with mineral and/ or organic fertilizers and minerals are likely to have high nutrient use efficiency and be the most cost-effective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Use of biochar in waste management, such as co-composting of animal manures and pyrolysis of sewage sludge, can capture nutrients and reduce GHG emissions.

    “Use of biochar in waste management, such as co-composting of animal manures and pyrolysis of sewage sludge, can capture nutrients and reduce GHG emissions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Biochar reduces the availability of heavy metals, increases plant resistance to disease, and improves resilience to environmental stressors.

    “Biochar reduces the availability of heavy metals, increases plant resistance to disease, and improves resilience to environmental stressors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biochars can be optimized to sorb P or N from wastewater and hence be loaded with extra nutrients that are accessible to plants, reducing wastewater P and N concentrations, preventing eutrophication, and returning nutrients to agricultural land.

    “Biochars can be optimized to sorb P or N from wastewater and hence be loaded with extra nutrients that are accessible to plants (Mood et al., 2020;Shang et al., 2018;Shepherd et al., 2016Shepherd et al., , 2017)), reducing wastewater P and N concentrations, preventing eutrophication, and returning nutrients to agricultural land.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mood et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shang et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shepherd et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The catalytic ability of biochar changes as it ages in soil through oxidation and interactions with minerals, microbes, soil fauna, and organic matter.

    “The catalytic ability of biochar changes as it ages in soil through oxidation and interactions with minerals, microbes, soil fauna, and organic matter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
154 of 154
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are few studies of biochar or BCF applied at low commercially viable rates as single or repeated applications.

    “but there are few studies of biochar or BCF applied at low (commercially viable) rates, as single or repeated applications.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Terra Preta soils are valid analogues for long-term aging of modern biochar.

    “The biochar-enriched anthropogenic Terra Preta soils associated with pre-Columbian settlements in the Brazilian Amazon (Steiner et al., 2009) provide evidence of very long-term reactions of biochar in soil.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N2O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N2O formation pathways.

    “Microbiological N transformations are the main source of N 2 O emissions from soil, with autotrophic nitrification and heterotrophic denitrification being the main N 2 O formation pathways.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH4, while paddy soils can be a significant source of CH4.

    “Whereas nonflooded soils mostly act as a sink of atmospheric CH 4 , paddy soils can be a significant source of CH 4 .”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In non-flooded soils, the relationship between SOC changes and N2O emissions usually regulates the net GHG emission, since agricultural soils are often weak CH4 sinks.

    “In non-flooded soils, the relationship between SOC changes and N 2 O emissions usually regulates the net GHG emission, since agricultural soils are often weak CH 4 sinks.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The economic case for biochar production is strongest for biochar made from residue materials, especially when the residues contain high concentrations of nutrients, such as animal manures and sewage sludge.

    “The economic case for biochar production is strongest for biochar made from residue materials, especially when the residues contain high concentrations of nutrients, such as animal manures and sewage sludge.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pyrolysis gases can be captured for use as a renewable energy product.

    “In addition, pyrolysis gases can be captured for use as a renewable energy product (see Text S4).”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The crop utilization efficiency of carbon is altered following biochar application, leading to decreased CO2 emissions because of plant utilization of labile carbon.

    “The crop utilization efficiency of carbon is also altered following biochar application, leading to decreased ­ CO 2 emissions (because of plant utilization of labile carbon) (Joseph et al. 2021).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Joseph et al. 2021

    Section 4.2 (Priming effects; page not provided) reports improved microbial carbon-use efficiency and a lower CO₂ respiration rate per unit of microbial biomass after biochar amendment. It does not attribute those effects to improved crop carbon-use efficiency or to plants using labile carbon; the efficiency reported is microbial, not crop-level. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Not all forms of biochar are environmentally friendly or beneficial.

    “not all forms of biochar are environmentally friendly or beneficial.249”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [249]

  • Conversion of agricultural waste into biochar to improve soil health is regarded as a promising strategy for storing soil nutrients and reducing GHG emissions.

    “the conversion of agricultural waste into biochar to improve soil health is regarded as a promising strategy for storing soil nutrients and reducing GHG emissions.249”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [249]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting optimal biochar rates for rice yield

    Major

    Table 1 lists 1-10 Mg ha−1 as the optimal dose in Awad et al. (2018), while the text says the greatest response in that meta-analysis occurred at 11-20 Mg ha−1.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Coninck H., 2018, Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre‐industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty
  2. Graber E. R., 2017, Biochar: A guide to analytical methods, 74
  3. Van Zwieten L., 2015, Biochar for environmental management, 489

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joseph, S., Cowie, A. L., Van Zwieten, L., Bolan, N., Budai, A., Buss, W., Cayuela, M. L., Graber, E. R., Ippolito, J. A., Kuzyakov, Y., Luo, Y., Ok, Y. S., Palansooriya, K. N., Shepherd, J., Stephens, S., Weng, Z. (., & Lehmann, J.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
  • New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
  • New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Wollongbar New South Wales Australia
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Waste Management CEBAS‐CSIC Murcia Spain
  • Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences The Volcani Center Agricultural Research Organization Rishon LeTzion Israel
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Korea University (KR)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Cowie, Annette L.
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-26
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
1731-1764
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W3185137361
Cited by
1,090
References
310
Citations by year
2026: 294 · 2025: 282 · 2024: 222 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 7
FWCI
74.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • La Trobe University (cc-by)
Funders
  • La Trobe University (2000004349)
  • Kazan Federal University
  • RUDN University (5–100)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
biochar, soil amendment, biochar aging, rhizosphere, soil organic carbon, phosphorus availability, heavy metal uptake, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, crop yield, pyrolysis feedstock, soil carbon stabilization, water retention, soil pH, plant disease resistance, circular economy, food security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review