Cited by 104Marine Biology and Environmental ChemistryMarine Sponges and Natural ProductsSeaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds

Antifouling potential of some marine organisms from India against species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas

Bhosale, S.H., Nagle, V.L., Jagtap, T.G.·2002·Marine Biotechnology

Abstract

Crude methanolic extracts of 37 marine organisms (16 species of flora, 21 species of fauna) were screened for antibacterial properties against 5 strains of bacteria isolated from marine environments. Of these, 10 plant and 9 animal extracts exhibited antibacterial activity against at least one bacterial strain. The extracts of 6 species were active against all the strains: i.e., Stoechospermum marginatum (brown algae), Cymodocea rotundata (seagrass), Petrosia sp. and Psammaplysilla purpurea (sponges), Sinularia compressa (soft coral), and Cassiopeia sp. (jellyfish). Among the plants, Padina tetrastromatica (brown algae) extract exhibited significant activity (9-11-mm inhibition zone at 500 microg per 6-mm disc) against Bacillus pumilus and Pseudomonas vesicularis, while the extracts of Petrosia, Psammaplysilla, and Cassiopeia were strongly active (11-13-mm inhibition zone at 500 microg per 6-mm disc) against B. circulans and P. putida. It was further confirmed that the attachment of bacterial strains on glass slides was inhibited remarkably with increasing concentrations of bioextracts of Petrosia sp. and Psammaplysilla purpurea. The present findings could form the basis for exploring the antibacterial potential of bioactive molecules from some of the marine organisms that exhibited moderate to strong antibacterial properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10126-001-0087-1

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Products isolated from marine plants have been shown to possess antibacterial, antifungal, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, hypotensive, and spasmogenic activities.

    “Because there is great chemical diversity in marine plants, including marine algae and mangroves, products isolated from these plants have been shown to possess antibacterial, antifungal, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, hypotensive, and spasmogenic activities [68,69].”

    From Marine Natural Products: A Source of Novel Anticancer Drugs (2019) · cites this paper as [69]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhosale, S. H., Nagle, V. L., & Jagtap, T. G.
Affiliations
National Institute of Oceanography (IN)
Venue
Marine Biotechnology
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
111-118
ISSN
  • 1436-2228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-2236
OpenAlex
W2012978975
Cited by
104
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
Keywords
antifouling activity, antibacterial activity, marine organisms, marine sponges, marine algae, marine corals, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, bacterial adhesion inhibition, methanol extract, Stoechospermum marginatum, Cymodocea rotundata, Petrosia, Cassiopeia, Padina tetrastromatica, bioactive natural products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review