A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions
Open accessAbstract
Objective: This systematic review examines experimental studies that test the effectiveness of strategies intended to integrate empirically supported mental health interventions into routine care settings. Our goal was to characterize the state of the literature and to provide direction for future implementation studies. Method: A literature search was conducted using electronic databases and a manual search. Results: Eleven studies were identified that tested implementation strategies with a randomized ( n = 10) or controlled clinical trial design ( n = 1). The wide range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated precluded meta-analysis. However, the majority of studies ( n = 7; 64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome. Conclusion: There is a clear need for more rigorous research on the effectiveness of implementation strategies, and we provide several suggestions that could improve this research area.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review characterizes 11 experimental studies testing strategies to implement empirically supported mental health interventions into routine care. Most included studies were randomized (10/11) and tested multifaceted strategies (10/11), but heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis; 7 of 11 studies (64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome.
Key findings
- Eleven studies met inclusion criteria: 10 RCTs and 1 controlled clinical trial. Eight focused on child/adolescent mental health and three on adult mental health. The majority (n = 7; 64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome; all studies except Azocar et al. (2003) provided at least some support for the implementation strategies used.
- Only one study evaluated a discrete strategy (guideline dissemination), while 10 (91%) evaluated multifaceted strategies; nine of those included training. Only Glisson et al. (2010) evaluated a blended, manualized strategy (ARC). Passive strategies in isolation—such as disseminating guidelines or manuals and using opinion leaders—were ineffective.
- CFIR domains targeted by implementation strategies were: characteristics of individuals (100%, n = 11), inner setting (82%, n = 9), process of implementation (64%, n = 7), outer setting (55%, n = 6), and intervention characteristics (45%, n = 5). Mean domains addressed was 3.45 (range = 2–5) and mean subdomains was 9.73 (range = 4–20); there was no clear relationship between number of domains/subdomains and effectiveness.
- Ninety-one percent of studies (n = 10) evaluated at least one implementation or service system outcome, 36% (n = 4) evaluated clinical outcomes in addition, and 9% (n = 1) evaluated only clinical outcomes. Fidelity and provider attitudes/satisfaction were most frequent; only one study assessed costs (Kauth et al., 2010: $2,458.80 total cost for approximately 28 additional hours of CBT per month per therapist). Mean implementation/service system outcomes assessed was 2.09 (SD = 1.30); mean client outcomes was .82 (SD = 1.33).
Methods
- Systematic review searching CINAHL Plus, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX on January 4, 2011, plus hand searches. The search identified 501 abstracts (492 database, 9 hand search), 25 full-text articles were screened, and 11 met inclusion criteria.
- Inclusion required empirical research implementing an empirically supported psychosocial treatment or practice guideline in mental health or social service systems, with both an implementation strategy and a comparative design meeting EPOC standards (RCT, CCT, controlled before-and-after, or interrupted time series). Studies focused primarily on physical health, substance abuse, pharmacological interventions, or testing clinical intervention efficacy/effectiveness were excluded.
- At least two reviewers independently extracted data using a modified Cochrane EPOC Data Abstraction Form, a Proctor et al. (2009)-guided outcomes checklist, and a CFIR-based checklist for strategy targets. No inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated; discrepancies were resolved through consensus meetings. Synthesis used tabulation, textual description, and vote-counting because meta-analysis was precluded.
Limitations
- The paper states that the small number of studies and diverse clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes made firm conclusions difficult; vote-counting gives equal weight to studies of varying sample sizes, effect sizes, and significance levels. It also states that grey literature was excluded, risk of bias/study quality was not assessed, reporting bias may have led to underestimating CFIR domains/subdomains addressed, the focus on rigorous designs limits learning from other designs, and the conceptual frameworks used have not been fully established empirically.
- Evident from the text: no meta-analysis was possible, no inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated, coding reliability was difficult particularly for CFIR domains, and only one included study evaluated implementation costs.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 102 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Seven of the 11 included studies (64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome.
“However, the majority of studies (n = 7; 64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The diversity of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes across included studies was too great for meta-analysis.
“The wide range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated precluded meta-analysis.”
- Also stated in: § Methods of Synthesis · plain
“The wide range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated in the included studies (see below) precluded meta-analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Methods of Synthesis · plain
- Findingown data
Five studies, or 45%, used strategies that targeted intervention characteristics.
“45% (n = 5) of studies employed strategies that targeted intervention characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No theory other than Diffusion of Innovations was discussed more than once in the reviewed studies.
“no other theory aside from Diffusion of Innovations theory was discussed more than once.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Five of the eleven reviewed studies, or 45%, explicitly referenced or discussed a guiding theory or conceptual model.
“Five studies (45%) explicitly referenced and/or discussed a guiding theory or conceptual model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation theory was the most commonly mentioned theory, discussed or cited in four articles.
“Rogers’ (2003) Diffusion of Innovation theory was the most commonly mentioned, as it was discussed and/or cited in four articles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Kauth and colleagues assessed the costs and benefits of external facilitation for increasing use of cognitive-behavioral therapy.
“Kauth et al. (2010) assessed the costs and benefits of external facilitation in increasing the use of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kauth et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Azocar and colleagues conducted the only evaluation of a discrete implementation strategy, which was disseminating guidelines.
“Azocar, Cuffel, Goldman, & McCarter (2003) conducted the only evaluation of a discrete strategy (disseminating guidelines), while the remaining studies (n =10; 91%) evaluated multifaceted implementation strategies (i.e., combinations of multiple implementation strategies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Azocar et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The child and adolescent mental health studies took place in schools, daycare centers, foster care and child welfare settings, and community mental health agencies.
“The child and adolescent mental health studies were conducted in diverse service settings, including: schools, daycare centers, foster care and child welfare settings, and community mental health agencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One study, or 9%, evaluated only clinical outcomes.
“9% (n = 1) evaluated only clinical outcomes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The remaining ten studies, or 91%, evaluated multifaceted implementation strategies.
“while the remaining studies (n =10; 91%) evaluated multifaceted implementation strategies (i.e., combinations of multiple implementation strategies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All reviewed studies except Azocar and colleagues provided at least some support for the implementation strategies used, meaning a non-significant change in the hypothesized direction.
“all of the studies with the exception of Azocar et al. (2003) provided at least some support for the implementation strategies used (i.e., there was a non-significant change in the hypothesized direction).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Azocar et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used in the included studies validly indicate implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes, so that the review's synthesis of their effects is meaningful.
- Findingown data
Six studies, or 55%, targeted the outer setting.
“55% (n = 6) targeted the outer setting”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All eleven reviewed studies, or 100%, targeted characteristics of individuals.
“One hundred percent (n = 11) of studies targeted characteristics of individuals, 82% (n = 9) targeted the inner setting, 64% (n = 7) targeted the process of implementation, 55% (n = 6) targeted the outer setting, and 45% (n = 5) of studies employed strategies that targeted intervention characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Four studies targeted individual characteristics other than knowledge, such as self-efficacy, competence, stage of change, or attitudes like flexibility, openness, and engagement.
“while just four studies targeted characteristics of individuals other than knowledge such as self-efficacy, competence (skill acquisition), individual stage of change, or attitudes such as flexibility, openness, and engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Lochman and colleagues evaluated initial and ongoing training, technical assistance, and audit and feedback for improving implementation and clinical outcomes.
“For example, Lochman et al. (2009) evaluated the effectiveness of training (both initial and ongoing), technical assistance, and audit and feedback in improving implementation and clinical outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lochman et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The most frequently addressed implementation outcomes were fidelity, also called adherence or compliance, and provider attitudes toward or satisfaction with the evidence-supported intervention.
“The most frequently addressed implementation outcomes were fidelity (also referred to as adherence or compliance) and provider attitudes toward or satisfaction with the ESI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only Glisson and colleagues evaluated a blended implementation strategy, ARC, that had been manualized.
“Only one study by Glisson and colleagues (2010) evaluated a blended implementation strategy (ARC) that has been manualized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glisson et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The review found no clear relationship between the number of theoretical domains and subdomains addressed and the effectiveness of implementation strategies.
“There was no clear relationship between the number of theoretical domains and subdomains addressed and the effectiveness of the implementation strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The number of CFIR domains or subdomains addressed by a study is a meaningful measure of the comprehensiveness of its implementation strategy, so that comparing studies by domain counts can inform conclusions about strategy effectiveness.
- Findingown data
Seven studies, or 64%, targeted the process of implementation.
“64% (n = 7) targeted the process of implementation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Four studies, or 36%, evaluated clinical outcomes in addition to implementation or service system outcomes.
“36% (n = 4) of studies evaluated clinical outcomes in addition to implementation or service system outcomes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Nine of the multifaceted strategies included training as one of the implementation strategies.
“Nine of those multifaceted strategies included training as an implementation strategy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Several studies found that passive strategies, such as disseminating clinical guidelines or treatment manuals and using opinion leaders, were ineffective when used alone.
“The results from several studies indicated that passive strategies such as the dissemination of clinical guidelines (Azocar et al., 2003) and treatment manuals (Bert, Farris, & Borkowski, 2008; Herschell et al., 2009) or the use of opinion leaders (Atkins et al., 2008) were ineffective in isolation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Azocar et al., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bert, Farris, & Borkowski, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Herschell et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used in the included studies validly indicate implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes, so that the review's synthesis of their effects is meaningful.
- Findingown data
All eleven studies fell into the characteristics-of-individuals domain because they attempted to enhance practitioners' knowledge.
“all eleven studies fell into this domain owing to their attempt to enhance the knowledge of practitioners”
- Also stated in: § Discussion and Applications to Social Work · hedged
“Most studies addressed “characteristics of individuals” by attempting to increase knowledge”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion and Applications to Social Work · hedged
- Findingown data
Only one study evaluated the costs of the implementation strategies.
“Only one study evaluated the costs of the implementation strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean number of client outcomes assessed was 0.82, with a standard deviation of 1.33.
“the mean number of client outcomes assessed was .82 (SD = 1.33).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The included studies varied dramatically in size, scope, and complexity.
“However, the studies varied dramatically in terms of size, scope, and complexity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The eleven studies addressed twelve different implementation or service system outcomes.
“These 11 studies addressed 12 different implementation or service system outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Four studies used theory to guide the selection of implementation strategies.
“Four of the studies used theory to inform the selection of the implementation strategies (Atkins et al., 2008; Forsner et al., 2010; Kauth et al., 2010; Lochman et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Atkins et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Forsner et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kauth et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Nine studies, or 82%, targeted the inner setting.
“82% (n = 9) targeted the inner setting”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ten studies, or 91%, evaluated at least one implementation or service system outcome.
“Ninety-one percent of studies (n = 10) evaluated at least one implementation or service system outcome, 9% (n = 1) evaluated only clinical outcomes, and 36% (n = 4) of studies evaluated clinical outcomes in addition to implementation or service system outcomes (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The inner setting was addressed frequently, in nine studies or 82%, by providing access to new information.
