Cited by 203Temporomandibular Joint DisordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Five-year outcomes in TMD: relationship of changes in pain to changes in physical and psychological variables

Ohrbach, Richard, Dworkin, Samuel F·1998·Pain

Abstract

Factors influencing natural history and clinical course of pain in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are largely unknown. Physical, psychological and behavioral data from a population-based epidemiologic study of TMD were examined in 234 cases of persons reporting TMD pain. The cases were assigned to one of five pain pattern groups based on changes in average TMD pain from baseline to 5-year follow-up: (i) remitted (49% of the sample), (ii) high-improvement (14%), (iii) low-improvement (9%), (iv) same (13%), and (v) worse (16%). For each pain change group, an ANOVA-derived pattern analysis was performed to assess whether the pattern of change in each of seven physical and three psychological variables was congruent or dissimilar to the pattern of change in average pain intensity. For none of the physical or psychological variables was the change over time completely congruent with the changes in pain. Changes in ambient average TMD pain were most closely related to those clinical variables whose assessment is influenced by pain or other self-reported symptoms (e.g., number of muscle sites painful to examiner palpation), while the amount of pain change was less closely related to changes in clinical variables, such as joint sounds, where assessment is not dependent on subjective report. The three psychological variables, anxiety, depression, and somatization, displayed similar change patterns, but these patterns were distinctly different from those of the physical variables in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00194-2

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the five most recently published temporomandibular disorder guidelines, four do not report the methodology used for their development and provide lists of available treatments without information on comparative effectiveness or certainty of evidence.

    “Of the five most recently published guidelines, four do not report the methodology used for their development, and they provide lists of available conservative and invasive treatments for TMD without information on comparative effectiveness or certainty of evidence.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohrbach, R., & Dworkin, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Ohrbach, Richard
Venue
Pain
Published
1998-01
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
315-326
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047826445
Cited by
203
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2t32de007227-06)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (T32DE07227, DE08773, P01DE008773)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, TMD pain, pain remission, pain improvement, natural history of pain, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, somatization, joint sounds, muscle palpation, clinical signs, five-year outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Treatment Outcome, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review