Cited by 5Analytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesCoconut Research and Applications

Development and validation of a rapid reversed-phase liquid chromatography method for CnAMP1 peptide quantification in human intestinal cell lines

Anaya, Katya, Sus, Nadine, Gadelha, Carlos, Frank, Jan·2019·Amino Acids

Abstract

Plant foods are rich sources of biologically active peptides that may have a role in the prevention of diseases. Coconut water is a valuable beverage due to its nutrient composition and the presence of bioactive compounds, such as the peptide CnAMP1. It is unknown if CnAMP1 can be absorbed into intestinal cells. We, therefore, aimed to develop and validate a simple reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method to quantify the peptide in Caco-2 and LS180 cell lysates. CnAMP1 standards (1-200 µmol/L) and spiked cell lysates were injected onto a Reprosil-Pur 120 C18-AQ column (4.6 × 250 mm) using acetonitrile:water:trifluoroacetic acid (14.0:85.9:0.1, by volume) as mobile phase in isocratic mode at flow rate of 1 mL/min. The method achieved rapid separation (total run time of 6 min), with linear response, good sensitivity (limit of detection, 8.2 ng; lower limit of quantification, 30.6 ng) and no interfering peaks. Best recoveries (84-96%), accuracies (7.6-14.8%) and precision (1.5-8%) were found for LS180 cell lysates spiked with medium (50 µmol/L) and high (100 µmol/L) amounts of the peptide. Uptake assays detected no peptides in the cell lysates; however, after the first 15-min incubation CnAMP1 underwent partial hydrolysis upon incubation with LS180 cells (29%) and extensive hydrolysis with Caco-2 cells (93%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00726-018-2675-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anaya, K., Sus, N., Gadelha, C., & Frank, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Hohenheim (DE)
  • Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR)
Corresponding author
Anaya, Katya
Venue
Amino Acids
Published
2018-11-14
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
407-418
ISSN
  • 0939-4451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-2199
OpenAlex
W2901915060
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Amino Acids (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
Keywords
coconut water, bioactive peptides, peptide quantification, reversed-phase liquid chromatography, Caco-2 cells, LS180 cells, intestinal absorption, peptide hydrolysis, method validation, phytochemicals
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Humans, Intestines, Reproducibility of Results, Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides, Validation Studies as Topic, Chromatography, Reverse-Phase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review