“The inner setting of the implementation context was addressed frequently (n = 9; 82%) by providing access to new information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only one reviewed study addressed self-efficacy of individuals within the organization.
“just one study addressed self-efficacy of individuals within the organization”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
It was also difficult to identify the theoretical and conceptual basis for selecting specific implementation strategies in many studies.
“As noted above, it was also difficult to identify the theoretical and conceptual basis for the selection of specific implementation strategies in many studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Other individual-level aspects essential for implementation, such as boosting providers' self-efficacy and motivation, were not addressed in the reviewed studies.
“yet it is evident that other individual-level aspects essential for implementation such as boosting providers’ self-efficacy and motivation were not addressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Efforts to conceptualize and measure implementation climate and implementation leadership are emerging.
“Efforts to conceptualize and measure implementation climate and implementation leadership are emerging (Aarons, Horowitz, Dlugosz, & Ehrhart, 2012; Weiner, Belden, Bergmire, & Johnston, 2011)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Aarons et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weiner et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Linking the strategies in each study to potential conceptual targets in the CFIR revealed significant gaps in targeting the implementation context.
“the process of linking the strategies in each study to potential conceptual “targets” in the CFIR (Damschroder et al., 2009) revealed significant gaps in targeting the implementation context”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Damschroder et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Fewer than 50% of the reviewed studies used theory or conceptual models to explicitly guide the research.
“We found that less that 50 percent of studies used theory or conceptual models to explicitly guide the research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The published trial reports included in the review adequately disclose the theories or conceptual models that guided the studies, so that the review's assessment of theory use is not substantially limited by undisclosed theoretical foundations.
- Findingown data
No reviewed study addressed individuals' identification within the organization.
“no studies addressed individuals’ identification within the organization”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Far fewer studies explicitly attempted to influence structural characteristics, organizational culture, implementation climate, or organizational leadership.
“Far fewer studies explicitly attempted to influence structural characteristics, organizational culture (Glisson et al., 2010 is one exception), implementation climate, or organizational leadership.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Glisson et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The implementation strategies evaluated using rigorous designs were mostly multifaceted.
“The types of implementation strategies evaluated using rigorous designs were mostly multifaceted, which is an encouraging finding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The outer setting of the implementation context was addressed in few of the reviewed studies.
“The outer setting of the implementation context was addressed in few of the reviewed studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Some studies evaluated constructs such as intervention acceptability or client satisfaction with services in relation to the evidence-based treatments being implemented, but did not assess the acceptability of the implementation strategies tested.
“Some studies evaluated constructs like intervention acceptability or client satisfaction with services in relation to the evidence-based treatments being implemented, but did not assess the acceptability of the implementation strategies that were tested.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Several implementation outcomes identified in a recent review by Proctor and colleagues were underutilized or absent, including appropriateness, implementation costs, feasibility, and sustainability.
“Several implementation outcomes identified in a recently published review (Proctor et al., 2011) were underutilized or absent, including: appropriateness of the intervention to the target population, implementation costs, the feasibility of the intervention within the setting, and the sustainability of the intervention after implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Research evaluating the use of economic incentives intended to improve the quality of mental health services is absent.
“This includes the absence of research evaluating the use of economic incentives intended to improve the quality of mental health services (Ettner & Schoenbaum, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ettner & Schoenbaum, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The implementation outcomes addressed most frequently were fidelity, attitudes toward or satisfaction with the evidence-supported intervention, and adoption.
“The implementation outcomes addressed most frequently included fidelity, attitudes toward or satisfaction with the ESI, and adoption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The Weisz et al. (2012) study demonstrated the potentially powerful effect of designing interventions that allow flexibility and adaptation to client needs.
“However, the Weisz et al. (2012) study demonstrated the potentially powerful effect of designing interventions that allow for flexibility and adaptation depending upon client needs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weisz et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In this review, studies that used theory did so to justify selecting either a clinical intervention or an implementation strategy.
“In the current review, studies that employed theory did so in order to justify the selection of either a clinical intervention or the implementation strategy selected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Proctor et al.'s conceptual model of implementation research highlights that implementation efforts require both an evidence-supported intervention and an implementation strategy or set of strategies to integrate it into routine care.
“First, Proctor et al.’s (2009) conceptual model of implementation research (Figure 1) informs the present review by highlighting the fact that implementation efforts require both an ESI and an implementation strategy or set of implementation strategies designed to integrate that ESI into routine care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor et al. (2009)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Key stakeholders in mental health service financing, provision, and receipt advocate for greater use of evidence-based prevention and treatment approaches.
“This has led key stakeholders involved in the financing, provision, and receipt of mental health services to advocate for the increased use of evidence-based approaches to prevention and treatment (American Psychological Association, 2005; Birkel, Hall, Lane, Cohan, & Miller, 2003; Howard, McMillen, & Pollio, 2003; Institute for the Advancement of Social Work Research, 2007; Institute of Medicine,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites American Psychological Association, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Birkel, Hall, Lane, Cohan, & Miller, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Howard, McMillen, & Pollio, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Barriers to mental health care quality exist at client, clinician, organizational, system, and policy levels.
“This is partly due to a myriad of barriers at the client, clinician, organizational, system, and policy levels that have been well documented in the literature (Flottorp et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flottorp et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The absence of reviews that deeply characterize rigorous implementation research in mental health or social services limits understanding of which implementation strategies are used or effective in those settings.
“Importantly, the lack of reviews providing an in-depth characterization of rigorous implementation research (i.e., those employing experimental manipulation) in mental health or the social services limits the field’s understanding of the implementation strategies used or found to be effective in these settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cochrane EPOC systematic reviews document the effectiveness of implementation strategies including printed educational materials, educational meetings, educational outreach, local opinion leaders, audit and feedback, computerized reminders, and tailored strategies.
“has conducted systematic reviews that document the effectiveness of implementation strategies such as printed educational materials (12 RCTs, 11 non-randomized studies), educational meetings (81 RCTs), educational outreach (69 RCTs), local opinion leaders (18 RCTs), audit and feedback (118 RCTs), computerized reminders (28 RCTs), and tailored implementation strategies (26 RCTs, Grimshaw, Eccles, L”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grimshaw, Eccles, Lavis, Hill, & Squires, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The number of RCTs testing implementation strategies in broader health care greatly exceeds the number in mental health and social service settings.
“This stands in contrast to the broader field of health care, where the number of RCTs testing implementation strategies dwarfs those in mental health and social service settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Most mental health consumers receive care that is not based on the best available evidence.
“a number of studies have found that the majority of mental health consumers receive care that is not based upon the best available evidence (e.g., Garland et al., 2010; Kohl, Schurer, & Bellamy, 2009; Raghavan, Inoue, Ettner, & Hamilton, 2010; Wang, Berglund, & Kessler, 2000; Zima et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Garland et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kohl, Schurer, & Bellamy, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Raghavan, Inoue, Ettner, & Hamilton, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Theories can help design and select implementation strategies by specifying the mechanisms through which the strategies may exert effects.
“Theories can be helpful in designing and selecting implementation strategies as they can specify the mechanisms by which they may exert their effects (Proctor et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Effective training approaches often use multifaceted strategies such as treatment manuals, multiple days of intensive workshop training, expert consultation, session review, supervisor training, booster sessions, and completion of training cases.
“In contrast, effective training approaches often involve multifaceted strategies including: a treatment manual, multiple days of intensive workshop training, expert consultation, live or taped review of client sessions, supervisor trainings, booster sessions, and the completion of one or more training cases (Herschell et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Herschell et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Proctor et al.'s model distinguishes implementation outcomes, service outcomes, and client outcomes.
“It also differentiates between implementation outcomes such as acceptability, cost, fidelity, penetration, sustainability (Proctor & Brownson, 2012; Proctor et al., 2011); service outcomes such as efficiency, safety, and timeliness (Institute of Medicine, 2001); and client outcomes such as symptom reduction and improved quality of life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Proctor & Brownson, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Proctor et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Institute of Medicine, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A scoping review of implementation research in mental health identified 22 RCTs, only two of which tested psychosocial interventions in mental health settings.
“For instance, a scoping review of the published literature focusing on implementation research in mental health identified 22 RCTs, only two of which tested psychosocial interventions in mental health settings (Goldner et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goldner et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Psychosocial interventions can be considered more complex and therefore more difficult to implement than pharmacological interventions.
“We acknowledge that while pharmacological interventions are often an essential component of mental health treatment, psychosocial interventions can be considered more complex, and thus more difficult to implement than pharmacological interventions (Michie et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Michie et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The review's ability to infer the effectiveness of implementation strategies was limited by the wide range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated.
“Our ability to make inferences about the effectiveness of implementation strategies was limited due to the wide range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Proctor et al.'s model identifies implementation strategies as the key component that can be manipulated to produce differential effects on implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes.
“In addition to framing the core elements of implementation research, this conceptual model identifies implementation strategies as the key component that can be manipulated to achieve differential effects on implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Vote counting has limitations because it gives equal weight to studies with different sample sizes, effect sizes, and significance levels.
“There are limitations to using vote counting to determine the effectiveness of interventions, as it gives equal weight to studies of varying sample sizes, effect sizes, and significance levels (Popay et al., 2006); thus, we temper our interpretation of results accordingly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Popay et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The implementation/dissemination search terms were selected because they were superior at accurately identifying knowledge translation studies in a recent systematic review.
“The specific terms used in the “implementation/dissemination” concept were selected due to their superiority in accurately identifying knowledge translation (otherwise known as implementation) studies in a recent systematic review (McKibbon et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McKibbon et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
There was high variability across the reviewed studies in their focus on outcomes.
“This reflects high variability across studies in outcome focus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The diverse range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, comparison conditions, and outcomes prevented the review from aggregating evidence on specific implementation strategies using meta-analytic techniques.
“The diverse range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, comparison conditions, and outcomes precluded our ability to aggregate evidence regarding the effectiveness of specific implementation strategies using meta-analytic techniques.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The relative lack of theoretical justification for selecting and testing specific discrete strategies worsened the problem by preventing understanding of how strategies were thought to improve implementation, service system, or clinical outcomes.
“The relative dearth of theoretical justification for the selection and testing of specific discrete strategies exacerbated this problem by precluding our ability to understand how strategies were thought to improve implementation, service system, and/or clinical outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is room for improvement in how theories and conceptual models are used and reported in implementation research publications.
“it is clear that there is room for improvement when it comes to using and/or reporting theories and conceptual models in implementation research publications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Factors such as the intensity or dosage of implementation strategies could sometimes be more important to implementation effectiveness than the comprehensiveness of the implementation effort.
“It is possible that factors such as the intensity or dosage of implementation strategies could sometimes be more important to implementation effectiveness than the comprehensiveness of the implementation effort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Even the earliest implementation studies recognized that implementation processes are unpredictable and therefore require iterative rather than linear approaches.
