Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments

Open access
Sakai, Shin-ichi, Yoshida, Hideto, Hirai, Yasuhiro, Asari, Misuzu, Takigami, Hidetaka, Takahashi, Shin, Tomoda, Keijirou, Peeler, Maria Victoria, Wejchert, Jakub, Schmid-Unterseh, Thomas, Douvan, Aldo Ravazzi, Hathaway, Roy, Hylander, Lars D., Fischer, Christian, Oh, Gil Jong, Jinhui, Li, Chi, Ngo Kim·2011·Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Abstract

Reduce, reuse, and recycle (3R) policies form the basis of waste management and global warming countermeasures globally, so we conducted a comparative study of 3R and waste management policies in the European Union (EU), USA, Korea, Japan, China, and Vietnam. An international workshop for 3R and waste management policymakers was held in Kyoto, Japan, and a bibliographic survey was also conducted to collect data. 3R policies are clearly given priority in the hierarchy of waste management in every country studied. Thermal recovery, which includes power generation from waste heat and methane gas collected from organic waste, is also a priority; this is consistent with the increased use of countermeasures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In the EU, waste management is characterized by practical and effective 3R policies through the development of realistic regulations and by the policymakers’ desire to simplify management systems. The policy ideal in China, however, is the development of a circular economy that targets reductions in the amount and hazardousness of waste. Limits on the number of final disposal sites, strategies for procuring resources, and GHG emission countermeasures are closely linked with 3R policies, and further development of 3R policies in parallel with such issues is expected.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10163-011-0009-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Sakai, S.-I., Yoshida, H., Hirai, Y., Asari, M., Takigami, H., Takahashi, S., Tomoda, K., Peeler, M. V., Wejchert, J., Schmid-Unterseh, T., Douvan, A. R., Hathaway, R., Hylander, L. D., Fischer, C., Oh, G. J., Jinhui, L., & Chi, N. K.
Venue
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Published
2011-05-18
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
86-102
ISSN
  • 1438-4957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-8227
OpenAlex
W2051237290
Cited by
309
References
0
FWCI
15.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10163-011-0009-x
The paper
Sakai, S.-I., Yoshida, H., Hirai, Y., Asari, M., Takigami, H., Takahashi, S., Tomoda, K., Peeler, M. V., Wejchert, J., Schmid-Unterseh, T., Douvan, A. R., Hathaway, R., Hylander, L. D., Fischer, C., Oh, G. J., Jinhui, L., & Chi, N. K. (2011). International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-011-0009-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.