Cited by 54Primate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Marmoset prosociality is intentional

Open access
Burkart, Judith M., van Schaik, Carel P.·2020·Animal Cognition

Abstract

Marmoset monkeys show high levels of proactive prosociality, a trait shared with humans, presumably because both species rely on allomaternal care. However, it is not clear whether the proximate regulation of this convergent trait is also similar, in particular with regard to intentionality, which is a defining characteristic of prosocial behavior in the human literature. The aim of this paper was to investigate whether marmoset monkeys’ prosociality fulfils the criteria of intentionality developed in primate communication research. The results show that marmoset prosocial behavior (i) has some degree of flexibility, since individuals can use multiple means to reach their goal and adjust them to specific conditions, (ii) depends on the presence of an audience, i.e. potential recipients (social use), and (iii) is goal-directed, because (a) it continues exactly until the putative goal is reached, and (b) individuals check back and look at/for their partner when their prosocial actions do not achieve the putative goal (i.e. if their actions don’t lead to the expected outcome, this elicits distinct reactions in the actor). These results suggest that marmoset prosociality is under some degree of voluntary, intentional control. They are in line with other findings that marmosets perceive each other as intentional agents, and only learn socially from actions that are perceived as intentional. The most parsimonious conclusion is, therefore, that prosocial behavior is fundamentally under voluntary control in marmosets, just as it is in humans, even though our more sophisticated cognitive abilities allow for a far more complex integration of prosociality into a broader variety of contexts and of behavioral goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10071-020-01363-6

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Digby LJ Ferrari SF Saltzman W Campbell CJ Fuentes A MacKinnon KC Panger MA Bearder SK Callitrichines: the role of competition in cooperatively breeding species Primates in perspective 2007 New York Oxford University Press 85 105
  2. Eisenberg N Fabes RA Spinrad T Eisenberg N Prosocial development Handbook of child psychology: social, emotional, and personality development 2006 Hoboken Wiley 646 718
  3. Plooij FX Lock A Some basics traits of language in wild chimpanzees? Action, gesture, and symbol 1978 London Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burkart, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Burkart, Judith M.
Venue
Animal Cognition
Published
2020-02-27
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
581-594
ISSN
  • 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-9456
OpenAlex
W3006706190
Cited by
54
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (This work was supported by the Swiss N projects 310030-13083 and 105312-114107)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
marmoset monkey, prosocial behavior, intentionality, allomaternal care, goal-directed behavior, social cognition, audience effects, social learning, intentional agents, primate communication, convergent evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Callithrix, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Motivation, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review