“Even some of the earliest implementation studies (e.g., Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984) have recognized the unpredictable nature of implementation processes that necessitates iterative (rather than linear) approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pressman & Wildavsky, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Other systematic reviews of implementation strategies in health have found that theory is used even less frequently than in this review.
“other systematic reviews of implementation strategies in health have found that theory is used even less frequently (Colquhoun et al., 2013; Davies, Walker, & Grimshaw, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Colquhoun et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Davies, Walker, & Grimshaw, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
When theories and models were used, they helped explain how and why specific strategies were thought to work, which is essential for building generalizable knowledge to inform implementation efforts.
“In these cases, theories and models were helpful in promoting an understanding of how and why specific strategies were thought to work, which is essential to developing a generalizable body of knowledge that can inform implementation efforts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Counting the number of CFIR domains addressed may be a limited proxy for the intensity and comprehensiveness of implementation strategies.
“It is also possible that counting the number of CFIR domains addressed is a limited proxy for the intensity and comprehensives of the strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Incorporating a variety of strategies, such as ongoing training, supervision, expert consultation, peer support, and ongoing fidelity monitoring, seems important for successful implementation and intervention sustainability.
“Incorporating a variety of strategies, such as ongoing training (e.g. “booster sessions”), access to supervision, expert consultation, peer support, and ongoing fidelity monitoring seems to be an important step in ensuring successful implementation and intervention sustainability (Beidas & Kendall, 2010; Davis & Davis, 2009; Herschell et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Beidas & Kendall, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Davis & Davis, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Herschell et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Some structural characteristics that affect implementation, such as organizational size, may not be readily changed.
“While some structural characteristics that impact implementation (for a meta-analysis of determinants and moderators of organizational innovation, see Damanpour, 1991) may not be readily changed (e.g., organizational size)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Damanpour, 1991
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The finding that few studies used implementation strategies targeting intervention characteristics suggests that most existing implementation research in this area has neglected intervention-related factors such as packaging that may improve implementation success.
“Our finding that few studies used implementation strategies that targeted intervention characteristics suggests that most existing implementation research in this area to date has neglected certain intervention-related factors, such as their “packaging,” which may improve the potential for implementation success.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Wide variation in outcomes assessed and inconsistent terminology for implementation outcomes reflect a lack of consensus in implementation science about how to assess successful implementation.
“As Proctor and colleagues (2011) note, the wide variation in outcomes assessed and the inconsistent use of terminology to describe implementation outcomes reflects a lack of consensus in implementation science about how to assess successful implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most theories, models, and frameworks in dissemination and implementation science have not been fully established empirically.
“which is the case for most theories, models, and frameworks in dissemination and implementation science (Grol et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grol et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The journal Implementation Science and several others have adopted the WIDER Recommendations to improve descriptions of implementation strategies, clinical interventions, and the theories supporting them.
“The journal Implementation Science and several others have embraced the WIDER Recommendations (Michie et al., 2009; Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research, 2008) in order to improve the descriptions of implementation strategies, clinical interventions, and the underlying theories that support them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Michie et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Reporting bias may have led to an underestimation of the CFIR domains and subdomains that were addressed in each study.
“Fourth, as Williams et al. (2011) have mentioned, reporting bias may have lead to an underestimation of the domains and subdomains of the CFIR that were addressed in each study”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The relatively small number of studies and the diverse range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes made it difficult to reach firm conclusions about the effectiveness of specific implementation strategies.
“First, the relatively small number of studies and the diverse range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated made it difficult to come to firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of specific implementation strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The conceptual frameworks used to characterize the implementation studies and strategies in this review have not been fully established empirically.
“the conceptual frameworks we used to characterize the implementation studies (Proctor et al., 2009) and strategies (Damschroder et al., 2009) have not been fully established empirically”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Proctor et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Damschroder et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
No single implementation strategy is a universal solution (a "magic bullet") for implementation.
“It suggests that no single implementation strategy represents a “magic bullet” (Oxman, Thomson, Davis, & Haynes, 1995)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oxman, Thomson, Davis, & Haynes, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The review's coding may have underestimated the CFIR domains and subdomains addressed in each study, because primary study authors may not have reported key aspects of implementation strategies due to space limits.
“bias may have lead to an underestimation of the domains and subdomains of the CFIR that were addressed in each study – that is, the authors may not have reported key aspects of the implementation strategies given space limitations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 36
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe review identified 11 studies testing implementation strategies; 10 were randomized controlled trials and 1 was a controlled clinical trial.
“Eleven studies were identified that tested implementation strategies with a randomized (n = 10) or controlled clinical trial design (n = 1).”
- Also stated in: § Study Designs · plain
“The majority of the studies (n = 10; 91%) were RCTs, and one study was a CCT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The authors treated a treatment as empirically supported if the included study's authors cited evidence supporting its efficacy or effectiveness.
- Also stated in: § Study Designs · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTwenty-five full-text articles were identified as potentially relevant.
“Abstracts were screened for eligibility and 25 full-text articles were identified as potentially relevant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mean number of CFIR domains addressed across studies was 3.45, with a range of 2 to 5.
“The mean number of domains addressed was 3.45 (range = 2–5), and the mean number of sub-domains addressed was 9.73 (range = 4–20).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA total of 501 abstracts were identified through the database and hand search.
“A total of 501 abstracts were identified through the database (n = 492) and hand search (n = 9) process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataKauth et al. (2010) and Kramer and Burns (2008) conducted small randomized studies with 23 and 17 participants, respectively, that could be characterized as feasibility or pilot studies.
“For example, Glisson et al. (2010) and Chamberlain, Price, Reid, & Landsverk (2008) both conducted large-scale RCTs involving over 600 youth, whereas Kauth and colleagues (2010) and Kramer and Burns (2008) conducted small randomized studies (n = 23 and n = 17 respectively) that could be characterized as feasibility or pilot studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kauth and colleagues (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kramer and Burns (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningSeveral studies evaluated multifaceted, multi-level implementation strategies that targeted multiple domains of the implementation context, although these approaches were not technically blended because they lacked manualization.
“Though their implementation approaches would not technically be classified as blended owing to a lack of manualization, we note that several studies evaluated multifaceted, multi-level implementation strategies by targeting multiple domains of the implementation context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mean number of CFIR subdomains addressed across studies was 9.73, with a range of 4 to 20.
“the mean number of sub-domains addressed was 9.73 (range = 4–20).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeven studies, or 64%, found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome, and about two-thirds demonstrated beneficial effects over comparison conditions.
“The majority of studies (n = 7; 64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome”
- Also stated in: § Discussion and Applications to Social Work · boosted
“A promising finding of this review was that approximately two-thirds (64%) of studies demonstrated beneficial effects of employing implementation strategies to improve intermediate and/or clinical outcomes over the comparison conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used in the included studies validly indicate implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes, so that the review's synthesis of their effects is meaningful.
- Also stated in: § Discussion and Applications to Social Work · boosted
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingcitationKramer and Burns justified selecting cognitive behavioral therapy by drawing on innovation characteristics: relative advantage, trialability, and compatibility.
“Kramer and Burns (2008) draw upon the characteristics of innovations that may make them easier to implement as they justify their selection of cognitive behavioral therapy by noting its relative advantage (it has been demonstrated to be effective in community trials), trialability (standardized components and manuals have been developed and can”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kramer and Burns, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe adult mental health service settings included outpatient mental health through a managed behavioral health care organization, Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, and psychiatric clinics in Stockholm, Sweden.
“The adult mental health service settings included: outpatient mental health (through a managed behavioral health care organization), Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, and psychiatric clinics (in Stockholm, Sweden)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationAtkins and colleagues supported using opinion leaders as an implementation strategy by citing diffusion theory's proposition that novel interventions begin with a small group of key opinion leaders who influence others in their networks.
“Atkins and colleagues (2008) supported the use of opinion leaders as an implementation strategy by stating, “diffusion theory posits that novel interventions are initiated by a relatively small group of key opinion leaders (KOLs) who serve as influential models for others in their social network” (p. 905).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Atkins et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSome studies testing very comprehensive implementation strategies showed positive effects, while other studies also showed positive effects with less comprehensive strategies.
“Some studies testing very comprehensive implementation strategies demonstrated positive effects (e.g., Forsner et al., 2010; Glisson et al., 2010); however, other studies also demonstrated positive effects with less comprehensive strategies (e.g., Herschell et al., 2009; Lochman et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Forsner et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Glisson et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Herschell et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used in the included studies validly indicate implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes, so that the review's synthesis of their effects is meaningful.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne study described in Palinkas et al. (2008) lacked final data at the time of the search; the later Weisz et al. (2012) article was examined instead.
“One of the studies described in the Palinkas et al. (2008) article did not have final data published at the time of this search; however, the results have subsequently been published and the more recent article (Weisz et al., 2012) was examined in this review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Palinkas et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weisz et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGlisson et al. (2010) and Chamberlain, Price, Reid, & Landsverk (2008) both conducted large-scale RCTs involving over 600 youth.
“For example, Glisson et al. (2010) and Chamberlain, Price, Reid, & Landsverk (2008) both conducted large-scale RCTs involving over 600 youth, whereas Kauth and colleagues (2010) and Kramer and Burns (2008) conducted small randomized studies (n = 23 and n = 17 respectively) that could be characterized as feasibility or pilot studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Glisson et al. (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chamberlain, Price, Reid, & Landsverk (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationExternal facilitation had a total cost of $2,458.80 for facilitator and therapist time and produced a benefit of about 28 additional hours of CBT per month per therapist.
“The external facilitation strategy resulted in a total cost (facilitator’s and therapists’ time) of $2,458.80 for a benefit of approximately 28 additional hours of CBT per month per therapist.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kauth et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataClient outcomes in the reviewed studies included symptom or behavioral checklists and out-of-home placements.
“Client outcomes included symptom/behavioral checklists and out-of-home placements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe reviewers found it difficult to achieve high reliability during the first round of coding, especially when coding the theoretical domains.
“Though we did not calculate inter-rater reliability statistics (i.e., Cohen’s kappa), we found it difficult to achieve high reliability during the first round of coding, particularly when coding the theoretical domains outlined by Damschroder and colleagues (2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEight of the eleven included studies were conducted in child and adolescent mental health, and three focused on adult mental health.
“Eight of the eleven included studies were conducted in child and adolescent mental health, with the remaining three focusing on adult mental health.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe mean number of implementation or service system outcomes assessed was 2.09, with a standard deviation of 1.30.
“The mean number of implementation or service system outcomes assessed was 2.09 (SD = 1.30)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe present review found no difference in clinical or implementation outcome attainment between studies that targeted multiple CFIR domains or subdomains and studies that targeted fewer, which is consistent with Grimshaw and colleagues.
