Cited by 706Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Building Design and Assessment

Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review

Ghisellini, Patrizia, Ripa, Maddalena, Ulgiati, Sergio·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Ghisellini, Patrizia
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
178
Pages
618-643
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2773287033
Cited by
706
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 15
FWCI
25.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (Parthenope University of Naples) (submittedVersion)
Funders
EUFORIE (H2020-EU.3.3.6)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Keywords
circular economy, construction and demolition waste, waste recycling, material reuse, environmental impact, economic sustainability, life cycle assessment, barriers to circular economy, implementation success factors, circular design, cleaner production, resource recovery, cradle-to-cradle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review