Cited by 268Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health services

A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions

Open access
Powell, Byron J., Proctor, Enola K., Glass, Joseph E.·2014·Research on Social Work Practice

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review examines experimental studies that test the effectiveness of strategies intended to integrate empirically supported mental health interventions into routine care settings. Our goal was to characterize the state of the literature and to provide direction for future implementation studies. Method: A literature search was conducted using electronic databases and a manual search. Results: Eleven studies were identified that tested implementation strategies with a randomized ( n = 10) or controlled clinical trial design ( n = 1). The wide range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated precluded meta-analysis. However, the majority of studies ( n = 7; 64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome. Conclusion: There is a clear need for more rigorous research on the effectiveness of implementation strategies, and we provide several suggestions that could improve this research area.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review characterizes 11 experimental studies testing strategies to implement empirically supported mental health interventions into routine care. Most included studies were randomized (10/11) and tested multifaceted strategies (10/11), but heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis; 7 of 11 studies (64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome.

Key findings

  • Eleven studies met inclusion criteria: 10 RCTs and 1 controlled clinical trial. Eight focused on child/adolescent mental health and three on adult mental health. The majority (n = 7; 64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome; all studies except Azocar et al. (2003) provided at least some support for the implementation strategies used.
  • Only one study evaluated a discrete strategy (guideline dissemination), while 10 (91%) evaluated multifaceted strategies; nine of those included training. Only Glisson et al. (2010) evaluated a blended, manualized strategy (ARC). Passive strategies in isolation—such as disseminating guidelines or manuals and using opinion leaders—were ineffective.
  • CFIR domains targeted by implementation strategies were: characteristics of individuals (100%, n = 11), inner setting (82%, n = 9), process of implementation (64%, n = 7), outer setting (55%, n = 6), and intervention characteristics (45%, n = 5). Mean domains addressed was 3.45 (range = 2–5) and mean subdomains was 9.73 (range = 4–20); there was no clear relationship between number of domains/subdomains and effectiveness.
  • Ninety-one percent of studies (n = 10) evaluated at least one implementation or service system outcome, 36% (n = 4) evaluated clinical outcomes in addition, and 9% (n = 1) evaluated only clinical outcomes. Fidelity and provider attitudes/satisfaction were most frequent; only one study assessed costs (Kauth et al., 2010: $2,458.80 total cost for approximately 28 additional hours of CBT per month per therapist). Mean implementation/service system outcomes assessed was 2.09 (SD = 1.30); mean client outcomes was .82 (SD = 1.33).

Methods

  • Systematic review searching CINAHL Plus, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX on January 4, 2011, plus hand searches. The search identified 501 abstracts (492 database, 9 hand search), 25 full-text articles were screened, and 11 met inclusion criteria.
  • Inclusion required empirical research implementing an empirically supported psychosocial treatment or practice guideline in mental health or social service systems, with both an implementation strategy and a comparative design meeting EPOC standards (RCT, CCT, controlled before-and-after, or interrupted time series). Studies focused primarily on physical health, substance abuse, pharmacological interventions, or testing clinical intervention efficacy/effectiveness were excluded.
  • At least two reviewers independently extracted data using a modified Cochrane EPOC Data Abstraction Form, a Proctor et al. (2009)-guided outcomes checklist, and a CFIR-based checklist for strategy targets. No inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated; discrepancies were resolved through consensus meetings. Synthesis used tabulation, textual description, and vote-counting because meta-analysis was precluded.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the small number of studies and diverse clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes made firm conclusions difficult; vote-counting gives equal weight to studies of varying sample sizes, effect sizes, and significance levels. It also states that grey literature was excluded, risk of bias/study quality was not assessed, reporting bias may have led to underestimating CFIR domains/subdomains addressed, the focus on rigorous designs limits learning from other designs, and the conceptual frameworks used have not been fully established empirically.
  • Evident from the text: no meta-analysis was possible, no inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated, coding reliability was difficult particularly for CFIR domains, and only one included study evaluated implementation costs.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049731513505778

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 102 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Seven of the 11 included studies (64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome.