“In the present study, we found no difference in outcome attainment (clinical or implementation) between studies that targeted multiple theoretical domains or subdomains of the CFIR and studies that targeted fewer domains or subdomains, providing evidence that is consistent with Grimshaw and colleagues (2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grimshaw et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The number of CFIR domains or subdomains addressed by a study is a meaningful measure of the comprehensiveness of its implementation strategy, so that comparing studies by domain counts can inform conclusions about strategy effectiveness.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn many other cases, it was difficult to determine the scope and detail of the implementation strategies used, which limits the ability to understand and replicate the implementation approach.
“In many other cases it was difficult to determine the scope and detail of the implementation strategies used, which obviously limits one’s ability to understand the implementation approach, let alone replicate it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMost studies effectively differentiated between clinical interventions and implementation strategies, but the description and reporting of implementation strategies could be vastly improved.
“For instance, while most studies effectively differentiated between clinical interventions and implementation strategies, the description and reporting of implementation strategies could be vastly improved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationForsner and colleagues provided an excellent example of a study that clearly described the implementation strategies, including a separate box detailing the different strategies employed.
“Forsner et al. (2010) is one excellent example of a study that clearly describes the implementation strategies (even providing a separate box detailing the different strategies employed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Forsner et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationEfforts are underway to catalog and rate the quality of implementation-related measures in order to promote valid and reliable instruments and catalyze development of new measures.
“Efforts are underway to catalog and rate the quality of implementation related measures (Rabin et al., 2012) to promote the use of a wider array of valid and reliable instruments and serve to catalyze the development of new measures needed to advance the field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rabin et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSome studies addressed many CFIR domains and subdomains but used strategies classified as passive, while other studies addressed few domains but used relatively intensive strategies.
“For example, some studies (e.g., Atkins et al., 2008) addressed many CFIR domains and subdomains, but used implementation strategies that have been classified as passive (e.g., opinion leaders and educational meetings), whereas other studies (e.g., Lochman et al., 2009) addressed few domains but used implementation strategies that are considered relatively intensive”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Atkins et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lochman et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRaghavan, Bright, and Shadoin highlighted potential change levers at the level of the policy ecology, but few if any of these strategies have been tested empirically.
“Raghavan, Bright, & Shadoin (2008) have highlighted a number of potential change levers at the level of the “policy ecology;” however, few if any of these strategies have been tested empirically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raghavan, Bright, & Shadoin, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLandsverk et al. (2011) concluded that mental health has lagged behind other disciplines in building an evidence base for implementation.
“has led Landsverk, Brown, Rolls Reutz, Palinkas, & Horwitz (2011) to conclude that the field of mental health has lagged behind other disciplines in building an evidence-base for implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Landsverk, Brown, Rolls Reutz, Palinkas, & Horwitz (2011)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationImplementation research has emerged as one way to address quality gaps in fields including mental health.
“Implementation research has emerged as one way of addressing the quality gaps in a variety of fields, including mental health (Brownson, Colditz, & Proctor, 2012, McMillen, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Brownson, Colditz, & Proctor, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McMillen, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Medicine have called for more research on identifying, developing, refining, and testing implementation strategies.
“It has been prioritized and supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; National Institute of Mental Health, 2008; National Institutes of Health, 2013) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM; Institute of Medicine, 2007, 2009b), both of which have called for more research that focuses on the identification, development, refinement, and testing of implementation strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites National Institute of Mental Health, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites National Institutes of Health, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Institute of Medicine, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConceptual models can help frame a study theoretically and provide a broad picture of hypothesized relationships among variables.
“as Proctor, Powell, Baumann, Hamilton, & Santens (2012) note, conceptual models can be “…useful in framing a study theoretically and providing a ‘big picture’ of the hypothesized relationships between variables” (p. 6)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor, Powell, Baumann, Hamilton, & Santens (2012)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPassive implementation approaches may increase provider knowledge and predispose providers to adopt a treatment, but they do little to change provider behavior.
“the most consistent finding from this literature is that while passive approaches to implementation (e.g., single session workshops, distribution of treatment manuals) may increase provider knowledge and even predispose providers to adopt a treatment, passive approaches do little to produce provider behavior change (Davis & Davis, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis & Davis, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPowell et al. (2012) identified 68 discrete implementation strategies.
“For example, the review by Powell et al. (2012) identified 68 discrete strategies that can be used to plan, educate, finance, restructure, manage quality, and attend to the policy context to facilitate implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Powell et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEach mutable aspect of the implementation context highlighted by the CFIR is potentially amenable to targeted and tailored implementation strategies.
“Each mutable aspect of the implementation context that the CFIR highlights is potentially amenable to the application of targeted and tailored implementation strategies (Powell et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Powell et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEPOC designates four designs as appropriate for testing implementation strategy effectiveness: randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series studies.
“EPOC designates four designs as appropriate for testing the effectiveness of implementation strategies, including: 1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2) controlled clinical trials (CCTs), 3) controlled before and after studies, and 4) interrupted time series studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, 2002a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe CFIR captures the complex, multi-level nature of implementation and suggests that successful implementation may require an array of strategies acting at multiple levels of the implementation context.
“This model captures the complex, multi-level nature (Shortell, 2004) of implementation, and suggests (implicitly) that successful implementation may necessitate the use of an array of strategies that exert their effects at multiple levels of the implementation context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shortell, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe CFIR proposes that implementation is influenced by intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals involved, and the process of implementation.
“The CFIR suggests that implementation is influenced by: 1) intervention characteristics (evidentiary support, relative advantage, adaptability, trialability, and complexity), 2) the outer setting (patient needs and resources, organizational connectedness, peer pressure, external policy and incentives), 3) the inner setting (structural characteristics, networks and communications, culture, climate,”
- Also stated in: § Overview of Implementation Models · plain
“4) the characteristics of individuals involved (knowledge, self-efficacy, stage of change, identification with organization, etc.), and 5) the process of implementation (planning, engaging, executing, reflecting, evaluating).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Damschroder et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Overview of Implementation Models · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe review did not calculate inter-rater reliability statistics such as Cohen's kappa.
“Though we did not calculate inter-rater reliability statistics (i.e., Cohen’s kappa), we found it difficult to achieve high reliability during the first round of coding, particularly when coding the theoretical domains outlined by Damschroder and colleagues (2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe classification approach used in this review was previously used to enrich understanding of implementation strategies applied to alcohol screening and brief intervention.
“This approach was previously used to enrich the understanding of implementation strategies applied to alcohol screening and brief intervention (Williams et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWide variations in the quality of reporting and in the justification for implementation strategies in the included studies partly caused the coding reliability difficulty.
“This is partly due to wide variations in the quality of reporting and the justification for the use of implementation strategies in the included studies, a point that we consider further in the discussion section.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAt least two reviewers independently reviewed and extracted data from each article.
“At least two reviewers independently reviewed and extracted data from each article.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe review tempered its interpretation of results because of the limitations of vote counting.
“thus, we temper our interpretation of results accordingly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningCoding discrepancies were discussed and resolved through consensus in face-to-face meetings.
“These challenges compelled us to hold a number of face-to-face meetings in which coding discrepancies were discussed and resolved through consensus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe CFIR's utility as a framework to guide empirical research is not fully established.
“Indeed, while the CFIR’s utility as a framework to guide empirical research is not fully established, it is consistent with the vast majority of frameworks and conceptual models in dissemination and implementation research in its emphasis of multi-level ecological factors (Tabak et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tabak et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe review's design criteria required a comparative design that met EPOC standards of rigor to test the implementation strategy.
“Our study design criteria required the use of a comparative design to test the implementation strategy that met standards of rigor set forth by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group (2002a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThere may be room for implementation programs that integrate protocolized adaptations, similar to how modular treatments allow clinicians to shift treatment protocols to meet client needs.
“Thus, there may be room for implementation programs that integrate protocolized adaptations, much in the same way that modular treatments (Weisz et al., 2012) allow clinicians to shift treatment protocols to meet client need.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weisz et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationInterpreting the results of studies that evaluated multifaceted strategies was another challenge for the review.
“Another challenge we faced was interpreting the results of studies that evaluated multifaceted strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThere may be opportunities to address the process of implementation in order to develop implementation programs that are more flexible and adaptive to the needs of the implementation context.
“Finally, there may also be opportunities to address the “process” of implementation to develop implementation programs that are more flexible and adaptive to the needs of the implementation context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies of large-scale implementation efforts have identified the importance of policy-level implementation strategies and suggested that different evidence-supported interventions may require different policy-level interventions.
“Studies of large-scale implementation efforts have identified the importance of policy level implementation strategies (e.g., aligning financial incentives, altering certification and licensing standards, state partnerships with academic institutions to develop ESI training curriculum for students), and have suggested that different ESIs may even require different policy-level interventions (Isett”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Isett et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Magnabosco, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCommon elements and transdiagnostic approaches may be similarly effective as approaches that design interventions for flexibility and adaptation.
“Other approaches that have been described in the literature such as the “common elements” and transdiagnostic approaches to treatment may be similarly effective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCommon elements can be systematically identified, taught to clinicians, and applied flexibly to meet clients' needs, which relieves clinicians of learning many full evidence-supported intervention protocols.
“These common elements can be systematically identified, taught to clinicians, and applied flexibly to meet clients’ needs, relieving clinicians of the burden of learning a whole host of ESI protocols (Barth et al., 2012; Chorpita, Becker, & Daleiden, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Barth et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chorpita, Becker, & Daleiden, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPassive strategies such as disseminating guidelines or manuals and using opinion leaders may be promising when combined with other strategies, but in isolation they may lack the intensity and comprehensiveness needed for successful implementation.
“The results from several studies seem to suggest that passive strategies (e.g., disseminating guidelines or manuals, opinion leaders) may represent promising approaches to implementation when combined with other strategies; however, in isolation, they may lack the intensity and comprehensiveness that successful implementation requires.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe review did not formally evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies, and the need for reporting guidelines in implementation research was readily apparent.
“Although we did not formally evaluate the methodological quality of included studies, the need for reporting guidelines in implementation research were readily apparent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLinking implementation strategies to the CFIR allowed the review to explore implementation effectiveness at the level of the implementation context and indirectly provided insight into debates about multifaceted versus discrete strategies.
“In an effort to make meaningful comparisons between studies that had different design characteristics we linked the implementation strategies in the included studies to a conceptual framework of implementation (Damschroder et al., 2009). Doing so allowed us to explore implementation effectiveness at the level of the implementation context, which indirectly provided insight into debates regarding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Damschroder et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBecause cost was assessed in only one of the eleven studies, the usefulness of this research to policy makers and organizational leaders deciding which implementation strategies to adopt is severely limited.
“Unfortunately, cost was assessed in only one of the eleven studies, which severely limits the usefulness of this research to policy makers and organizational leaders who are charged with making decisions about which implementation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOthers have suggested that the reason for Grimshaw and colleagues' finding is that many multifaceted strategies focus on only one level of the implementation context.
“Others have suggested that the reason for Grimshaw and colleagues’ (2006) finding is that many multifaceted strategies focus on only one level of the implementation context (Wensing, Bosch, & Grol, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wensing, Bosch, & Grol, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThis review is the first systematic review to assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies across diverse mental health treatment settings and to link implementation strategies to conceptual targets considered important in the implementation literature.
