The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): A new application of Ainsworth's (1969) Strange Situation Test.
Abstract
Fifty-one owner-dog pairs were observed in a modified version of M. D. S. Ainsworth's (1969) Strange Situation Test. The results demonstrate that adult dogs (Canis familiaris) show patterns of attachment behavior toward the owner. Although there was considerable variability in dogs' attachment behavior to humans, the authors did not find any effect of gender, age, living conditions, or breed on most of the behavioral variables. The human-dog relationship was described by means of a factor analysis in a 3-dimensional factor space: Anxiety, Acceptance, and Attachment. A cluster analysis revealed 5 substantially different classes of dogs, and dogs could be categorized along the secure-insecure attached dimensions of Ainsworth's original test. A dog's relationship to humans is analogous to child-parent and chimpanzee-human attachment behavior because the observed behavioral phenomena and the classification are similar to those described in mother-infant interactions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attachment has been associated with the human-dog dyad and is characterized by behaviors like proximity seeking, exploration and separation distress.
“Thus, attachment has also been associated with the human–dog dyad and is characterized by behaviors like proximity seeking, exploration and separation distress.”
From Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
Object relations, dependency, and attachment: a theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1127008 · Cited by 1,461 · cited 6×
“The theories of attachment behavior range from the psychoanalytic approach (Freud, 1946) through the different learning theories (Cairns, 1966; Gewirtz, 1972; Hoffman & Ratner, 1973; Solomon & Corbit, 1973) to the ethological model of attachment ( Ainsworth, 1969, 1972; Bowlby, 1958, 1969; for a review, see Rajecki, L…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAn opponent-process theory of motivation. II. Cigarette addiction
Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1973) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034534 · Cited by 290
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Simple Reason for a Big Difference
Miklósi, Á., Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., Gácsi, M., Virányi, Z., & Csányi, V. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00263-x · Cited by 718
Self-citationUse of experimenter-given cues in dogs
Miklösi, Á., Polgárdi, R., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (1998) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s100710050016 · Cited by 428
Self-citationKonok, V., Korcsok, B., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.002 · Cited by 88
Self-citationTherapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature
Glenk, L. M., & Foltin, S. (2021) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci8100226 · Cited by 71
Neuroendocrine mechanisms of social bonds and separation stress in rodents, dogs, and other species
Nagasawa, M., & Kikusui, T. (2021) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2021_257 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., Csányi, V., & Dóka, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Psychology
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-229
- ISSN
- 1939-2087
- 0735-7036
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review