    “However, the majority of studies (n = 7; 64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The diversity of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes across included studies was too great for meta-analysis.

    “The wide range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated precluded meta-analysis.”
    • Also stated in: § Methods of Synthesis · plain
      “The wide range of clinical interventions, implementation strategies, and outcomes evaluated in the included studies (see below) precluded meta-analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Five studies, or 45%, used strategies that targeted intervention characteristics.

    “45% (n = 5) of studies employed strategies that targeted intervention characteristics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    No theory other than Diffusion of Innovations was discussed more than once in the reviewed studies.

    “no other theory aside from Diffusion of Innovations theory was discussed more than once.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Five of the eleven reviewed studies, or 45%, explicitly referenced or discussed a guiding theory or conceptual model.

    “Five studies (45%) explicitly referenced and/or discussed a guiding theory or conceptual model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 36
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The review identified 11 studies testing implementation strategies; 10 were randomized controlled trials and 1 was a controlled clinical trial.

    “Eleven studies were identified that tested implementation strategies with a randomized (n = 10) or controlled clinical trial design (n = 1).”
    • Also stated in: § Study Designs · plain
      “The majority of the studies (n = 10; 91%) were RCTs, and one study was a CCT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The authors treated a treatment as empirically supported if the included study's authors cited evidence supporting its efficacy or effectiveness.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Twenty-five full-text articles were identified as potentially relevant.

    “Abstracts were screened for eligibility and 25 full-text articles were identified as potentially relevant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean number of CFIR domains addressed across studies was 3.45, with a range of 2 to 5.

    “The mean number of domains addressed was 3.45 (range = 2–5), and the mean number of sub-domains addressed was 9.73 (range = 4–20).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A total of 501 abstracts were identified through the database and hand search.

    “A total of 501 abstracts were identified through the database (n = 492) and hand search (n = 9) process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Kauth et al. (2010) and Kramer and Burns (2008) conducted small randomized studies with 23 and 17 participants, respectively, that could be characterized as feasibility or pilot studies.

    “For example, Glisson et al. (2010) and Chamberlain, Price, Reid, & Landsverk (2008) both conducted large-scale RCTs involving over 600 youth, whereas Kauth and colleagues (2010) and Kramer and Burns (2008) conducted small randomized studies (n = 23 and n = 17 respectively) that could be characterized as feasibility or pilot studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kauth and colleagues (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kramer and Burns (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Several studies evaluated multifaceted, multi-level implementation strategies that targeted multiple domains of the implementation context, although these approaches were not technically blended because they lacked manualization.

    “Though their implementation approaches would not technically be classified as blended owing to a lack of manualization, we note that several studies evaluated multifaceted, multi-level implementation strategies by targeting multiple domains of the implementation context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean number of CFIR subdomains addressed across studies was 9.73, with a range of 4 to 20.

    “the mean number of sub-domains addressed was 9.73 (range = 4–20).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Seven studies, or 64%, found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome, and about two-thirds demonstrated beneficial effects over comparison conditions.

    “The majority of studies (n = 7; 64%) found a statistically significant effect in the hypothesized direction for at least one implementation or clinical outcome”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion and Applications to Social Work · boosted
      “A promising finding of this review was that approximately two-thirds (64%) of studies demonstrated beneficial effects of employing implementation strategies to improve intermediate and/or clinical outcomes over the comparison conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used in the included studies validly indicate implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes, so that the review's synthesis of their effects is meaningful.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingcitation

    Kramer and Burns justified selecting cognitive behavioral therapy by drawing on innovation characteristics: relative advantage, trialability, and compatibility.

    “Kramer and Burns (2008) draw upon the characteristics of innovations that may make them easier to implement as they justify their selection of cognitive behavioral therapy by noting its relative advantage (it has been demonstrated to be effective in community trials), trialability (standardized components and manuals have been developed and can”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kramer and Burns, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The adult mental health service settings included outpatient mental health through a managed behavioral health care organization, Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, and psychiatric clinics in Stockholm, Sweden.

