Cited by 55Innovative Human-Technology InteractionChildren's Rights and ParticipationUsability and User Interface Design

Building a BRIDGE between children and users: a socio-cultural approach to child–computer interaction

Iversen, Ole Sejer, Brodersen, Christina·2008·Cognition, Technology & Work

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10111-007-0064-1

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iversen, O. S., & Brodersen, C.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
  • Iversen, Ole Sejer
  • Brodersen, Christina
Venue
Cognition, Technology & Work
Published
2007-04-05
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
83-93
ISSN
  • 1435-5558 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5566
OpenAlex
W2086972313
Cited by
55
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition Technology & Work (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
child-computer interaction, communities of practice, children as users, bridge method, design methods, children's technology, participatory design, children's lives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review