Cited by 107Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeClinical practice guidelines implementationHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Systematic review of economic evaluations and cost analyses of guideline implementation strategies

Open access
Vale, Luke, Thomas, Ruth, MacLennan, Graeme, Grimshaw, Jeremy·2007·The European Journal of Health Economics

Abstract

To appraise the quality of economic studies undertaken as part of evaluations of guideline implementation strategies, we conducted a systematic review of such studies published between 1966 and 1998. Studies were assessed against BMJ economic evaluations guidelines for each stage (guideline development, implementation and treatment). Of 235 studies identified, 63 reported some information on cost. Only 3 studies provided evidence that their guideline was effective and efficient, 38 reported treatment costs only, 12 implementation and treatment costs, 11 implementation costs alone, and 2 guideline development, implementation and treatment costs. No study gave reasonably complete information on costs. Thus, very few satisfactory economic evaluations of guideline implementation strategies have been performed. Current evaluations have numerous methodological defects and rarely consider all relevant costs and benefits. Future evaluations should focus on evaluating the implementation of evidence-based guidelines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10198-007-0043-8

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vale, L., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., & Grimshaw, J.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Vale, Luke
Venue
The European Journal of Health Economics
Published
2007-03-09
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
111-121
ISSN
  • 1439-3972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-7598
  • 1618-7601
OpenAlex
W2093313132
Cited by
107
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The European Journal of Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
economic evaluation, cost analysis, guideline implementation, evidence-based recommendations, implementation costs, treatment costs
MeSH terms
Costs and Cost Analysis, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review