    “The adult mental health service settings included: outpatient mental health (through a managed behavioral health care organization), Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, and psychiatric clinics (in Stockholm, Sweden)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Atkins and colleagues supported using opinion leaders as an implementation strategy by citing diffusion theory's proposition that novel interventions begin with a small group of key opinion leaders who influence others in their networks.

    “Atkins and colleagues (2008) supported the use of opinion leaders as an implementation strategy by stating, “diffusion theory posits that novel interventions are initiated by a relatively small group of key opinion leaders (KOLs) who serve as influential models for others in their social network” (p. 905).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Atkins et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Some studies testing very comprehensive implementation strategies showed positive effects, while other studies also showed positive effects with less comprehensive strategies.

    “Some studies testing very comprehensive implementation strategies demonstrated positive effects (e.g., Forsner et al., 2010; Glisson et al., 2010); however, other studies also demonstrated positive effects with less comprehensive strategies (e.g., Herschell et al., 2009; Lochman et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Forsner et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Glisson et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Herschell et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used in the included studies validly indicate implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes, so that the review's synthesis of their effects is meaningful.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One study described in Palinkas et al. (2008) lacked final data at the time of the search; the later Weisz et al. (2012) article was examined instead.

    “One of the studies described in the Palinkas et al. (2008) article did not have final data published at the time of this search; however, the results have subsequently been published and the more recent article (Weisz et al., 2012) was examined in this review.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Palinkas et al. (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Weisz et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Glisson et al. (2010) and Chamberlain, Price, Reid, & Landsverk (2008) both conducted large-scale RCTs involving over 600 youth.

    “For example, Glisson et al. (2010) and Chamberlain, Price, Reid, & Landsverk (2008) both conducted large-scale RCTs involving over 600 youth, whereas Kauth and colleagues (2010) and Kramer and Burns (2008) conducted small randomized studies (n = 23 and n = 17 respectively) that could be characterized as feasibility or pilot studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Glisson et al. (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chamberlain, Price, Reid, & Landsverk (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    External facilitation had a total cost of $2,458.80 for facilitator and therapist time and produced a benefit of about 28 additional hours of CBT per month per therapist.

    “The external facilitation strategy resulted in a total cost (facilitator’s and therapists’ time) of $2,458.80 for a benefit of approximately 28 additional hours of CBT per month per therapist.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kauth et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Client outcomes in the reviewed studies included symptom or behavioral checklists and out-of-home placements.

    “Client outcomes included symptom/behavioral checklists and out-of-home placements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The reviewers found it difficult to achieve high reliability during the first round of coding, especially when coding the theoretical domains.

    “Though we did not calculate inter-rater reliability statistics (i.e., Cohen’s kappa), we found it difficult to achieve high reliability during the first round of coding, particularly when coding the theoretical domains outlined by Damschroder and colleagues (2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eight of the eleven included studies were conducted in child and adolescent mental health, and three focused on adult mental health.

    “Eight of the eleven included studies were conducted in child and adolescent mental health, with the remaining three focusing on adult mental health.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean number of implementation or service system outcomes assessed was 2.09, with a standard deviation of 1.30.

    “The mean number of implementation or service system outcomes assessed was 2.09 (SD = 1.30)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The present review found no difference in clinical or implementation outcome attainment between studies that targeted multiple CFIR domains or subdomains and studies that targeted fewer, which is consistent with Grimshaw and colleagues.

    “In the present study, we found no difference in outcome attainment (clinical or implementation) between studies that targeted multiple theoretical domains or subdomains of the CFIR and studies that targeted fewer domains or subdomains, providing evidence that is consistent with Grimshaw and colleagues (2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grimshaw et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The number of CFIR domains or subdomains addressed by a study is a meaningful measure of the comprehensiveness of its implementation strategy, so that comparing studies by domain counts can inform conclusions about strategy effectiveness.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In many other cases, it was difficult to determine the scope and detail of the implementation strategies used, which limits the ability to understand and replicate the implementation approach.

    “In many other cases it was difficult to determine the scope and detail of the implementation strategies used, which obviously limits one’s ability to understand the implementation approach, let alone replicate it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Most studies effectively differentiated between clinical interventions and implementation strategies, but the description and reporting of implementation strategies could be vastly improved.

