Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heavyweight versus non-heavyweight mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Oliveira Trindade, Bruna, Marcolin, Patrícia, Brandao, Gabriela R, Bueno Motter, Sarah, Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, Sérgio, Diana Mao, Rui-Min, Lu, Richard·2023·Hernia
DOI 10.1007/s10029-023-02865-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10029-023-02865-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Liang MK, Holihan JL, Itani K, Alawadi ZM, Gonzalez JRF, Askenasy EP, Ballecer C, Chong HS, Goldblatt MI, Greenberg JA, Harvin JA, Keith JN, Martindale RG, Orenstein S, Richmond B, Roth JS, Szotek P, Towfigh S, Tsuda S, Berger DH (2017) Ventral hernia management: expert consensus guided by systematic review. Annals Surg 265(1):80–89. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701 · DOI
  2. Funk LM, Perry KA, Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS (2013) Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States. Surg Endosc 27(11):4104–4112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3075-4 · DOI
  3. Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, Van Den Tol MP, De Lange DCD, Braaksma MMJ, IJzermans JNM, Boelhouwer RU, De Vries BC, Salu MKM, Wereldsma JCJ, Bruijninckx CMA, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. New Eng J Med 343(6):392–398. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200008103430603 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cobb WS (2018) A Current review of synthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 142:64S-71S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004857 · DOI
  5. Grubnik VV, Grubnik AV, Vorotyntseva KO (2014) Laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with the new type of meshes: Randomized control trial. Videosurg Other Miniinvasive Tech 2:145–151. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.41623 · DOI
  6. Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426382 · DOI
  7. Brown CN, Finch JG (2010) Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92(4):272–278. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588410X12664192076296 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Moreno-Egea A, Carrillo-Alcaraz A, Soria-Aledo V (2013) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic hernia repair comparing titanium-coated lightweight mesh and medium-weight composite mesh. Surg Endosc 27(1):231–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2425-y · DOI
  9. Nguyen PT, Asarias JR, Pierce LM (2012) Influence of a new monofilament polyester mesh on inflammation and matrix remodeling. J Invest Surg 25(5):330–339. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2011.639848 · DOI
  10. Lake SP, Ray S, Zihni AM, Thompson DM, Gluckstein J, Deeken CR (2015) Pore size and pore shape – but not mesh density – alter the mechanical strength of tissue ingrowth and host tissue response to synthetic mesh materials in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 42:186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.011 · DOI
  11. Petro CC, Nahabet EH, Criss CN, Orenstein SB, Von Recum HA, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2015) Central failures of lightweight monofilament polyester mesh causing hernia recurrence: a cautionary note. Hernia 19(1):155–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1237-5 · DOI
  12. Li J, Ji Z, Zhang W, Li L (2015) The comparison of lightweight mesh and standard mesh in incisional hernia repair with the open sublay technique: the results of a meta-analysis. Surg Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 25(3):238–244. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000144 · DOI
  13. Kroh A, Zufacher M, Eickhoff R, Heise D, Helmedag M, Ulmer F, Neumann UP, Conze J, Hilgers R-D, Binnebösel M (2023) No difference in outcomes between large- and small-pore meshes in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial investigating open retromuscular meshplasty for incisional hernia repair. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery 408(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02751-x · DOI
  14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, & Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343(2):d5928–d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Welty G, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Kasperk R, Schumpelick V (2001) Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes. Hernia 5(3):142–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100290100017 · DOI
  17. Schmidbauer S, Ladurner R, Hallfeldt KK, Mussack T (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10(6):247–253
  18. Conze J, Kingsnorth AN, Flament JB, Simmermacher R, Arlt G, Langer C, Schippers E, Hartley M, Schumpelick V (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg 92(12):1488–1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5208 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Berrevoet F, Maes L, De Baerdemaeker L, Rogiers X, Troisi R, de Hemptinne B (2010) Comparable results with 3-year follow-up for large-pore versus small-pore meshes in open incisional hernia repair. Surgery 148(5):969–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.02.011 · DOI
  20. Groene SA, Prasad T, Lincourt AE, Augenstein VA, Sing R, Heniford BT (2016) Prospective, multi-institutional surgical and quality-of-life outcomes comparison of heavyweight, midweight, and lightweight mesh in open ventral hernia repair. Am J of Surg 212(6):1054–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.003 · DOI
  21. Rogmark P, Ekberg O, Montgomery A (2017) Long-term retromuscular and intraperitoneal mesh size changes within a randomized controlled trial on incisional hernia repair, including a review of the literature. Hernia : J Hern Abdominal Wall Surg 21(5):687–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1624-9 · DOI
  22. Heniford BT, Ross SW, Wormer BA, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Colavita PD, Kercher KW, Augenstein VA (2020) Preperitoneal ventral hernia repair: a decade long prospective observational study with analysis of 1023 patient outcomes. Ann Surg 271(2):364–374. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002966 · DOI
  23. Makam R, Chamany T, Nagur B, Bilchod S, Kulkarni A (2023) Laparoscopic subcutaneous onlay mesh repair for ventral hernia: our early experience. J Minimal Access Surg 19(2):223. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_225_22 · DOI
  24. Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Burger JWA, Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EGG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–585. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Maskal S, Miller B, Ellis R, Phillips S, Prabhu A, Beffa L, Krpata D, Rosenblatt S, Rosen M, Petro C (2023) Mediumweight polypropylene mesh fractures after open retromuscular ventral hernia repair: Incidence and associated risk factors. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10039-4 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Miller BT, Baier KF, Zolin SJ, Huang L-C, Phillips S, Petro CC, Beffa LRA, Krpata DM, Rosen MJ, Prabhu AS (2023) Long-term outcomes of seromas after ventral hernia repair: A propensity score-matched analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative. Hernia J Hernias Abd Wall Surg 27(2):373–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02613-x · DOI
  28. Marcolin P, de Figueiredo SMP, Constante MM, de Melo VMF, de Araújo SW, Mao R-MD, Lu R (2023) Drain placement in retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia J Hernias Abd Wall Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02792-1 · DOI
  29. Rickert A, Kienle P, Kuthe A, Baumann P, Engemann R, Kuhlgatz J, von Frankenberg M, Knaebel HP, Büchler MW (2012) A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 397(8):1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Oliveira Trindade, B., Marcolin, P., Brandao, G. R., Bueno Motter, S., Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, S., Diana Mao, R.-M., & Lu, R.
Venue
Hernia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-08-30
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
291-300
ISSN
1248-9204
DOI
10.1007/s10029-023-02865-1
Cited by
13
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.