“To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that assesses the effectiveness of implementation strategies within diverse settings where mental health treatments are delivered (e.g., community mental health centers, schools, daycare centers, foster care, etc.), and that links implementation strategies to conceptual targets deemed important in the implementation literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenImplementation outcomes such as acceptability, appropriateness, cost, and feasibility may all directly affect whether a strategy or set of strategies will be effective in the real world.
“Implementation outcomes such as acceptability, appropriateness, cost, and feasibility may all have direct bearing on whether a strategy or set of strategies will be effective in the “real world.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThese measures and frameworks can serve a practical purpose by guiding the targeted application of implementation strategies to increase the likelihood of implementation success.
“these measures and frameworks can serve a very practical purpose by guiding the targeted application of implementation strategies to increase the likelihood of implementation success (Aarons et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aarons et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth common elements and transdiagnostic approaches attempt to simplify evidence-based care by manipulating intervention characteristics to make them more widely applicable to clients in routine care, and they may be promising opportunities for implementation research.
“Both of these approaches attempt to simplify the provision of evidence-based care by manipulating characteristics of the intervention to make them more widely applicable to the types of clients that clinicians are likely to serve in routine care, and may represent promising opportunities for implementation research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe common elements approach is based on the idea that evidence-supported interventions for a given disorder share many common features that contribute to their effectiveness.
“The common elements approach is predicated on the idea that ESIs for a given disorder (e.g., childhood anxiety disorders) share many common features that contribute to their effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Barth et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chorpita, Becker, & Daleiden, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGrimshaw and colleagues' extensive review of guideline implementation strategies in health concluded that there was no evidence that multifaceted strategies were superior to single-component strategies.
“Grimshaw et al.’s (2006) extensive review of guideline implementation strategies in health concluded that there was no evidence that multifaceted strategies were superior to single-component strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grimshaw et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransdiagnostic treatments provide unified treatment protocols for clinical disorders that have overlapping clinical features, high co-occurrence, or common maintaining mechanisms.
“Transdiagnostic treatments provide unified treatment protocols for clinical disorders that have overlapping clinical features, high levels of co-occurrence, or common maintaining mechanisms (McHugh, Murray, & Barlow, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McHugh, Murray, & Barlow, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlexander and Hearld note that it is difficult to separate the effects of individual intervention components and to determine whether some components are more important than others.
“As Alexander and Hearld (2012) note, it is “difficult to parse out the effects of individual intervention components and determine whether some components are more important than others” (p. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alexander and Hearld, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe review did not assess risk of bias or study quality of the included studies.
“Third, we did not assess risk of bias/study quality of the included studies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe review did not include grey literature and therefore may have missed unpublished studies that met the other inclusion criteria.
“Second, we did not include “grey literature;” thus, we may have missed unpublished studies meeting our other inclusion criteria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationA recently developed checklist based on the WIDER Recommendations may further assist implementation researchers in reporting their studies.
“A recently developed checklist based upon the WIDER Recommendations may further assist implementation researchers in reporting their studies (Albrecht, Archibald, Arseneau, & Scott, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Albrecht, Archibald, Arseneau, & Scott, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe review used a vote-counting approach to synthesis, which is prone to limitations but can be useful for an initial description of patterns across studies when coupled with narrative synthesis.
“We chose to use a “vote counting” approach to synthesis. This approach is prone to the limitations discussed above in the “methods of synthesis” section, but can be a useful way of providing an initial description of the patterns found across studies (Popay et al., 2006) and, coupled with the narrative approach to synthesis that we have utilized, is a useful way of summarizing included studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Popay et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe authors affirm Eccles and colleagues' call for a suite of reporting guidelines for different types of implementation research.
“Despite the utility of the WIDER Recommendations and other reporting guidelines, we also affirm Eccles et al. (2009) call for a suite of reporting guidelines for different types of implementation research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eccles et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe WIDER guidelines ask researchers to provide detailed descriptions of interventions and implementation strategies, clarify assumed change processes and design principles, provide access to manuals and protocols, and describe active control conditions in detail.
“These guidelines may be very helpful to researchers studying implementation strategies in mental health, as they implore researchers to: 1) provide detailed descriptions of interventions (and implementation strategies) in published papers, 2) clarify assumed change processes and design principles, 3) provide access to manuals and protocols that provide information about the clinical interventions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Michie et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe review focused on rigorous designs that minimize threats to internal validity because its aim was to assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies.
“our focus on the effectiveness of implementation strategies compelled us to focus on rigorous designs that minimize threats to internal validity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The authors treated a treatment as empirically supported if the included study's authors cited evidence supporting its efficacy or effectiveness.
“We assumed a treatment to be “empirically supported” if the authors cited evidence that supported its efficacy or effectiveness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The published trial reports included in the review adequately disclose the theories or conceptual models that guided the studies, so that the review's assessment of theory use is not substantially limited by undisclosed theoretical foundations.
“We do acknowledge that our systematic review was focused on the discussion of theory within the published trial, yet it is possible that the theoretical foundation of the implementation intervention was discussed elsewhere.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The number of CFIR domains or subdomains addressed by a study is a meaningful measure of the comprehensiveness of its implementation strategy, so that comparing studies by domain counts can inform conclusions about strategy effectiveness.
“It is also possible that counting the number of CFIR domains addressed is a limited proxy for the intensity and comprehensives of the strategies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The outcome measures used in the included studies validly indicate implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes, so that the review's synthesis of their effects is meaningful.
“Third, we did not assess risk of bias/study quality of the included studies”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Powell and colleagues identified the use of 50 implementation strategies by agencies related to planning, education, finances, restructuring, and quality improvement.
“In contrast, Powell and colleagues (2014) identified the use of 50 implementation strategies by agencies related to planning, education, finances, restructuring, and quality improvement.”
From Implementation-as-Usual in Community-Based Organizations Providing Specialized Services to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) · cites this paper as Powell et al., 2014
The Introduction’s “Implementation Strategies” section gives the listed categories but says a Powell et al. (2012) review identified 68 discrete strategies, not 50 strategies used by agencies. The Results section describes strategies evaluated in included studies, rather than identifying 50 used by agencies. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredImplementation of new ASD practices within ASD-CBOs may involve various strategies, some with supportive evidence and others without evidence to support that they effectively change provider behavior.
“These integrated findings indicate that implementation of new ASD practices within ASD-CBOs may involve various strategies-some with supportive evidence (e.g., pilot ASD-EBP within the agency and revise, if needed; Powell et al., 2014) and others without evidence to support that they effectively change provider behavior (e.g., train staff only, 'just use [the practice]'; Fixsen et al., 2009).”
From Implementation-as-Usual in Community-Based Organizations Providing Specialized Services to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) · cites this paper as Powell et al., 2014
The Results (Types of Strategies Evaluated; page unavailable) report that the review evaluated several implementation strategies, mostly multifaceted ones. The Discussion describes evidence favoring multifaceted approaches over training alone. But the passages do not establish that piloting an ASD evidence-based practice within an ASD community-based organization and revising it has supportive evidence; the review addresses mental health interventions more broadly. The sentence attributes its training-only example to Fixsen et al., not Powell et al. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA mixed-methods study of seven social service organizations serving children, youth and families provides one of the richest descriptions of IAU.
“One of the richest descriptions of IAU comes from a mixed-methods study of seven social service organizations serving children, youth and families (Powell et al., 2013; Powell, 2014).”
From Implementation-as-Usual in Community-Based Organizations Providing Specialized Services to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) · cites this paper as Powell, 2014
The References identify Powell et al. (2013) as a mixed-methods study of implementation as usual in children’s social service organizations. This cited paper is a systematic review, however, and its Discussion only cites that study in connection with mixed-methods approaches; it does not establish that the study involved seven organizations or provided one of the richest descriptions of IAU. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Cites
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,631 · see citing works
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,557 · see citing works
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,555 · see citing works
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496 · see citing works
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 · Cited by 8,721 · see citing works
Self-citationCrossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2002) · Journal for Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2002.tb00463.x · Cited by 8,508 · see citing works
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542 · see citing works
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485 · see citing works
Cane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 · Cited by 4,888 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For more examples of individual level factors that may be important to address during implementation, we direct readers to the Theoretical Domains Framework (Cane et al., 2012; Michie et al., 2005).”
BackgroundMaking psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach
Michie, S. (2005) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.011155 · Cited by 3,440 · see citing works
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aberdeen, T. (2013) · The Canadian Journal of Action Research · doi:10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73 · Cited by 3,118 · see citing works
Knowledge translation of research findings
Grimshaw, J. M., Eccles, M. P., Lavis, J. N., Hill, S. J., & Squires, J. E. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-50 · Cited by 2,407 · see citing works
Welcome to Implementation Science
Eccles, M. P., & Mittman, B. S. (2006) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-1 · Cited by 2,254 · see citing works
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006) · Lancaster University · doi:10.13140/2.1.1018.4643 · Cited by 2,070 · see citing works
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Lyons, R. (2006) · Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/pnp.208 · Cited by 1,907 · see citing works
Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4 · Cited by 1,894 · see citing works
Self-citationOxman, A. D., Thomson, M., Davis, D. A., & Haynes, R. B. (1995) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,847 · see citing works
Leavitt, M. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,835 · see citing works
Update on empirically validated therapies, II: (619622010-001)
Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., Daiuto, A., DeRubeis, R., Detweiler, J., Haaga, D. A. F., et al. (1997) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e619622010-001 · Cited by 1,488 · see citing works
Bridging Research and Practice
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
What Works for Whom?: A Critical Review of Psychotherapy Research
Roth, A. D., & Fonagy, P. (1996) · Cited by 1,382 · see citing works
Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice
Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (2012) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.001.0001 · Cited by 1,355 · see citing works
Self-citationKitson, A. L., Rycroft-Malone, J., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K., & Titchen, A. (2008) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-1 · Cited by 1,314 · see citing works
Journal of General Internal Medicine
(2013) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/11606.1525-1497 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Mixed method designs in implementation research
Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Horwitz, S., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., & Landsverk, J. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z · Cited by 1,187 · see citing works
Flottorp, S. A., Oxman, A. D., Krause, J., Musila, N. R., Wensing, M., Godycki-Cwirko, M., Baker, R., & Eccles, M. P. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-35 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Kazdin, A. E. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.3.146 · Cited by 1,112 · see citing works
Beidas, R. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2010) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01187.x · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health
Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., Glass, J. E., & York, J. L. (2012) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558711430690 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Self-citationWells, K. B., Sherbourne, C., Schoenbaum, M., Duan, N., Meredith, L., Unützer, J., Miranda, J., Carney, M. F., & Rubenstein, L. V. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.2.212 · Cited by 1,021 · see citing works
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Michie, S., Fixsen, D., Grimshaw, J. M., & Eccles, M. P. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-40 · Cited by 976 · see citing works
Planning and Studying Improvement in Patient Care: The Use of Theoretical Perspectives
GROL, R. P. T. M., BOSCH, M. C., HULSCHER, M. E. J. L., ECCLES, M. P., & WENSING, M. (2007) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x · Cited by 943 · see citing works
The PARIHS Framework—A Framework for Guiding the Implementation of Evidence-based Practice
Rycroft-Malone, J. (2004) · Journal of Nursing Care Quality · doi:10.1097/00001786-200410000-00002 · Cited by 923 · see citing works
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Jamtvedt, G., Young, J. M., Kristoffersen, D. T., O'Brien, M. A., & Oxman, A. D. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub2 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
Weisz, J. R. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.147 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Berwick, D. M. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.10.1182 · Cited by 809 · see citing works
A primer on leading the improvement of systems: Fig 1
Berwick, D. M. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7031.619 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Herschell, A. D., Kolko, D. J., Baumann, B. L., & Davis, A. C. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.02.005 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Vollmar, H. C., Mayer, H., Ostermann, T., Butzlaff, M. E., Sandars, J. E., Wilm, S., & Rieger, M. A. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-1 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Knowledge Translation in Health Care: Moving from Evidence to Practice
(2009) · International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance · doi:10.1108/ijhcqa.2009.06222fae.002 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Wang, P. S., Berglund, P., & Kessler, R. C. (2000) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.9908044.x · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Toward Evidence-Based Quality Improvement.