    “For instance, while most studies effectively differentiated between clinical interventions and implementation strategies, the description and reporting of implementation strategies could be vastly improved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Forsner and colleagues provided an excellent example of a study that clearly described the implementation strategies, including a separate box detailing the different strategies employed.

    “Forsner et al. (2010) is one excellent example of a study that clearly describes the implementation strategies (even providing a separate box detailing the different strategies employed).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Forsner et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Efforts are underway to catalog and rate the quality of implementation-related measures in order to promote valid and reliable instruments and catalyze development of new measures.

    “Efforts are underway to catalog and rate the quality of implementation related measures (Rabin et al., 2012) to promote the use of a wider array of valid and reliable instruments and serve to catalyze the development of new measures needed to advance the field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rabin et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Some studies addressed many CFIR domains and subdomains but used strategies classified as passive, while other studies addressed few domains but used relatively intensive strategies.

    “For example, some studies (e.g., Atkins et al., 2008) addressed many CFIR domains and subdomains, but used implementation strategies that have been classified as passive (e.g., opinion leaders and educational meetings), whereas other studies (e.g., Lochman et al., 2009) addressed few domains but used implementation strategies that are considered relatively intensive”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Atkins et al., 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lochman et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Raghavan, Bright, and Shadoin highlighted potential change levers at the level of the policy ecology, but few if any of these strategies have been tested empirically.

    “Raghavan, Bright, & Shadoin (2008) have highlighted a number of potential change levers at the level of the “policy ecology;” however, few if any of these strategies have been tested empirically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Raghavan, Bright, & Shadoin, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Landsverk et al. (2011) concluded that mental health has lagged behind other disciplines in building an evidence base for implementation.

    “has led Landsverk, Brown, Rolls Reutz, Palinkas, & Horwitz (2011) to conclude that the field of mental health has lagged behind other disciplines in building an evidence-base for implementation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Landsverk, Brown, Rolls Reutz, Palinkas, & Horwitz (2011)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Implementation research has emerged as one way to address quality gaps in fields including mental health.

    “Implementation research has emerged as one way of addressing the quality gaps in a variety of fields, including mental health (Brownson, Colditz, & Proctor, 2012, McMillen, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brownson, Colditz, & Proctor, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McMillen, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Medicine have called for more research on identifying, developing, refining, and testing implementation strategies.

    “It has been prioritized and supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; National Institute of Mental Health, 2008; National Institutes of Health, 2013) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM; Institute of Medicine, 2007, 2009b), both of which have called for more research that focuses on the identification, development, refinement, and testing of implementation strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites National Institute of Mental Health, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites National Institutes of Health, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Institute of Medicine, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Conceptual models can help frame a study theoretically and provide a broad picture of hypothesized relationships among variables.

    “as Proctor, Powell, Baumann, Hamilton, & Santens (2012) note, conceptual models can be “…useful in framing a study theoretically and providing a ‘big picture’ of the hypothesized relationships between variables” (p. 6)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Proctor, Powell, Baumann, Hamilton, & Santens (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Passive implementation approaches may increase provider knowledge and predispose providers to adopt a treatment, but they do little to change provider behavior.

    “the most consistent finding from this literature is that while passive approaches to implementation (e.g., single session workshops, distribution of treatment manuals) may increase provider knowledge and even predispose providers to adopt a treatment, passive approaches do little to produce provider behavior change (Davis & Davis, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Davis & Davis, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Powell et al. (2012) identified 68 discrete implementation strategies.

    “For example, the review by Powell et al. (2012) identified 68 discrete strategies that can be used to plan, educate, finance, restructure, manage quality, and attend to the policy context to facilitate implementation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Powell et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Each mutable aspect of the implementation context highlighted by the CFIR is potentially amenable to targeted and tailored implementation strategies.

    “Each mutable aspect of the implementation context that the CFIR highlights is potentially amenable to the application of targeted and tailored implementation strategies (Powell et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Powell et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    EPOC designates four designs as appropriate for testing implementation strategy effectiveness: randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series studies.

