Cited by 97Temporomandibular Joint DisordersDental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Depression and anxiety levels in patients with temporomandibular disorders: comparison with the general population

Simoen, Louis, Van den Berghe, Linda, Jacquet, Wolfgang, Marks, Luc·2020·Clinical Oral Investigations

Abstract

Objectives The objective of this study was to compare levels of depression and anxiety of a group of patients with orofacial pain attributed to a temporomandibular disorder (TMD) to the general population. Materials and methods Diagnosis of orofacial pain attributed to a TMD was given according the DC/TMD classification system. PHQ-9 and GAD-7 questionnaires were used to respectively screen for depression and anxiety. Scores of these two questionnaires in the study group were compared to the scores of two large population samples representing normative data in the general population. Results Two hundred forty-three patients (191 females and 52 males) were included in the study. Both Kolmogorov-Smirnov and chi-square testing showed statistically significant higher scores (p ≤ 0.05) for both PHQ-9 and GAD-7 in the study group in comparison with the general population and PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores were strongly correlated. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that screening for depression and anxiety should be considered in the diagnosis of patients with orofacial pain attributed to a TMD. Clinical relevance PHQ-9 and GAD-7 could be used to assist clinicians, without specific training in mental health, to screen for potential signs of existing comorbidity of depression or anxiety disorders in patients with orofacial pain attributed to TMD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00784-020-03260-1

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simoen, L., Van den Berghe, L., Jacquet, W., & Marks, L.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Corresponding author
Simoen, Louis
Venue
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2020-03-26
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
3939-3945
ISSN
  • 1432-6981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-3771
OpenAlex
W3012956018
Cited by
97
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2
FWCI
11.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Oral Investigations (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, depression, anxiety, orofacial pain, PHQ-9, GAD-7, depression screening, anxiety screening, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Facial Pain, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review