The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Field Dynamic Nuclear Polarization for Solid and Solution Biological NMR
Open accessAbstract
Abstract.Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) results in a substantial nuclear polarization enhancement through a transfer of the magnetization from electrons to nuclei. Recent years have seen considerable progress in the development of DNP experiments directed towards enhancing sensitivity in biological nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). This review covers the applications, hardware, polarizing agents, and theoretical descriptions that were developed at the Francis Bitter Magnet Laboratory at Massachusetts Institute of Technology for high-field DNP experiments. In frozen dielectrics, the enhanced nuclear polarization developed in the vicinity of the polarizing agent can be efficiently dispersed to the bulk of the sample via 1H spin diffusion. This strategy has been proven effective in polarizing biologically interesting systems, such as nanocrystalline peptides and membrane proteins, without leading to paramagnetic broadening of the NMR signals. Gyrotrons have been used as a source of high-power (5–10 W) microwaves up to 460 GHz as required for the DNP experiments. Other hardware has also been developed allowing in situ microwave irradiation integrated with cryogenic magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR. Advances in the quantum mechanical treatment are successful in describing the mechanism by which new biradical polarizing agents yield larger enhancements at higher magnetic fields. Finally, pulsed methods and solution experiments should play a prominent role in the future of DNP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions
Ernst, R. R., Bodenhausen, G., & Wokaun, A. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198556473.001.0001 · Cited by 1,418
Cited by
Surface Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization
Lesage, A., Lelli, M., Gajan, D., Caporini, M. A., Vitzthum, V., Miéville, P., Alauzun, J., Roussey, A., Thieuleux, C., Mehdi, A., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja104771z · Cited by 585
Dynamic nuclear polarization for sensitivity enhancement in modern solid-state NMR
Lilly Thankamony, A. S., Wittmann, J. J., Kaushik, M., & Corzilius, B. (2017) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.06.002 · Cited by 544
Takahashi, H., Ayala, I., Bardet, M., De Paëpe, G., Simorre, J.-P., & Hediger, S. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja312501d · Cited by 149
Chow, W. Y., De Paëpe, G., & Hediger, S. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01043 · Cited by 87
Self-citationDickwella Widanage, M. C., Singh, K., Li, J., Yarava, J. R., Scott, F. J., Xu, Y., Gow, N. A. R., Mentink-Vigier, F., Wang, P., Lamoth, F., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61678-1 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnes, A. B., De Paëpe, G., van der Wel, P. C. A., Hu, K.-N., Joo, C.-G., Bajaj, V. S., Mak-Jurkauskas, M. L., Sirigiri, J. R., Herzfeld, J., Temkin, R. J., & Griffin, R. G.
- Venue
- Applied Magnetic Resonance
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 237-263
- ISSN
- 0937-9347 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-7507
- OpenAlex
- W2015144711
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Field Dynamic Nuclear Polarization for Solid and Solution Biological NMR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00723-008-0129-1
- The paper
- Barnes, A. B., De Paëpe, G., van der Wel, P. C. A., Hu, K.-N., Joo, C.-G., Bajaj, V. S., Mak-Jurkauskas, M. L., Sirigiri, J. R., Herzfeld, J., Temkin, R. J., & Griffin, R. G. (2008). High-Field Dynamic Nuclear Polarization for Solid and Solution Biological NMR. Applied Magnetic Resonance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-008-0129-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.