Grimshaw, J., Eccles, M., Thomas, R. E., MacLennan, G., Ramsay, C. R., Fraser, C. M., & Vale, L. D. (2006) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00357.x · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Davies, P., Walker, A. E., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-14 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Jamtvedt, G., Jm, Y., Kristoffersen, D., O'Brien, M. T., & Oxman, A. D. (2003) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0031-9406(05)60176-9 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice
Cosby, J. (2006) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.016824 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions
Institute of Medicine (2006) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/11470 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
The Breakthrough Series: IHI’s Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement
Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2004) · Diabetes Spectrum · doi:10.2337/diaspect.17.2.97 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
An implementation research agenda
Eccles, M. P., Armstrong, D., Baker, R., Cleary, K., Davies, H., Davies, S., Glasziou, P., Ilott, I., Kinmonth, A.-L., Leng, G., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-18 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Sundquist, J. L. (1973) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2148170 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
National Survey of Psychotherapy Training in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Social Work
Weissman, M. M., Verdeli, H., Gameroff, M. J., Bledsoe, S. E., Betts, K., Mufson, L., Fitterling, H., & Wickramaratne, P. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.925 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research
(2010) · Critical Values · doi:10.1093/criticalvalues/3.1.16 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions
The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG) (2006) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-4 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Glisson, C., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2005) · Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s11020-005-7456-1 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
McKibbon, K. A., Lokker, C., Wilczynski, N. L., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M., Davis, D. A., Haynes, R. B., & Straus, S. E. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-16 · Cited by 345 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The specific terms used in the ‘‘implementation/ dissemination’’ concept were selected due to their superiority in accurately identifying knowledge translation (otherwise known as implementation) studies in a recent systematic review (McKibbon et al., 2010).”
MethodMcHugh, R. K., Murray, H. W., & Barlow, D. H. (2009) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.005 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Glisson, C., Dukes, D., & Green, P. (2006) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.12.010 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Teaching Evidence-Based Practice: Toward a New Paradigm for Social Work Education
Howard, M. O., McMillen, C. J., & Pollio, D. E. (2003) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731502250404 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Understanding the Common Elements of Evidence-Based Practice
Chorpita, B. F., Becker, K. D., & Daleiden, E. L. (2007) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e318033ff71 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Rakovshik, S. G., & McManus, F. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.004 · Cited by 281 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Several reviews of implementation strategies in mental health have focused on training in ESIs (e.g., Beidas & Kendall, 2010; Herschell, Kolko, Baumann, & Davis, 2010; Rakovshik & McManus, 2010).”
BackgroundTailoring quality improvement interventions to identified barriers: a multiple case analysis
Bosch, M., Van Der Weijden, T., Wensing, M., & Grol, R. (2007) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00660.x · Cited by 272 · see citing works
The meaning and measurement of implementation climate
Weiner, B. J., Belden, C. M., Bergmire, D. M., & Johnston, M. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-78 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Albrecht, L., Archibald, M., Arseneau, D., & Scott, S. D. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-52 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Randomized trial of MST and ARC in a two-level evidence-based treatment implementation strategy.
Glisson, C., Schoenwald, S. K., Hemmelgarn, A., Green, P., Dukes, D., Armstrong, K. S., & Chapman, J. E. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019160 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Mental Health Care for Children With Disruptive Behavior Problems: A View Inside Therapists' Offices
Garland, A. F., Brookman-Frazee, L. I., Hurlburt, M. S., Accurso, E. C., Zoffness, R. J., Haine‐Schlagel, R., & Ganger, W. C. (2010) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2010.61.8.788 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback
Colquhoun, H. L., Brehaut, J. C., Sales, A., Ivers, N., Grimshaw, J., Michie, S., Carroll, K., Chalifoux, M., & Eva, K. W. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-66 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Report of the 2005 Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice
(2005) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e582372010-001 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Henggeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Liao, J., Letourneau, E. J., & Edwards, D. L. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3102_02 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Raghavan, R., Bright, C. L., & Shadoin, A. L. (2008) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-26 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Evidence-Based Practice at a Crossroads
Barth, R. P., Lee, B. R., Lindsey, M. A., Collins, K. S., Strieder, F. H., Chorpita, B. F., Becker, K. D., & Sparks, J. A. (2011) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731511408440 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Mixed-Methods Designs in Mental Health Services Research: A Review
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M. S., & Landsverk, J. A. (2011) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.62.3.pss6203_0255 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Brekke, J. S., Ell, K., & Palinkas, L. A. (2006) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731506293693 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Teacher key opinion leaders and mental health consultation in low-income urban schools.
Atkins, M. S., Frazier, S. L., Leathers, S. J., Graczyk, P. A., Talbott, E., Jakobsons, L., Adil, J. A., Marinez-Lora, A., Demirtas, H., Gibbons, R. B., et al. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013036 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Implementing Evidence-Based Practice
Gray, M., Joy, E., Plath, D., & Webb, S. A. (2012) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731512467072 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., Baumann, A. A., Hamilton, A. M., & Santens, R. L. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-96 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Self-citationMitchell, D. (1919) · The Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0073493 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Linking Sustainability Research to Intervention Types
Scheirer, M. A. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.300976 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Show Me, Don’t Tell Me: Behavioral Rehearsal as a Training and Analogue Fidelity Tool
Beidas, R., Cross, W. F., & Dorsey, S. (2013) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2013.04.002 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
The State Policy Context of Implementation Issues for Evidence-Based Practices in Mental Health
Isett, K. R., Burnam, M. A., Coleman-Beattie, B., Hyde, P. S., MORRISSEY, J. P., Magnabosco, J. L., Rapp, C. A., Ganju, V. K., & Goldman, H. H. (2007) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2007.58.7.914 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Dissemination of the Coping Power program: Importance of intensity of counselor training.
Lochman, J. E., Boxmeyer, C. L., Powell, N. P., Lixin Qu, A., Wells, K., & Windle, M. T. (2009) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014514 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Shortell, S. M. (2004) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558704266768 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Cognitive and behavioral practice
Davis, D. D., & Peterson, L. (1994) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/s1077-7229(05)80083-5 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Williams, E. C., Johnson, M. L., Lapham, G. T., Caldeiro, R. M., Chew, L., Fletcher, G. S., McCormick, K. A., Weppner, W. G., & Bradley, K. A. (2011) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/a0022102 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Zima, B. T., Hurlburt, M. S., Knapp, P., Ladd, H., Tang, L., Duan, N., Wallace, P., Rosenblatt, A., Landsverk, J., & Wells, K. B. (2005) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-200502000-00005 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Palinkas, L. A., Schoenwald, S. K., Hoagwood, K., Landsverk, J. A., Chorpita, B. F., & Weisz, J. R. (2008) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2008.59.7.738 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Systematic review of economic evaluations and cost analyses of guideline implementation strategies
Vale, L., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., & Grimshaw, J. (2007) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-007-0043-8 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures
Rabin, B. A., Purcell, P., Naveed, S., Moser, R. P., Henton, M. D., Proctor, E. K., Brownson, R. C., & Glasgow, R. E. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-119 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationKauth, M. R., Sullivan, G., Blevins, D., Cully, J. A., Landes, R. D., Said, Q., & Teasdale, T. A. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-75 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Magnabosco, J. L. (2006) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-13 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Ebert, L., Amaya-Jackson, L. M., Markiewicz, J. M., Kisiel, C., & Fairbank, J. A. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-011-0347-y · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Landsverk, J. A., Brown, C. H., Rolls-Reutz, J., Palinkas, L. A., & Horwitz, S. M. (2010) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0315-y · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Practitioner Expertise in Evidence-Based Practice Decision Making
Mccracken, S., & Marsh, J. (2008) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731507308143 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Measurement Issues in Dissemination and Implementation Research
Proctor, E. K., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.003.0013 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationGrypma, L., Haverkamp, R., Little, S., & Unützer, J. (2006) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.10.008 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
The Role of Organizational Processes in Dissemination and Implementation Research
Aarons, G. A., Moullin, J. C., & Ehrhart, M. G. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0008 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Raghavan, R., Inoue, M., Ettner, S. L., Hamilton, B. H., & Landsverk, J. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.151472 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Methods and metrics challenges of delivery-system research
Alexander, J. A., & Hearld, L. R. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-15 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Cascading implementation of a foster and kinship parent intervention.
