Cited by 46Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disorders and Treatments

No evidence for cognitive improvement from oral nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) in dementia

Rainer, M., Kraxberger, E., Haushofer, M., Mucke, H. A. M., Jellinger, K. A.·2000·Journal of Neural Transmission

Abstract

Reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) is advertised as an over-the-counter product or dietary supplement to treat Alzheimer's disease. We performed a 3-month open-label study with oral 10 mg/day NADH with 25 patients with mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer, vascular, and fronto-temporal types in addition to their current cholinomimetic drug medication. In 19 patients who completed the study, we found no evidence for any cognitive effect as defined by established psychometric tests. We conclude that NADH is unlikely to achieve cognitive improvements in an extent reported earlier, and present theoretical arguments against an effectiveness of this compound in dementia disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s007020070011

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An open-label study in 17 AD patients reported that NADH ingestion at a total of 10 mg/day for 8-12 weeks improved cognitive effects.

    “an open-label study in 17 AD patients (33–84 years, mean age 67.7) reported that NADH ingestion (twice a day with a total 10 mg/day) for 8–12 weeks improved cognitive effects”

    From NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Rainer et al., 2000

  • A follow-up clinical study with a similar design found no cognitive improvements in AD patients.

    “a follow-up clinical study with similar design did not result in any cognitive improvements”

    From NAD+ in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Rainer et al., 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rainer, M., Kraxberger, E., Haushofer, M., Mucke, H. A. M., & Jellinger, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Donauspital (AT)
  • Ludwig Boltzmann für Klinische Neurobiologie (AT)
Venue
Journal of Neural Transmission
Published
2000-12-20
Volume
107
Issue
12
Pages
1475-1481
ISSN
  • 0300-9564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1463
OpenAlex
W2093579804
Cited by
46
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Transmission (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
NAD+, NADH, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive function, dietary supplements, cholinergic drugs, frontotemporal dementia, vascular dementia, psychometric assessment
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Cognition, Dementia, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Memory, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, NAD, Orientation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Dementia, Vascular, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review