The role of the striatum in visuomotor integration during handwriting: An fMRI study
Abstract
This study investigates the role of the dorsal/sensorimotor striatum in visuomotor integration (i.e., the transformation of internal visual information about letter shapes into motor output) during handwriting. Twenty healthy participants underwent fMRI scanning with tasks consisting of self-paced handwriting of alphabetically ordered single letters and simple dots, with both tasks performed without visual feedback. Functional connectivity (FC) from these two tasks was compared to demonstrate the difference between coordinated activity arising during handwriting and the activity during a simpler motor condition. Our study focused upon the writing-specific cortico-striatal network of preselected regions of interest consisting of the visual word form area (VWFA), anterior intraparietal sulcus/superior parietal lobule, striatum, premotor cortex/Exner's area, and primary and supplementary motor regions. We observed systematically increased task-induced cortico-striatal and cortico-cortical FC. This increased synchronization of neural activity between the VWFA, i.e., the visual cortical area containing information about letter shapes, and the frontoparietal motor regions is mediated by the striatum. These findings suggest the involvement of the striatum in integrating stored letter-shape information with motor planning and execution during handwriting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Handwriting engaged the visual word form area to a greater extent than typing, suggesting that handwriting leads to deeper processing of written information.
“Similarly, Barton et al. [34] observed that handwriting engaged the visual word form area (VWFA) to a greater extent than typing, further suggesting that handwriting leads to deeper processing of written information.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Letter writing produced higher functional connectivity between the visual word form area and motor cortices compared with simple dot writing, reinforcing the role of cognitive load in determining neural activation patterns.
“Similarly, Bartoň et al. [34] demonstrated that letter writing produced higher functional connectivity between the visual word form area (VWFA) and motor cortices compared with simple dot writing, reinforcing the role of cognitive load in determining neural activation patterns.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
Language‐specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area
Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf094 · Cited by 1,254 · cited 1× · see citing works
“2011)] and the visual word form area (VWFA) within ventral occipitotemporal cortex that contains information about letter shapes relevant to the written production of single letters (James and Gauthier 2006; Vinci-Booher and James 2016), and orthographic knowledge of words (Cohen et al. 2002); for a review, see (Rapcs…”
BackgroundThe role of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in language processing
Booth, J. R., Wood, L., Lu, D., Houk, J. C., & Bitan, T. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.074 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle?
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15030345 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bartoň, M., Fňašková, M., Rektorová, I., Mikl, M., Mareček, R., Rapcsak, S. Z., & Rektor, I.
- Affiliations
- Central European Institute of Technology (CZ)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rektor, Ivan
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Transmission
- Published
- 2020-01-04
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-337
- ISSN
- 0300-9564 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-1463
- OpenAlex
- W2997278917
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Transmission (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- striatum, visual-motor integration, handwriting, dorsal striatum, sensorimotor striatum, visual word form area, corticostriatal network, functional connectivity, motor planning, letterforms, premotor cortex, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, anterior intraparietal sulcus, superior parietal lobule, visual feedback
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Female, Handwriting, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Activity, Nerve Net, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review