The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EuroQol: the current state of play
Brooks, R. (1996) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6 · Cited by 5,815
The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8 · Cited by 3,026
Self-citationWalters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2005) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-004-7713-0 · Cited by 1,341
Self-citationMeasuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation
Brazier, J., Ratcliffe, J., Saloman, J., & Tsuchiya, A. (2016) · Oxford Medicine Online · doi:10.1093/med/9780198725923.001.0001 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationA comparison of the EQ‐5D and SF‐6D across seven patient groups
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., Tsuchiya, A., & Busschbach, J. (2004) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.866 · Cited by 797
Self-citationThe Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study: Initial Catalog of Health-state Quality Factors
Fryback, D. G., Dasbach, E. J., Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Dorn, N., Peterson, K., & Martin, P. A. (1993) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9301300202 · Cited by 733
Quality of life assessments in clinical trials
(1991) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology · doi:10.1016/0300-9629(91)90459-p · Cited by 692
A general health policy model: update and applications.
Kaplan, R. M., & Anderson, J. P. (1988) · PubMed Central · Cited by 467
Inequalities in self-reported health: validation of a new approach to measurement
Doorslaer, E. V., & Jones, A. M. (2003) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00080-2 · Cited by 424
Marra, C. A., Woolcott, J. C., Kopec, J. A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J. E., Esdaile, J. M., & Anis, A. H. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.034 · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Cited by
Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets
van Hout, B., Janssen, M. F., Feng, Y.-S., Kohlmann, T., Busschbach, J., Golicki, D., Lloyd, A., Scalone, L., Kind, P., & Pickard, A. S. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008 · Cited by 2,153
Ramsey, S. D., Willke, R. J., Glick, H., Reed, S. D., Augustovski, F., Jonsson, B., Briggs, A., & Sullivan, S. D. (2015) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.001 · Cited by 811
Valuation of the Child Health Utility 9D Index
Stevens, K. (2012) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/11599120-000000000-00000 · Cited by 416
Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting
Petrou, S., & Gray, A. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d1548 · Cited by 318
Vogl, M., Wenig, C. M., Leidl, R., & Pokhrel, S. (2012) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-203 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Brazier, J. E., Yang, Y., Tsuchiya, A., & Rowen, D. L.
- Venue
- The European Journal of Health Economics
- Published
- 2009-07-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-225
- ISSN
- 1439-3972 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-7598
- 1618-7601
- OpenAlex
- W2087604552
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 55.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10198-009-0168-z
- The paper
- Brazier, J. E., Yang, Y., Tsuchiya, A., & Rowen, D. L. (2010). A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. The European Journal of Health Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-009-0168-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