    “EPOC designates four designs as appropriate for testing the effectiveness of implementation strategies, including: 1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2) controlled clinical trials (CCTs), 3) controlled before and after studies, and 4) interrupted time series studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, 2002a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The CFIR captures the complex, multi-level nature of implementation and suggests that successful implementation may require an array of strategies acting at multiple levels of the implementation context.

    “This model captures the complex, multi-level nature (Shortell, 2004) of implementation, and suggests (implicitly) that successful implementation may necessitate the use of an array of strategies that exert their effects at multiple levels of the implementation context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shortell, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The CFIR proposes that implementation is influenced by intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals involved, and the process of implementation.

    “The CFIR suggests that implementation is influenced by: 1) intervention characteristics (evidentiary support, relative advantage, adaptability, trialability, and complexity), 2) the outer setting (patient needs and resources, organizational connectedness, peer pressure, external policy and incentives), 3) the inner setting (structural characteristics, networks and communications, culture, climate,”
    • Also stated in: § Overview of Implementation Models · plain
      “4) the characteristics of individuals involved (knowledge, self-efficacy, stage of change, identification with organization, etc.), and 5) the process of implementation (planning, engaging, executing, reflecting, evaluating).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Damschroder et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The review did not calculate inter-rater reliability statistics such as Cohen's kappa.

    “Though we did not calculate inter-rater reliability statistics (i.e., Cohen’s kappa), we found it difficult to achieve high reliability during the first round of coding, particularly when coding the theoretical domains outlined by Damschroder and colleagues (2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The classification approach used in this review was previously used to enrich understanding of implementation strategies applied to alcohol screening and brief intervention.

    “This approach was previously used to enrich the understanding of implementation strategies applied to alcohol screening and brief intervention (Williams et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Williams et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Wide variations in the quality of reporting and in the justification for implementation strategies in the included studies partly caused the coding reliability difficulty.

    “This is partly due to wide variations in the quality of reporting and the justification for the use of implementation strategies in the included studies, a point that we consider further in the discussion section.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    At least two reviewers independently reviewed and extracted data from each article.

    “At least two reviewers independently reviewed and extracted data from each article.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The review tempered its interpretation of results because of the limitations of vote counting.

    “thus, we temper our interpretation of results accordingly.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Coding discrepancies were discussed and resolved through consensus in face-to-face meetings.

    “These challenges compelled us to hold a number of face-to-face meetings in which coding discrepancies were discussed and resolved through consensus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The CFIR's utility as a framework to guide empirical research is not fully established.

    “Indeed, while the CFIR’s utility as a framework to guide empirical research is not fully established, it is consistent with the vast majority of frameworks and conceptual models in dissemination and implementation research in its emphasis of multi-level ecological factors (Tabak et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tabak et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The review's design criteria required a comparative design that met EPOC standards of rigor to test the implementation strategy.

    “Our study design criteria required the use of a comparative design to test the implementation strategy that met standards of rigor set forth by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group (2002a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    There may be room for implementation programs that integrate protocolized adaptations, similar to how modular treatments allow clinicians to shift treatment protocols to meet client needs.

    “Thus, there may be room for implementation programs that integrate protocolized adaptations, much in the same way that modular treatments (Weisz et al., 2012) allow clinicians to shift treatment protocols to meet client need.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weisz et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Interpreting the results of studies that evaluated multifaceted strategies was another challenge for the review.

    “Another challenge we faced was interpreting the results of studies that evaluated multifaceted strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    There may be opportunities to address the process of implementation in order to develop implementation programs that are more flexible and adaptive to the needs of the implementation context.

    “Finally, there may also be opportunities to address the “process” of implementation to develop implementation programs that are more flexible and adaptive to the needs of the implementation context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Studies of large-scale implementation efforts have identified the importance of policy-level implementation strategies and suggested that different evidence-supported interventions may require different policy-level interventions.

