Cited by 568Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire: a validation

Brockington, I. F., Fraser, C., Wilson, D.·2006·Archives of Women's Mental Health

Abstract

This is a validation of a self-rating questionnaire designed to detect disorders of the mother-infant relationship. 125 subjects filled in the questionnaire, and were also interviewed using the 5(th) Edition of the Birmingham Interview for Maternal Mental Health. On the basis of these interviews and the case records, we made consensus diagnoses of various forms and degrees of mother infant relationship disorder, according to criteria published in this paper. We calculated specificity, sensitivity and positive predictive value of the four scale scores generated by the questionnaire. Scale 1 (a general factor) had a sensitivity of 0.82 for all mother-infant relationship disorders. Scale 2 (rejection and pathological anger) had a sensitivity of 0.88 for rejection of the infant, but only 0.67 for severe anger. The performance of scale 3 (infant-focused anxiety) was unsatisfactory. Scale 4 (incipient abuse) selected only a few mothers, but was of some value in identifying those at high risk of child abuse. Revision of the thresholds can improve sensitivity, especially of scale 2, where a cut-off point of 12 = normal, 13 = high better identifies mothers with threatened rejection. These new cut-off points would need validation in another sample.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-006-0132-1

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. MDS Ainsworth, 1972, Merrill Palmer Quart, 18, 123
  2. Brockington IF, Chandra P, George S, Hofberg K, Lanczik MH, Loh CC, Niemelä P, Rondón M, Shi SX, Wainscott G (2006) The Birmingham Interview for Maternal Mental Health. In press.
  3. IF Brockington, 1992, Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 2, 187

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 568

Metadata

Authors
Brockington, I. F., Fraser, C., & Wilson, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
Venue
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Published
2006-05-04
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
233-242
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2122318173
Cited by
568
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire, mother-infant relationship, postpartum depression, maternal rejection, maternal anger, child abuse risk, questionnaire validation, sensitivity and specificity, cut-off values
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, England, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Mother-Child Relations, New Zealand, Object Attachment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review