Cited by 359Primate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically

Open access
Burkart, Judith M., Fehr, Ernst, Efferson, Charles, van Schaik, Carel P.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Human cooperation is unparalleled in the animal world and rests on an altruistic concern for the welfare of genetically unrelated strangers. The evolutionary roots of human altruism, however, remain poorly understood. Recent evidence suggests a discontinuity between humans and other primates because individual chimpanzees do not spontaneously provide food to other group members, indicating a lack of concern for their welfare. Here, we demonstrate that common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) do spontaneously provide food to nonreciprocating and genetically unrelated individuals, indicating that other-regarding preferences are not unique to humans and that their evolution did not require advanced cognitive abilities such as theory of mind. Because humans and marmosets are cooperative breeders and the only two primate taxa in which such unsolicited prosociality has been found, we conclude that these prosocial predispositions may emanate from cooperative breeding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0710310104

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Untreated marmosets, tamarins, and capuchins have each demonstrated some form of spontaneous other-regarding preferences toward familiar partners.

    “Untreated marmosets (Burkart et al., 2007), tamarins (Cronin et al., 2010), and capuchins (Lakshminarayanan and Santos, 2008) have each demonstrated some form of spontaneous other-regarding preferences toward familiar partners”

    From Neuropeptide diversity and the regulation of social behavior in New World primates (2016) · cites this paper as Burkart et al., 2007

  • In captive marmosets, there is a clear willingness or tolerance to reward others in a low-cost task without the expectation to receive an immediate reward for themselves.

    “In captive marmosets, there is a clear willingness or tolerance to reward others in a low-cost task without the expectation to receive an immediate reward for themselves (Burkart et al., 2007; Mustoe et al., 2015)”
  • The key social distinction that may account for the differences in prosociality and inequity aversion strategies in marmosets in the current study and Mustoe et al., 2015, compared to others, is that our marmosets lived in exclusive male-female pairs with no offspring while other studies have investigated marmosets that live in larger family groups.

    “Overall, the key social distinction that may account for the differences in prosociality and inequity aversion strategies in marmosets in the current study and Mustoe et al., 2015, compared to others (Burkart et al., 2007; Freeman et al., 2013), is that our marmosets lived in exclusive male-female pairs with no offspring while other studies have investigated marmosets that live in larger family”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burkart, J. M., Fehr, E., Efferson, C., & van Schaik, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
  • *Anthropological Institute, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-12-11
Volume
104
Issue
50
Pages
19762-19766
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2117308887
Cited by
359
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 24
FWCI
27.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
altruism, social preferences, Callithrix jacchus, food provisioning, cooperative breeding, theory of mind, chimpanzees
MeSH terms
Altruism, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Breeding, Callithrix, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Food, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review