The DOI matches its Crossref record.
International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments
Open accessAbstract
Reduce, reuse, and recycle (3R) policies form the basis of waste management and global warming countermeasures globally, so we conducted a comparative study of 3R and waste management policies in the European Union (EU), USA, Korea, Japan, China, and Vietnam. An international workshop for 3R and waste management policymakers was held in Kyoto, Japan, and a bibliographic survey was also conducted to collect data. 3R policies are clearly given priority in the hierarchy of waste management in every country studied. Thermal recovery, which includes power generation from waste heat and methane gas collected from organic waste, is also a priority; this is consistent with the increased use of countermeasures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In the EU, waste management is characterized by practical and effective 3R policies through the development of realistic regulations and by the policymakers’ desire to simplify management systems. The policy ideal in China, however, is the development of a circular economy that targets reductions in the amount and hazardousness of waste. Limits on the number of final disposal sites, strategies for procuring resources, and GHG emission countermeasures are closely linked with 3R policies, and further development of 3R policies in parallel with such issues is expected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · Cited by 2,762
The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste
Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., K. Steinberger, J., Wright, N., & Ujang, Z. B. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020 · Cited by 1,711
The world of plastic waste: A review
Nayanathara Thathsarani Pilapitiya, P. G. C., & Ratnayake, A. S. (2024) · Cleaner Materials · doi:10.1016/j.clema.2024.100220 · Cited by 1,034
Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207 · Cited by 706
Metadata
- Authors
- Sakai, S.-I., Yoshida, H., Hirai, Y., Asari, M., Takigami, H., Takahashi, S., Tomoda, K., Peeler, M. V., Wejchert, J., Schmid-Unterseh, T., Douvan, A. R., Hathaway, R., Hylander, L. D., Fischer, C., Oh, G. J., Jinhui, L., & Chi, N. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
- Published
- 2011-05-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 86-102
- ISSN
- 1438-4957 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-8227
- OpenAlex
- W2051237290
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10163-011-0009-x
- The paper
- Sakai, S.-I., Yoshida, H., Hirai, Y., Asari, M., Takigami, H., Takahashi, S., Tomoda, K., Peeler, M. V., Wejchert, J., Schmid-Unterseh, T., Douvan, A. R., Hathaway, R., Hylander, L. D., Fischer, C., Oh, G. J., Jinhui, L., & Chi, N. K. (2011). International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-011-0009-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.