    “Studies of large-scale implementation efforts have identified the importance of policy level implementation strategies (e.g., aligning financial incentives, altering certification and licensing standards, state partnerships with academic institutions to develop ESI training curriculum for students), and have suggested that different ESIs may even require different policy-level interventions (Isett”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Isett et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Magnabosco, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Common elements and transdiagnostic approaches may be similarly effective as approaches that design interventions for flexibility and adaptation.

    “Other approaches that have been described in the literature such as the “common elements” and transdiagnostic approaches to treatment may be similarly effective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Common elements can be systematically identified, taught to clinicians, and applied flexibly to meet clients' needs, which relieves clinicians of learning many full evidence-supported intervention protocols.

    “These common elements can be systematically identified, taught to clinicians, and applied flexibly to meet clients’ needs, relieving clinicians of the burden of learning a whole host of ESI protocols (Barth et al., 2012; Chorpita, Becker, & Daleiden, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Barth et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chorpita, Becker, & Daleiden, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Passive strategies such as disseminating guidelines or manuals and using opinion leaders may be promising when combined with other strategies, but in isolation they may lack the intensity and comprehensiveness needed for successful implementation.

    “The results from several studies seem to suggest that passive strategies (e.g., disseminating guidelines or manuals, opinion leaders) may represent promising approaches to implementation when combined with other strategies; however, in isolation, they may lack the intensity and comprehensiveness that successful implementation requires.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The review did not formally evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies, and the need for reporting guidelines in implementation research was readily apparent.

    “Although we did not formally evaluate the methodological quality of included studies, the need for reporting guidelines in implementation research were readily apparent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Linking implementation strategies to the CFIR allowed the review to explore implementation effectiveness at the level of the implementation context and indirectly provided insight into debates about multifaceted versus discrete strategies.

    “In an effort to make meaningful comparisons between studies that had different design characteristics we linked the implementation strategies in the included studies to a conceptual framework of implementation (Damschroder et al., 2009). Doing so allowed us to explore implementation effectiveness at the level of the implementation context, which indirectly provided insight into debates regarding”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Damschroder et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Because cost was assessed in only one of the eleven studies, the usefulness of this research to policy makers and organizational leaders deciding which implementation strategies to adopt is severely limited.

    “Unfortunately, cost was assessed in only one of the eleven studies, which severely limits the usefulness of this research to policy makers and organizational leaders who are charged with making decisions about which implementation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Others have suggested that the reason for Grimshaw and colleagues' finding is that many multifaceted strategies focus on only one level of the implementation context.

    “Others have suggested that the reason for Grimshaw and colleagues’ (2006) finding is that many multifaceted strategies focus on only one level of the implementation context (Wensing, Bosch, & Grol, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wensing, Bosch, & Grol, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    This review is the first systematic review to assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies across diverse mental health treatment settings and to link implementation strategies to conceptual targets considered important in the implementation literature.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that assesses the effectiveness of implementation strategies within diverse settings where mental health treatments are delivered (e.g., community mental health centers, schools, daycare centers, foster care, etc.), and that links implementation strategies to conceptual targets deemed important in the implementation literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Implementation outcomes such as acceptability, appropriateness, cost, and feasibility may all directly affect whether a strategy or set of strategies will be effective in the real world.

    “Implementation outcomes such as acceptability, appropriateness, cost, and feasibility may all have direct bearing on whether a strategy or set of strategies will be effective in the “real world.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    These measures and frameworks can serve a practical purpose by guiding the targeted application of implementation strategies to increase the likelihood of implementation success.

    “these measures and frameworks can serve a very practical purpose by guiding the targeted application of implementation strategies to increase the likelihood of implementation success (Aarons et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aarons et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both common elements and transdiagnostic approaches attempt to simplify evidence-based care by manipulating intervention characteristics to make them more widely applicable to clients in routine care, and they may be promising opportunities for implementation research.

    “Both of these approaches attempt to simplify the provision of evidence-based care by manipulating characteristics of the intervention to make them more widely applicable to the types of clients that clinicians are likely to serve in routine care, and may represent promising opportunities for implementation research.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The common elements approach is based on the idea that evidence-supported interventions for a given disorder share many common features that contribute to their effectiveness.