Chamberlain, P., Price, J. M., Reid, J. B., & Landsverk, J. A. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Powell, B. J., Proctor, E. K., Glisson, C. A., Kohl, P. L., Raghavan, R., Brownson, R. C., Stoner, B. P., Carpenter, C. R., & Palinkas, L. A. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-92 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationAzocar, F., Cuffel, B., Goldman, W., & McCarter, L. (2005) · Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/bf02287816 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Evaluation of a Treatment Manual and Workshops for Disseminating, Parent–Child Interaction Therapy
Herschell, A. D., McNeil, C. B., Urquiza, A. J., McGrath, J. M., Zebell, N. M., Timmer, S. G., & Porter, A. (2008) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0194-7 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Ngo, V. K., Asarnow, J. R., Lange, J. M., Jaycox, L. H., Rea, M. M., Landon, C., Tang, L., & Miranda, J. M. (2009) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2009.60.10.1357 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The Role of Organizational Processes in Dissemination and Implementation Research
Aarons, G. A., Horowitz, J. D., Dlugosz, L. R., & Ehrhart, M. G. (2012) · Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.003.0007 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The Role of Economic Evaluation in Dissemination and Implementation Research
Raghavan, R. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.003.0005 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Evidence-based practice and clinical social work
Thyer, B. A. (2002) · Evidence-Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/ebmh.5.1.6 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Selecting, Tailoring, and implementing knowledge translation interventions
Wensing, M., Bosch, M., & Grol, R. P. T. M. (2009) · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Knowledge Translation in Mental Health: A Scoping Review
Goldner, E. M., Jeffries, V., Bilsker, D., Jenkins, E., Menear, M., & Petermann, L. (2011) · Healthcare policy · doi:10.12927/hcpol.2011.22620 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Supported local implementation of clinical guidelines in psychiatry: a two-year follow-up
Forsner, T., Wistedt, A. Å., Brommels, M., Janszky, I., de León, A. P., & Forsell, Y. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-4 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Parent Training: Implementation Strategies for Adventures in Parenting
Bert, S. C., Farris, J. R., & Borkowski, J. G. (2008) · The Journal of Primary Prevention · doi:10.1007/s10935-008-0135-y · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Kramer, T. L., & Burns, B. J. (2008) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-14 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Asarnow, J. R., Jaycox, L. H., Duan, N., LaBorde, A. P., Rea, M. M., Murray, P., Anderson, M., Landon, C., Tang, L., & Wells, K. B. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.3.311 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Evidence-Based Clearinghouses in Social Work
Soydan, H., Mullen, E. J., Alexandra, L., Rehnman, J., & Li, Y. (2010) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731510367436 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The State of Parent Training: Program Offerings and Empirical Support
Kohl, P. L., Schurer, J., & Bellamy, J. L. (2009) · Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services · doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3894 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Hawley, K. M., & Proctor, E. K. (2013) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.003602012 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationConsumers and families as partners in implementing evidence-based practice
Birkel, R. C., Hall, L. L., Lane, T., McNulty, K. C., & Miller, J. E. (2003) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0193-953x(03)00065-0 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Spoont, M. R., Greer, N. L., Su, J. W., Fitzgerald, P., Rutks, I. R., & Wilt, T. J. (2011) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The Role of Economic Incentives in Improving the Quality of Mental Health Care
Ettner, S. L., & Schoenbaum, M. (2006) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781845428914.00039 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Dissemination and Implementation in Social Service Settings
McMillen, C. J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.003.0018 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
(2009)
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 120 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review.
- *Chamberlain P., 2008, Child Welfare, 87, 27
- Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. (2002a). Data collection checklist (pp. 1–30). Retrieved from http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/uploads/datacollectionchecklist.pdf
- Gibbs L. E., 2003, Evidence-based practice for the helping professions
- Goldner E. M., 2011, Healthcare Policy, 7, 83
- Institute of Medicine, 2007, The state of quality improvement and implementation research: Workshop summary
- *Kauth M. R., 2010, Implementation Science, 5, 1, 10.1186/1748-5908-5-1 · DOI · Paper page
- National Institute of Mental Health, 2008, National Institute of Mental Health strategic plan
- Oxman A. D., 1995, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 153, 1424
- President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, 2003, Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America: Final report
- Wensing M., 2009, Knowledge translation in health care: Moving from evidence to practice, 94
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies
Powell, B. J., Beidas, R. S., Lewis, C. C., Aarons, G. A., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., & Mandell, D. S. (2017) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6 · Cited by 967 · see citing works
Self-citationAguirre Velasco, A., Cruz, I. S. S., Billings, J., Jimenez, M., & Rowe, S. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02659-0 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
“For this the theme of contextualization is fundamental and the specificities of the process of implementation (planning, engaging, executing, reflecting and evaluating) [126, 127].”
Lewis, C. C., Klasnja, P., Powell, B. J., Lyon, A. R., Tuzzio, L., Jones, S., Walsh-Bailey, C., & Weiner, B. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00136 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Self-citationBirken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Shea, C. M., Haines, E. R., Alexis Kirk, M., Leeman, J., Rohweder, C., Damschroder, L., & Presseau, J. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Self-citationReframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery
Baumann, A. A., & Cabassa, L. J. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4975-3 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Cook, C. R., Lyon, A. R., Locke, J. J., Waltz, T. J., & Powell, B. J. (2019) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-019-01017-1 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Self-citationBreimaier, H. E., Heckemann, B., Halfens, R. J. G., & Lohrmann, C. (2015) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-015-0088-4 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Tracking implementation strategies: a description of a practical approach and early findings
Bunger, A. C., Powell, B. J., Robertson, H. A., MacDowell, H., Birken, S. A., & Shea, C. (2017) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0175-y · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationSchool-based mindfulness instruction: An RCT
Sibinga, E. M. S., Webb, L., Ghazarian, S. R., & Ellen, J. M. (2016) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2015-2532 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Varsi, C., Ekstedt, M., Gammon, D., & Ruland, C. M. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5091 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Baumann, A. A., Powell, B. J., Kohl, P. L., Tabak, R. G., Penalba, V., Proctor, E. K., Domenech-Rodriguez, M. M., & Cabassa, L. J. (2015) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.025 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Self-citationSuccessfully implementing a national electronic health record: a rapid umbrella review
Fennelly, O., Cunningham, C., Grogan, L., Cronin, H., O’Shea, C., Roche, M., Lawlor, F., & O’Hare, N. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104281 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC): protocol for a mixed methods study
Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Chinman, M. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., Damschroder, L. J., & Kirchner, J. E. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-39 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationT-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool
Birken, S. A., Rohweder, C. L., Powell, B. J., Shea, C. M., Scott, J. E., Leeman, J., Grewe, M. E., Kirk, M. A., Damschroder, L. J., Aldridge, W. A., et al. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0836-4 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationWilliams, N. J. (2016) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0693-2 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Bullock, H. L., Lavis, J. N., Wilson, M. G., Mulvale, G. M., & Miatello, A. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01082-7 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Boyd, M. R., Powell, B. J., Endicott, D., & Lewis, C. C. (2018) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2017.11.012 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrated Primary Care and Social Work: A Systematic Review
Fräser, M. W., Lombardi, B. M., Wu, S., Zerden, L. D. S., Richman, E. L., & Fraher, E. P. (2018) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/697567 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Folker, A. P., Mathiasen, K., Lauridsen, S. M., Stenderup, E., Dozeman, E., & Folker, M. P. (2018) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2018.02.001 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
“Future research could aim to answer these questions through systematic experiments with service models and implementation strategies (Powell et al., 2014; Ross et al., 2016).”
BackgroundHudson, K. G., Lawton, R., & Hugh‐Jones, S. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4942-z · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Tabak, R. G., Sinclair, K. A., Baumann, A. A., Racette, S. B., Sebert Kuhlmann, A., Johnson-Jennings, M. D., & Brownson, R. C. (2015) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-015-0341-0 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Powell, B. J., Mandell, D. S., Hadley, T. R., Rubin, R. M., Evans, A. C., Hurford, M. O., & Beidas, R. S. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0593-9 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationA reflection of the current status of the mental healthcare system in South Africa
Sorsdahl, K., Petersen, I., Myers, B., Zingela, Z., Lund, C., & van der Westhuizen, C. (2023) · SSM - Mental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100247 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Wood, K., Giannopoulos, V., Louie, E., Baillie, A., Guajardo, M. G. U., Lee, K. S., Haber, P., & Morley, K. C. (2020) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/2633489520959072 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Implementation Support Skills: Findings From a Systematic Integrative Review
Albers, B., Metz, A. J. R., Burke, K., Bührmann, L., Bartley, L., Driessen, P., & Varsi, C. (2020) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731520967419 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Williams, N. J., Glisson, C. A., Hemmelgarn, A. L., & Green, P. (2016) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0742-5 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Applying the Policy Ecology Framework to Philadelphia’s Behavioral Health Transformation Efforts
Powell, B. J., Beidas, R. S., Rubin, R. M., Stewart, R. E., Wolk, C. B., Matlin, S. L., Weaver, S., Hurford, M. O., Evans, A. C., Hadley, T. R., et al. (2016) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0733-6 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationHabib, M. A., Rizvan, R., & Ahmed, S. (2022) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100818 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Building capacity for dissemination and implementation research: one university’s experience
Brownson, R. C., Proctor, E. K., Luke, D. A., Baumann, A. A., Staub, M., Brown, M. T., & Johnson, M. O. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0634-4 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationImplementation frameworks in child, youth and family services – Results from a scoping review
Albers, B., Mildon, R. L., Lyon, A. R., & Shlonsky, A. (2017) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.07.003 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Implementation Science: Why It Matters for the Future of Social Work
Cabassa, L. J. (2016) · Journal of Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/10437797.2016.1174648 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Bullock, H. L., & Lavis, J. N. (2019) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0479-1 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Mazzucca, S., Tabak, R. G., Pilar, M. R., Ramsey, A. T., Baumann, A. A., Kryzer, E., Lewis, E. M., Padek, M. M., Powell, B. J., & Brownson, R. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00032 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationBaffsky, R., Ivers, R., Cullen, P., Wang, J. J., McGillivray, L., & Torok, M. H. (2022) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-022-01434-9 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Aggarwal, N. K., Lam, P., Castillo, E. G., Weiss, M. G., Diaz, E., Alarcón, R. D., van Dijk, R., Rohlof, H., Ndetei, D. M., Scalco, M., et al. (2016) · Academic Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40596-015-0429-3 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
The case for prioritizing implementation strategy fidelity measurement: benefits and challenges
Akiba, C. F., Powell, B. J., Pence, B. W., Nguyen, M. X., Golin, C. E., & Go, V. F.-L. (2021) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibab138 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationHusebo, B. S., Flo, E., Aarsland, D., Selbæk, G., Testad, I., Gulla, C., Aasmul, I., & Ballard, C. G. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0310-5 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Huang, K., Kwon, S. C., Cheng, S., Kamboukos, D. M., Shelley, D., Brotman, L. M., Kaplan, S. A., Ogedegbe, O., & Hoagwood, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00190 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Assessing Implementation Strategy Reporting in the Mental Health Literature: A Narrative Review
