Cited by 213Dental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsDental Health and Care Utilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis

Open access
de Amorim, Rodrigo G., Leal, Soraya C., Frencken, Jo E.·2012·Clinical Oral Investigations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic investigation plus meta-analysis into survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers and to compare the results with those from the 2005 ART meta-analysis. Until February 2010, four databases were searched. Two hundred four publications were found, and 66 reported on ART restorations or sealant survival. Based on five exclusion criteria, two independent reviewers selected the 29 publications that accounted for the meta-analysis. Confidence intervals (CI) and or standard errors were calculated and the heterogeneity variance of the survival rates was estimated. Location (school/clinic) was an independent variable. The survival rates of single-surface and multiple-surface ART restorations in primary teeth over the first 2 years were 93% (CI, 91-94%) and 62% (CI, 51-73%), respectively; for single-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over the first 3 and 5 years it was 85% (CI, 77-91%) and 80% (CI, 76-83%), respectively and for multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over 1 year it was 86% (CI, 59-98%). The mean annual dentine lesion incidence rate, in pits and fissures previously sealed using ART, over the first 3 years was 1%. No location effect and no differences between the 2005 and 2010 survival rates of ART restorations and sealants were observed. The short-term survival rates of single-surface ART restorations in primary and permanent teeth, and the caries-preventive effect of ART sealants were high. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ART can safely be used in single-surface cavities in both primary and permanent teeth. ART sealants have a high caries preventive effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00784-011-0513-3

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Flow chart of retrieved English publications from keywords to included publications reporting survival results of ART sealants or ART restorations
Fig. 1 Flow chart of retrieved English publications from keywords to included publications reporting survival results of ART sealants or ART restorationsCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Flow chart of retrieved Portuguese/Spanish publications from keywords to included publications reporting survival results of ART sealants or ART restorations
Fig. 2 Flow chart of retrieved Portuguese/Spanish publications from keywords to included publications reporting survival results of ART sealants or ART restorationsCC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Loh KH (2003) An ART technique in the mobile dental squad in Malaysia: a four-year review. Malaysian Dent J 24:95–101
  2. Pan American Health Organization (2006) Oral health of low income children. Procedures for atraumatic restorative treatment. Final report. PAHO, Washington
  3. van Den Dungen GM, Huddleston Slater AE, van Amerongen WE (2004) ART of conventioneel? Onderzoeksresultaten van proximale restauraties in tijdelijke molaren. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelk 111:345–349
  4. Falbo S, Grisoski M, Vivone G, Zac L (2002) Dos años de atención comunitária con tecnica atraumática en ninõs escolares. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent 90:171–174
  5. Oliveira MT, Bittencourt ST, Oliveira MDS, Roberta H, Pereira JR (2009) Avaliação clínica do desempenho de TRA (tratamento restaurador atraumático) associado a um agente químico de remoção de cárie. Rev Odontol Ciênc 24:190–193
  6. Silva JJS, Carvalho RB, Batittucci MHG, Silva KRS (2005) Tratamento restaurador atraumático (TRA) em escolares do Morro São Benedito, município de Vitória, ES. J Bras Clín Odontol Integr 9:24–30
  7. Bresciani E, Nogueira DA, Henostroza Quintans N, Barata TJE, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL (2002) Influência do isolamento absoluto sobre o sucesso do tratamento restaurador atraumático (ART) em cavidades classe II, em dentes decíduos. Rev Fac Odontol Bauru 10:231–237
  8. Peres SHCS, Hussne R, Peres AS (2005) Tratamento restaurador atraumático (ART) em crianças de 4 a 7 anos: avaliação clínica após 6 meses. Rev Inst Ciênc Saúde 23:275–280
  9. Oliveira LMC (2000) Avaliação de um programa de tratamento restaurador atraumático em crianças institucionalizadas. PhD Thesis, Rio de Janeiro, p 168
  10. Bustamante C, Edelberg MH (2004) Tratamiento restaurador atraumático (TRA) em dientes permanentes jóvenes. Resultados de 3 años: un procedimiento válido para la prevención e inactivación de caries en el marco de un programa comunitario de atención primaria. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent 92:155–159
  11. Figueiredo MC, Froner AM, Rosito DB, Gallarreta FWM, Sampaio MS (1999) A utilização da técnica de Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático (ART) em bebês: avaliação clínica de um ano. J Bras Odontopediatr Odontol Bebê 2:362–368

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
de Amorim, R. G., Leal, S. C., & Frencken, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de Brasília (BR)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Frencken, Jo E.
Venue
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2011-01-28
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
429-441
ISSN
  • 1432-6981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-3771
OpenAlex
W2114683488
Cited by
213
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Clinical Oral Investigations (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
atraumatic restorative treatment, restoration, high-viscosity glass ionomer, primary teeth, permanent teeth, dental caries prevention, pit and fissure sealants
MeSH terms
Dental Caries, Dental Clinics, Dental Fissures, Dentin, Glass Ionomer Cements, Humans, Schools, Dental, Tooth, Deciduous, Survival Analysis, Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review