Cited by 6Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Maternal perspectives on poor mental health and the impact on mother-infant relationships

Open access
Cantrell, Sarah J, Pearson, Rebecca M, Prioreschi, Alessandra·2025·Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

Abstract

AIM: The high prevalence of trauma, anxiety, and depression among postpartum women, particularly in low-income groups, poses a global health challenge. These mental health issues can strain the mother-infant relationship and negatively affect the infant's socio-emotional and cognitive development, with broader societal implications. This study aims to explore South African postpartum mothers' perceptions of mental health and their influence on mother-infant bonding to inform targeted support strategies. METHODS: = 8). In-depth discussions were conducted to explore mothers' views on the causes of postpartum mental health issues and their perceived effects on bonding. Following transcription, a thematic analysis was performed, whereby each script line was coded and categorised. The process included independent verification by a second researcher, resulting in the identification of key themes from the data. RESULTS: Mothers described mental health issues as experiences of 'stress' and 'worry'. Five key contributors included partner and family conflict (particularly paternity denial), lack of community and healthcare support, and insufficient resources. Mothers reported that these stressors hindered mothers' abilities to bond with their infants, with maternal persecution emerging as a prominent theme. CONCLUSION: Interpersonal and financial stressors play a significant role in shaping postpartum mothers' mental health and influencing their relationships with their infants. Findings highlight culturally and contextually appropriate interventions to support mothers and to foster positive mother-infant relationships in resource-limited settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02646838.2025.2511797

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cantrell, S. J., Pearson, R. M., & Prioreschi, A.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
Cantrell, Sarah J
Venue
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Published
2025-06-10
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 0264-6838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-672X
OpenAlex
W4411175589
Cited by
6
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (using the UK’s Official Development Assistance
  • Wellcome (222007/Z/20/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum mental health, mother-infant bonding, maternal mental health, postpartum depression, anxiety, trauma, low-income mothers, paternity denial, financial stress, South Africa, resource-limited settings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review