The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence, injury rate and, symptom frequency in generalized joint laxity and joint hypermobility syndrome in a “healthy” college population
Abstract
Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) and joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS) are gaining increased attention as potential sources of pain and injury. The aims of this study were to evaluate prevalence of GJH and JHS and to determine whether musculoskeletal injuries and symptoms commonly attributed to GJH and JHS were more common within a "healthy" college student population. The study involved a convenience sample of 267 college and graduate students, aged 17-26. GJH was assessed using the Beighton score with a cutoff of 5/9, while JHS was assessed using the Brighton criteria. Injury history and symptoms were assessed by recall. Prevalence of GJH was 26.2 % overall (females 36.7 %, males 13.7 %). Prevalence of JHS was 19.5 % overall (females 24.5 %, males 13.7 %). Injury rates were not significantly different for individuals who had GJH vs. those who did not have GJH. Individuals with JHS were significantly more likely to have had sprains, back pain, and stress fractures. Symptoms were no different between those with GJH and those who did not have GJH. However, individuals with JHS were significantly more likely to report clumsiness, easy bruising, and balance problems than those who did not have JHS. GJH and JHS were relatively common in this healthy college student population; GJH was not associated with increased incidence of injury or symptoms commonly attributed to JHS, but JHS was associated with increased incidence of some injuries and symptoms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies of “college students” (typical ages between 18 and 24) report a GJH prevalence between 11%-12.5%[16,17] and other between 12.5%-26%.[2,18,19]”
From Hypermobility spectrum disorders: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Russek & Errico (2016) reported an overall prevalence of 26.2% for GJH in a healthy university student population using a cut-off Beighton score of ≥5 and a prevalence of 19.5% for BJHS using the Brighton criteria.”
From Prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal injuries, and chronic musculoskeletal pain among American university students (2019) · cites this paper as Russek & Errico (2016)
In the citing paper
“Russek & Errico (2016) reported an overall prevalence of 26.2% for GJH using a cut-off Beighton score of ≥5 in 267 undergraduate and graduate students aged 17–26.”
From Prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal injuries, and chronic musculoskeletal pain among American university students (2019) · cites this paper as Russek & Errico (2016)
In the citing paper
“The study also found that GJH was not associated with an increased incidence of musculoskeletal injuries.”
From Prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal injuries, and chronic musculoskeletal pain among American university students (2019) · cites this paper as Russek & Errico (2016)
In the citing paper
“Despite the condition being termed “GJH,” it is more often pauciarticular than polyarticular, and not all joints used as part of the Beighton criterion are equally affected (Russek & Errico, 2016; Al-Rawi, Al-Aszawi & Al-Chalabi, 1985; Cameron et al., 2010; Quresh, Maalik & Ahmad, 2010).”
From Prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal injuries, and chronic musculoskeletal pain among American university students (2019) · cites this paper as Russek & Errico, 2016
Citations
Cites
(2000) · PubMed · Cited by 738
Joint hypermobility syndrome in childhood. A not so benign multisystem disorder?
Adib, N., Davies, K., Grahame, R., Woo, P., & Murray, K. J. (2005) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh557 · Cited by 356
(2007) · PubMed · Cited by 356
Juul-Kristensen, B., Rogind, H., Jensen, D. V., & Remvig, L. (2007) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem290 · Cited by 299
Tinkle, B. T., Bird, H. A., Grahame, R., Lavallee, M., Levy, H. P., & Sillence, D. (2009) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33070 · Cited by 290
Hypermobility and the hypermobility syndrome
Simmonds, J. V., & Keer, R. J. (2007) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2007.05.001 · Cited by 265
Rombaut, L., Malfait, F., Cools, A., De Paepe, A., & Calders, P. (2010) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638280903514739 · Cited by 236
Clinch, J., Deere, K., Sayers, A., Palmer, S., Riddoch, C., Tobias, J. H., & Clark, E. M. (2011) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.30435 · Cited by 195
(2007) · PubMed · Cited by 194
Lewkonia, R. M. (1987) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.62.1.1 · Cited by 180
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Russek LN, Errico DM (2013) The prevalence of generalized joint laxity and joint hypermobility syndrome among female college athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 43(1):A5. doi:10.2519
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Beighton Score as a measure of generalised joint hypermobility
Malek, S., Reinhold, E. J., & Pearce, G. S. (2021) · Rheumatology International · doi:10.1007/s00296-021-04832-4 · Cited by 224
Managing Chronic Pain in Children and Adolescents: A Clinical Review
Landry, B. W., Fischer, P. R., Driscoll, S. W., Koch, K. M., Harbeck‐Weber, C., Mack, K. J., Wilder, R. T., Bauer, B. A., & Brandenburg, J. E. (2015) · PM&R · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.09.006 · Cited by 128
Reuter, P. R., & Fichthorn, K. R. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.7625 · Cited by 110
Beck, B. R., & Drysdale, L. (2021) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports9040052 · Cited by 98
Saadat, A. A., Lall, A. C., Battaglia, M. R., Mohr, M. R., Maldonado, D. R., & Domb, B. G. (2019) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546518825246 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Russek, L. N., & Errico, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Clarkson University (US)
- Utica College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Russek, Leslie N.
- ORCID
- Russek, Leslie N.
- Venue
- Clinical Rheumatology
- Published
- 2015-05-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1029-1039
- ISSN
- 0770-3198 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-9949
- OpenAlex
- W1963797047
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Clinical Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- generalized joint hypermobility, joint hypermobility syndrome, prevalence, musculoskeletal injuries, injury rates, symptom frequency, university students, Beighton score, Brighton criteria, sprains, back pain, stress fractures, clumsiness, easy bruising, balance problems
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Students, Universities, Prevalence, Range of Motion, Articular, Arthralgia, Young Adult, Symptom Assessment, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
