Cited by 19Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderCognitive Abilities and Testing

Slow processing speed: A cross-disorder phenomenon with significant clinical value, and in need of further methodological scrutiny

Open access
Rommelse, Nanda, Luman, Marjolein, Kievit, Rogier·2020·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-020-01639-9

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low processing speed would not be appropriate as a diagnostic marker for autism, as it is found across different neurological and psychiatric conditions.

    “However, low processing speed would not be appropriate as a diagnostic marker for autism, as this is found across different neurological and psychiatric conditions (Rommelse et al., 2020).”

    From Cognitive Profile in Autism and ADHD: A Meta-Analysis of Performance on the WAIS-IV and WISC-V (2024) · cites this paper as Rommelse et al., 2020

    The “Slow processing speed” section reports reduced processing speed in autism and several other psychiatric conditions, and also describes it in neurological conditions. This supports the claim that it is not unique to autism. The paper does not explicitly assess whether low processing speed is appropriate as an autism diagnostic marker. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rommelse, N., Luman, M., & Kievit, R.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Levvel (NL)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Rommelse, Nanda
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2020-09-11
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1325-1327
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W3085526852
Cited by
19
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
processing speed, clinical significance, neuropsychological assessment, child and adolescent psychiatry
MeSH terms
Child, Family, Humans, Outpatients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review