Cited by 181Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeEconomic and Environmental ValuationEvaluation and Performance Assessment

When should decision-analytic modeling be used in the economic evaluation of health care?

Siebert, Uwe·2003·The European Journal of Health Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10198-003-0205-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siebert, U.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Siebert, Uwe
Venue
The European Journal of Health Economics
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
143-150
ISSN
  • 1439-3972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-7598
  • 1618-7601
OpenAlex
W1991892404
Cited by
181
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The European Journal of Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
decision-analytic modeling, health economic evaluation, cost-effectiveness analysis, model selection, health technology assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review