Cited by 51Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementAgroforestry and silvopastoral systems

Potentials and impacts of short-rotation coppice plantation with aspen in Eastern Germany under conditions of climate change

Lasch, Petra, Kollas, Chris, Rock, Joachim, Suckow, Felicitas·2010·Regional Environmental Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10113-009-0095-7

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Willow and poplar are favoured for short-rotation coppice due to their high growth rates and broad genetic variability, which allows adaptation to different soil and climate conditions.

    “Willow and poplar are favoured for SRC due to their high growth rates and broad genetic variability, which allows adaptation to different soil and climate conditions [27, 28].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lasch, P., Kollas, C., Rock, J., & Suckow, F.
Affiliations
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
Venue
Regional Environmental Change
Published
2009-07-21
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
83-94
ISSN
  • 1436-378X (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-3798
OpenAlex
W2040760455
Cited by
51
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Regional Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Keywords
short rotation coppice, aspen, Populus tremula, energy crops, climate change impacts, soil carbon sequestration, groundwater recharge, percolation, forest growth modeling, 4C model, marginal cropland, Eastern Germany, CO2 emission reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review