Hooley, C., Amano, T., Markovitz, L., Yaeger, L., & Proctor, E. (2020) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-019-00965-8 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationLovero, K. L., Kemp, C. G., Wagenaar, B. H., Giusto, A., Greene, M. C., Powell, B. J., & Proctor, E. K. (2023) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-023-01310-2 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationPowell, B. J., Haley, A. D., Patel, S. V., Amaya-Jackson, L. M., Glienke, B., Blythe, M., Lengnick‐Hall, R., McCrary, S., Beidas, R. S., Lewis, C. C., et al. (2020) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00009-5 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationBührmann, L., Schuurmans, J., Ruwaard, J., Fleuren, M. A. H., Etzelmueller, A., Piera-Jiménez, J., Finch, T. L., Rapley, T., Potthoff, S., Aouizerate, B., et al. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04686-4 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Ailabouni, N. J., Reeve, E., Helfrich, C. D., Hilmer, S. N., & Wagenaar, B. H. (2021) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.018 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Nordstrom, B. R., Saunders, E. C., McLeman, B. M., Meier, A., Xie, H., Lambert-Harris, C. A., W, B. T. M. S., Brooklyn, J. R., King, G., Kloster, N., et al. (2016) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000200 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Louie, E., Barrett, E. L., Baillie, A., Haber, P., & Morley, K. C. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01090-7 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Vis, C., Schuurmans, J., Aouizerate, B., Craggs, M. A., Batterham, P. J., Bührmann, L., Calear, A. L., Pashoja, A. C., Christensen, H. M., Dozeman, E., et al. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/41532 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Preparing Our Next-Generation Scientific Workforce to Address the Grand Challenges for Social Work
Gehlert, S. J., Hall, K. L., & Palinkas, L. A. (2017) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/690659 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Merle, J. L., Thayer, A. J., Larson, M. F., Pauling, S., Cook, C. R., Rios, J. A., McGinnis, J. L., & Sullivan, M. M. (2021) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2021.11.005 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
McNeely, J., Troxel, A. B., Kunins, H. V., Shelley, D., Lee, J. D., Walley, A. Y., Weinstein, Z., Billings, J., Davis, N. J., Marcello, R. K., et al. (2019) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-019-0135-7 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Garcia, D., Blizzard, A. M., Peskin, A., Rothenberg, W. A., Schmidt, E. M., Piscitello, J., Espinosa, N., Salem, H., Rodriguez, G. M., Sherman, J. A., et al. (2021) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-021-01211-0 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Lewis, C. C., Darnell, D. A., Kerns, S. E. U., Monroe‐DeVita, M., Landes, S. J., Lyon, A. R., Stanick, C., Dorsey, S., Locke, J. J., Marriott, B. R., et al. (2016) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0428-0 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Beidas, R. S., Becker‐Haimes, E. M., Adams, D. R., Skriner, L. C., Stewart, R. E., Wolk, C. B., Buttenheim, A. M., Williams, N. J., Inacker, P., Richey, E., et al. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0684-7 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Zullig, L. L., Deschodt, M., Liška, J., Bosworth, H. B., & Geest, S. D. (2018) · The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021348 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Technology-Based Alcohol Interventions in Primary Care: Systematic Review
Ramsey, A. T., Satterfield, J. M., Gerke, D. R., & Proctor, E. K. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10859 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning Collaboratives: a Strategy for Quality Improvement and Implementation in Behavioral Health
Gotham, H. J., Paris, M., & Hoge, M. A. (2022) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-022-09826-z · Cited by 42 · see citing works
McWilliam, J., Brown, J., Sanders, M. R., & Jones, L. (2016) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0661-4 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Campbell, W. N., & Douglas, N. (2017) · Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention · doi:10.1080/17489539.2017.1370215 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Thijssen, S. V., Jacobs, M., Swart, R., Heising, L. M., Ou, C. X. J., & Roumen, C. (2021) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-12-2020-0493 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Sales, A. E., Ersek, M. T., Intrator, O. K., Levy, C. R., Carpenter, J. G., Hogikyan, R. V., Kales, H. C., Landis‐Lewis, Z., Olsan, T. H., Miller, S. C., et al. (2016) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0497-0 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Livet, M., Blanchard, C., Sorensen, T. D., & McClurg, M. R. (2018) · JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY · doi:10.1002/jac5.1037 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Kim, S. J., Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Swanson, S. J., & Langfitt-Reese, S. (2015) · Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation · doi:10.3233/jvr-150770 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Implementation of e‐mental health for depression and anxiety: A critical scoping review
Ellis, L. A., Augustsson, H., Grødahl, A. I., Pomare, C., Churruca, K., Long, J. C., Ludlow, K., Zurynski, Y. A., & Braithwaite, J. (2020) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.22309 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Vax, S., Farkas, M. D., Russinova, Z. L., Mueser, K. T., & Drainoni, M. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01132-0 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Implementation Science in Suicide Prevention
Reifels, L., Krishnamoorthy, S., Kõlves, K., & Francis, J. (2022) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000846 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Advancing Implementation Research and Practice in Behavioral Health Systems
Powell, B. J., & Beidas, R. S. (2016) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0762-1 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationTraining transfer: a systematic review of the impact of inner setting factors
Jackson, C. B., Brabson, L. A., Quetsch, L. B., & Herschell, A. D. (2018) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-018-9837-y · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Dickson, K. S., Lind, T., Jobin, A., Kinnear, M., Lok, H., & Brookman-Frazee, L. I. (2021) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-021-01144-4 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Howell, D., Powis, M., Kirkby, R. L., Amernic, H., Moody, L., Bryant‐Lukosius, D., O’Brien, M. A., Rask, S., & Krzyzanowska, M. K. (2021) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012051 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Reese, T. J., Schlechter, C. R., Kramer, H., Kukhareva, P., Weir, C. R., Fiol, G. D., Caverly, T. J., Hess, R., Flynn, M. C., Taft, T., et al. (2021) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibab115 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Dickson, K. S., Lind, T., Jobin, A., Kinnear, M., Lok, H., & Brookman-Frazee, L. I. (2021) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-021-01133-7 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
De-Implementation: Lessons to be Learned when Abandoning Inappropriate Homelessness Interventions
Denvall, V., Bejerholm, U., Stylianides, K. C., Johanson, S., & Knutagård, M. (2022) · International Journal on Homelessness · doi:10.5206/ijoh.2022.2.13709 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Pieper, M. J. C., Achterberg, W. P., van der Steen, J. T., & Francke, A. L. (2018) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.3973 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
McBain, R. K., Levin, J. S., Matthews, S., Qureshi, N., Long, D., Schickedanz, A. B., Gilgoff, R., Kotz, K. J., Slavich, G. M., & Eberhart, N. K. (2023) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102282 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Louie, E., Barrett, E. L., Baillie, A., Haber, P., & Morley, K. C. (2020) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-020-1285-0 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Frank, H. E., Becker‐Haimes, E. M., Rifkin, L. S., Norris, L. A., Ollendick, T. H., Olino, T. M., Kratz, H. E., Beidas, R. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102308 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Edgelow, M., Scholefield, E., McPherson, M. Q., Mehta, S., & Ortlieb, A. (2021) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-021-01772-1 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Alegria, M. M., Falgas‐Bagué, I., Francisco Collazos, D., Carmona, R., Markle, S. L., Wang, Y., Baca‐García, E., Cook, B. L., Chavez, L. M., Fortuna, L. R., et al. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6927 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Allanson, E., Tunçalp, Ö., Vogel, J. P., Khan, D. N., Oladapo, O. T., Long, Q., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2017) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000266 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Rapport, F., Smith, J. A., O'Brien, T. A., Tyrrell, V. J., Mould, E. V. A., Long, J. C., Gul, H., & Braithwaite, J. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034522 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Akiba, C. F., Powell, B. J., Pence, B. W., Muessig, K. E., Golin, C. E., & Go, V. F.-L. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00365-4 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationNewman, K., Eerd, D. V., Powell, B. J., Urquhart, R., Cornelissen, E., Chan, V. W. Y., & Lal, S. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0282-5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Effect of a Change Agent on Use of Evidence-Based Mental Health Practices
Leathers, S. J., Spielfogel, J. E., Blakey, J. M., Christian, E., & Atkins, M. S. (2015) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0694-1 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Harnessing the strength of families to prevent social problems and promote adolescent well-being
Lippold, M. A., & Jensen, T. M. (2017) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.066 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Lui, J. H. L., Brookman-Frazee, L. I., Lind, T., Le, K., Roesch, S. C., Aarons, G. A., Innes-Gomberg, D., Pesanti, K., & Lau, A. S. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01149-5 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
The Pursuit of Quality for Social Work Practice: Three Generations and Counting
Proctor, E. K. (2017) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/693431 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationDrahota, A., Meza, R. D., Bustos, T. E., Sridhar, A., Martinez, J. I., Brikho, B., Stahmer, A. C., & Aarons, G. A. (2021) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-020-01084-5 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Controlling Phlebotomy Volume Diminishes PICU Transfusion: Implementation Processes and Impact
Steffen, K. M., Doctor, A., Hoerr, J., Gill, J., Markham, C. M., Brown, S. M., Cohen, D. M., Hansen, R., Kryzer, E., Richards, J., et al. (2017) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2480 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationOrengo‐Aguayo, R., Stewart, R. W., Villalobos, B. T., Rodríguez, J. H., Dueweke, A. R., de Arellano, M. A., & Young, J. N. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000691 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Implementation of Electronic Health Record System in Ghana: A Review
Achampong, E. K. (2022) · The Open Public Health Journal · doi:10.2174/18749445-v15-e2208181 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Engdahl, P., Svedberg, P., Lexén, A., & Bejerholm, U. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/15625 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Ibekwe, L. N., Walker, T. J., Ebunlomo, E. O., Ricks, K. A. B., Prasad, S., Savas, L. S., & Fernández, M. E. (2020) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839920957979 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Apgar, D. H. (2021) · Journal of Community Practice · doi:10.1080/10705422.2021.1881856 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Specifying and reporting implementation strategies used in a school-based prevention efficacy trial
Moore, S. A., Arnold, K. T., Beidas, R. S., & Mendelson, T. (2021) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/26334895211047841 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Vaňková, B., Ribaut, J., Dobbels, F., Gerull, S., Malá‐Ládová, K., Zullig, L. L., & Geest, S. D. (2021) · Transplantation Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.trre.2021.100671 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Family Interventions for Trauma-Affected Refugees
Mak, C., & Wieling, E. A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19159361 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Required sample size to detect mediation in 3-level implementation studies
Williams, N. J., Preacher, K. J., Allison, P. D., Mandell, D. S., & Marcus, S. C. (2022) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01235-2 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Lyssenko, L., Müller, G., Kleindienst, N., Schmahl, C. G., Berger, T., Eifert, G. H., Kölle, A., Nesch, S., Ommer-Hohl, J., Wenner, M., et al. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2100-z · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Moreno, E. M., & Moriana, J. A. (2016) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0135-y · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Walker, S. C., Bumbarger, B. K., & Phillippi, S. W. (2015) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.05.001 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Powell, B. J., Proctor, E. K., & Glass, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Powell, Byron J.
- Venue
- Research on Social Work Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-10-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-212
- ISSN
- 1049-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7581
- PMC
- PMC4002057
- OpenAlex
- W2046149030
- Semantic Scholar
- 8f506d0a995878915bf1933974516664dc87746c
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Research on Social Work Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448, TL1TR000449, 5p30mh068579-05)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31AA021034)
- National Institute of Mental Health (P30-MH-068579, F31MH098478, T32MH019960)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA015035)
- National Center for Research Resources (TL1RR024995, UL1RR024992)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- implementation strategies, empirically supported treatments, mental health interventions, implementation research, intervention effectiveness, mental health services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review