Cited by 20Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Do larger studies find smaller effects? The example of studies for the prevention of conduct disorder

McMahon, Brid, Holly, Louise, Harrington, Richard, Roberts, Chris, Green, Jonathan·2008·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Introduction There is some emerging evidence in medicine that larger clinical trials tend to be associated with smaller effect sizes. Much of the evidence-base currently informing practice in Child Psychiatry relies on relatively small trials. We therefore investigated the relationship between trial size and effect size in research within a key area of child mental health.Method A recent systematic review of 20 trials of prevention of conduct disorder was subjected to meta-regression, to examine the relationship between study size and effect size, and to explore hypothesised confounding variables.Results In this sample of studies, reported effect size was inversely related to sample size. This effect is not explained by year of publication, intervention type or quality of methodology in the study.Discussion Our finding is consistent with other reports in the literature. The origin of this effect is not yet clear. However if replicated it clearly has significant implications for the way trials in child mental health are interpreted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-008-0685-9

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMahon, B., Holly, L., Harrington, R., Roberts, C., & Green, J.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Green, Jonathan
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2008-04-21
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
432-437
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W2159468524
Cited by
20
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
sample size, effect size, child mental health, clinical trials, meta-regression, trial interpretation, confounding variables
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Regression Analysis, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sample Size, Conduct Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review