    “The common elements approach is predicated on the idea that ESIs for a given disorder (e.g., childhood anxiety disorders) share many common features that contribute to their effectiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Barth et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chorpita, Becker, & Daleiden, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Grimshaw and colleagues' extensive review of guideline implementation strategies in health concluded that there was no evidence that multifaceted strategies were superior to single-component strategies.

    “Grimshaw et al.’s (2006) extensive review of guideline implementation strategies in health concluded that there was no evidence that multifaceted strategies were superior to single-component strategies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grimshaw et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Transdiagnostic treatments provide unified treatment protocols for clinical disorders that have overlapping clinical features, high co-occurrence, or common maintaining mechanisms.

    “Transdiagnostic treatments provide unified treatment protocols for clinical disorders that have overlapping clinical features, high levels of co-occurrence, or common maintaining mechanisms (McHugh, Murray, & Barlow, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McHugh, Murray, & Barlow, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Alexander and Hearld note that it is difficult to separate the effects of individual intervention components and to determine whether some components are more important than others.

    “As Alexander and Hearld (2012) note, it is “difficult to parse out the effects of individual intervention components and determine whether some components are more important than others” (p. 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alexander and Hearld, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The review did not assess risk of bias or study quality of the included studies.

    “Third, we did not assess risk of bias/study quality of the included studies”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The review did not include grey literature and therefore may have missed unpublished studies that met the other inclusion criteria.

    “Second, we did not include “grey literature;” thus, we may have missed unpublished studies meeting our other inclusion criteria.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    A recently developed checklist based on the WIDER Recommendations may further assist implementation researchers in reporting their studies.

    “A recently developed checklist based upon the WIDER Recommendations may further assist implementation researchers in reporting their studies (Albrecht, Archibald, Arseneau, & Scott, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Albrecht, Archibald, Arseneau, & Scott, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The review used a vote-counting approach to synthesis, which is prone to limitations but can be useful for an initial description of patterns across studies when coupled with narrative synthesis.

    “We chose to use a “vote counting” approach to synthesis. This approach is prone to the limitations discussed above in the “methods of synthesis” section, but can be a useful way of providing an initial description of the patterns found across studies (Popay et al., 2006) and, coupled with the narrative approach to synthesis that we have utilized, is a useful way of summarizing included studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Popay et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The authors affirm Eccles and colleagues' call for a suite of reporting guidelines for different types of implementation research.

    “Despite the utility of the WIDER Recommendations and other reporting guidelines, we also affirm Eccles et al. (2009) call for a suite of reporting guidelines for different types of implementation research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eccles et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The WIDER guidelines ask researchers to provide detailed descriptions of interventions and implementation strategies, clarify assumed change processes and design principles, provide access to manuals and protocols, and describe active control conditions in detail.

    “These guidelines may be very helpful to researchers studying implementation strategies in mental health, as they implore researchers to: 1) provide detailed descriptions of interventions (and implementation strategies) in published papers, 2) clarify assumed change processes and design principles, 3) provide access to manuals and protocols that provide information about the clinical interventions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Michie et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The review focused on rigorous designs that minimize threats to internal validity because its aim was to assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies.

    “our focus on the effectiveness of implementation strategies compelled us to focus on rigorous designs that minimize threats to internal validity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
70 of 70
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The authors treated a treatment as empirically supported if the included study's authors cited evidence supporting its efficacy or effectiveness.

    “We assumed a treatment to be “empirically supported” if the authors cited evidence that supported its efficacy or effectiveness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The published trial reports included in the review adequately disclose the theories or conceptual models that guided the studies, so that the review's assessment of theory use is not substantially limited by undisclosed theoretical foundations.

    “We do acknowledge that our systematic review was focused on the discussion of theory within the published trial, yet it is possible that the theoretical foundation of the implementation intervention was discussed elsewhere.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The number of CFIR domains or subdomains addressed by a study is a meaningful measure of the comprehensiveness of its implementation strategy, so that comparing studies by domain counts can inform conclusions about strategy effectiveness.

