Cited by 35Innovative Human-Technology InteractionChildren's Rights and ParticipationChild Development and Digital Technology

A Utopian agenda in child–computer interaction

Iversen, Ole Sejer, Dindler, Christian·2013·International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.002

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Child as Protagonist

    Iversen, O. S., Smith, R. C., & Dindler, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children · doi:10.1145/3078072.3079725 · Cited by 306 · see citing works

    “” Iversen and Dindler [23] describe participatory “epistemology” in which they point to the intangible outcomes of PD processes, such as “emancipation” through design with and for children.”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Authors
Iversen, O. S., & Dindler, C.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Iversen, Ole Sejer
Venue
International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
24-29
ISSN
2212-8689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056086357
Cited by
35
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-09-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
child-computer interaction, participatory design, co-design, UTOPIA project, democracy, emancipation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review