CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dogs’ attention towards humans depends on their relationship, not only on social familiarity

Horn, Lisa, Range, Friederike, Huber, Ludwig·2013·Animal Cognition
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0584-9PMC PMC4041126
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10071-012-0584-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attachment has been associated with the human-dog dyad and is characterized by behaviors like proximity seeking, exploration and separation distress.

    “Thus, attachment has also been associated with the human–dog dyad and is characterized by behaviors like proximity seeking, exploration and separation distress.”

    From Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Cools AKA, Van Hout AJM, Nelissen MHJ (2008) Canine reconciliation and third-party-initiated postconflict affiliation: do peacemaking social mechanisms in dogs rival those of higher primates? Ethology 114:53–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01443.x · DOI
  2. Corriveau K, Harris PL (2009) Choosing your informant: weighing familiarity and recent accuracy. Dev Sci 12:426–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00792.x · DOI
  3. Corriveau KH, Harris PL, Meins E, Fernyhough C, Arnott B, Elliott L, Liddle B, Hearn A, Vittorini L, de Rosnay M (2009) Young children’s trust in their mother’s claims: longitudinal links with attachment security in infancy. Child Dev 80:750–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01295.x · DOI
  4. Csibra G, Gergely G (2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends Cogn Sci 13:148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Fraser ON, Bugnyar T (2011) Ravens reconcile after aggressive conflicts with valuable partners. PLoS One 6:e18118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018118 · DOI
  6. Fraser ON, Stahl D, Aureli F (2010) The function and determinants of reconciliation in Pan troglodytes. Int J Primatol 31:39–57. doi: 10.1007/s10764-009-9377-7 · DOI
  7. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE (1997) Familiarity in schooling fish: how long does it take to acquire? Anim Behav 53:945–949. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0315 · DOI
  8. Huber L, Range F, Voelkl B, Szucsich A, Virányi Z, Miklosi A (2009) The evolution of imitation: what do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation? Philos T Roy Soc B 364:2299–2309. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0060 · DOI
  9. Keller M, Cornilleau F, Archer E, Lévy F (2011) Development of social familiarity in ewes. Physiol Behav 104:392–397. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.04.030 · DOI
  10. Kubinyi E, Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2003) Dogs (Canis familiaris) learn from their owners via observation in a manipulation task. J Comp Psychol 117:156–165. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.2.156 · DOI
  11. Mongillo P, Bono G, Regolin L, Marinelli L (2010) Selective attention to humans in companion dogs, Canis familiaris. Anim Behav 80:1057–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.014 · DOI
  12. Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Gurobi K, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Social learning in dogs: the effect of a human demonstrator on the performance of dogs in a detour task. Anim Behav 62:1109–1117. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1866 · DOI
  13. Range F, Huber L (2007) Attention in common marmosets: implications for social-learning experiments. Anim Behav 73:1033–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.015 · DOI
  14. Range F, Horn L, Bugnyar T, Gajdon GK, Huber L (2009) Social attention in keas, dogs, and human children. Anim Cogn 12:181–192. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0181-0 · DOI
  15. Rendell L, Fogarty L, Hoppitt WJE, Morgan TJH, Webster MM, Laland KN (2011) Cognitive culture: theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies. Trends Cogn Sci 15:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Scheid C, Range F, Bugnyar T (2007) When, what, and whom to watch? Quantifying attention in ravens (Corvus corax) and jackdaws (Corvus monedula). J Comp Psychol 121:380–386. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.380 · DOI
  17. Schwab C, Bugnyar T, Schloegl C, Kotrschal K (2008) Enhanced social learning between siblings in common ravens, Corvus corax. Anim Behav 75:501–508. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.006 · DOI
  18. Swaney W, Kendal J, Capon H, Brown C, Laland KN (2001) Familiarity facilitates social learning of foraging behaviour in the guppy. Anim Behav 62:591–598. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1788 · DOI
  19. Téglás E, Gergely A, Kupán K, Miklósi Á, Topál J (2012) Dogs’ gaze following is tuned to human communicative signals. Curr Biol 22:209–213. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.018 · DOI
  20. Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (1997) Dog–human relationship affects problem-solving behavior in the dog. Anthrozoös 10:214–224. doi: 10.2752/089279397787000987 · DOI
  21. Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V, Dóka A (1998) Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) strange situation test. J Comp Psychol 112:219–229. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.3.219 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Topál J, Byrne RW, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2006) Reproducing human actions and action sequences: “do as I do!” in a dog. Anim Cogn 9:355–367. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0051-6 · DOI
  23. Topál J, Gergely G, Erdőhegyi Á, Csibra G, Miklósi Á (2009) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science 325:1269–1272. doi: 10.1126/science.1176960 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Horn, L., Range, F., & Huber, L.
Venue
Animal Cognition
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-12-06
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
435-443
ISSN
  • 1435-9448
  • 1435-9456
DOI
10.1007/s10071-012-0584-9
PMC
PMC4041126
Cited by
90
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review