    “It is also possible that counting the number of CFIR domains addressed is a limited proxy for the intensity and comprehensives of the strategies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The outcome measures used in the included studies validly indicate implementation, service system, and clinical outcomes, so that the review's synthesis of their effects is meaningful.

    “Third, we did not assess risk of bias/study quality of the included studies”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Powell and colleagues identified the use of 50 implementation strategies by agencies related to planning, education, finances, restructuring, and quality improvement.

    “In contrast, Powell and colleagues (2014) identified the use of 50 implementation strategies by agencies related to planning, education, finances, restructuring, and quality improvement.”

    From Implementation-as-Usual in Community-Based Organizations Providing Specialized Services to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) · cites this paper as Powell et al., 2014

    The Introduction’s “Implementation Strategies” section gives the listed categories but says a Powell et al. (2012) review identified 68 discrete strategies, not 50 strategies used by agencies. The Results section describes strategies evaluated in included studies, rather than identifying 50 used by agencies. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Implementation of new ASD practices within ASD-CBOs may involve various strategies, some with supportive evidence and others without evidence to support that they effectively change provider behavior.

    “These integrated findings indicate that implementation of new ASD practices within ASD-CBOs may involve various strategies-some with supportive evidence (e.g., pilot ASD-EBP within the agency and revise, if needed; Powell et al., 2014) and others without evidence to support that they effectively change provider behavior (e.g., train staff only, 'just use [the practice]'; Fixsen et al., 2009).”

    From Implementation-as-Usual in Community-Based Organizations Providing Specialized Services to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) · cites this paper as Powell et al., 2014

    The Results (Types of Strategies Evaluated; page unavailable) report that the review evaluated several implementation strategies, mostly multifaceted ones. The Discussion describes evidence favoring multifaceted approaches over training alone. But the passages do not establish that piloting an ASD evidence-based practice within an ASD community-based organization and revising it has supportive evidence; the review addresses mental health interventions more broadly. The sentence attributes its training-only example to Fixsen et al., not Powell et al. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A mixed-methods study of seven social service organizations serving children, youth and families provides one of the richest descriptions of IAU.

    “One of the richest descriptions of IAU comes from a mixed-methods study of seven social service organizations serving children, youth and families (Powell et al., 2013; Powell, 2014).”

    From Implementation-as-Usual in Community-Based Organizations Providing Specialized Services to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) · cites this paper as Powell, 2014

    The References identify Powell et al. (2013) as a mixed-methods study of implementation as usual in children’s social service organizations. This cited paper is a systematic review, however, and its Discussion only cites that study in connection with mixed-methods approaches; it does not establish that the study involved seven organizations or provided one of the richest descriptions of IAU. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 120 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review.
  2. *Chamberlain P., 2008, Child Welfare, 87, 27
  3. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. (2002a). Data collection checklist (pp. 1–30). Retrieved from http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/uploads/datacollectionchecklist.pdf
  4. Gibbs L. E., 2003, Evidence-based practice for the helping professions
  5. Goldner E. M., 2011, Healthcare Policy, 7, 83
  6. Institute of Medicine, 2007, The state of quality improvement and implementation research: Workshop summary
  7. *Kauth M. R., 2010, Implementation Science, 5, 1, 10.1186/1748-5908-5-1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. National Institute of Mental Health, 2008, National Institute of Mental Health strategic plan
  9. Oxman A. D., 1995, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 153, 1424
  10. President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, 2003, Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America: Final report
  11. Wensing M., 2009, Knowledge translation in health care: Moving from evidence to practice, 94

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powell, B. J., Proctor, E. K., & Glass, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Powell, Byron J.
Venue
Research on Social Work Practice
Published
2013-10-08
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
192-212
ISSN
  • 1049-7315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7581
OpenAlex
W2046149030
Cited by
268
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Social Work Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000448, TL1TR000449, 5p30mh068579-05)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31AA021034)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P30-MH-068579, F31MH098478, T32MH019960)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA015035)
  • National Center for Research Resources (TL1RR024995, UL1RR024992)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
implementation strategies, empirically supported treatments, mental health interventions, implementation research, intervention effectiveness, mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review